Search results for: “supersonic”

  • Seeking Quieter Supersonic Flight

    Seeking Quieter Supersonic Flight

    Supersonic flight over the U.S. has been banned by all non-military aircraft for more than fifty years. The ban gained momentum in the 1960s after test programs over St. Louis and Oklahoma provoked public outcry. But NASA’s X-59 aircraft is working to lift the ban by softening the sonic booms that encouraged the ban in the first place. Although it hasn’t been tested at supersonic speeds yet, pilots are putting the sharp and skinny X-59 through its paces, slowly widening the flight envelope.

    In the video above, NASA shares footage of some of the recent test flights, including various maneuvers like phugoids, banking rolls, flutter, and landing gear tests. Pay close attention to the pilot’s view and the radio chatter, and you’ll hear that they’re hovering around Mach 0.98 in some cases–just underneath the point of generating a shock wave around the aircraft. It will be neat to see what happens when they finally do go supersonic. Will it be as quiet as promised? (Video credit: NASA; image credit: NASA/L. Losey; see also NASA; via Gizmodo)

    Fediverse Reactions
  • Supersonic Jet Interaction

    Supersonic Jet Interaction

    When supersonic jets get emitted into rarefied air, they behave differently than they do in regular atmospheric conditions. Here, researchers picture three different configurations these jets can take. In the top image, the jets are close enough together that they appear to merge into a narrow supersonic jet. In the middle image, the jets are not quite as close together. They merge but form what appears to be a subsonic wake. In the final image, the jets are far enough apart that they don’t merge, although they do appear to “lean in” toward one another. (Image credit: S. Lee et al.)

    Research poster showing two supersonic jets interacting in a rarefied atmosphere.
    Fediverse Reactions
  • Imaging a New Era of Supersonic Travel

    Imaging a New Era of Supersonic Travel

    Supersonic commercial travel was briefly possible in the twentieth century when the Concorde flew. But the window-rattling sonic boom of that aircraft made governments restrict supersonic travel over land. Now a new generation of aviation companies are revisiting the concept of supersonic commercial travel with technologies that help dampen the irritating effects of a plane’s shock waves.

    One such company, Boom Supersonic, partnered with NASA to capture the above schlieren image of their experimental XB-1 aircraft in flight. The diagonal lines spreading from the nose, wings, and tail of the aircraft mark shock waves. It’s those shock waves’ interactions with people and buildings on the ground that causes problems. But the XB-1 is testing out scalable methods for producing weaker shock waves that dissipate before reaching people down below, thus reducing the biggest source of complaints about supersonic flight over land. (Image credit: Boom Supersonic/NASA; via Quartz)

    The XB-1 test aircraft in flight.
    Fediverse Reactions
  • An Exoplanet’s Supersonic Jet Stream

    An Exoplanet’s Supersonic Jet Stream

    WASP-127b is a hot Jupiter-type exoplanet located about 520 light-years from us. A new study of the planet’s atmosphere reveals a supersonic jet stream whipping around its equatorial region at 9 kilometers per second. For comparison, our Solar System’s fastest winds, on Neptune, are a comparatively paltry 0.5 kilometers per second. The team estimates the speed of sound — which depends on temperature and the atmosphere’s chemical make-up — on WASP-127b as about 3 kilometers per second, far below the measured wind speed. The planet’s poles, in contrast, are much colder and have far lower wind speeds.

    Of course, these measurements can only give us a snapshot of what the exoplanet’s atmosphere is like; we don’t have altitude data, for example, to see how the wind speed varies with height. Nevertheless, it shows that exoplanets beyond our planetary system can have some unimaginably wild weather. (Video and image credit: ESO/L. Calçada; research credit: L. Nortmann et al.; via Gizmodo)

    Fediverse Reactions
  • Reapproaching Supersonic Air Travel

    Reapproaching Supersonic Air Travel

    Before the Concorde even began regular flights, protests over its sound levels caused the U.S. and many other countries to ban overland commercial supersonic flight. Those restrictions have stood for fifty years. But NASA and Lockheed Martin Aeronautics are hoping to make supersonic air travel a possibility again with their experimental X-59 aircraft, designed to have a much quieter sonic boom.

