FYFD

Tag: experimental fluid dynamics

  • Why Does This Kite Look So Real?

    Why Does This Kite Look So Real?

    A recent viral video features mesmerizing footage of a giant octopus kite flown at a kite festival in Singapore earlier this month. The kite’s arms twist and wave lazily in the breeze. Watching the video, I was struck by how realistic the kite’s motion looks. It really looks like an octopus is just cruising there in mid-air. And that resemblance might not be accidental.

    In fluid dynamics, scientists often use a concept called dynamic similitude to test the physics of a scale model instead of the full-size original. The simplest version of this uses the Reynolds number to compare the model and the original. The Reynolds number is a dimensionless number that depends on the object’s size, the flow’s speed, and the density and viscosity of the fluid. If you match the scale model’s Reynolds number to the original’s Reynolds number, then the physics will be the same – even if you changed the fluid or the size of the object.

    Returning to our kite, one thing the footage doesn’t entirely convey is just how enormous this kite really is. The Straits Times reports the kite is about the length of five buses and requires six people to get aloft. But the kite’s size helps compensate for the fact that it’s flying in air instead of swimming through viscous water like a real octopus. Although I’m left estimating the kite’s size and the wind’s speed, my quick calculations put the Reynolds numbers for the kite and the octopus on the order of 10,000. So, strange as it seems, this giant kite really is acting like a swimming octopus!

    (Image credits: E. Chew, source)

  • Eulerian vs. Lagrangian

    Eulerian vs. Lagrangian

    When I first studied fluid dynamics, one of the concepts I struggled with was that of Eulerian and Lagrangian reference frames. Essentially, these are just two different perspectives you can view the fluid from.  Physics is the same in both, but mathematically, you approach them differently. In the Eulerian perspective one sits at a location and watches the flow pass, like an observer watching a river go by. It’s demonstrated in the top animation, where turbulent flow sweeps past in a pipe. This is the usual perspective experimentally – you put an instrument at a certain point in the flow and you gather information as the fluid streams past in time.

    In the Lagrangian perspective, on the other hand, one follows a particular bit of fluid around and observes its changes over time. This means that one has to follow along at the mean speed of the flow in order to keep up with the fluid parcel one is observing. It would be like running alongside a river so that you can always be watching the same water as it flows downstream. The Lagrangian view of the same turbulent pipe flow is shown in the bottom animation. Notice how moving alongside the pipe makes it easier to see how the turbulence morphs as it goes along. Experimentally, this can be harder to achieve (at least in a flow with non-zero mean speed), but it’s a useful method of studying unsteadiness. (Image credit: J. Kühnen et al., source)

  • Re-Entry

    Re-Entry

    Atmospheric re-entry subjects vehicles to extreme conditions. At high Mach numbers, the leading shock wave compresses the air so strongly that it reaches temperatures hotter than the surface of the sun. At these temperatures, oxygen and nitrogen molecules in the air dissociate, bathing a vehicle in a plasma of ionized gas molecules. Often these atoms chemically react with the surface materials of a vehicle causing ablation that removes mass from the vehicle while helping protect the vehicle substructure from re-entry heating. Tests in specialized ground facilities like arc-jet plasma tunnels are necessary to develop thermal protection systems capable of shielding a vehicle during hypersonic flight. (Image credit: D. Ponseggi/NASA)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Bullet-Time Inferno

    Remember the bullet time effect from The Matrix? This spectacular video gives you a similar effect with the turbulent flames created by firebreathers. To capture this level of detail, Mitch Martinez uses an array of 50 cameras placed around the performers, allowing him to reconstruct the full, three-dimensional representation of the flames. Similarly, some scientists use arrays of high-speed video cameras to collect 3D, time-resolved data about phenomena like combustion. Because these flows are so complex in terms of their fluid dynamics and chemistry, capturing full 3D data is important to help understand and model the flow better. (Video credit: M. Martinez; via Rakesh R.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Suppressing Instability

    The Rayleigh Taylor instability is a common fluid phenomenon in which the interface between fluids of differing densities becomes unstable. It’s what’s responsible for all those awesome pictures of milk in ice coffee. For many years, fluid dynamicists theorized that the instability might be inhibited by rotation, which tends to suppress velocity changes along the axis of rotation. But actually creating an experiment demonstrating the effect was extremely difficult because any attempts to set a denser fluid over a lighter one before rotating it would kick off the instability. Recently, however, researchers succeeded in creating an experimental demonstration, seen in the video above. They did so by using magnetism. The initial set-up consists of two fluids of similar densities – a heavier, diamagnetic fluid on the bottom and a lighter, paramagnetic fluid floating on top. The tank was then spun up until both fluids were rotating like a rigid body. Then, the entire set-up was lowered into a vertically-oriented magnetic field. The paramagnetic fluid on top was attracted by the field while the diamagnetic fluid on the bottom was repelled. The end result is that the magnetic field created the effect of the upper fluid being heavier, thereby initiating the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. As you can see in the video, rotation does slow down–but not prevent–the instability. But it took some very clever and careful experimental design to show!  (Video credit: K. Baldwin et al.)

    ——————

    Don’t forget about our FYFD survey! I’ve teamed up with researcher Paige Brown Jarreau to create a survey of FYFD readers. By participating, you’ll be helping me improve FYFD and contributing to novel academic research on the readers of science blogs. It should only take 10-15 minutes to complete. You can find the survey here. Please take a few minutes to participate and share!

