FYFD

Tag: physics

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    An Introduction to Turbulence

    With some help from Physics Girl and her friends, Grant Sanderson at 3Blue1Brown has a nice video introduction to turbulence, complete with neat homemade laser-sheet illuminations of turbulent flows. Grant explains some of the basics of what turbulence is (and isn’t) and gives viewers a look at the equations that govern flow – as befits a mathematics channel! 

    There’s also an introduction to Kolmogorov’s theorem, which, to date, has been one of the most successful theoretical approaches to understanding turbulence. It describes how energy is passed from large eddies in the flow to smaller ones, and it’s been tested extensively in the nearly 80 years since its first appearance. Just how well the theory holds, and what situations it breaks down in, are still topics of active research and debate. (Video and image credit: G. Sanderson/3Blue1Brown; submitted by Maria-Isabel C.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Making a Square Vortex

    As someone who has played with her share of vortex cannons, I can assure you that messing around with smoke generators and vortex rings is a lot of fun. And in this video, Dianna gives things a little twist: she makes the vortex cannon’s mouth a square instead of a circle.

    Now, that doesn’t create a square vortex ring. (Vortex rings don’t really do 90-degree corners.) But it does make the vortex ring all neat and wobbly. Whenever you have two vortices near one another (or, in this case, two parts of a vortex line near one another), they interact. As Dianna shows with hurricanes, depending on the direction of rotation and their relative strength, nearby vortices can orbit one another or travel together in straight lines – or they can cause more complicated interactions, like in the case of the square-launched rings.

    I think there may also be some interesting effects here from vortex stretching, but that’s a topic for another day! (Video and image credit: D. Cowern/Physics Girl; see also: LIBLAB; submitted by Maria-Isabel C.)

  • Carbonation in Microgravity

    Carbonation in Microgravity

    Bubbly beverages are popular among humans, but there’s surprising complexity underlying their seemingly simply carbonation, as explored in a new Physics Today article. Most drinks get their bubbles from carbon dioxide, which at higher than atmospheric pressures, can stay dissolved inside water and other liquids. When that pressure gets released, any carbon-dioxide-filled gas cavity in the liquid adopts the allowable saturation concentration for the ambient pressure, which sets up a concentration gradient of carbon dioxide  between the liquid and the bubble. That causes carbon dioxide gas to diffuse into the bubbles, making them grow. 

    Here on Earth, those growing bubbles are buoyant, and they form rising plumes of bubbles. They continue gathering carbon dioxide as they rise, making them grow ever larger (lower left). In microgravity, on the other hand, the bubbles congregate where they form and continue growing through diffusion (lower right). This is one reason carbonated beverages are unpopular in space – instead of rising to the surface and escaping, all the carbon dioxide in a drink gets consumed, leaving astronauts with no way to expel it aside from burping!

    For lots more fascinating facts about bubbly drinks – including how they relate to geology! – check out the full Physics Today article. (Image credits: beer – rawpixel; bubbles – P. Vega-Martínez et al.; see also: R. Zenit and J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    The Tacoma Narrows Bridge

    One of the most dramatic and famous engineering failures of the twentieth century is also one of the most complicated: the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. This early suspension bridge earned the name “Galloping Gurtie” from construction workers while it was still being built because its flexibility made it prone to moving up and down under even relatively light winds. That vertical motion was due to vortex-induced vibration. As the wind blew, it shed vortices off the downstream side of the bridge. These vortices alternated, coming off the top and then bottom of the bridge deck. The resulting forces made the bridge shift up and down.

    That wasn’t the bridge’s ultimate downfall, though. Shortly before it collapsed, the bridge stopped flexing up and down and instead twisted back and forth. This was a clear sign that the bridge had moved into aeroelastic flutter. In this situation, you get a feedback loop between the bridge’s aerodynamics and its structural dynamics. When the wind twists the bridge deck to a positive angle of attack, it will try to continue forcing the bridge to twist that direction. The internal forces of the bridge will try to twist it back, but when that happens, it can overshoot and end up at a negative angle of attack. At that point, the wind tries to push it further that direction and internal forces twist it back, overshooting the other way. This back-and-forth can create a dangerous feedback loop where the twisting of the bridge keeps getting worse and worse. In fact, that’s exactly what happened – right up until the bridge collapsed rather than twisting any more. (Video and image credit: Practical Engineering)

