NASA has released a jaw-dropping new compilation of Earth’s auroras viewed from the International Space Station. It’s available in up to 4K resolution, and I heartily recommend watching it fullscreen at the highest resolution you can comfortably manage. (To paraphrase: this is ultra high definition – it’s better resolution than real life!) I don’t think I’ve ever seen aurora footage that so clearly showed the fluid behavior of auroras when viewed from space. This flow-like quality is to be expected since the auroras occur due to ionized particles from the solar wind exciting atoms in our upper atmosphere in a magnetohydrodynamic dance that never gets too old to watch. (Video credit: NASA; via Gizmodo)
Boston area FYFDers: I’m giving a talk at Harvard tomorrow afternoon on science communication – Wed. April 20th, 4pm, Maxwell Dworkin, G115.
The shape of a droplet sitting on a surface depends, in part, on its surface tension properties but also on the nanoscale roughness of the surface. Small variations in the height and shape of the surface will change the area a drop contacts as well as the contact angle the edge of the drop makes with the surface. If the contact line between the drop and surface stays the same as a droplet evaporates into the surrounding gas or dissolves into the surrounding liquid, then we say the drop is pinned. A pinned drop’s contact angle will decrease as the drop’s volume decreases. This strains the ability of the nanoscale roughness to keep the drop’s edge pinned. As individual points of contact fail, the drop’s edge may jump inward to a new contact point. This set of discrete jumps between pinned states is called a stick-jump or stick-slip mode. (Image credit: E. Dietrich et al., source; see also: E. Dietrich et al. 2015)
This week NASA released two new images of the shock waves surrounding T-38C jets in free flight. They’re the result of NASA’s new adaptations of the schlieren photography technique, which has let scientists visualize shock waves (in the lab, at least) for more than a century. To celebrate, I thought it would be fun to demonstrate some of the data engineers can extract from images like the one above. So I’m going to show you how to calculate how fast this plane was flying!
Shock waves depend a lot on geometry. This is not too surprising, really, since shock waves are nature’s way of quickly turning the air because there’s an object in the way. This leads to a very powerful observation, though: the angle of a shock wave depends on the geometry of the object and the Mach number of the flow. (The Mach number is the ratio of an object’s speed to the local speed of sound, so an object moving at Mach 1 is moving at the speed of sound.)
The reverse observation is also true: if we can measure the angle of a shock wave from a known geometry, then we can calculate the Mach number. Now, I don’t have any special information about the geometry of a T-38, so most of the shock waves in this picture can’t tell me much quantitatively.
But, it turns out, I don’t need to know anything about the geometry of the plane to figure out its Mach number. That’s because that very first shock wave over on the right is coming off a sharp probe mounted over the airplane’s nose. The probe is sharp enough, in fact, that I can treat it as though it’s a tiny point disturbance. That means that rightmost shock wave is a special kind of shock known as a Mach wave, and its geometry depends solelyon the Mach number. It’s a pretty simple equation, too:
So, all I have to do is fire up some software like GIMP or ImageJ and estimate the angle of that first shock wave.
I came up with an estimate of about 77 degrees for the shock wave angle, which gives Mach 1.026 for the plane’s speed. Keep in mind that a) I’m using a grainy photo; and b) I have no information about the plane’s orientation relative to the camera. Nevertheless, NASA’s caption reports that this plane was moving at Mach 1.05 in the picture. My quick and dirty estimate is only off by 2%!
Of course, engineers are interested in a lot more than estimating an aircraft’s speed from these photos. With a little more geometry information, they can gather a lot of useful data from these images. One of the goals for the new photography technique is to help study new aircraft designs that generate weaker shock waves and quieter sonic booms. (Original images: NASA)
Time for another look at some of the best fluids content out there. It’s the fluids round-up – with a special focus this week on oceans!
– Ryan Pernofski spent two years filming the ocean in slow motion with his iPhone to make the short film “Slowmocean” seen above. It’s a gorgeous ode to the beauty of breaking waves.
– Oceans with higher salinity than Earth’s could drive global circulation that would make exoplanets more hospitable to life.
– Wind and waves make harsh, erosive environments. This photo essay from SFGate shows how greatly the sands of Pacifica shift over time. (submitted by Richard)
– Ever listened to an orchestra made from ice? You should! Learn about Tim Linhart, who builds and maintains ice instruments. (submitted by ashketchumm)
– MIT has demonstrated a new 3D-printing technique that allows for printing liquid and solid parts simultaneously, allowing would-be creators to rapid-prototype hydraulically-driven robotics.
