FYFD

Category: Research

  • Juno’s Citizen Science

    Juno’s Citizen Science

    The Juno mission’s JunoCam has been producing stunning photos each time the spacecraft swoops past Jupiter. The instrument has a planning team, but its primary use is for citizen scientists, who have been suggesting images to take each orbit and have been processing those images. Most of the photos we see are like the one on the left above – photos that have been heavily color-enhanced to highlight details. The image on the right shows what Jupiter would look like to the human eye. Look closely, and you’ll catch many of the same colors and shapes in both photos. 

    At a recent conference, a member of JunoCam’s team presented scientific results that have come from the instrument, including analysis of Jupiter’s polar storm systems (8 vortices for the north pole and 5 for the south), tantalizing hints at Jovian equivalents to earthly cloud types, and more. She also announced a new Analysis page where members of the public can both see the science in progress and participate first-hand! (Image credit: NASA / SwRI / MSSS / G. Eichstädt / S. Doran; NASA / JPL-Caltech / SwRI / MSSS / B. Jónsson; via E. Lakdawalla; submitted by jshoer)

  • Water Atop Oil

    Water Atop Oil

    At first glance, this image looks much like the impact of any drop on a pool of the same liquid, but that’s not what you’re seeing. This is the impact of a water droplet on a thin film of oil, and the immiscibility of those two fluids has important effects on the collision. When the water drop impacts, it spreads and forms a compound crown that rises out of the fluid. Eventually, that momentum runs out and the crown falls into the liquid.

    Water’s intermolecular forces are strong enough to pull the remains of the droplet back in on itself. As that fluid collides at the center, it gets forced up into a central jet with enough energy to eject a droplet or two at its tip. Even though this looks like a Worthington jet, it’s not. Worthington jets form after the collapse of a cavity in the impacted liquid – in other words, they form on pools, not on films. Despite the visual similarity, this central jet is formed entirely differently! (Image and research credit: Z. Che and O. Matar, source; submitted by O. Matar)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Jumping Droplets

    Condensation, which removes heat by changing a vapor into a liquid, is a common feature in industrial heat transfer. When droplets form on surfaces, they typically have to grow to millimeter size before gravity causes them to slide off and open up the surface to new droplet formation. Hydrophobic surfaces can shed droplets a little sooner. Droplets only 100 micrometers in size will spontaneously jump off hydrophobic surfaces due to the release of excess surface energy during droplet coalescence, but this only happens when those droplets have a small contact area with the surface. Defects in the nanoscale structure of the surface can allow water to squeeze in between posts and hold on.

    To counter this, new experiments packed copper nanowires into a dense 3D array. This permits fewer defects and helps condensing droplets leap from the surface sooner. Each droplet carries away a bit of the surface’s heat. The new method is impressively efficient at it. Researchers found the new heat exchanger could remove 100% more heat than previous hydrophobic designs. (Video credit: Science; research credit: R. Wen et al.)

  • Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics: Droplet Tunneling

    Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics: Droplet Tunneling

    This post is part of a collaborative series with FYP on pilot-wave hydrodynamics. Previous posts: 1) Introduction; 2) Chladni patterns; 3) Faraday instability; 4) Walking droplets; 5) Droplet lattices; 6) Quantum double-slit experiments; 7) Hydro single- and double-slit experiments; 8) Quantum tunneling

    Quantum tunneling  is a strange subatomic behavior that was first described to explain how alpha particles escape a nucleus during radioactive decay. Classically, a particle trapped in a well can only escape if its energy is sufficiently high, but in quantum mechanics, even a particle with lower-than-necessary energy can occasionally “tunnel” out.

    To test whether hydrodynamic walkers can tunnel, researchers built corrals. In the central region, the pool on which the walker moves is relatively deep. Over the walls, the pool is much shallower. In this shallow area, the wave from the droplet’s bouncing decays quickly, creating a partially reflective barrier. For most collisions, the walker reflects off the barrier. Other times, apparently at random, a collision results in the walker crossing the wall and tunneling out of its well.

