We wrote earlier this year about the discovery of a new type of fire whirl – the blue whirl – but now the authors have published video of the blue whirl in action! The blue whirl was discovered while investigating the use of fire whirls to more efficiently burn off oil spilled atop water. A tightly spinning yellow fire whirl produces less soot than a non-vortex burn; the blue whirl is even more efficient, producing little to no soot at all. Much remains to be learned about this new type of fire vortex, but in the meantime, enjoy some high-speed video of the blue whirl, particularly from 1:50 onward. (Video credit: M. Gollner et al.)
Search results for: “vortex”
A Buoyant Rise
Hold a buoyant sphere like a ping pong ball underwater and let it go, and you’ll find that the ball pops up out of the water. Intuitively, you would think that letting the ball go from a lower depth would make it pop up higher – after all, it has a greater distance to accelerate over, right? But it turns out that the highest jumps comes from balls that rise the shortest distance. When released at greater depths, the buoyant sphere follows a path that swerves from side to side. This oscillating path is the result of vortices being shed off the ball, first on one side and then the other. (Image and research credit: T. Truscott et al.)
Crow Instability
Watching airplane contrails overhead, you may have noticed them transform into a daisy chain of distorted rings. This is an effect known as the Crow instability. The contrails themselves are the airplane’s wingtip vortices, made visible by water vapor condensed out of the engine exhaust. These two initially parallel vortex lines spin in opposite directions. A slight crosswind can disturb the initially straight lines, causing them to become wavy. This waviness increases over time until the vortex lines almost touch. Then the vortices pinch off and reconnect into a line of vortex rings that slowly dissipate. Be sure to check out the full-resolution version of this animation for maximum effect. (Image credit: J. Hertzberg, source)
Shaking in the Wind
Sitting at a traffic stop on a windy day, you may have noticed the beam holding the traffic lights shaking steadily up and down. This phenomenon is called vortex-induced vibration. When the wind flows over the beam, it looks something like the flow animation shown above. Airflow follows the shape of the beam until near the backside, where the air separates from the surface and creates a vortex that sloughs off into the beam’s wake. These vortices form asymmetrically on the beam – first on one side, then the other. This creates unequal pressures on either side of the beam, and those pressure differences create a force that moves the beam. Because vortices are being steadily shed off the beam, it will keep moving back and forth as long as the wind is strong enough. (Image credits: traffic light – L. Sennick, source; cylinder – Aphex82/Wikimedia)
“Gargantua”
Peering into a vortex feels like staring into an abyss in the Julia Set Collective’s “Gargantua”. Like their previously featured works, this video uses a macro perspective on fluid phenomenon to create an alternate sense of scale. Instead of a whirlpool, we could be observing a wormhole. Part of this is a matter of fooling our brains with perspective, but it also works because, on some level, we recognize that these same fluid patterns occur at very different lengthscales and so it is believable that what we see is much bigger than in reality. (Video credit and submission: S. Bocci/Julia Set Collective)
Shear Across the Water
This photo series shows the development of a Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. It’s formed when two layers of fluid move past one another at different speeds. In this case, the two fluids meet off the back of a flat plate (seen at the left of the top image) when fast-moving flow from the top of the plate encounters slower fluid beneath. Friction and shear between the fluid layers causes billows to rise up and form waves very similar to those on the ocean (wind across the water works the same way!). Those waves turn over into vortex-like spirals and keep mixing until they break down into turbulence. This pattern crops up pretty frequently, especially in clouds. (Image credit: G. Lawrence)
“Catacomb of Veils”
Burning Man’s “Catacomb of Veils”, the largest sculpture burned in the 2016 event, produced a series of smoke tornadoes as it blazed. Like dust devils or fire tornadoes, these vortices are driven by hot, buoyant air rising – in this case, from the fire. As the surrounding air moves in toward the fire, any rotational motion, or vorticity, in the air is intensified due to conservation of angular momentum. That concentrates it into a vortex, which becomes visible when it picks up smoke. Simultaneously, the wind was blowing in a consistent direction, sending any new vortices generated marching downstream. You can watch even more vortices and some slow-motion footage of the burning in the full video by Mark Day. (Image credit: M. Day, source; submitted by Larry B)
Happy 50th, Star Trek!
Today’s post is largely brought to you by the fact that I have been sick the past four days and my fiance and I have been bingeing on Star Trek Voyager. At some point, we began wondering about the sequence from 0:30-0:49 in which Voyager flies through a nebula and leaves a wake of von Karman vortices. Would a starship really leave that kind of wake in a nebula?
