FYFD

Search results for: “art”

  • Stone Skipping Physics

    Stone Skipping Physics

    The current record for stone-skipping is about 88 skips. For most of us, that’s an unimaginably high number, but according to physicists, human throwers may top out around 300 or 350 skips. In the video above and the accompanying article, Wired reporter Robbie Gonzalez explores both the technique of a world-record-holding skip and the physics that enable it.

    The perfect skip requires many ingredients: a large, flat rock with good edges; a strong throw to spin the rock and hold it steady at the right angle of attack; and a good first contact with the right entry angle and force to set up the skips’ trajectory. The video is long, but it’s well worth a full watch. It gives you an inside look both at a master skipper and at the experts of skipping science. (Video and image credit: Wired; see also: Splash Lab, C. Clanet et al.; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

    ETA: Wired’s embed code is acting up, so if you can’t see the stone skipping video here, just go to the article directly.

    Heads up for those going to the APS DFD meeting! You can catch my talk Monday, Nov. 19th at 5:10PM in Room B206. I’ll be talking about how to use narrative devices to tell scientific stories. I’ll be around for the whole meeting, so feel free to come say hi!

  • Sheep as a Compressible Flow

    Not everything that flows is a fluid. And when viewed from above traffic, crowds, and even herds of sheep flow in patterns like those of a fluid. In particular, these conglomerations move like compressible fluids – ones that allow substantial changes in density as they flow. From above, each sheep is just a few pixels of white, but you can see which areas of the herd have the highest density by how white an area looks. The highest density regions also tend to be the slowest moving – not surprising in a crowd.

    Now watch the gates. They act like choke points in the flow and, to some extent, like a nozzle in supersonic flow. As the sheep approach the gate, they’re in a dense, slow moving clump, but as they pass through it, the sheep speed up and spread out. This is exactly what happens in a supersonic nozzle. On the upstream end, flow in the nozzle is subsonic and dense. But once the flow hits the speed of sound at the narrowest point in the nozzle, the opening on the downstream side allows the flow to spread out and speed up past Mach 1.  (Video credit: MuzMuzTV*; submitted by Trent D.)

    *Editor’s Note: I do my best to credit the original producers of any media featured on FYFD, but this is especially difficult with viral videos as there can be many copies, all of which are uncredited. I’ve made my best guess on this one, but if this is your video, please let me know so that I can credit you properly. Thanks!

  • Hovering

    Hovering

    Nectar-drinking species of hummingbirds and bats are both excellent at hovering – one of the toughest aerodynamic feats – but they each have their own ways of doing it. Hummingbirds (bottom) use a nearly horizontal stroke pattern that’s quite symmetric on both the up- and downstroke. To keep generating lift in the upstroke, they twist their wings strongly midway through the stroke. So although hummingbirds get most of their lift from the downstroke, they get quite a bit from the upstroke as well.

    Bats, on the other hand, use an asymmetric wingbeat pattern when hovering. Bats flap in a diagonal stroke pattern, using a high angle of attack in the downstroke and an even higher one during the upstroke. They also retract their wings partially during the upstroke. This flapping pattern gives them weak lift during the upstroke, which they compensate for with a stronger downstroke. Compared to non-hovering bat species, nectar-drinking bats do get more lift during the upstroke, but they’re nowhere near as good as the hummingbirds. The bats compensate by having much larger wings compared to their body size. Bigger wings mean more lift.

    In the end, the two types of hovering cost roughly the same amount of power per gram of body weight. That’s great news for engineers designing the next generation of flapping robots because it suggests two very different, but equally power-efficient methods for hovering. (Image credit: Lentink Lab/Science News, source; research credit: R. Ingersoll et al.; via Science News; submitted by Kam Yung-Soh) 

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Making a Square Vortex

    As someone who has played with her share of vortex cannons, I can assure you that messing around with smoke generators and vortex rings is a lot of fun. And in this video, Dianna gives things a little twist: she makes the vortex cannon’s mouth a square instead of a circle.

    Now, that doesn’t create a square vortex ring. (Vortex rings don’t really do 90-degree corners.) But it does make the vortex ring all neat and wobbly. Whenever you have two vortices near one another (or, in this case, two parts of a vortex line near one another), they interact. As Dianna shows with hurricanes, depending on the direction of rotation and their relative strength, nearby vortices can orbit one another or travel together in straight lines – or they can cause more complicated interactions, like in the case of the square-launched rings.

    I think there may also be some interesting effects here from vortex stretching, but that’s a topic for another day! (Video and image credit: D. Cowern/Physics Girl; see also: LIBLAB; submitted by Maria-Isabel C.)