  • Recreating Hurricanes

    Recreating Hurricanes

    Hurricane-related winds and storm surge cause massive damage every year. Understanding and being able to predict the impact of these storms on coastal structures can help save lives and properties. Until recently the most ferocious of hurricanes–category 5 storms that feature winds above 250 kph (150 mph)–could not be recreated in a laboratory scale. Now the University of Miami’s SUSTAIN (SUrge-STructure-Atmosphere INteraction) facility can produce category-5 equivalent winds, waves, and surge in a controlled environment. The massive test section measures 18 m x 6 m x 2 m and can be filled with over 140,000 liters of saltwater. The acrylic walls of the facility let researchers use optical flow diagnostics like particle image velocimetry (PIV) to measure flow anywhere in the test section. Some of their planned studies include experiments on how oil spills behave in storms and how strong aquaculture nets must be to maintain their catch through a storm. It will also be used to study interactions between buildings and storm surge. For more, check out their website or this video from the Weather Channel. (Image credits: Gort Photography, AFP/K. Sheridan, AP Photo/W. Lee; SUSTAIN Laboratory)

  • Laser-Induced Fluorescence

    Laser-Induced Fluorescence

    One of the challenges of experimental fluid dynamics is capturing information about a flow that varies in three spatial dimensions and time. Experimentalists have developed many techniques over the years–some qualitative and some quantitative–all of which can only capture a small portion of the flow. The photos above are a series of laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) images of an airfoil at increasing angles of attack. The green swirls are from an added chemical that fluoresces after being excited with a laser. In this case, the technique is providing flow visualization, showing how flow over the upper surface of the airfoil shifts and separates as the angle of attack increases. The technique can also be used, however, to measure velocity, temperature, and chemical concentration. (Image credit: S. Wang et al.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Water-Based Tractor Beam

    Researchers in Australia have demonstrated a “tractor beam” capable of manipulating floating objects from a distance using surface waves on water. And, unlike some research, you can try to replicate this result right in the comfort of your own bathtub! When a wave generator oscillates up and down, it creates surface waves that move objects and particles on the water’s surface. When the wave amplitudes are small, the outgoing wave fronts tend to be planar, as in part (a) of the figure above. These planar waves push surface flow away from the wave generator in a central outward jet, and new fluid is entrained from the sides to replace it. This creates the kind of flowfield shown in the streaklines of part (b).

    Increasing the amplitude of the surface waves drastically changes the surface flow’s behavior. Larger wave amplitudes are more susceptible to instabilities due to the nonlinear nature of the surface waves. This means that the planar wave fronts seen in part (a) break down into a three-dimensional wavefield, like the one shown in part (c). Near the wave-maker, the surface waves now behave chaotically. This pulsating motion ejects surface flow parallel to the wave-maker, which in turn draws fluid and any floating object toward the wave-maker. The corresponding surface flowfield is shown in part (d). The researchers are refining the process, but they hope the physics will one day be useful in applications oil spill clean-up. (Video credit: Australia National University; image and research credit: H. Punzmann et al. 1, 2; via phys.org; submitted by Tracy M)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Specialized’s Win Tunnel

    Awhile back, I mentioned that bike manufacturer Specialized had built their own wind tunnel to test cycling equipment. In this video, they provide a walk-through of their facility. Although there are features unique to this tunnel and its intended purpose, much of what Chris and Mark describe is standard for any subsonic wind tunnel. The story begins upstream in the inlet and contraction, where air is pulled into the tunnel. Honeycomb flow straighteners direct the incoming air, followed by a series of mesh screens. These screens break up any turbulent eddies, which helps smooth and laminarize the flow. The test section is where measurements occur, whether on cyclists or other models. This part of the tunnel is usually equipped with many sensors and specialized equipment, like the balance shown. These allow researchers to measure quantities like force, velocity, pressure, and/or temperature. Then the wind tunnel widens gradually in a diffuser, which slows down the air and helps prevent disturbances from propagating upstream. Finally, the fans at the back provide the source of low-pressure that drives the air flow. (Video credit: Specialized Bicycles; submitted by J. Salazar)

  • Brazuca

    Brazuca

    Since 2006, Adidas has unveiled a new football design for each FIFA World Cup. This year’s ball, the Brazuca, is the first 6-panel ball and features glued panels instead of stitched ones. It also has a grippy surface covered in tiny nubs. Wind tunnel tests indicate the Brazuca experiences less drag than other recent low-panel-number footballs as well as less drag than a conventional 32-panel ball. Its stability and trajectory in flight are also more similar to a conventional ball than other recent World Cup balls, particularly the infamous Jabulani of the 2010 World Cup. The Brazuca’s similar flight performance relative to a conventional ball is likely due to its rough surface. Like the many stitched seams of a conventional football, the nubs on the Brazuca help trip flow around the ball to turbulence, much like dimples on a golf ball. Because the roughness is uniformly distributed, this transition is likely to happen simultaneously on all sides of the ball. Contrast this with a smooth, 8-panel football like the Jabulani; with fewer seams to trip flow on the ball, transition is uneven, causing a pressure imbalance across the ball that makes it change its trajectory. For more, be sure to check out the Brazuca articles at National Geographic and Popular Mechanics, as well as the original research article. (Photo credit: D. Karmann; research credit: S. Hong and T. Asai)