    Over many experiments, researchers were able to construct a probabilistic view of walker tunneling. In quantum mechanics, a particle’s likelihood of tunneling out of a well depends on the particle’s energy and the well’s thickness. The analogs for a walker are velocity and barrier thickness. The thicker the barrier, the harder it is for a walker to tunnel through. Conversely, a faster walker has a higher probability of tunneling through a barrier of a given thickness. As the authors themselves observe:

    “Although our experiment is foreign to the quantum world, the similarity of the observed behaviors is intriguing.” #

    As we wrap up our series tomorrow, we’ll consider some of those similarities more deeply.

    (Image credits: A. Eddi et al., sources)

  • Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics: Slit Experiments

    Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics: Slit Experiments

    This post is part of a collaborative series with FYP on pilot-wave hydrodynamics. Previous entries: 1) Introduction; 2) Chladni patterns; 3) Faraday instability; 4) Walking droplets; 5) Droplet lattices; 6) Quantum double-slit experiments

    In quantum mechanics, the single and double-slit experiments are foundational. They demonstrate that light and elementary particles like electrons have wave-like and particle-like properties, both of which are necessary to explain the behaviors observed. Similarly, a hydrodynamic walker consists of both a particle and a wave, so, perhaps unsurprisingly, researchers tested them in both single-slit and double-slit experiments.

    When a walker passes through a single-slit (top row), it’s deflected in a seemingly random direction due to its waves interacting with the slit. But if you watch enough walkers traverse the slit, you can put together a statistical representation of where the walker will get deflected. Compare that with the results for a series of photons passing through a slit one-at-a-time, and you’ll see a remarkable match-up.

    If you test the walker instead with two slits, the droplet can only pass through one slit, but its accompanying wave passes through both (bottom row). Let enough walkers through the system one-by-one, and they, like their photonic cousins, build up interference fringes that match the quantum experiment. Diffraction and interference are only a couple of the walkers’ tricks, however. In the next posts, we’ll take a look at another analog to quantum behavior: tunneling.

    (Image and research credits: Couder et al., source, selected papers 1, 2; images courtesy of E. Fort)

  • Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics: Walking Drops

    Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics: Walking Drops

    This post is a collaborative series with FYP on pilot-wave hydrodynamics. Previous entries: 1) Introduction; 2) Chladni patterns; 3) Faraday instability

    If you place a small droplet atop a vibrating pool, it will happily bounce like a kid on a trampoline. On the surface, this seems quite counterintuitive: why doesn’t the droplet coalesce with the pool? The answer: there’s a thin layer of air trapped between the droplet and the pool. If that air were squeezed out, the droplet would coalesce. But it takes a finite amount of time to drain that air layer away, even with the weight of the droplet bearing down on it. Before that drainage can happen, the vibration of the pool sends the droplet aloft again, refreshing the air layer beneath it. The droplet falls, gets caught on its air cushion, and then sent bouncing again before the air can squeeze out. If nothing disturbs the droplet, it can bounce almost indefinitely.

    image

    Droplets don’t always bounce in place, though. When forced with the right frequency and acceleration, a bouncing droplet can transition to walking. In this state, the droplet falls and strikes the pool such that it interacts with the ripple from its previous bounce. That sends the droplet aloft again but with a horizontal velocity component in addition to its vertical one. In this state, the droplet can wander about its container in a way that depends on its history or “memory” in the form of waves from its previous bounces. And this is where things start to get a bit weird – as in quantum weirdness – because now our walker consists of both a particle (droplet) and wave (ripples). The similarities between quantum behaviors and the walking droplets, the collective behavior of which is commonly referred to as “pilot-wave hydrodynamics,” are rather remarkable. In the next couple posts, we’ll take a look at some important quantum mechanical experiments and their hydrodynamic counterparts.

