Search results for: “supersonic”

Imaging a New Era of Supersonic Travel
Supersonic commercial travel was briefly possible in the twentieth century when the Concorde flew. But the window-rattling sonic boom of that aircraft made governments restrict supersonic travel over land. Now a new generation of aviation companies are revisiting the concept of supersonic commercial travel with technologies that help dampen the irritating effects of a plane’s shock waves.
One such company, Boom Supersonic, partnered with NASA to capture the above schlieren image of their experimental XB-1 aircraft in flight. The diagonal lines spreading from the nose, wings, and tail of the aircraft mark shock waves. It’s those shock waves’ interactions with people and buildings on the ground that causes problems. But the XB-1 is testing out scalable methods for producing weaker shock waves that dissipate before reaching people down below, thus reducing the biggest source of complaints about supersonic flight over land. (Image credit: Boom Supersonic/NASA; via Quartz)
Fediverse Reactions
March 24, 2025
An Exoplanet’s Supersonic Jet Stream
WASP-127b is a hot Jupiter-type exoplanet located about 520 light-years from us. A new study of the planet’s atmosphere reveals a supersonic jet stream whipping around its equatorial region at 9 kilometers per second. For comparison, our Solar System’s fastest winds, on Neptune, are a comparatively paltry 0.5 kilometers per second. The team estimates the speed of sound — which depends on temperature and the atmosphere’s chemical make-up — on WASP-127b as about 3 kilometers per second, far below the measured wind speed. The planet’s poles, in contrast, are much colder and have far lower wind speeds.
Of course, these measurements can only give us a snapshot of what the exoplanet’s atmosphere is like; we don’t have altitude data, for example, to see how the wind speed varies with height. Nevertheless, it shows that exoplanets beyond our planetary system can have some unimaginably wild weather. (Video and image credit: ESO/L. Calçada; research credit: L. Nortmann et al.; via Gizmodo)
Fediverse Reactions
February 11, 2025
Reapproaching Supersonic Air Travel
Before the Concorde even began regular flights, protests over its sound levels caused the U.S. and many other countries to ban overland commercial supersonic flight. Those restrictions have stood for fifty years. But NASA and Lockheed Martin Aeronautics are hoping to make supersonic air travel a possibility again with their experimental X-59 aircraft, designed to have a much quieter sonic boom.
In supersonic flight, every curve, bolt, and bump generates a shock wave, and these waves tend to coalesce at the front and back of the aircraft, creating strong leading and trailing shocks. It’s these shock waves that are responsible for the double sonic boom that rattles windows and startles those of us on the ground. The X-59 reduces its noise by spreading out those shock waves, a feat designers managed with heavy reliance on computational fluid dynamics. They used wind tunnel studies mainly for validation, since iterating designs in the wind tunnel was far slower than working computationally. With the initial aircraft built, the team will now do test flights and, starting in 2026, will fly over the public and solicit feedback on whether the aircraft is acceptably quiet. (Image credit: NASA; via Physics Today)
The sound of the X-59’s sonic boom compared to other familiar sound levels.
