FYFD

Category: Research

  • Paris 2024: Coordinating the Front-Crawl

    Paris 2024: Coordinating the Front-Crawl

    Of all the swimming strokes humans have invented, none is faster or more efficient than the front-crawl. That’s why all competitors use it in freestyle events, and why it’s the only stroke that appears in races longer than 200 meters. But elite swimmers don’t perform the front-crawl the same way in a sprint as they do in a longer race. Instead, researchers found that swimmers use three different regimes of arm coordination.

    For long-distance races, elite swimmers adopt a stroke that has only one arm in the water at a time. Each stroke is followed by a glide phase with one arm stretched in front of them. Researchers compared this to the burst-and-coast method that fish use to minimize the energy they use. As a swimmer’s speed increases, they shorten the glide phase and begin to maximize the force produced with each propulsive stroke.

    In the third regime — the fastest one used by elite sprinters — the strokes of a swimmer’s arms are superposed, with both arms engaged in propulsion at the same time during parts of the cycle. This mode maximizes propulsive force but requires a lot of energy, so swimmers can only sustain it for a short while.

    Since researchers built their observations into a physical model that explains how and why elite swimmers do this, the model can actually be used to advise individual swimmers on how they can adapt their stroke based on their size, desired speed, and other physical characteristics. (Image credit: J. Chng; research credit: R. Carmigniani et al.)

    Related topics: More on swimming physics including why swimmers are faster underwater and how to design faster pools.

    Find all of our current and past Olympics coverage here.

  • Paris 2024: Bouncing and Spinning

    Paris 2024: Bouncing and Spinning

    Spin, or the lack thereof, plays a major role in many sports — including tennis, golf, football, baseball, volleyball, and table tennis — because it affects whether flow stays attached around a ball, as well as how much lift or side force a ball gets. A ball’s spin doesn’t stay constant, however. During flight, a ball’s spin decays at a rate proportional to its initial spin and velocity. Researchers have found that a ball’s moment of inertia, flow regime, and surface roughness all affect that decay, but which factor is the most significant varies by ball and by sport.

    Whether a ball bounces while spinning also matters. For compliant balls on a non-compliant surface — think tennis balls on a court — a bounce can actually change how much a ball spins. During impact, a tennis ball can: slide, decreasing its tangential velocity while increasing its topspin; roll, where the ball’s tangential velocity matches the tangential velocity of the surface; or over-spin, where the ball spins faster than it rolls. For a given impact angle and velocity, researchers found that stiffer and/or lighter balls were more likely to over-spin. Within tennis’s allowable range of ball stiffness and mass, manufacturers could create tennis balls that over-spin far more than conventional ones, creating another opportunity for deceptive tactics in the sport. (Image credit: J. Calabrese; research credit: T. Allen et al.)

    Related topics: How flow separates from a surface, and why turbulence is sometimes preferable

    Find all of our Olympics coverage — past and ongoing — here and every sports post here.

  • Paris 2024: Triathlon Swimming

    Paris 2024: Triathlon Swimming

    Unlike the swimming competition, Olympic triathletes complete their swim legs in open waters. There are no lane dividers and no rules against drafting off a fellow athlete. Curious to see how draft positioning could affect swimmers, researchers experimented with swimmer-shaped models in a water channel and a numerical simulation. They found that the most advantageous position is directly behind a lead swimmer, where the follower could enjoy a 40% reduction in drag. Another good position is near the leader’s hip, where waves off the leader provide a 30% reduction in drag.

    The worst place to swim, interestingly, is immediately side-by-side. With both swimmers neck-in-neck, drag is maximized, and each swimmer feels more drag than they would swimming by themselves! (Image credit: J. Romero; research credit: B. Bolan et al.)

    Related topics: Drafting in each triathlon stage and drafting effects in nordic skiing

    Join us all this week and next for more Olympics-themed stories.

