FYFD

Search results for: “jet”

  • Privacy Policy

    Who we are

    FYFD, located at https://fyfluiddynamics.com, is a Sharp Science Communication Consulting, LLC website. Both were founded by Nicole Sharp.

    What personal data we collect and why we collect it

    Comments

    When visitors leave comments on FYFD we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.

    An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: https://automattic.com/privacy/. After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.

    Media

    If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.

    Contact forms

    Our contact form collects your name, email address, subject line, and message. That information is sent as an email to a Gmail address accessible only to FYFD authors. We do not have a specific time limit for storing that data, but if you would like your information to be removed, simply contact us and we will do so.

    Email newsletter

    For our email newsletter, we collect your name and email address. Our campaigns are managed through the GDPR-compliant WordPress plug-in Jackmail. You may unsubscribe at any time using the link included in each newsletter. If you would additionally like your information removed from our records, contact us and we will do so.

    Cookies

    If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.

    If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.

    When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select “Remember Me”, your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.

    If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.

    Embedded content from other websites

    Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.

    These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.

    Analytics

    We currently use Google Analytics.

    Who we share your data with

    We do not share your data with third parties, although we do use plug-ins that may pass your data to external servers to process it, including Akismet Anti-Spam and Jetpack by WordPress.com.

    How long we retain your data

    If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue.

    For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.

    What rights you have over your data

    If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.

    Where we send your data

    Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Engineering Droplets

    A jet of falling liquid doesn’t remain a uniform cylinder; instead, it breaks into droplets. In this video, Bill Hammack explores why this is and what engineers have learned to do to control the size of the droplets formed.

    The technical name for this phenomenon is the Plateau-Rayleigh instability. It begins (like many instabilities) with a tiny perturbation, a wobble in the falling jet. This begins a game of tug of war. One of the competitors, surface tension, is trying to minimize the surface area of the liquid, which means breaking it into spherical droplets. But doing so requires forcing some of the the liquid to flow upward, against both gravity and the liquid’s inertia. The battle takes some time, but eventually surface tension wins and the jet breaks up.

    That’s not necessary a bad thing. It’s actually key to many engineering processes, like ink-jet printing and rocket combustion, as Bill explains in the full video. (Video and image credit: B. Hammack; submitted by @eclecticca)

  • Wrapping Rivulets

    Wrapping Rivulets

    Tea lovers have long been frustrated by the tendency of liquid jets to adhere to solid surfaces – the so-called teapot effect that makes the last vestiges of every pour drip down the spout. By investigating the effect with vertical rods, researchers found that, at low enough flow rates, a liquid jet is able to adhere completely, forming a liquid helix that coils around the rod. The authors were also able to construct a mathematical model to capture the behavior. They concluded that both the wettability of a surface and the curvature of the solid are critical to determining whether or not a liquid jet will stick. (Image and research credit: E. Jambon-Puillet et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Inside an Evaporating Drop

    Inside an Evaporating Drop

    The evaporation of a simple droplet holds far more complexity than one would expect. If you look closely at the edge of the drop, there’s a tiny, beautiful display at work. It begins with small variations in surface tension at the contact line where solid, liquid, and gas meet. These could be caused by local temperature or concentration differences; either way, the gradient in surface tension creates a flow. It starts out as a series of microjets spaced evenly around the contact line (left). 

    As the microjets strengthen, they merge into larger and larger vortical structures (right). This kind of feature – large structures emerging from smaller ones – is known as an inverse cascade. Fluid dynamicists have traditionally studied the classic (turbulent) energy cascade, where kinetic energy moves from large scales into smaller ones, but researchers are beginning to recognize more situations where the inverse cascade occurs, such as in the storms of Jupiter. (Image and research credit: A. Ghasemi et al., source)

  • The Bouncing Drop

    The Bouncing Drop

    For a droplet to bounce, we expect it to hit a wall or a sharp interface of some kind. But in a new study, researchers demonstrate a droplet that bounces with neither. Shown above is an oil droplet sinking through a stratified mixture of ethanol (toward the top) and water (toward the bottom). Because the oil is heavier than ethanol, it initially sinks, dragging some of the ethanol with it as it falls. Over time, some of that ethanol rises again, forming what’s known as a buoyant jet.

    Simultaneously, the gradient of ethanol to water between the top and bottom of the drop creates an imbalance in surface tension. The ethanol near the top of the drop has a lower surface tension than the water at the bottom. This creates a downward Marangoni flow along the drop interface.

    The bounce itself happens quickly after a long, slow sinking period. As the drop’s sinking slows, the buoyant jet weakens until it disappears completely. At the same time, the downward Marangoni flow pulls fresh ethanol-rich fluid toward the top of the drop. That increases the surface tension difference and strengthens the Marangoni flow, creating a positive feedback loop. In less than a second, the Marangoni flow increases by two orders of magnitude, pulling so hard that the drop shoots upward.

    That resets the cycle by weakening the Marangoni flow and strengthening the buoyant jet. The droplet can continue bouncing for about 30 minutes until the concentration gradient is so well-mixed that the cycle can’t continue. (Image and research credit: Y. Li et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Astrophysical Turbulence

    Astrophysical Turbulence

    Subsonic turbulence – like the random and chaotic motions of air and water in our everyday lives – is something we have only a limited understanding of. Our knowledge of supersonic turbulence, where shock waves and compressibility rule, is even more tenuous. In part this is because, although we can observe snapshots of supersonic turbulence in astronomical settings like the Orion Nebula shown above, we cannot watch it evolve. On these scales, features simply don’t change appreciably on human timescales.

