FYFD

Search results for: “jet”

  • Breaking Up

    Breaking Up

    The dripping of a faucet and the break-up of a jet into droplets is universal. That means that the forces – the inertia of the fluid, the capillary forces governed by surface tension, and the viscous dissipation – balance in such a way that the initial conditions of the jet – its size, speed, etc. – don’t matter to the process of break-up. 

    We’d expect that the inverse situation – the breakup of a gas into bubbles in a liquid – would be similarly universal, but it’s not. When unconfined bubbles pinch off, the way they do so is heavily influenced by initial conditions. But that changes, according to a new study, if you confine the gas to a liquid-filled tube before pinch-off. Confinement forces a different balance between viscous and capillary effects, one which effectively erases the initial conditions of the flow and restores universality to the pinch-off process. (Image and research credit: A. Pahlavan et al.; via phys.org)

  • Catching Fire

    Catching Fire

    Citrus fruits like oranges house tiny pockets of oil in their peels. When squeezed, the oils jet out in tiny micro-jets that are about the width of a human hair. Despite their small size, the jets reach speeds of about 30 m/s and quickly break into a stream of droplets. When exposed to the flame of a lighter, like in the animation above, those microdroplets combust easily, creating a momentary fireball used to augment some cocktails. For more on how the citrus peel generates these jets, check out this previous post. (Image credit: Warped Perception, source; research credit: N. Smith et al.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Reducing the Force of Water Entry

    As anyone who’s jumped off the high board can tell you, hitting the water involves a lot of force. That’s because any solid object entering the water has to accelerate water out of its way. This is why gannets and other diving birds streamline themselves before entering the water. But even for non-streamlined objects, like a sphere, there are ways to reduce the force of impact.

    This video explores three such techniques, all of which involve disturbing the water before the sphere enters. In the first, the sphere is dropped inside a jet of fluid. Since the jet is already forcing water down and aside when the sphere enters, the acceleration provided by the sphere is less and so is the force it experiences.

    The second and third techniques both rely on dropping a solid object ahead of the one we care about. In the second case, a smaller sphere breaks the surface ahead of the larger one, allowing the big sphere to hit a cavity rather than an undisturbed surface. Like with the jet, the first sphere’s entry has already accelerated fluid downward, so there’s less mass that the bigger sphere has to accelerate, thereby reducing its impact force.

    In the third case, the first sphere is dropped well ahead of the second, creating an upward-moving Worthington jet that the second sphere hits. In this case, there’s water moving upward into the sphere, so how could this possibly reduce the force of entry? The key here is that the water of the jet wets the sphere before it enters the pool. Notice how very little air accompanies the second sphere compared to the first one. That’s because the second sphere is already wet. It’s also been slowed down by the jet so that it enters the water at a lower speed, all of which adds up to a lower force of entry. (Image and research credit: N. Speirs et al.)

  • Privacy Policy

    Who we are

    FYFD, located at https://fyfluiddynamics.com, is a Sharp Science Communication Consulting, LLC website. Both were founded by Nicole Sharp.

    What personal data we collect and why we collect it

    Comments

    When visitors leave comments on FYFD we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.

    An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: https://automattic.com/privacy/. After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.

    Media

    If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.

    Contact forms

    Our contact form collects your name, email address, subject line, and message. That information is sent as an email to a Gmail address accessible only to FYFD authors. We do not have a specific time limit for storing that data, but if you would like your information to be removed, simply contact us and we will do so.

    Email newsletter

    For our email newsletter, we collect your name and email address. Our campaigns are managed through the GDPR-compliant WordPress plug-in Jackmail. You may unsubscribe at any time using the link included in each newsletter. If you would additionally like your information removed from our records, contact us and we will do so.

    Cookies

    If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.

    If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.

    When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select “Remember Me”, your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.

    If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.

    Embedded content from other websites

    Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.

    These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.

    Analytics

    We currently use Google Analytics.

    Who we share your data with

    We do not share your data with third parties, although we do use plug-ins that may pass your data to external servers to process it, including Akismet Anti-Spam and Jetpack by WordPress.com.

    How long we retain your data

    If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue.

    For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.

    What rights you have over your data

    If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.

    Where we send your data

    Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Engineering Droplets

    A jet of falling liquid doesn’t remain a uniform cylinder; instead, it breaks into droplets. In this video, Bill Hammack explores why this is and what engineers have learned to do to control the size of the droplets formed.

    The technical name for this phenomenon is the Plateau-Rayleigh instability. It begins (like many instabilities) with a tiny perturbation, a wobble in the falling jet. This begins a game of tug of war. One of the competitors, surface tension, is trying to minimize the surface area of the liquid, which means breaking it into spherical droplets. But doing so requires forcing some of the the liquid to flow upward, against both gravity and the liquid’s inertia. The battle takes some time, but eventually surface tension wins and the jet breaks up.

