FYFD

Tag: science

  • How Hummingbirds Drink

    How Hummingbirds Drink

    Hummingbirds are incredible acrobatic fliers, capable of hovering for more than 30 seconds at a time, even in windy conditions. Their feeding habits are equally impressive. Many species of hummingbirds have a forked tongue, each half of which curls over like a partial straw. As the bird extends its tongue, its beak compresses the space inside the tongue’s curls. Once in the nectar, both halves of the tongue re-expand, pulling liquid in along the full length of the tongue. For the birds, this is a much faster technique than simply sucking the nectar up like a straw. Hummingbirds can lick nectar more than ten times a second this way. For more gorgeous imagery of hummingbirds, be sure to check out National Geographic’s full feature. (Image credit: A. Varma, source; via Aarthi S.)

  • Slipping Through a Soap Film

    Slipping Through a Soap Film

    A droplet falling at high speed can pass through a soap film without breaking it. On impact, the drop stretches the soap film and ultimately only passes through by getting coated with a thin shell of soap film fluid. That liquid shell is separated from the original droplet by an extremely thin air layer. This air layer isn’t typically visible, but we know that it’s there from what happens when that soap-film-shelled droplet later impacts a liquid pool. As seen above, the droplet sits on the surface until the soap film shell coalesces with the pool. This sucks the drop under, but the drop itself does not coalesce. Instead it becomes an antibubble – a submerged liquid drop surrounded by a shell of air. (Image credit: J. Zou et al., source)

  • Reader Question: Resonating Bottles

    Reader Question: Resonating Bottles

    Reader shoebill-san asks:

    why does it make that weird sound when i blow over a bottle? i did a science experiment in college where we looked at the resonance in a beaker at different water levels, is it like that? related?

    Blowing across the top of a bottle creates what’s called Helmholtz resonance, where air inside the neck of the bottle actually vibrates up and down, like you see in the animation above. The stream of air from your mouth creates low pressure just outside the bottle, pulling some of the air out. That air will tend to overshoot, ultimately causing pressure in the bottle neck to drop lower. That vacuum will pull air back into the bottle, at which point the low pressure your blowing supplies pulls it back out, and so on. The actual sound you hear comes from those puffs of moving air. In reality, they move too fast to see; the animation comes from a high-speed video, and I highly recommend watching the full vid.

    From your description, I’m not 100% sure what the experiment you did in college was, but I’m guessing it was some variation of the glass harp, where you rub a partially-filled glass and get an eerie sound that varies depending on how much water is in the glass. Like the bottle example above, that’s an example of resonance, but the two are different. In the bottle, it’s the air that’s resonating. For the glass harp, it’s the glass walls themselves that are resonating. The liquid inside just changes the pitch by slowing down the speed at which the glass’s walls vibrate. For a full and fantastic explanation of how that works, check out this video by Dan Quinn. (Image credit: N. Moore, source)

  • Cycling Skinsuits and Vortex Generators

    Cycling Skinsuits and Vortex Generators

    It didn’t take long for an aerodynamic controversy to crop up in this year’s Tour de France. At the 14km individual time trial, riders from Team Sky wore custom Castelli skinsuits with integrated dot-like patterns on their upper arms (shown above). By the next day, a sports scientist with a competing team cried foul play, claiming that these fabrics could have given Team Sky as much as 25 seconds’ advantage over other riders. The Sky team finished with 4 out of the top 10 places on the time trial, and their leader, three-time Tour winner Chris Froome, finished some 35 seconds ahead of his expected competitors for the yellow jersey.

    Vortex generators explained

    So how could a few dots make a measurable difference? These protrusions are vortex generators meant to modify flow around a cyclist. Humans are not aerodynamic and what typically happens when air flows over a cyclist’s arms is shown in the flow visualization above: the air follows the curve of the arm part way, then it separates from the body, leaving a region of recirculation that increases drag. Vortex generators can help prevent or delay that drag-inducing flow separation by adding extra energy and turbulence to the air near the arm’s surface. Because turbulent boundary layers can follow a curve longer before separating, this helps reduce the drag by reducing the recirculation zone.

    About that time savings

    Aerodynamically speaking, those vortex generators can make a difference, but the question is, how much? In his complaint, Grappe cites a 2016 paper by L. Brownlie et al. that wind-tunnel tested different vortex generator patterns for use in running apparel. The speeds tested included those relevant to cycling. The specific numbers Grappe quotes aren’t directly relevant, however:

    As noted above, race garments that contain VG provide reductions in Fd of between 3.7 and 6.8% compared to equivalent
    advanced race apparel developed for the 2012 London Olympics which in turn provided substantially lower drag than
    conventional race apparel.

    the effectiveness of 5, 10 and 15 cm wide strips of VG applied to each flank of a sleeveless singlet revealed that the 5 cm wide
    strips provided between 3.1 and 7.1% less Fd than the 10 cm wide strips and between 1.9 and 4.3% less Fd than the 15 cm wide
    strips.  