  • Carbonation in Microgravity

    Carbonation in Microgravity

    Bubbly beverages are popular among humans, but there’s surprising complexity underlying their seemingly simply carbonation, as explored in a new Physics Today article. Most drinks get their bubbles from carbon dioxide, which at higher than atmospheric pressures, can stay dissolved inside water and other liquids. When that pressure gets released, any carbon-dioxide-filled gas cavity in the liquid adopts the allowable saturation concentration for the ambient pressure, which sets up a concentration gradient of carbon dioxide  between the liquid and the bubble. That causes carbon dioxide gas to diffuse into the bubbles, making them grow. 

    Here on Earth, those growing bubbles are buoyant, and they form rising plumes of bubbles. They continue gathering carbon dioxide as they rise, making them grow ever larger (lower left). In microgravity, on the other hand, the bubbles congregate where they form and continue growing through diffusion (lower right). This is one reason carbonated beverages are unpopular in space – instead of rising to the surface and escaping, all the carbon dioxide in a drink gets consumed, leaving astronauts with no way to expel it aside from burping!

    For lots more fascinating facts about bubbly drinks – including how they relate to geology! – check out the full Physics Today article. (Image credits: beer – rawpixel; bubbles – P. Vega-Martínez et al.; see also: R. Zenit and J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez)

  • Nacreous Clouds

    Nacreous Clouds

    During winter, the polar skies can ignite with mother-of-pearl-like iridescence. Polar stratospheric clouds – also known as nacreous clouds – are a rare, beautiful, and destructive type of cloud found only in high latitudes at altitudes of 15 – 25 km. They are formed from tiny crystals of ice and nitric acid, and they shine brightest a few hours before sunrise or after sunset, when sunlight shines on them but not the surface. Their destructive side is connected with ozone depletion; they serve as reaction sites for chlorofluorocarbons in the atmosphere to react and produce ozone-destroying molecules. The clouds may have cultural significance as well; at least one study suggests they were part of Munch’s inspiration for “The Scream”. (Image credit: A. Light; via Gizmodo)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    “Float”

    In “Float” artist Susi Sie uses water and oil to create a whimsical landscape of bubbles and droplets. Coalescence is a major player in the action, though Sie uses some clever time manipulations to make her bubbles and droplets multiply as well. Watching coalescence in reverse feels like seeing mitosis happen before your eyes. (Video and image credit: S. Sie)

  • What Makes Turbulence So Hard

    What Makes Turbulence So Hard

    Turbulence – that pestersome, unpredictable, and chaotic state of flow – has been a thorn in the sides of mathematicians, physicists, and engineers for centuries. It is certainly one of – if not the – oldest unsolved problem in physics. Over at Ars Technica, Lee Phillips has a nice overview of the situation, including what makes the problem so difficult:

    The Navier-Stokes equation is difficult to solve because it is nonlinear. This word is thrown around quite a bit, but here it means something specific. You can build up a complicated solution to a linear equation by adding up many simple solutions. An example you may be aware of is sound: the equation for sound waves is linear, so you can build up a complex sound by adding together many simple sounds of different frequencies (“harmonics”). Elementary quantum mechanics is also linear; the Schrödinger equation allows you to add together solutions to find a new solution.

    But fluid dynamics doesn’t work this way: the nonlinearity of the Navier-Stokes equation means that you can’t build solutions by adding together simpler solutions. This is part of the reason that Heisenberg’s mathematical genius, which served him so well in helping to invent quantum mechanics, was put to such a severe test when it came to turbulence. 

    Phillips goes on to describe some of the many methods researchers use to unravel the mysteries of turbulence computationally, experimentally, and theoretically. This is a great introduction for those curious to get a sense of how turbulence, stability theory, and computational fluid dynamics all fit together. (Image credits: L. Da Vinci; NASA; see also: Ars Technica; submitted by Kam Yung-Soh)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Inside Hurricane Maria

    In addition to looking outward, NASA constantly monitors our own planet using a suite of satellites. In this video, they visualize data taken by the Global Precipitation Measurement Core Observatory of Hurricane Maria two days before it hit Puerto Rico. Instruments on board the satellite measure both liquid and frozen precipitation, giving scientists – and now the public – a glimpse into the heart of a developing hurricane. Be sure to take a look around; it’s a 360-degree video, and I bet it’s even more spectacular in VR. Having a trove of data like this helps researchers better understand the processes that influence a strengthening hurricane, which ultimately allows them to make better predictions about hurricane behavior in order to save lives. (Video credit: NASA; via Francesco C.)

  • A Splat is Born

    One day calligrapher Mae Nguyen accidentally squeezed a droplet out of her waterbrush pen, and a fun, new technique was born. Nguyen sometimes uses the arrays of droplets to paint and other times blows on them to create colorful splatters, like in the video above. I’d love to see the latter technique, in particular, in slow motion! I expect there is some really cool mixing as the droplets coalesce. Check out more of Nguyen’s work on her website and Instagram account. (Video credit: M. Nguyen)

More posts