FYFD

Search results for: “jet”

  • Using Paper to Avoid Splashback

    Using Paper to Avoid Splashback

    Daily life and countless pool parties have taught us all that objects falling into water create a splash. Sometimes that splash is undesirable, and while there are many ways to tune a splash – by adding surfactants or changing the fluid’s viscosity – there’s a relatively common one that’s escaped scientific study until now. Researchers looked at how splashes change when you add a thin, penetrable fabric – commonly known as toilet paper – to the water surface. 

    Now, the common assumption is that adding a sheet of toilet paper can prevent splashback, but the story is not quite that simple. On the left, you see a splash generated without toilet paper. Because the ball is hydrophilic (water-loving), it does not pull any air into a cavity as it passes. There’s a nice axisymmetric Worthington jet formed, and it doesn’t splash very high, although some of the satellite droplets go quite a bit higher.

    On the right, we see a splash with a single sheet of toilet paper. In this case, the impact of the sphere penetrates the paper, and the way the paper deforms causes air to get sucked down into a cavity behind the ball. That creates a wider, amorphous jet that rebounds higher than the jet in clean water, though it does not shed satellite drops. 

    The researchers found that single and even double sheets of toilet paper can actually increase the height of the splash jet if the object penetrates them. The hole the object makes actually helps focus the jet. Adding a couple more layers, though, can eliminate splashing completely. (Image and research credit: D. Watson et al.)

  • A Burst of Microdroplets

    A Burst of Microdroplets

    If you hold a bubbly beverage like champagne or soda near your face, you’ll feel a light mist of tiny, nearly invisible droplets.These droplets form when bubbles reach the surface and pop, generating a tiny jet that ejects an even tinier droplet, as shown in the animation above. This process is remarkably common; its occurrence in the ocean results in billions of tons of sea salt entering our atmosphere each year. Since these tiny microdroplets stay aloft for far longer than their larger brethren, understanding how they form and just how small they can be is vital for understanding their impact on climate, pathogen spreading, and other topics. A new study suggests that the minimum size for an ejected droplet is just 1% of the size of the bubble that births it. (Image and research credit: C. F. Brasz et al., source)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    The Kaye Effect

    Allow a stream of shampoo to fall into a pile and you’ll catch a glimpse of the bizarre Kaye effect. A jet of shampoo will briefly rise up before becoming chaotic and falling. The key to this behavior is the shear-thinning of the shampoo. When the shampoo is just sitting on a surface, it’s quite viscous, but slide your hand across it, and the shampoo will become much less resistant to flowing.

    When the jet of falling shampoo hits the pile, it creates a little dimple. Sometimes the incoming jet hits that dimple and slips along it, thanks to a sudden decrease in viscosity. That can send an outgoing jet of shampoo riding off the dimple like a ramp. As the dimple deepens, the outgoing streamer rises up until it hits the incoming jet and becomes unstable. The shampoo streamer collapses, only to be restarted when a new dimple forms. (Image and video credit: S. Mould; h/t to Guillaume D.)

  • Breaking With a Wave

    Breaking With a Wave

    For rocket combustion and other applications, like watering your lawn with a hose, a stream of fluid may need to be broken up into droplets. While simply spraying a liquid jet will make it break up, waving that jet back and forth will break it up faster. A recent study simulated this problem numerically to determine the exact mechanisms driving that break-up. The researchers found two major culprits.

    The first is a Kelvin-Helmholtz, or shear-based, instability. When a jet leaves the nozzle, there’s friction between it and the comparatively still air surrounding it. This creates tiny ripples in the surface that eventually grow into the distortions we can see, and it’s found in all jets, regardless of their side-to-side motion.

    The second culprit, which is only found in the oscillating jet, is a Rayleigh-Taylor instability. By moving the jet side-to-side, you’re driving the dense liquid into less dense air, which creates a different set of disturbances that also help break up the jet. The final result: swinging the jet side-to-side breaks it into smaller droplets faster. (Image and research credit: S. Schmidt et al.)

  • Flying Backwards

    Flying Backwards

    Spend a summer afternoon floating in a kayak and chances are you’ll see some impressive aerial acrobatics from dragonflies. One of the dragonfly’s superpowers is its ability to fly backwards, which helps it evade predators and take-off from almost any orientation. To do this, the dragonfly rotates its body so that it is nearly vertical, thereby changing the direction it generates lift. In engineering terms, this is “force-vectoring,” similar to the techniques used by helicopters and vertical-take-off jets. 