    Here Brownlie et al. are specifically describing the savings for running apparel, which uses vortex generators in very different places than you would on a cyclist. Note the second quote even refers to a sleeveless singlet, so the vortex generators measured are definitely not in the same place as these skinsuits!

    The bottom line

    I fully expect that vortex generators give a marginal aerodynamic edge, which is why Sky and other teams have already been using them in competition. But I hesitate to declare that the savings is as high as 5-7%, and I have no way to verify Grappe’s subsequent claims that this translates to 18-25 seconds in the time trial. Those are numbers he gives without citing what model is being used to translate drag gains into time.

    In the end, what is needed is clarification of the rules. As they stand, one rule seems to allow the skinsuits because the vortex generators are integrated into the fabric, whereas another states clothing is forbidden “to influence the performances of a rider such as reducing air resistance”. Those two stances seems contradictory, and, for now, the race officials’ verdict to allow the suits stands.

    If you want to learn more about aerodynamics and cycling, be sure to check out my latest FYFD video. (Image credits: B. Tessier/Reuters; Getty Images; L. Brownlie et al. 2009; h/t to W. Küper)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    When Walls Chirp

    If you’ve ever clapped near a wall with a corrugated surface, you may have noticed some strange echoes. Surfaces like these can cause a chirping sound to observers. The reason, as Nick Moore explains in the video above, is that the original sound reflects off the corrugations at different times and travels back to the observer such that the first reflections to arrive are closely spaced (and thus higher pitched) while the later reflections are spread further out. This creates a chirp that starts at a high pitch and then falls to lower ones. Have you ever come across structures that do this? (Video credit: N. Moore)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    “Fractal”

    Timelapses are a wonderful way to capture the power and majesty of storms like the supercell thunderstorms featured in Chad Cowan’s “Fractal”. The video contains snapshots from six years’ worth of storms over the US’s Great Plains. The highlights include some spectacular mammatus clouds (0:30) and excellent billowing cloud formation (1:27) with turbulence every bit as towering as that of a volcanic plume. June is one of the best months for amazing storms in the Great Plains, largely thanks to the atmospheric mixing that occurs over the Rocky Mountains. If you have the opportunity to witness these amazing natural displays, enjoy it, but be safe! (Video credit: C. Cowan; image via Colossal)

  • Schooling in Soap Films

    Schooling in Soap Films

    In sports, flocks of birds, and schools of fish, we’re accustomed to thinking that the followers get an aerodynamic or hydrodynamic advantage over the leaders, but this may not always be the case. Here are two flags placed one after another in a soap film flowing from top to bottom. The flags are passive, meaning that their motion is entirely dependent on the flow around them; they cannot exert any resistive force of their own. In this case, scientists observe an effect known as inverted drafting. The lead flag actually experiences less drag – by as much as 50% – than the following flag. This seems to be a result of flow around the second flag having an upstream influence on the motion of the first. (Image and research credit: L. Ristroph and J. Zhang, pdf)

  • How Cycling Position Affects Aerodynamics

    How Cycling Position Affects Aerodynamics

    New FYFD video! How much does a rider’s position on the bike affect the drag they experience? To find out I teamed up with folks from the University of Colorado at Boulder and at SimScale to explore this topic using high-speed video, flow visualization, and computational fluid dynamics. 

    Check out the full video below, and if you need some more cycling science before the Tour de France gets rolling, you can find some of my previous cycling-related posts here. (Image and video credit: N. Sharp; CFD simulation – A. Arafat)

    ETA: Please note that the video contained in this post was sponsored by SimScale.

  • Watching Radiation

    Watching Radiation

    We’re used to radiation being invisible. With a Geiger counter, it gets turned into audible clicks. What you see above, though, is radiation’s effects made visible in a cloud chamber. In the center hangs a chunk of radioactive uranium, spitting out alpha and beta particles. The chamber also has a reservoir of alcohol and a floor cooled to -40 degrees Celsius. This generates a supersaturated cloud of alcohol vapor. When the uranium spits out a particle, it zips through the vapor, colliding with atoms and ionizing them. Those now-charged ions serve as nuclei for the vapor, which condenses into droplets that reveal the path of the particle. The characteristics of the trails are distinct to the type of decay particle that created them. In fact, both the positron and muon were first discovered in cloud chambers! (Image credit: Cloudylabs, source)

  • Glacial Remains

    Glacial Remains

    The high walls of this alpine canyon were cut by flowing glacial ice. This type of amphitheater-shaped valley is known as a cirque. The photo shows one of the Chicago Lakes on Mount Evans in the Colorado Rockies. The glacier that once sat here carved the steep walls you see in the background but also hollowed out a series of depressions like the ones shown in the figure below. When temperatures warmed and the glacier melted, it left behind a series of three small lakes, or tarns, like the one in the photo above. Cirques are found throughout the mountain ranges of the world. (Image credit: Mt. Evans – J. Shoer; cirque formation – DooFi)

    image