FYFD

Category: Research

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    The Clever Cat’s Tongue

    Cats spend almost a quarter of their waking hours grooming, and their tongues are wonderfully specialized for this task, allowing them to clean, cool, and untangle themselves with ease. Anyone who’s ever been licked by a cat knows their tongues feel sandpaper-y. This is due to rear-facing hook-like structures called papillae that have a stiffness comparable to human fingernails.

    The papillae are hollow, and their U-shaped tip helps them wick up saliva, which the cat deposits deep into its undercoat when it licks. Although the papillae only hold about 5% of the volume of saliva on the cat’s tongue, this wicking action is key because most of the tongue surface can’t reach the inner coat; only the papillae do. The saliva that reaches these dense inner hairs is important not only for cleaning the fur, but for helping the cat cool off. As the saliva evaporates, it carries heat away with it, just like sweating does for us.

    The papillae are key to untangling fur, but their shape also makes it easy to remove hairs caught on the tongue. Researchers built a 3D-printed cat-inspired hair brush to show how efficient and easy to clean a cat’s tongue can be! (Video credit: Science; research credit: A. Noel and D. Hu)

  • What Drives Droplets

    What Drives Droplets

    There’s been a lot of interest recently in what goes on inside droplets made up of more than one fluid as they evaporate. This can be entertaining with liquids like whiskey or ouzo, but it has practical applications in ink-jet printing and manufacturing as well. And a new experiment suggests that we’ve been fundamentally wrong about what drives the flow inside these drops.

    As these drops evaporate, a donut-shaped recirculating vortex forms inside them, as seem in the cutaway views above. Conventional wisdom says that vortex is driven by surface tension. Evaporation of components like alcohol is more efficient at the edges of the drop, and as the alcohol evaporates, it creates a higher surface tension at the drop’s edge than at its peak. Marangoni forces then pull fluid down toward the edges, creating the vortex. That explanation is  consistent with observations of a sessile drop sitting on top of a surface (left side of images).

    But those observations are also consistent with another explanation: evaporating ethanol makes the local density higher, so alcohol-rich parts of the drop rise toward the peak while alcohol-poor regions sink. This difference in density would also create a flow pattern consistent with observations. So which is the real driver, surface tension or gravity?

    To find out, researchers flipped the drop upside-down (right side of images). When hanging, the preferred flow direction due to surface tension doesn’t change; flow should still go from the deepest point on the drop toward the edge. But gravity is swapped; alcohol-rich areas should be found near the edge and attachment points of the drop because buoyancy drives them there. And that is exactly what’s observed. The flow direction inside the hanging droplet is consistent with the direction prescribed by buoyancy-driven flow, thereby upending conventional wisdom. It turns out that gravity, not surface tension, is the major driver of internal flow in these multi-component droplets! (Image and research credit: A. Edwards et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Ricequakes

    Ricequakes

    Rockfill dams, sinkholes, ice shelves, and other geological features often consist of brittle, porous materials that are partially submerged. Over time, pressure and chemical reactions with the fluid around them can cause these structures to collapse, but it can take many, many years. 

    To study the physics behind this, researchers have turned to a new model: puffed rice cereal. Like their counterparts in nature, puffed rice grains contain micropores that slowly soften and get crushed after being wetted. Researchers filled their test container with puffed rice and put it under pressure to give the whole stack a constant stress. Then they injected milk in the bottom section of the container. After an immediate collapse in the wet material (lower left), the remaining grains collapsed slowly in a series of “ricequakes”. 

    As the micropores compacted, the cereal let out audible cracks that corresponded with the motion of a crushing wavefront (lower right). The time between ricequakes increased linearly and depended on pore size. The relationship was so consistent, researchers found, that they could predict how long the puffed rice stack had been wet simply by listening to the time between crackles! Experiments like these offer scientists an exciting chance to understand geological physics that would otherwise take up to millions of years to observe. (Image and research credit: I. Einav and F. Guillard; via Physics World; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Forming Asteroids

    Forming Asteroids

    Amidst the swirling gas and dust surrounding young stars, asteroids and planets form. Just how these bodies come together – especially before they are massive enough to exert any significant gravitational potential – is an open question. Researchers are trying to better understand the physics involved by studying how clusters of granular material behave when impacted. 

    Above you see footage from two experiments. Both take place in a drop tower under vacuum conditions. That means the effects of air drag and gravity are removed, just like in space. On the left, the cluster is made up of soft clumps of dust; on the right, the cluster contains hard glass beads. Surprisingly, the researchers found that the two different materials behave the same way. They were able to describe both sets of impacts with exactly the same model. This suggests there may be an underlying universal behavior behind all of these granular materials, though the researchers note more experiments are needed. (Image and research credit: H. Karsuragi and J. Blum; via APS Physics)

  • Making Waves in Cold Atoms

    Making Waves in Cold Atoms

    If you take a glass of water and tap on the side of it, you’ll generate waves on the water’s surface. The form of the waves depends on surface tension and gravity, and viscosity governs how quickly the waves fade away. In a recent experiment, researchers performed an equivalent tap for a container of ultra-cold atoms, and the results they found were odd indeed.

    The researchers used lithium-6 atoms chilled so close to absolute zero that they could form a superfluid. The “glass” they were contained in consisted of intersecting laser beams, and the “tap” came from toggling the intensity of one of the lasers. This created rippling waves through the atoms that the group could observe.