April 15, 2024
Challenges of Commercial Supersonic Flight
Years ago as I sat on a plane taxiing at Heathrow, I caught a glimpse of a Concorde out on the tarmac. My classmates couldn’t understand why I was so excited to see that funny looking plane, but even as a high schooler, I was fascinated by the prospect of flying faster than sound.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of challenges to overcome in making supersonic flight widely available — fuel efficiency, cost effectiveness, and sonic boom control, to name a few. This video delves into some of the major issues and touches on some of the recent work at NASA and other organizations studying the problem. Perhaps as new technologies develop and mature we’ll once again see faster-than-sound air travel outside of rocket launches and military jets. (Video and image credit: TED-Ed)
June 24, 2021
Supersonic Commercial Flight
April 21, 2021
Testing a Supersonic Car
How do you test a supersonic car like the Bloodhound SSC in a wind tunnel? With free-flying objects like airplanes, wind tunnel testing is relatively straightforward. Mounting a stationary model in a supersonic flow gives an equivalent flow-field to that object flying through still air at supersonic speeds. The same does not hold true for the supersonic car, though, because you need to account for the effect of the ground on airflow. One option is to build a moving wall in the wind tunnel. For low-speed applications, this is feasible but incredibly complicated and very expensive. For supersonic speeds, it’s impossible. You could achieve the same moving-wall effect at supersonic speeds with a rocket sled, but that is also expensive and difficult to fit in most experimental facilities. The simplest solution is the one you see above – build two models and mount them belly-to-belly. Reflecting the models makes the plane of symmetry a stagnation plane, which, fluid dynamically speaking, acts like an imaginary ground plane relative to the model. For more on the project and the technique, check out this article. (Photo credit: B. Evans; via ThinkFLIP; submitted by G. Doig)
February 25, 2015
AEDC 16-ft Supersonic Tunnel
This 1960 photo shows three men standing inside Arnold Engineering Development Complex’s 16-ft supersonic wind tunnel facility. The wind tunnel was capable of Mach numbers between 1.60 and 4.75 through a test section 4.8 meters wide and 20.2 meters long. It served as a large-scale testing facility for aircraft and propulsion systems. Like many large-scale and high-speed wind tunnel facilities in the United States, it is no longer active. In recent years, many unique wind tunnel facilities at NASA, military bases, and universities have been closed down, depriving researchers and engineers of the ability to include large-scale testing in their design and development of new technologies. These facility closures leave a substantial gap between the speeds and Reynolds numbers achievable in small-scale experiments and computational fluid dynamics and those experienced in flight. (Photo credit: P. Tarver)
May 29, 2014
Controlling Supersonic Flight
The forces on an object in flight come from the distribution of pressure on the surface. To alter an object’s trajectory, one has to shift the pressure distribution. On subsonic and transonic aircraft, this is usually done with control surfaces like an aileron, but at supersonic speeds this can require a lot of force. The schlieren images above show an alternative approach in which a plasma actuator near the nosetip generates asymmetric forces on the cone. The actuator discharges plasma at t=0, and flow is from left to right. In the first image, the bubble of plasma is expanding on the upper side of the cone, disrupting the nearby shock wave. Over time, it moves downstream, carrying its disruption with it. The asymmetric effect of the plasma causes uneven pressures on either side of the cone that can be triggered in order to turn it in flight. (Photo credit: P. Gnemmi and C. Rey)
January 27, 2014
Supersonic Oil Flow Viz
This image shows oil-flow visualization of a cylindrical roughness element on a flat plate in supersonic flow. The flow direction is from left to right. In this technique, a thin layer of high-viscosity oil is painted over the surface and dusted with green fluorescent powder. Once the supersonic tunnel is started, the model gets injected in the flow for a few seconds, then retracted. After the run, ultraviolet lighting illuminates the fluorescent powder, allowing researchers to see how air flowed over the surface. Image (a) shows the flat plate without roughness; there is relatively little variation in the oil distribution. Image (b) includes a 1-mm high, 4-mm wide cylinder. Note bow-shaped disruption upstream of the roughness and the lines of alternating light and dark areas that wrap around the roughness and stretch downstream. These lines form where oil has been moved from one region and concentrated in another, usually due to vortices in the roughness wake. Image © shows the same behavior amplified yet further by the 4-mm high, 4-mm wide cylinder that sticks up well beyond the edge of the boundary layer. Such images, combined with other methods of flow visualization, help scientists piece together the structures that form due to surface roughness and how these affect downstream flow on vehicles like the Orion capsule during atmospheric re-entry. (Photo credit: P. Danehy et al./NASA Langley #)
February 11, 2013
Supersonic Bubble Shock Waves
Supercomputing has been an enormous boon to fluid dynamics over the past few decades. Many problems, like the interaction between a supersonic shock wave and a bubble, are too complicated for analytical solutions and difficult to measure experimentally. Numerical simulation of the problem, combined with visualization of key variables, adds invaluable understanding. Here a shock wave strikes a helium bubble at Mach 3, and the subsequent interactions in terms of density and vorticity are shown. This situation is relevant to a number of applications, such as supersonic combustion and shockwave lithotripsy–a medical technique in which kidney stones are broken up inside the body using shock waves. After impact, an air jet forms and penetrates the center of the structure while the outer regions mix and form a persistent vortex ring. (Video credit: B. Hejazialhosseini et al.; via Physics Buzz)
December 4, 2012

More posts