  • Nacreous Clouds

    Nacreous Clouds

    During winter, the polar skies can ignite with mother-of-pearl-like iridescence. Polar stratospheric clouds – also known as nacreous clouds – are a rare, beautiful, and destructive type of cloud found only in high latitudes at altitudes of 15 – 25 km. They are formed from tiny crystals of ice and nitric acid, and they shine brightest a few hours before sunrise or after sunset, when sunlight shines on them but not the surface. Their destructive side is connected with ozone depletion; they serve as reaction sites for chlorofluorocarbons in the atmosphere to react and produce ozone-destroying molecules. The clouds may have cultural significance as well; at least one study suggests they were part of Munch’s inspiration for “The Scream”. (Image credit: A. Light; via Gizmodo)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    “Float”

    In “Float” artist Susi Sie uses water and oil to create a whimsical landscape of bubbles and droplets. Coalescence is a major player in the action, though Sie uses some clever time manipulations to make her bubbles and droplets multiply as well. Watching coalescence in reverse feels like seeing mitosis happen before your eyes. (Video and image credit: S. Sie)

  • What Makes Turbulence So Hard

    What Makes Turbulence So Hard

    Turbulence – that pestersome, unpredictable, and chaotic state of flow – has been a thorn in the sides of mathematicians, physicists, and engineers for centuries. It is certainly one of – if not the – oldest unsolved problem in physics. Over at Ars Technica, Lee Phillips has a nice overview of the situation, including what makes the problem so difficult:

    The Navier-Stokes equation is difficult to solve because it is nonlinear. This word is thrown around quite a bit, but here it means something specific. You can build up a complicated solution to a linear equation by adding up many simple solutions. An example you may be aware of is sound: the equation for sound waves is linear, so you can build up a complex sound by adding together many simple sounds of different frequencies (“harmonics”). Elementary quantum mechanics is also linear; the Schrödinger equation allows you to add together solutions to find a new solution.

    But fluid dynamics doesn’t work this way: the nonlinearity of the Navier-Stokes equation means that you can’t build solutions by adding together simpler solutions. This is part of the reason that Heisenberg’s mathematical genius, which served him so well in helping to invent quantum mechanics, was put to such a severe test when it came to turbulence. 

    Phillips goes on to describe some of the many methods researchers use to unravel the mysteries of turbulence computationally, experimentally, and theoretically. This is a great introduction for those curious to get a sense of how turbulence, stability theory, and computational fluid dynamics all fit together. (Image credits: L. Da Vinci; NASA; see also: Ars Technica; submitted by Kam Yung-Soh)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Inside Hurricane Maria

    In addition to looking outward, NASA constantly monitors our own planet using a suite of satellites. In this video, they visualize data taken by the Global Precipitation Measurement Core Observatory of Hurricane Maria two days before it hit Puerto Rico. Instruments on board the satellite measure both liquid and frozen precipitation, giving scientists – and now the public – a glimpse into the heart of a developing hurricane. Be sure to take a look around; it’s a 360-degree video, and I bet it’s even more spectacular in VR. Having a trove of data like this helps researchers better understand the processes that influence a strengthening hurricane, which ultimately allows them to make better predictions about hurricane behavior in order to save lives. (Video credit: NASA; via Francesco C.)

  • Hydraulics Make Spiders So Creepy

    Hydraulics Make Spiders So Creepy

    There’s something about the way spiders move that many of us find inherently creepy. And that something, it turns out, is fluid dynamical. Unlike humans and other vertebrates, spiders don’t move using two sets of opposing muscles. The natural state of their multi-jointed legs causes them to flex inward. This is why dead spiders have their legs all curled up.

    To walk, spiders use hydraulic pressure. They pump a fluid called hemolymph into their legs to force them to straighten. If you look closely, you’ll notice that spiders’ legs always connect to the front section of their body. This is called the cephalothorax, and it acts like a sort of bellows that controls the pressure and flow of hemolymph. It moves the hemolymph around the spider’s body in a fraction of a second, allowing spiders to be quite fast, but something about the movement still feels off for those of us used to vertebrate motion. Happy Halloween, everyone!  (Image credit: R. Miller, source; see also; submitted by jpshoer)

  • Boiling with Sound

    Boiling with Sound

    Ultrasonic vibrations can boil nanoscale liquid layers, according to a new simulation-based study. Above you see a layer of water initially about 2 nm thick. When the surface it’s on vibrates at frequencies in the 100 GHz range – about a billion times faster than a hummingbird flaps – it superheats the thin layer of water. In this case, the film undergoes nucleate boiling, forming the same kinds of bubbles you see when boiling a pot of water. When the water layer gets too thin to support nucleate boiling, it stops boiling but evaporation continues. The transition occurs when van der Waals forces become significant. The technique only works with ultrathin layers of a liquid, but the authors envision broad application possibilities in industry as well as in micro- and nano-scale fluid systems. (Image and research credit, and submission: R. Pillai et al.)