My first question was whether the nebula could be treated as a continuous fluid instead of a collection of particles. This is part of the continuum assumption that allows physicists to treat fluid properties like density, temperature, and velocity as well-defined quantities at all points. The continuum assumption is acceptable in flows where the Knudsen number is small. The Knudsen number is the ratio of the mean free path length to a characteristic flow length, in this case, Voyager’s size. The mean free path length is the average distance a particle travels before colliding with another particle. Nebulae are much less dense than our atmosphere, so the mean free path length is larger (~ 2 cm by my calculation) but still much smaller than Voyager’s length of 344 m. So it is reasonable to treat the nebula as a fluid.
As long as the nebula is acting like a fluid, it’s not unreasonable to see alternating vortices shed from Voyager. But are the vortices we see realistic relative to Voyager’s size and speed? Physicists use the dimensionless Strouhal number to describe oscillatory flows and vortex shedding. It’s a ratio of the vortex shedding frequency times the characteristic length to the flow’s velocity. We already know Voyager’s size, so we just need an estimate of its velocity and the number of vortices shed per second. I visually estimated these as 500 m/s and 2.5 vortices/second, respectively. That gives a Strouhal number of 0.28, very close to the value of 0.2 typically measured in the wake of a cylinder, the classical case for a von Karman vortex street.
So far Voyager’s wake is looking quite reasonable indeed. But what about its speed relative to the nebula’s speed of sound? If Voyager is moving faster than the local speed of sound, we might still see vortex shedding in the wake, but there would also be a bow shock off the ship’s leading edge. To answer this question, we need to know Voyager’s Mach number, its speed relative to the local speed of sound. After some digging through papers on nebulae, I found an equation to estimate speed of sound in a nebula (Eq 9 of Jin and Sui 2010) using the specific gas constant and temperature. Because nebulae are primarily composed of hydrogen, I approximated the nebula’s gas constant with hydrogen’s value and chose a representative temperature of 500 K (also based on Jin and Sui 2010). This gave a local speed of sound of 940 m/s, and set Voyager’s Mach number at 0.53, inside the subsonic range and well away from any shock wave formation.
Of course, these are all rough estimates and back-of-the-envelope fluid dynamics calculations, but my end conclusion is that Voyager’s vortex shedding wake through the nebula is realistic after all! (Video credit: Paramount; topic also requested by heuste11)
Happy 50th anniversary, Star Trek! Some of my earliest memories of TV are of watching TNG with my parents. Star Trek taught me that curiosity and scientific inquiry were vital and valuable, and that anyone could grow up to be a scientist, engineer, and leader. Thank you for such an inspiring and hopeful vision for humanity’s future!
And, seriously, those von Karman vortices are awesome.
Soap Film Wakes
Soap films can create remarkable flow visualizations when illuminated with monochromatic (single color) light. Each of the photos above shows a flow moving from left to right with a small object near the left creating an obstruction. In the top two images, the objects are cylinders; in the lower one it’s a flat plate tilted at 45 degrees. All of the objects shed vortices as the flow moves past. These vortices alternate in direction – the first spins clockwise, the next counter-clockwise, then clockwise again and so on. This pattern is known as a von Karman vortex street and can even show up in the atmosphere! (Image credit: D. Araya et al.)
Rio 2016: Sailing and Rule 42
If you watch some of the sailing in Rio, you may hear commentators mention sailors being penalized for breaking Rule 42. Broadly speaking, Rule 42 says that sailors can’t use their body to propel the boat. While it seems like a little rocking couldn’t make much difference, it turns out events have these rules for good reason.
One way to break Rule 42 is to perform sail flicking, demonstrated in the animation above. The sailor uses his or her body weight to roll the boat slightly, which causes the sail to flick. Aerodynamically speaking, we’d call this motion heaving. On the flexible sail, this unsteady motion decreases drag, allowing the boat to go faster. Done with the right frequency and amplitude, sail flicking actually makes the sail’s drag become negative, thereby creating thrust!
The bottom image shows a visualization of the wake of a normal sail (left) and a sail being flicked (right). Both sails shed vortices in the downstream direction, but the flicked sail has much stronger vortices, indicated by the darker colors. In addition to giving a sailor an illegal boost, sail flicking creates more difficult, turbulent conditions for any competitors downstream, so it’s restricted in many (but not all) sailing events. (Image credits: AP Photos; Reuters; National Solo, source; research and flow diagram credit: R. Schutt and C. Williamson, pdf)
Join us throughout the Rio Olympics for more fluid dynamics in sports. If you love FYFD, please help support the site!