    This has limited scientists to mostly numerical and theoretical studies of supersonic turbulence, but that is starting to change. Researchers are now building experimental set-ups that collide laser-driven plasma jets to generate boundary-free turbulence at Mach 6. Thus far, the observations are consistent with what’s been seen in nature: at low speeds, the turbulence is consistent with Kolmogorov’s theories, with energy cascading from large scales to smaller ones predictably. But as the Mach number increases, the nature of the turbulence shifts, moving toward the large density fluctuations seen in nebulae and other astrophysical realms. (Image credit: F. Battistella; research credit: T. White et al.; see also Nature Astronomy; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    The Beauty of Flames

    The flickering yellow and orange flames most of us are used to thinking of are rather different from the flames researchers study. In this video, the Beauty of Science team offers a short primer on different flame shapes studied in combustion, including laminar, swirling, and jet flames. Each has its own distinctive character and may be advantageous or not, depending on the application for the flame. A laminar flame, for example, is steady, which might make it a good choice for something like a Bunsen burner, where consistency is needed. Whereas a turbulent flame is better capable of mixing fuel and oxidizer, which is key in applications like rocket engines, where that mixing can be a limiting factor in the engine’s efficiency. (Image and video credit: Beauty of Science)

  • Understanding Jupiter

    Understanding Jupiter

    The swirling clouds of Jupiter hide a complicated and mysterious interior. For decades, scientists have worked to puzzle out the inner dynamics of Jupiter’s atmosphere and what could be going on inside it to generate the flows we see visibly. Near Jupiter’s equator, we see strong jets that flow either east or west, depending on their latitude; this creates the stunning cloud bands we’re used to seeing on the planet. Toward the poles, though, things look more like what we see above – swirling but unbanded.

    Through theory, experiments, and simulations, scientists have tried to work out exactly what ingredients are necessary to make Jupiter look this way, but it’s pretty tough to recreate the conditions simply because Jupiter is so extreme. You need a lot of rotation, a lot of turbulence, and a way to stretch that turbulence if you want to imitate Jupiter. There’s been progress recently, though, and it suggests that the jets we see on Jupiter are far more than skin-deep. Instead, they likely stretch deep into the Jovian atmosphere at the equator and ride somewhat shallower toward the poles. (Image credit: NASA JPL; research credit: S. Cabanes et al.)

  • Inside a Heart

    Inside a Heart

    You may not give it much thought, but there is important fluid dynamics happening inside you every moment of every day, especially inside your heart. Of the four chambers of the heart, the left ventricle has the thickest walls, reflecting its important task: pumping oxygenated blood throughout the body. In a healthy heart (top of poster; click here for the full-size version), a vortex ring and trailing jet fill the ventricle when the mitral valve opens. Then the ventricle contracts and pumps blood out the aortic valve and into the rest of the body.

    But for individuals with a leaking aortic valve (bottom of poster), things look different. Blood leaks back through the aortic valve at the same time that the mitral valve opens to allow freshly oxygenated blood back in. The two inflows disrupt mixing in the chamber, and, instead of pumping fully-oxygenated blood into the body, the left ventricle has to struggle to pump a less-oxygenated mixture into the body. (Image credit: G. Di Labbio et al.)

    ETA: (Research paper: G. Di Labbio et al., arXiv)

  • What Drives Droplets

    What Drives Droplets

    There’s been a lot of interest recently in what goes on inside droplets made up of more than one fluid as they evaporate. This can be entertaining with liquids like whiskey or ouzo, but it has practical applications in ink-jet printing and manufacturing as well. And a new experiment suggests that we’ve been fundamentally wrong about what drives the flow inside these drops.

    As these drops evaporate, a donut-shaped recirculating vortex forms inside them, as seem in the cutaway views above. Conventional wisdom says that vortex is driven by surface tension. Evaporation of components like alcohol is more efficient at the edges of the drop, and as the alcohol evaporates, it creates a higher surface tension at the drop’s edge than at its peak. Marangoni forces then pull fluid down toward the edges, creating the vortex. That explanation is  consistent with observations of a sessile drop sitting on top of a surface (left side of images).

    But those observations are also consistent with another explanation: evaporating ethanol makes the local density higher, so alcohol-rich parts of the drop rise toward the peak while alcohol-poor regions sink. This difference in density would also create a flow pattern consistent with observations. So which is the real driver, surface tension or gravity?

    To find out, researchers flipped the drop upside-down (right side of images). When hanging, the preferred flow direction due to surface tension doesn’t change; flow should still go from the deepest point on the drop toward the edge. But gravity is swapped; alcohol-rich areas should be found near the edge and attachment points of the drop because buoyancy drives them there. And that is exactly what’s observed. The flow direction inside the hanging droplet is consistent with the direction prescribed by buoyancy-driven flow, thereby upending conventional wisdom. It turns out that gravity, not surface tension, is the major driver of internal flow in these multi-component droplets! (Image and research credit: A. Edwards et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

More posts