In nature, some powerful tornadoes form additional tornadoes within their shear layer. These subvortices revolve around the main tornado, causing massive destruction in their wake. In the laboratory, researchers create a similar multi-tornado system with a spinning disk at the bottom of a shallow, cylindrical layer of water. Depending on how fast the disk spins, different numbers of subvortices form around the main vortex.
In this poster, researchers show the transition from a 3-subvortex system to a 2-subvortex one. Starting at the 12 o’clock position and moving clockwise, we see 3 subvortices arranged in a triangle. A sudden change in the disk’s rotation speed destabilizes the system, causing the subvortices to break down and shift into a new 2-subvortex configuration. As this happens, material that was isolated in each subvortex (darker blue regions) is suddenly able to mix. That suggests that a real-world multiple vortex tornado might suddenly shed debris if it lost enough angular momentum. Back in the lab, though, the shift to a stable 2-subvortex system once again isolates material in individual subvortices and prevents it from mixing with the rest of the flow. (Image and research credit: G. Di Labbio et al. 1, 2)
In late January, dust from the Sahara blew westward toward the Cabo Verde archipelago before turning northward toward Europe. During winter and spring, Saharan dust tends to stay at lower altitudes, where it can be carried by the northeast trade winds. In contrast, from late spring to early fall, dust rises higher, carried westward by the Saharan Air Layer; there, the dust can help suppress both the formation and intensity of the Atlantic’s hurricanes.
On the left side of the image scant clouds trace von Karman vortex streets behind the archipelago, marking the atmospheric disruption caused by the rocky islands. (Image credit: L. Dauphin; via NASA Earth Observatory)
In graduate school, my advisor introduced us to a particularly vexing fluid dynamical thought experiment known as the Feynman sprinkler. After observing an S-shaped sprinkler that rotated when water shot out its arms, physicist Richard Feynman wondered what would happen if the device were placed in a tank of water with the flow reversed. If the sprinkler was sucking in water, would it rotate and, if so, in what direction?
This seemingly simple question has confounded physicists ever since, in part because you can make believable arguments for multiple different results. Attempts to build the apparatus experimentally produced differing results, too — often due to variables that don’t appear in the thought experiment, like friction in the sprinkler’s bearing. But, at long last, a group posits they have the final answer to the problem.
They cleverly built their sprinkler so that it floats in its tank, with the addition or removal of water from the sprinkler controlled by a second siphon-connected tank. With no solid-solid contacts, the sprinkler can rotate with very little friction.
Flow visualization of the sprinkler in reverse (suction) mode. For image clarity, the device is held in place to prevent spinning. Notice how the jets coming into the hub glance off one another and form counter-rotating vortex pairs at an angle. This asymmetry is the source of the sprinkler’s rotation when allowed to move.
The team found that sucking water into the sprinkler does, indeed, reverse the sprinkler’s rotation, but it’s not a simple reversal of the forward sprinkler’s flow. To see why, check out the video above, which visualizes flow inside the sprinkler during suction. For clarity, the device is held fixed in place during flow visualization. Notice that the two arms of the sprinkler sit directly opposite one another in the hub. Thus, you’d expect their two jets to collide and form counter-rotating vortices along a vertical axis. But the vortex pairs are offset from the centerline.
This asymmetry takes place because the velocity profiles of flow across the hub inlets are skewed. Instead of the largest velocity occurring on the centerline of the inlet, each occurs slightly to one side. So when the jets collide, they do so off-center and impart a torque to the sprinkler. The reason for the skewed profiles at the inlets lies further upstream in the curved arms of the sprinkler. Centrifugal force from turning the corner leaves a mark on the flow, leading, ultimately, to the skewed velocity profiles, offset jets, and spinning sprinkler. (Image and research credit: K. Wang et al.; via APS Physics)
In the remote South Atlantic, north of the Antarctic Circle, sit the volcanic Zavodovski and Visokoi islands. Though only roughly 500 and 1000 meters tall, respectively, each island disrupts the atmosphere nearby, often generating cloudy wakes. In today’s pair of images, the northerly Zavodovski has a particularly bright cloud wake, thanks to sulfate aerosols degassing from its volcano, Mount Curry. Though it’s hard to pick out the effect in the natural-color image above, the false-color version below shows the bright wake clearly. The filtering on this image turns snow and ice — like that on Visokoi’s peak — red and makes the water vapor of clouds white. The sulfates from Mount Curry act as nucleii for water droplets, forming many small, reflective drops that stand out against the rest of the sky. (Image credit: W. Liang; via NASA Earth Observatory)
This false-color satellite image highlights the volcanic seeding by filtering snow and ice as red and water vapor in clouds as white.