    (Image credit: D. Harris et al., source)

  • Gliding Lizards

    Gliding Lizards

    Flying lizards are truly gliders, but that doesn’t mean they’re unsophisticated. Newly reported observations of the species in the wild show that flying lizards don’t simply hold their forelimbs out a la Superman. Instead, they reach back with their forelimbs, pressing their arms into the underside of the thin patagium that serves as their flight surface while rotating their hands to grasp the upper side of the patagium. This forms a composite wing with a thicker leading edge and seems to be how the lizards control their glide. Close observation of their flight shows that, while holding their patagium, the lizards actively arch their backs to camber their composite wing. This can increase their maximum lift coefficient, allowing them to glide longer distances. (Image and research credit: J. Dehling, source)

  • Breaking Up Turbulence

    Breaking Up Turbulence

    Under most circumstances, we think about flows changing from ordered and laminar to random and turbulent. But it’s actually possible for disordered flows to become laminar again. This is what we see happening in the clip above. Upstream, the flow in this pipe is turbulent (left). Then four rotors are used to perturb the flow (center). This disrupts the turbulence and causes the flow to become laminar again downstream (right). To understand how this works, we have to talk about one of the fundamental concepts in turbulence: the energy cascade.

    Turbulent flows are known for their large range of length scales. Think about a volcanic plume, for example. Some of the turbulent motions in the plume may be a hundred meters across, but there are a continuous range of smaller scales as well, all the way down to a centimeter or less in size. In a turbulent flow, energy starts at the largest scales and flows further and further down until it reaches scales small enough that viscosity can extinguish them.

    That should offer a hint as to what’s happening here. The rotors are perturbing the flow, yes, but they’re also breaking the larger turbulent scales down into smaller ones. The smaller the largest lengthscales of the flow are, the more quickly their energy will decay to the smallest lengthscales where viscosity can damp them out. This is what we see here. Once the turbulent energy is concentrated at the smallest scales, viscosity damps them out and the flow returns to laminar. Check out the full video below for a cool sequence where the camera moves alongside the pipe so you can watch the turbulence fading as it moves downstream. (Image and video credit: J. Kühnen et al.)

    ETA: As it turns out, there’s more going on here than I’d originally thought. Simulations show that breaking up length scales is not the primary cause of relaminarization in this case. Instead, the rotors are modifying the velocity profile across the pipe in such a way that it tends to cause the turbulence to die out. The full paper is now out in Nature Physics and on arXiv.

  • The Fishbone

    The Fishbone

    The simple collision of two liquid jets can form striking and beautiful patterns. Here the two jets strike one another diagonally near the top of the animation. One is slanted into the screen; the other slants outward. At their point of contact, the liquid spreads into a sheet and forms what’s known as a fishbone pattern. The water forms a thicker rim at the edge of the sheet, and this rim destabilizes when surface tension can no longer balance the momentum of the fluid. Fingers of liquid form along the edge, stretching outward until they break apart into droplets. Ultimately, this instability tears the liquid sheet apart. Under the right conditions, all kinds of beautiful shapes form in a system like this. (Image credit: V. Sanjay et al., source)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Swimming Microdroplets

    Simple systems can sometimes have surprisingly complex behaviors. In this video, the Lutetium Project outlines a scheme for swimming microdroplets. Most of the droplets shown are just water, but they’re released into a chamber filled with a mixture of oil and surfactants. All flow through the chamber is shut off, but the droplets swim around in complicated, disordered patterns anyway. To see why, we have to zoom way in. The surfactant molecules in the oil cluster around the droplets, orienting so that their hydrophobic parts are in the oil and their hydrophilic parts point toward the water. They actually draw some of the water out of the droplets. This creates a variation in surface tension that causes Marangoni flow, making the droplets swim. Over time, the droplets shrink and slow down as the surfactants pull away more and more of their water and the variations in surface tension get smaller. (Image and video credit: The Lutetium Project; research credit: Z. Izri et al.)