Search results for: “drag”

Water Jumping Hoops
Small creatures like springtails and spiders can jump off the air-water interface using surface tension. But larger creatures can water-jump, too, using drag. Here, researchers study drag-based water jumping with a simple elastic hoop. Initially, two sides of the hoop are pulled closer by a string, deforming the hoop. Then, with the hoop sitting upright on the air-water interface, a laser burns the string, releasing the energy stored in the hoop. The hoop’s bottom pushes into the water, generating drag. That resistance provides a reaction force strong enough to launch the hoop.
Compared to the hoop’s jumps off land, it’s slower to take-off from water, and it’s less efficient at jumping. Lighter hoops, however, jump better off water than heavier ones — a wrinkle that isn’t seen in ground jumpers. That suggests that weight reduction is more important for aquatic jumpers than for their terrestrial counterparts. (Image and research credit: H. Jeong et al.)
January 18, 2024
Swimming Through Mud
At the bottom of ponds, nematodes and other creatures swim in a world of mud. They squirm their way through a sediment of dirt particles suspended in water. Mud, of course, is notoriously impossible to see through, so to understand these creatures’ movements, scientists turn instead to biorobotics. Here, a team uses a magnetic head attached to an elastic tail to mimic these tiny creatures.
To drive the robot’s motion, they use an oscillating magnetic field, which forces the magnetic head to rotate. Combined with the elastic tail and the drag caused by surrounding materials, this causes the robot to swim in a fashion similar to its biological inspirations.
A biomimetic robot swims through immersed grains. The robot’s magnetic head is forced with an oscillating magnetic field. It swims through an underwater bed of hydrogel beads, with diameters smaller than that of the robot’s head.
To mimic the muddy environment of a pond’s bottom, scientists used a bed of hydrogel beads immersed in water. Looking at the experimental video above, you’ll see no sign of the beads. That’s because the hydrogel beads have nearly the same index of refraction as water. Once you pour water in, they seem to disappear. That allows the researchers to focus instead on the robot’s motion. In other experiments, they added dye to the beads so that they could see how they moved around the robot.
They found that the robot’s motion fluidizes the grains around it. Effectively, the robot’s motion creates an area with fewer grains and more water for it to move through. Once it’s passed, however, more grains settle in, and the bed returns to a denser packing. (Image credit: nematode – P. Garcelon, experiment – A. Biswas et al.; research credit: A. Biswas et al.)
November 13, 2023
Butterfly Scales
Catch a butterfly, and you’ll notice a dust-like residue left behind on your fingers. These are tiny scales from the butterfly’s wing. Under a microscope, those scales overlap like shingles all over the wing. Their downstream edges tilt upward, leaving narrow gaps between one scale and the next. Experiments show that, although butterflies can fly without their scales, these tiny features make a big difference in their efficiency.
At the microscale, a butterfly’s scales overlap like roof shingles but are tilted upward, leaving cavities in the downstream direction.
When air flows over the scales, tiny vortices form in the gaps between. These laminar vortices act like roller bearings, helping the flow overhead move along with less friction and, thus, less drag. Compared to a smooth surface, the scales reduce skin friction on the wing by 26-45%. (Image credit: butterfly – E. Minuskin, scales – N. Slegers et al., experiment – S. Gautam; research credit: N. Slegers et al. and S. Gautam; via Physics Today)
This lab-scale experiment shows how air moves over butterfly scales. As flow moves from left to right, small persistent vortices form in the gaps between scales. These act like roller bearings that reduce the skin friction from air moving past.
September 21, 2023
Fish Fins Work Together
Researchers studying how fish swim have long focused on their tail fins and the flows created there. But a fish’s other fins have important effects, too, as seen in this recent study. Researchers built a CFD simulation based on observations of a swimming rainbow trout, focusing on the flow from its back and tail fins. They found that the vortex created by the back fin stabilizes and strengthens the one generated by the tail. It also played a role in reducing drag on the fish by maintaining the pressure difference across the body. When they tried changing the size and geometry of the fins, the fish’s efficiency suffered, indicating that evolution has already optimized the trout’s fins for swimming efficiency. (Image credits: top – J. Sailer, simulation – J. Guo et al.; research credit: J. Guo et al.; via APS Physics)
Visualization of flow around a digitized rainbow trout.
August 24, 2023
Anchoring Mussels
Mussels live in rough conditions, constantly pummeled by waves and turbulent currents. They hold themselves fast in the flow using dozens of byssel threads (commonly called a mussel’s beard) that anchor them to rocks and other mussels. The threads get built within the mussel’s foot, the tongue-like protrusion mussels use to drag themselves. The threads are similar to our ligaments: strong and stretchy. Each one is cemented securely using an adhesive that hardens in water. If engineers could replicate that adhesive, it would be fantastic for use in medicine. (Video and image credit: Deep Look)
May 10, 2023
Honeybee Feeding
Busy bees feed on millions of flowers for each kilogram of honey they produce. To gather nectar, bees use their hairy tongues, which project out of a sheath-like cover. Protraction (i.e., sticking their tongue out) is relatively fast because all the hairs on the tongue initially lie flat. In the nectar, those hairs flare out, creating a miniature forest that traps viscous nectar and drags it back into the bee during retraction.