A sheet of flame splits around a cylinder in this Gallery of Fluid Motion poster. Looking at the image sequences, you can see how the flames lift up as they flow around the cylinder, following the arms of a horseshoe vortex. Researchers study situations like this one to better understand how wildfires move as they encounter obstacles. Understanding and predicting how fires flow is increasingly important with more wildfires encountering human-built infrastructure. (Image credit: L. Shannon et al.)
WASP-96B is a tidally-lockedexoplanet between the size of Saturn and Jupiter. This hot, massive planet lies close to its star, orbiting in less than three-and-a-half Earth days. A recent study shows that planets like these can have very different weather, depending on what depth their atmosphere absorbs heat at.
Using numerical simulations, researchers took a detailed look at the possible atmospheric dynamics on this planet. When the atmosphere absorbed heat at a shallow depth — near the outer layers of the planet — a coupled vortex pair formed (left, below). These vortices promenaded westward and completed a circuit around the planet every 11-15 days.
Shallow heating on a hot Jupiter produces a pair of coupled vortices (left), but deeper heating in the atmosphere generates four more-chaotic vortices (right).
In contrast, deeper heating produced a more-chaotic pattern of four vortices (right, above) that each lasted 3 to 15 days before disappearing, replaced by a new vortex. This atmosphere, they found, was very turbulent, with smaller-scale vortices as well.
Since each weather pattern is visually distinct and carries its own brightness signature, the authors predict that additional observations of WASP-96b with the current generation of telescopes will show which type of heating dominates on the exoplanet. (Image and research credit: J. Skinner et al.; via APS Physics)
Snapshots from a simulation of a deep-heated hot Jupiter. Each image shows the planet on a different consecutive day.
Mushrooms are the fruiting bodies of much bigger, largely underground fungi. Being fruit, mushrooms have the job of spreading spores so that the fungus can reproduce. Some mushrooms rely on the wind; others create their own wind. Still others use vortex rings to carry their spores higher. Who knew such fascinating and beautiful physics lies along the forest floor? (Image credit: top – A. Papatsanis, bottom – I. Potyó; via Wildlife POTY)
Colorful chandeliers, passing spirits, sprouting mushrooms, and fountains of falling ink appear in Christopher Dormoy’s “Aquakosmos.” Driven by the slight density difference between ink and water, many of these elaborate shapes result from the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Anytime you see mushroom-like plumes and chandelier-like splitting vortex rings, there’s probably a Rayleigh-Taylor instability behind it. Check out the full video above, and, if you want to give this kind of flow visualization a try yourself, a glass of water and vial of food coloring is a great place to start. (Video and image credit: C. Dormoy)
Researchers studying how fishswim have long focused on their tail fins and the flows created there. But a fish’s other fins have important effects, too, as seen in this recent study. Researchers built a CFD simulation based on observations of a swimming rainbow trout, focusing on the flow from its back and tail fins. They found that the vortex created by the back fin stabilizes and strengthens the one generated by the tail. It also played a role in reducing drag on the fish by maintaining the pressure difference across the body. When they tried changing the size and geometry of the fins, the fish’s efficiency suffered, indicating that evolution has already optimized the trout’s fins for swimming efficiency. (Image credits: top – J. Sailer, simulation – J. Guo et al.; research credit: J. Guo et al.; via APS Physics)
Visualization of flow around a digitized rainbow trout.
Rocky, isolated islands disturb the atmosphere, sending air swirling off one side of the island and then the other. The effects are not always visible to the naked eye, but, as they do here, they can show up in satellite imagery as whirling von Karman vortex streets. The eddies of this image are due to the Canary Islands, and if you follow the line of swirls backward, you’ll find their originating islands. Note that the cloudy swirls don’t appear immediately behind the islands. That’s because there wasn’t enough moisture in the air for clouds to condense yet; the same swirls that you see in the downstream clouds exist in the clear air closer to the islands. (Image credit: A. Nussbaum; via NASA Earth Observatory)