The Brazil nut effect is a common name for the phenomenon where large particles tend to rise to the top of a mixture when it’s shaken. It’s also the subject of the latest FYFD video, which you can see above.
I’ve seen other mentions of the topic previously, but when I started researching the literature, I discovered that the Brazil nut effect was much more complicated than I’d thought! Hopefully, you’ll find the results as interesting as I did. And if you want to dig further, there are links to the papers I used over on YouTube.
Filming was also interesting this time around. I tried out stop-motion animation for the first time. It takes so much patience! But I think the results are so cute. (Image and video credit: N. Sharp/FYFD)
This weekend I’ll be holding my second live webcast for FYFD patrons. This month we’ll be focusing on the subject of planetary science, one of the coolest applications out there for fluid dynamics. My guests will be Keri Bean, a NASA JPL mission operations engineer and atmospheric scientist, and Professor Geoffrey Collins, a geologist at Wheaton College in Massachusetts. Keri has worked on all the recent Martian missions, including Mars Curiosity and the Phoenix Lander. She currently works on operations for the Dawn mission to Ceres. Geoff studies the geophysics of icy planets and moons like Pluto and Titan. He was part of the Galileo and Cassini missions to Jupiter and Saturn and is currently part of the team working on a future mission to Europa.
Rocket launches often produce spectacular imagery, but it’s rare to get a launch view quite like this one. The photograph above shows the recent launch of an Atlas V rocket as viewed from the International Space Station. The rocket itself is too small to be seen directly. Instead, that bright spot you see is the rocket’s exhaust. The smoky swooping curves mark the rocket’s exhaust plume. Because the gases leaving the rocket are at much higher pressure than the scant air pressure in the upper parts of the atmosphere, the exhaust expands rapidly, ballooning outward. Here the water vapor in the exhaust has frozen into crystals that catch the sunlight and make them stand out against the surrounding sky. (Image credit: NASA; via NASA Earth Observatory)
Engineers frequently face the challenge of maintaining control of air flow around an object across a wide range of conditions. After all, wind turbines and airplanes don’t always get to choose the perfect weather. To widen their operating ranges, designers can use active flow control to keep air flowing around an airfoil instead of separating and causing stall. One method of flow control uses plasma actuators on the upper surface of an airfoil. When activated, the plasma actuator ionizes air near the wing surface, producing the purplish glow seen above. That ionized air, or plasma, gets accelerated by the electric field of the device. The acceleration adds momentum to air near the wing surface, which helps it stay attached and flowing smoothly despite the unfavorable pressure conditions near the trailing edge of the wing. Compared to other methods of active flow control, plasma actuation is relatively simple to implement and so is actively being researched for applications in aviation and wind energy. (Image and research credit: I. Brownstein et al., source)
If you’ve ever bitten into a chocolate-covered bonbon, you may have noticed that the candy’s chocolate coating is remarkably uniform. Inspired by this observation, a group of engineers have investigated how viscous fluids poured over a curved surface flow and solidify; their findings were published this week.
Rather than heated chocolate, the group used polymer-filled fluids that cure and harden over time. Interestingly, they found that the final shell is quite uniform and that its thickness does not depend on the pouring technique. Instead, they can predict the final shell thickness based on the radius of the mold and the rheological properties of the fluid–specifically its density, viscosity, and curing time. The reason for this is that the time it takes for the fluid to drain and coat the mold is much shorter than the time it takes for the polymer to cure. As a result, the amount of fluid that sticks to the mold depends on geometry and fluid properties – not how the fluid was poured.
Amateur confectioners rejoice: pouring uniform chocolate coatings may be easier than you thought! (Image credit: MIT News, video; research credit: A. Lee et al.)
Underwater explosions are incredibly dangerous and destructive, and this animation shows you why. What you see here are three balloons, each half-filled with water and half with air. A small explosive has been set off next to them in a pool. In air, the immense energy of an explosion actually doesn’t propagate all that far because much of it gets expended in compressing the air. Water, on the other hand, is incompressible, so that explosive energy just keeps propagating. For squishy, partially air-filled things like us humans or these balloons, that explosion’s force transmits into us with nearly its full effect, causing expansion and contraction of anything compressible inside us as our interior and exterior pressures try to equalize. The results can be devastating. To see the equivalent experiment in air, check out Mark Rober’s full video on how to survive a grenade blast. (Image credit: M. Rober, source)