Bees feed by projecting their tongues into nectar. Tongue extension is faster because the tongue’s hairs lie flat. During the slower retraction phase, the hairs flare out, trapping nectar and pulling it back into the bee.
Through modeling and experiments, researchers found that the time it takes a bee to retract its tongue depends on the bee’s overall mass. Smaller bees are slower to the retract their tongues, likely to allow enough time for their shorter tongues to capture enough nectar. With bee populations on the decline, the team’s predictions may help communities select flowers with nectar concentrations that best fit their local bees’ needs. (Image credits: top – J. Szabó, bee eating – B. Wang et al.; research credit: B. Wang et al.; via APS Physics)
May 2, 2023
A Bubble’s Path
Centuries ago, Leonardo da Vinci noticed something peculiar about bubbles rising through water. Small bubbles followed a straight path, but slightly larger ones swung back and forth or corkscrewed upward. The mechanism behind this behavior has been a matter of debate ever since, but the authors of a recent study believe they’ve nailed down the answer.
The forces determining a bubble’s path are remarkably complex, which is why it’s taken so long to figure this out. Viscosity acts as a source of drag on the rising bubble, acting across a thin boundary region surrounding the bubble. That boundary isn’t constant, though; the bubble’s shape changes as the flow pushes on it, and the changing shape of the bubble pushes on the flow, in turn. Capturing those subtle interactions numerically and comparing them to careful experiments was necessary to unravel the mystery.
The team found that bubbles above a critical radius (0.926 millimeters) begin to tilt. That tilt causes a change in the bubble’s shape, which increases the flow along one side. This kicks off the wobbling motion, which carries on because of the continuing changes in the bubble’s shape and the flow around it. (Image credit: A. Grey; research credit: M. Herrada and J. Eggers; via Vice; submitted by @lediva)
March 9, 2023
Swimming Intermittently
Many fish do not swim continuously; instead, they use an intermittent motion, swimming in a sudden burst and then coasting. This intermittent swimming is tough to simulate, due to its unsteady nature, but a new study does so using some clever computational techniques.
Animation showing a fish swimming in a burst-and-coast pattern.
Researchers suspected that the energy intensity of a fish’s burst could be balanced by the low-drag, low-effort phase of coasting. And, indeed, that’s consistent with the team’s results. But they found that the swimming method does require careful optimization; with the wrong cadence, the burst-and-coast technique can be incredibly energy intensive. In nature, of course, fish have had millions of years to optimize their technique, but the results serve as a warning to those building fish-based robots. Those biorobots will need careful optimization to benefit from this swimming style. (Image credit: tetra – Adobe Stock Images, simulation – G. Li et al.; research credit: G. Li et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
February 21, 2023
Snowing in the Core
Some rocky planetary bodies, like Jupiter‘s moon Ganymede, generate magnetic fields through snow-like, solid precipitation that falls in their liquid metal cores. To study this peculiar and complex arrangement, researchers look at sugar grains falling through — and dissolving into — water. The solid sugar grains mimic the iron snowflakes that fall in Ganymede’s core. As they sink, they drag fluid with them. But the grains can also dissolve, making the fluid around them denser and prone to sinking even faster. The dense, sinking flows trigger buoyant convection inside the surrounding fluid.
As seen in the experiments, there are many factors competing here. Large grains dissolve more slowly and are able to drag more fluid with them as they fall. Small grains, on the other hand, dissolve quickly, causing more buoyancy-driven flows. Laboratory analogs like these help scientists unravel the complexities of situations we cannot observe otherwise. (Image and video credit: Q. Kriaa et al.)
December 28, 2022
Why Moths Are Slow Fliers
Hawkmoths and other insects are slow fliers compared to birds, even ones that can hover. To understand why these insects top out at 5 m/s, researchers simulated their flight from hovering to forward flight at 4 m/s. They analyzed real hawkmoths flying in wind tunnels to build their simulated insects, then studied their digital moths with computational fluid dynamics.
During hovering flight, they found that hawkmoths generate equal amounts of lift with their upstroke and downstroke. As the moth transitions into forward flight, though, its wing orientation shifts to reduce drag, and the upstroke stops being so helpful. Instead, the upstroke generates a downward lift that the downstroke has to counter in addition to the insect’s weight. At higher forward speeds, this trend gets even worse.
The final verdict? Hawkmoths don’t have the flexibility to twist their wings on the upstroke the way birds do to avoid that large downward lift. Since they can’t mitigate that negative lift, the insects have a slower top speed overall. (Image and research credit: S. Lionetti et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
December 8, 2022

More posts