  • Paris 2024: Swimsuit Tech

    Paris 2024: Swimsuit Tech

    The aughts were an exciting time to watch competitive swimming. Records were falling left and right, especially in 2008 and 2009. The first wave of improvements came around 2000, with the introduction of full-body swimwear. According to one analysis, men’s freestyle swimming performances improved by about 1% with that change. The next big leap came in 2008 when companies introduced polyurethane panels into the suits (most famously the LZR Razer suits pictured above) causing an additional 1.5-3.5% performance improvement. The panels were stiff, reducing the swimmer’s cross-sectional area and thereby reducing drag. Their effect was greatest in sprint events; long-distance swimmers saw fewer improvements, possibly because turning in the stiffer suits was tiring.

    The biggest leap came in 2009 with all polyurethane full-body swimsuits, which streamlined swimmers and gave them skin friction improvements that let them slip through the water more easily. Freestyle swimmers with those suits were showing a full 5.5% performance improvement on top of the 2000-era full-body suits.

    With so many records falling in 2008 and 2009 — largely to swimmers wearing the expensive new suits that some teams could not afford — swimming’s federation chose to ban the new technology, causing an immediate drop in performances to pre-polyurethane levels. Although sprint performances will likely improve little by little each year, no one is likely to break the sprint records of 2008-2009 in the next decade — not unless the federation establishes a “new rules” record the way officials did with the javelin after a major rule change. (Image credit: Getty Images; research credit: L. Foster et al.)

    Today kicks off our fluids-themed Olympics coverage. Stay tuned for more sports this week and next week. If that’s not enough sports physics for you, check out what we wrote in previous years.

  • Hole Punch Clouds

    Hole Punch Clouds

    At times altocumulus cloud cover is pierced by circular or elongated holes, filled only with the wispiest of virga. These odd holes are known by many names: cavum, fallstreak holes, and hole punch clouds. Long-running debates about these clouds’ origins were put to rest some 14 years ago, after scientists showed they were triggered by airplanes passing through layers of supercooled droplets.

    When supercooled, water droplets hang in the air without freezing, even though they are colder than the freezing point. This typically happens when the water is too pure to provide the specks of dust or biomass needed to form the nucleus of an ice crystal. But when an airplane passes through, the air accelerated over its wings gets even colder, dropping the temperature another 20 degrees Celsius. That is cold enough that, even without a nucleus, water drops will freeze. More and more ice crystals will form, until they grow heavy enough to fall, leaving behind a clear hole or wisps of falling precipitation.

    In the satellite image above, flights moving in and out of Miami International Airport have left a variety of holes in the cloud cover each of them large enough to see from space! (Image credit: M. Garrison; research credit: A. Heymsfield et al. 2010 and A. Heymsfield et al. 2011; via NASA Earth Observatory)

  • “Stomp-Rocket”: A New Type of Eruption

    “Stomp-Rocket”: A New Type of Eruption

    When Kilauea‘s caldera collapsed in 2018, it came with a sequence of 12 closely-timed eruptions that did not match either of the typical volcanic eruption types. Usually, eruptions are either magmatic — caused by rising magma — or phreatic — caused by groundwater flash-boiling into steam. The data from Kilauea matched neither type.

    Instead, scientists proposed a new model for eruption, based around a mechanism similar to the stomp-rockets that kids use. They suggested that, before the eruption, Kilauea’s magma reservoir contained a mixture of magma and a pocket of gas. When part of the magma reservoir collapsed, the falling rock compressed the gases in the chamber — much the way a child’s foot compresses the air reservoir of a stomp rocket — building up enough gas pressure to explosively launch debris and hot gas up to the surface.

    The team found that computer simulations of this new eruption model matched well with observations and measurements taken at Kilauea in 2018. Kilauea is one of the most closely monitored volcanoes in the world; although the team suspects this mechanism occurs during caldera collapse of other volcanoes, it’s unlikely they could have pieced together such a convincing case for an eruption anywhere else. (Image credit: O. Holm; research credit: J. Crozier et al.; via Physics World)

  • Venusian Lava Flows

    Venusian Lava Flows

    Venus is often known as Earth’s twin, given its similar size and proximity. But, thanks to its runaway greenhouse effect, Venus is a hellish landscape buried beneath a hot atmosphere of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. Unlike Earth, Venus is not tectonically active, though it does have active volcanoes. A recent study re-examined synthetic aperture radar data from the Magellan spacecraft mission in the early 1990s and found that the data contained evidence of fresh lava flows.