    Measuring at various temperatures, the group found that the waves in the atoms always decayed the way one expects for a classical fluid like water. Even when the atoms transitioned into a superfluid, the wave decay did not change. Since superfluids are considered to have zero viscosity, you’d expect their waves to decay more slowly, but it turns out, that’s not the case! (Image credit: F. Mittermeier; research credit: M. Zwierlein et al., see also; via Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Growing Droplets

    Growing Droplets

    The moisture in clouds eventually condenses into droplets that grow into raindrops and fall. Some steps in this process are well understood, but others are not. In particular, scientists have struggled with the problem of how droplets grow from about 30 microns to 80 microns, where they’re big enough to start falling and merging.

    Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations (below) have shown that turbulence can help drive small water drops together. When droplets are tiny and light, they simply follow the air flow. But when they’re a little heavier, turbulent eddies (seen in orange below) act like miniature centrifuges, flinging larger water droplets (shown in cyan below) out into clusters, where they’re more likely to collide with one another.

    Although this effect has been seen in experiments and simulation, it’s been difficult to capture in clouds themselves. But a new set of test flights (above) confirms that this mechanism is present in the wild as well! (Image credit: UCAR/NCAR Earth Observing Laboratory, P. Ireland et al., source; research credits: M. Larsen et al., P. Ireland et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

    image
  • Using Instabilities for Manufacturing

    Using Instabilities for Manufacturing

    Manufacturing textured, flexible surfaces can be difficult, but researchers are exploring ways to use fluid dynamical instabilities to make the process easier. They begin with a pourable polymer mixture that cures and solidifies over time. By putting the mixture on a cylinder and rotating it, engineers trigger the Rayleigh-Taylor instability – the same instability that makes dense fluids sink into lighter ones. Here, the instability is driven not only by gravity but by the added acceleration caused by centrifugal force. It causes the fluid film to drain and form arrays of droplets, which then cure into dimples. The researchers can control the size, shape, and spacing of the droplets by changing parameters like the spin rate. And by repeating the process multiple times on the same piece, they can build up spikier shapes, like the ones shown on the poster below. (Image and research credit: J. Marthelot et al., poster)

    image

    Reminder for those at the APS DFD meeting! My talk is tonight at 5:10PM in Room B206. You’ll probably want to come early if you want a seat!

  • Stone Skipping Physics

    Stone Skipping Physics

    The current record for stone-skipping is about 88 skips. For most of us, that’s an unimaginably high number, but according to physicists, human throwers may top out around 300 or 350 skips. In the video above and the accompanying article, Wired reporter Robbie Gonzalez explores both the technique of a world-record-holding skip and the physics that enable it.

    The perfect skip requires many ingredients: a large, flat rock with good edges; a strong throw to spin the rock and hold it steady at the right angle of attack; and a good first contact with the right entry angle and force to set up the skips’ trajectory. The video is long, but it’s well worth a full watch. It gives you an inside look both at a master skipper and at the experts of skipping science. (Video and image credit: Wired; see also: Splash Lab, C. Clanet et al.; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

    ETA: Wired’s embed code is acting up, so if you can’t see the stone skipping video here, just go to the article directly.

    Heads up for those going to the APS DFD meeting! You can catch my talk Monday, Nov. 19th at 5:10PM in Room B206. I’ll be talking about how to use narrative devices to tell scientific stories. I’ll be around for the whole meeting, so feel free to come say hi!

  • Hovering

    Hovering

    Nectar-drinking species of hummingbirds and bats are both excellent at hovering – one of the toughest aerodynamic feats – but they each have their own ways of doing it. Hummingbirds (bottom) use a nearly horizontal stroke pattern that’s quite symmetric on both the up- and downstroke. To keep generating lift in the upstroke, they twist their wings strongly midway through the stroke. So although hummingbirds get most of their lift from the downstroke, they get quite a bit from the upstroke as well.

    Bats, on the other hand, use an asymmetric wingbeat pattern when hovering. Bats flap in a diagonal stroke pattern, using a high angle of attack in the downstroke and an even higher one during the upstroke. They also retract their wings partially during the upstroke. This flapping pattern gives them weak lift during the upstroke, which they compensate for with a stronger downstroke. Compared to non-hovering bat species, nectar-drinking bats do get more lift during the upstroke, but they’re nowhere near as good as the hummingbirds. The bats compensate by having much larger wings compared to their body size. Bigger wings mean more lift.

    In the end, the two types of hovering cost roughly the same amount of power per gram of body weight. That’s great news for engineers designing the next generation of flapping robots because it suggests two very different, but equally power-efficient methods for hovering. (Image credit: Lentink Lab/Science News, source; research credit: R. Ingersoll et al.; via Science News; submitted by Kam Yung-Soh) 

  • Carbonation in Microgravity

    Carbonation in Microgravity

    Bubbly beverages are popular among humans, but there’s surprising complexity underlying their seemingly simply carbonation, as explored in a new Physics Today article. Most drinks get their bubbles from carbon dioxide, which at higher than atmospheric pressures, can stay dissolved inside water and other liquids. When that pressure gets released, any carbon-dioxide-filled gas cavity in the liquid adopts the allowable saturation concentration for the ambient pressure, which sets up a concentration gradient of carbon dioxide  between the liquid and the bubble. That causes carbon dioxide gas to diffuse into the bubbles, making them grow. 

    Here on Earth, those growing bubbles are buoyant, and they form rising plumes of bubbles. They continue gathering carbon dioxide as they rise, making them grow ever larger (lower left). In microgravity, on the other hand, the bubbles congregate where they form and continue growing through diffusion (lower right). This is one reason carbonated beverages are unpopular in space – instead of rising to the surface and escaping, all the carbon dioxide in a drink gets consumed, leaving astronauts with no way to expel it aside from burping!

    For lots more fascinating facts about bubbly drinks – including how they relate to geology! – check out the full Physics Today article. (Image credits: beer – rawpixel; bubbles – P. Vega-Martínez et al.; see also: R. Zenit and J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez)