When a water drop hits a surface that’s much hotter than its boiling point, part of it will vaporize immediately. Depending on the temperature, this Leidenfrost effect can be a relatively gentle process — or not. Here, the surface is so hot that the entire drop is boiling before it’s even finished spreading from impact. The vapor in contact with the surface is trying to escape, bubbling up so violently that it rips the original droplet into a spray of tiny droplets. (Video and image credit: L. Gledhill)
Search results for: “water droplet”

The Optical Atom
Researchers applied a quantum mechanical technique to study an evaporating drop in extreme detail. The team trapped a spherical water drop and collected the light scattered off it as it evaporated. Using an analytic technique originally developed for an atom, they were able to study changes in the drop down to the nanometric level without relying on numerical simulations to interpret the results. The authors suggest that their method is well-suited to studying the concentration of chemical or biological contaminants on the surface of a drop as it evaporates. (Image credit: droplet – Z. Kaiyv, Fano combs – J. Marmolejo et al.; research credit: J. Marmolejo et al.; via APS Physics)

Illustration of the Fano combs seen by analyzing light scattered from an evaporating drop. 
Toilet Plumes
Toilet flushes are gross. We’ve seen it before, though not in the same detail as this study. Here, researchers illuminate the spray from the flush of a typical commercial toilet, like those found in many public restrooms. They found that flushing generates a plume of droplets that reaches 1.5 meters in under 8 seconds, producing many thousands of droplets across a range of sizes.
The experiments were conducted in a ventilated lab space, and the flushes involved only clean water — no fecal matter or toilet paper — so they don’t perfectly mimic the confines of a public toilet stall. But the implications are still pretty gross. Without a lid to contain the flush’s spray, these energetic toilets are spraying droplets capable of carrying COVID, influenza, and other nastiness all over our bathrooms. (Image and research credit: J. Crimaldi et al.; via Gizmodo)

To Fizz or Not to Fizz
Place a drop of carbonated water on a superhydrophobic surface and it will slide almost frictionlessly, much the way Leidenfrost drops do. The drop behaves this way thanks to the self-produced layer of carbon dioxide vapor that it levitates on. As the gas escapes, the drop eventually settles back into contact with its surface. But until then, its levitation makes for some fun.

On the treated half of the glass (left), bubbles form a continuous film against the glass. On the untreated side (right), bubbles nucleate, grow, and rise as expected for a fizzy drink. Single droplets aren’t the only source of fun, however. In the images above, researchers coated the left half of a wine glass with a superhydrophobic treatment, while leaving the right half of the glass untouched. Once (dyed) carbonated water is poured into the glass, we see a bizarre dichotomy. In the right, untreated half of the glass, carbon dioxide bubbles nucleate, grow, and rise through the glass. But on the left side, the liquid appears still and bubble-less. In fact, the carbon dioxide gas on the left side is forming a continuous bubble film by the surface of the glass! (Image, video, and research credit: P. Bourrianne et al., see also)

Soapy Solutions
When a drop of soap falls into a pool of water, its surface-loving molecules spread out on the water’s surface. Exactly how the soap spreads depends on the local concentration of its surfactant molecules, which create areas with different surface tensions that cause flow. All in all, it’s a tough process to predict because it varies in time at every point on the pool. But a recent paper offers a new class of exact solutions for the problem.
The paper considers a surfactant-laden droplet spreading over a (relatively speaking) deep pool. Other researchers showed recently that this situation can be described with a complex version of the Burgers’s equation, which was originally developed to describe turbulent flows. The authors solved the equation for a variety of initial conditions and found that the time-dependent spread of the surfactants was sensitive to the initial surface distribution. The higher the initial surface concentration, the faster the surfactants spread. (Image credit: T. Despeyroux; research credit: T. Bickel and F. Detcheverry; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

Beautiful Waves
Australian photographer Ray Collins captures some of the most impressively dynamic photographs of ocean waves I’ve ever seen. The textures of the water range from glassy smooth to scaled to violent sprays of droplets. You can easily get lost in every image. For more, check out his website and Instagram. (Image credits: R. Collins; via Colossal)