    The team found two areas near volcanoes where the surface backscatter changed significantly between orbital observations. After examining many possible explanations for the changes, the team concluded that the differences were most likely due to new lava. They even performed the same analysis for a volcanic field here on Earth between known lava flows and observed the same behavior. Combined with another recent study that found evidence of volcanic activity in Magellan data, signs are pointing toward Venus being about as volcanically active as our own planet, even if the mechanisms driving the volcanism differ. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech; research credit: D. Sulcanese et al.; via Gizmodo)

  • Saving Energy By Following a Leader

    Saving Energy By Following a Leader

    Scientists have long suspected that birds save energy by following a leader — think of the V-shaped flight formation used by geese — but a new study captures that savings directly. The team studied starlings, flying singly or in groups of two or three, in a special wind tunnel. Each bird wore a tiny backpack with sensors and lights that captured its motion and helped researchers identify it individually in videos. And, using before and after metabolic measurements, the researchers could pin down exactly how much energy each bird used when flying.

    They found that birds who spent most of the flight in a “follower” position used up to 25% less energy than they did when flying solo. That’s a major incentive to follow someone else. Interestingly, they also found that the most efficient solo fliers were the birds most likely to take on the “leader” position. The team notes that these “leaders” tend to use a lower wing-flapping frequency, but a full explanation of how they save energy will require a follow-up study. (Image credit: R. Gissler and S. Hao; research credit: S. Friman et al.; via Physics World)

  • How Water Droplets Charge Up

    How Water Droplets Charge Up

    Rubbing a balloon on your hair can build a significant electrical charge. Water droplets have the same issue when they slide across a hydrophobic, electrically-insulated surface. A new study models why these charges build up and tests the model both experimentally and through simulation. They focused their theory on three effects that determine how much charge builds up. The first is a two-way chemical reaction that continuously creates charge at the interface, with positive charge building in the drop. Secondly, the drop’s contact angle with the surface sets how many protons can build up at the contact line, thereby affecting the electrical field they generate. And, finally, fluid motion at the rear of the drop deflects protons upward, shifting the electrical field. In particular, their model predicts that the higher contact angles of hydrophobic surfaces should increase charge build-up and faster sliding velocities should slow charge build-up, both of which agree with experiments.

    The model should help researchers understand various charging scenarios, like those found on self-cleaning surfaces, in inkjet printing, and in semiconductor manufacturing. In the last scenario, rinsing semiconductor wafers in ultrapure water can build up charges in the kilovolt range, which is enough to damage the product. (Image credit: D. Carlson; research credit: A. Ratschow et al.; via APS Physics)

  • A Shallow Origin for the Sun’s Magnetic Field

    A Shallow Origin for the Sun’s Magnetic Field

    The Sun‘s complex magnetic field drives its 11-year solar activity cycle in ways we have yet to understand. During active periods, more sunspots appear, along with roiling flows within the Sun that scientists track through helioseismology. Longstanding theories posit that the Sun’s magnetic field has a deep origin, about 210,000 kilometers below the surface. But new measurements have prompted an alternate theory: that the Sun’s magnetic field originates in its outer 5-10% due to a magnetorotational instability.

    Magnetorotational instabilities are usually associated with the accretion disks around black holes and other massive objects. When an electrically-conductive fluid — like the Sun’s plasma — is rotating, even a small deviation in its path can get magnified by a magnetic field. In accretion disks, these little disruptions grow until the disk becomes turbulent.

    By applying this idea to the sun, researchers found they were better able to match measurements of the plasma flows beneath the Sun’s surface. With measurements from future heliophysics missions, they believe they can work out the mechanisms driving sunspot formation, which would help us better predict solar storms that can damage electronics here on Earth. (Image credit: NASA/SDO/AIA/LMSAL; research credit: G. Vasil et al.; via Physics World)