    Scientists found that backwards-flying dragonflies could generate forces two to three times their body weight, in part due to the strong leading-edge vortices (bottom image) formed on the forewings. They also found that the hind wings are timed so that their lift is enhanced by catching the trailing vortex of the first pair of wings. Engineers hope to use what they’re learning from insect flight to build more capable flying robots. (Image and research credit: A. Bode-Oke et al., source; via Science)

  • Sandy Splashes

    Sandy Splashes

    Sand and other granular materials can be strikingly fluid-like. Here the impact of a solid sphere on sand generates a splash remarkably similar to what’s seen with water. When the ball hits, it creates a crater in the surface and sends up a bowl-like spray of sand. As the ball continues falling through the sand, the grains try to fill the empty space left behind. The walls of sand collapsing around the void meet somewhere between the surface and the depth of the ball. This generates the tall jet we observe, as well as a second one under the surface that we can’t see. We know that collapse traps an air bubble under the surface because of the eruption that occurs as the jet falls. That’s the air bubble reaching the surface. (Image credit: T. Nguyen et al., source; see also R. Mikkelsen et al.)

  • Rim Break-Up

    Rim Break-Up

    Splashing drops often expand into a liquid sheet and spray droplets from an unstable rim. Although this behavior is key to many natural and industrial processes, including disease transmission and printing, the physics of the rim formation and breakup has been difficult to unravel. But a new paper offers some exciting insight into this unsteady process. 

    The researchers found that if they carefully tracked the instantaneous, local acceleration and thickness of the rim, it always maintained a perfect balance between acceleration-induced forces and surface tension. That means that even though different points on the rim appear very different, there’s a universality to how they behave. They found that this rule held over a remarkably large range of situations, including across fluids of different viscosities and splashes on various surfaces. (Image and research credit: Y. Wang et al.; via MIT News; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Turbulence and Star Formation

    Turbulence and Star Formation

    Space, as I’ve discussed previously, is surprisingly full of matter, especially clouds of dust. And yet the rate of star formation we observe is bizarrely low; the Milky Way, for example, produces only about one solar mass worth of new stars every year. If gravity were the sole force driving star formation, we’d see far more stars forming. Recent research suggests that turbulence plays a major role in regulating the star formation process, both by countering gravity’s attempts to collapse gases into a proto-star and by creating supersonic shocks that drive material together to jump-start star formation. There seem to be other important ingredients as well: young stars tend to form jets that blow material back into the interstellar clouds they’re forming in, feeding the turbulent background. For more, check out Physics Today. (Image credit: ESA/NASA/Hubble/ESO, via APOD; research credit: C. Federrath)

  • Can Zooplankton Mix Oceans?

    Can Zooplankton Mix Oceans?

    Krill and other tiny marine zooplankton make daily migrations to and from the ocean surface. Previously, models of ocean mixing ignored these migrations; these animals are tiny, researchers argued, so any effects they could have would be too small to matter. But zooplankton make these migrations in huge swarms, and studies of a laboratory analog of their migrations (using brine shrimp rather than krill) reveal that, when moving en masse, these tiny swimmers create turbulent jets and eddies far larger than an individual. Their collective motion is enough to mix salty water layers 1000 times faster than molecular diffusion alone! Learn more in the latest FYFD video, embedded below. (Image and video credit: N. Sharp; research credit: I. Houghton et al.; h/t to Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Nautilus Swimming

    Nautilus Swimming

    The shellbound chambered nautilus is a champion of underwater jet propulsion. It can eke out efficiencies as high as 75%, far outclassing other jet-based swimmers like squid, salps, and jellyfish. That high efficiency is especially important for the nautilus, which spends a great deal of time at depths where the oxygen needed to fuel movement is in short supply. To get around, the nautilus draws water in through an enlarged orifice, then squirts it out little by little. Its this asymmetry between drawing in and expending that keeps efficiency high. By releasing a jet slower and at lower speeds, the nautilus is able to reduce wasteful losses to friction and thereby keep the efficiency high. The drawback is that the nautilus swims relatively slowly at an average of around 8 centimeters–less than one body length–per second. (Image credit: Simon and Simon Photography/University of Leeds; research credit: T. Neil and G. Askew; via NYTimes; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

More posts