Free Contact Lines
How a simple drop of water sits on a surface is a strangely complicated question. The answer depends on the droplet’s size, its chemistry, the roughness of the surface, and what kind of material it’s sitting on. Vetting the mathematical models that describe these behaviors is especially difficult since droplets often get stuck, or “pinned,” along their contact line where water, air, and surface meet.
To get around this issue, researchers sent their experiment to the International Space Station, asking astronauts to run the tests for them. Without gravity‘s influence squishing drops, the astronauts could use much larger droplets than they could on Earth. Larger drops are less likely to get pinned by a stray surface defect, so on the space station, astronauts could place droplets on a vibrating platform and observe their contact line freely moving as the drop changed shape. Under these conditions, the experiment tested many surfaces with different wetting characteristics, thereby gathering data to test models we cannot easily confirm on Earth. (Image and research credit: J. McCraney et al.; via APS Physics)

Encapsulating Drops
Sometimes a droplet needs a little protection while it’s traveling to its destination. When that’s the case, we often try to encapsulate it in a layer of material that won’t be affected by whatever environment the drop is traveling through. In this study, researchers aimed to give their drops not one but two layers of protection — in as simple a way as possible.
The team began with three layers of liquid. The lowest layer was water, the middle layer was an oil, and the top layer was a mixture of water and isopropyl alcohol. Next, they added glass particles that were denser than the alcohol, but less dense than the oil. This caused the particles to form a clump — a granular raft — along the interface between the alcohol and the oil (not shown). When the layer of particles became heavy enough, it began to sink into the oil, carrying some of the alcohol with them. This conglomeration formed the initial droplet of alcohol mixture encased in an armor of glass beads.
As this armored droplet sank, it approached the second interface: the oil-water interface. At this juncture, the team observed three different outcomes. When the glass particles were small or light, the armored drop would come to a rest at the oil-water interface. As the drop deformed, water would pierce the armor, causing the whole drop to rupture (Image 1).
In the second case, heavier particles caused the armored drop to sink through the oil-water interface, but a low oil viscosity meant that the oil film drained from the bottom of the drop before the drop was fully encapsulated. Once again, this let the water through and ruptured the droplet (Image 2).
In the final case, armored drops with just the right bead density and oil viscosity would sink through the oil-water interface until the oil pinched off behind the drop. This pinch-off allowed the oil to redistribute around the drop, encapsulating it in layers of both oil and particles, thereby protecting it as it continued its journey (Image 3). (Image credits: top – Girl with red hat, experiment – A. Hooshanginejad et al.; research credit: A. Hooshanginejad et al.)

When Seeing a Flow Changes It
Adding dye to a flow is a common technique for visualization. After all, many flows in fluids like air and water are invisible to our bare eyes. But for some classes of flows — especially those driven by variations in surface tension — adding dye can have unforeseen effects. A recent study shows how true this is for bursting Marangoni droplets, where evaporation and alcohol concentration can pull a water-alcohol droplet apart.

As more dye is added to the experiment, the daughter droplets grow larger and more ligaments form. In the first three images, a dashed black line has been added to show the location of the droplet rim. Without dye, it’s nearly impossible to see the phenomenon since the refractive indices of the two component liquids are so close. But the researchers found that, as they added more methyl blue dye, it did more than increase the contrast in the flow. It changed the flow, making the droplets larger and creating ligaments between them. They believe that the dye’s own surface tension creates local gradients that alter the flow. It’s a reminder that experimentalists have to be careful to consider how our efforts to measure and observe a flow can change it. (Image credit: top – The Lutetium Project, bottom – C. Seyfert and A. Marin with modification; research credit: C. Seyfert and A. Marin)

Acidic Aerosols
As ocean waves crash, they generate aerosols — tiny liquid and solid particulates — that interact with the atmosphere. Curious about the chemistry of these tiny drops, researchers set out to measure their acidity. That’s easier said than done. Over time, aerosol droplets acidify as they interact with acidic gases in the atmosphere and capturing fresh aerosols in the field is next to impossible.
To tackle these challenges, researchers instead moved the aerosols to the laboratory, filling a wave channel with seawater and agitating it to generate aerosols they could then measure. They found that the smallest aerosols become a million times more acidic than the bulk ocean in only two minutes! Find out more about their experiment and its implications over at Physics Today. (Image credit: E. Jepsen; research credit: K. Angle et al.)