    That’s not necessary a bad thing. It’s actually key to many engineering processes, like ink-jet printing and rocket combustion, as Bill explains in the full video. (Video and image credit: B. Hammack; submitted by @eclecticca)

  • Wrapping Rivulets

    Wrapping Rivulets

    Tea lovers have long been frustrated by the tendency of liquid jets to adhere to solid surfaces – the so-called teapot effect that makes the last vestiges of every pour drip down the spout. By investigating the effect with vertical rods, researchers found that, at low enough flow rates, a liquid jet is able to adhere completely, forming a liquid helix that coils around the rod. The authors were also able to construct a mathematical model to capture the behavior. They concluded that both the wettability of a surface and the curvature of the solid are critical to determining whether or not a liquid jet will stick. (Image and research credit: E. Jambon-Puillet et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Inside an Evaporating Drop

    Inside an Evaporating Drop

    The evaporation of a simple droplet holds far more complexity than one would expect. If you look closely at the edge of the drop, there’s a tiny, beautiful display at work. It begins with small variations in surface tension at the contact line where solid, liquid, and gas meet. These could be caused by local temperature or concentration differences; either way, the gradient in surface tension creates a flow. It starts out as a series of microjets spaced evenly around the contact line (left). 

    As the microjets strengthen, they merge into larger and larger vortical structures (right). This kind of feature – large structures emerging from smaller ones – is known as an inverse cascade. Fluid dynamicists have traditionally studied the classic (turbulent) energy cascade, where kinetic energy moves from large scales into smaller ones, but researchers are beginning to recognize more situations where the inverse cascade occurs, such as in the storms of Jupiter. (Image and research credit: A. Ghasemi et al., source)

  • The Bouncing Drop

    The Bouncing Drop

    For a droplet to bounce, we expect it to hit a wall or a sharp interface of some kind. But in a new study, researchers demonstrate a droplet that bounces with neither. Shown above is an oil droplet sinking through a stratified mixture of ethanol (toward the top) and water (toward the bottom). Because the oil is heavier than ethanol, it initially sinks, dragging some of the ethanol with it as it falls. Over time, some of that ethanol rises again, forming what’s known as a buoyant jet.

    Simultaneously, the gradient of ethanol to water between the top and bottom of the drop creates an imbalance in surface tension. The ethanol near the top of the drop has a lower surface tension than the water at the bottom. This creates a downward Marangoni flow along the drop interface.

    The bounce itself happens quickly after a long, slow sinking period. As the drop’s sinking slows, the buoyant jet weakens until it disappears completely. At the same time, the downward Marangoni flow pulls fresh ethanol-rich fluid toward the top of the drop. That increases the surface tension difference and strengthens the Marangoni flow, creating a positive feedback loop. In less than a second, the Marangoni flow increases by two orders of magnitude, pulling so hard that the drop shoots upward.

    That resets the cycle by weakening the Marangoni flow and strengthening the buoyant jet. The droplet can continue bouncing for about 30 minutes until the concentration gradient is so well-mixed that the cycle can’t continue. (Image and research credit: Y. Li et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Astrophysical Turbulence

    Astrophysical Turbulence

    Subsonic turbulence – like the random and chaotic motions of air and water in our everyday lives – is something we have only a limited understanding of. Our knowledge of supersonic turbulence, where shock waves and compressibility rule, is even more tenuous. In part this is because, although we can observe snapshots of supersonic turbulence in astronomical settings like the Orion Nebula shown above, we cannot watch it evolve. On these scales, features simply don’t change appreciably on human timescales.

    This has limited scientists to mostly numerical and theoretical studies of supersonic turbulence, but that is starting to change. Researchers are now building experimental set-ups that collide laser-driven plasma jets to generate boundary-free turbulence at Mach 6. Thus far, the observations are consistent with what’s been seen in nature: at low speeds, the turbulence is consistent with Kolmogorov’s theories, with energy cascading from large scales to smaller ones predictably. But as the Mach number increases, the nature of the turbulence shifts, moving toward the large density fluctuations seen in nebulae and other astrophysical realms. (Image credit: F. Battistella; research credit: T. White et al.; see also Nature Astronomy; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    The Beauty of Flames

    The flickering yellow and orange flames most of us are used to thinking of are rather different from the flames researchers study. In this video, the Beauty of Science team offers a short primer on different flame shapes studied in combustion, including laminar, swirling, and jet flames. Each has its own distinctive character and may be advantageous or not, depending on the application for the flame. A laminar flame, for example, is steady, which might make it a good choice for something like a Bunsen burner, where consistency is needed. Whereas a turbulent flame is better capable of mixing fuel and oxidizer, which is key in applications like rocket engines, where that mixing can be a limiting factor in the engine’s efficiency. (Image and video credit: Beauty of Science)

More posts