    In supersonic flight, every curve, bolt, and bump generates a shock wave, and these waves tend to coalesce at the front and back of the aircraft, creating strong leading and trailing shocks. It’s these shock waves that are responsible for the double sonic boom that rattles windows and startles those of us on the ground. The X-59 reduces its noise by spreading out those shock waves, a feat designers managed with heavy reliance on computational fluid dynamics. They used wind tunnel studies mainly for validation, since iterating designs in the wind tunnel was far slower than working computationally. With the initial aircraft built, the team will now do test flights and, starting in 2026, will fly over the public and solicit feedback on whether the aircraft is acceptably quiet. (Image credit: NASA; via Physics Today)

    The sound of the X-59's sonic boom compared to other familiar sound levels.
    The sound of the X-59’s sonic boom compared to other familiar sound levels.
  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Challenges of Commercial Supersonic Flight

    Years ago as I sat on a plane taxiing at Heathrow, I caught a glimpse of a Concorde out on the tarmac. My classmates couldn’t understand why I was so excited to see that funny looking plane, but even as a high schooler, I was fascinated by the prospect of flying faster than sound.

    Unfortunately, there are a lot of challenges to overcome in making supersonic flight widely available — fuel efficiency, cost effectiveness, and sonic boom control, to name a few. This video delves into some of the major issues and touches on some of the recent work at NASA and other organizations studying the problem. Perhaps as new technologies develop and mature we’ll once again see faster-than-sound air travel outside of rocket launches and military jets. (Video and image credit: TED-Ed)

  • Testing a Supersonic Car

    Testing a Supersonic Car

    How do you test a supersonic car like the Bloodhound SSC in a wind tunnel? With free-flying objects like airplanes, wind tunnel testing is relatively straightforward. Mounting a stationary model in a supersonic flow gives an equivalent flow-field to that object flying through still air at supersonic speeds. The same does not hold true for the supersonic car, though, because you need to account for the effect of the ground on airflow. One option is to build a moving wall in the wind tunnel. For low-speed applications, this is feasible but incredibly complicated and very expensive. For supersonic speeds, it’s impossible. You could achieve the same moving-wall effect at supersonic speeds with a rocket sled, but that is also expensive and difficult to fit in most experimental facilities. The simplest solution is the one you see above – build two models and mount them belly-to-belly. Reflecting the models makes the plane of symmetry a stagnation plane, which, fluid dynamically speaking, acts like an imaginary ground plane relative to the model. For more on the project and the technique, check out this article.  (Photo credit: B. Evans; via ThinkFLIP; submitted by G. Doig)

  • AEDC 16-ft Supersonic Tunnel

    AEDC 16-ft Supersonic Tunnel

    This 1960 photo shows three men standing inside Arnold Engineering Development Complex’s 16-ft supersonic wind tunnel facility. The wind tunnel was capable of Mach numbers between 1.60 and 4.75 through a test section 4.8 meters wide and 20.2 meters long. It served as a large-scale testing facility for aircraft and propulsion systems. Like many large-scale and high-speed wind tunnel facilities in the United States, it is no longer active. In recent years, many unique wind tunnel facilities at NASA, military bases, and universities have been closed down, depriving researchers and engineers of the ability to include large-scale testing in their design and development of new technologies. These facility closures leave a substantial gap between the speeds and Reynolds numbers achievable in small-scale experiments and computational fluid dynamics and those experienced in flight. (Photo credit: P. Tarver)

  • Controlling Supersonic Flight

    Controlling Supersonic Flight

    The forces on an object in flight come from the distribution of pressure on the surface. To alter an object’s trajectory, one has to shift the pressure distribution. On subsonic and transonic aircraft, this is usually done with control surfaces like an aileron, but at supersonic speeds this can require a lot of force. The schlieren images above show an alternative approach in which a plasma actuator near the nosetip generates asymmetric forces on the cone. The actuator discharges plasma at t=0, and flow is from left to right. In the first image, the bubble of plasma is expanding on the upper side of the cone, disrupting the nearby shock wave. Over time, it moves downstream, carrying its disruption with it. The asymmetric effect of the plasma causes uneven pressures on either side of the cone that can be triggered in order to turn it in flight.  (Photo credit: P. Gnemmi and C. Rey)