Water repellent, or hydrophobic, surfaces are common in nature, including lotus leaves, many insects, and even some geckos. These hydrophobic surfaces typically gain their water-repelling ability from extremely tiny nanoscale structures in the form of tiny hairs or specially textured surfaces. But, while the nanoscale structures impart superhydrophobicity, researchers have found that larger macroscale structures can improve water-repellent characteristics by reducing a drop’s time of contact with the surface. A smaller contact time means less chance of contamination on self-cleaning surfaces. It’s also helpful in preventing water from freezing on contact to cold surfaces – valuable, for example, in protecting airplane wings’ leading edges from icing over. This combination of nanoscale and macroscale, water-repelling structures can be found in nature, too, such as on the wings of butterflies, which must quickly shed water in order to fly. (Image credits: K. Hounsell et al.; A. Gauthier et al., source video)
Category: Research

Convection Cells
This magnified photo shows Rayleigh-Benard convection cells in silicone oil. This buoyancy-driven convection occurs when a fluid is heated from below and cooled above. Inside the cells, fluid rises through the center and sinks along the edges; this motion is made apparent here thanks to aluminum flakes in the oil. The distinctive hexagonal shape of the cells is actually due to surface tension. Here, the upper surface of the fluid is left open to the air and this free surface boundary condition causes hexagonal shapes to form. If the fluid were instead covered by a solid surface, the convection cells that form would be shaped differently. (Image credit: M. Velarde et al.; via Van Dyke’s An Album of Fluid Motion)
——————
LAST CALL: FYFD reader survey closes Wednesday! I’ve teamed up with researcher Paige Brown Jarreau to create a survey of FYFD readers. By participating, you’ll be helping me improve FYFD and contributing to novel academic research on the readers of science blogs. It should only take 10-15 minutes to complete. You can find the survey here.

Soap Bubble Coalescence
Droplets falling onto a bath of the same liquid will sometimes coalesce via a series of increasingly smaller droplets in a process known as the coalescence cascade. Soap bubbles, it turns out, can exhibit a similar partial coalescence. When a bubble nears a soap film and the air between them drains away, coalesce can begin. If the the soap film beneath the bubble ruptures, some air from the inside of the bubble can escape. Part of the bubble coalesces with the soap film and a smaller daughter bubble is left behind. The researchers observed this process happen up to three times before the bubble coalesced completely. Alternatively, if the soap film did not rupture, the air inside the bubble had no escape, and the bubble would coalesce into a hemispherical lens atop the soap film. (Video credit: G. Pucci et al.; via KeSimpulan)
——————
Don’t forget about our FYFD survey! I’ve teamed up with researcher Paige Brown Jarreau to create a survey of FYFD readers. By participating, you’ll be helping me improve FYFD and contributing to novel academic research on the readers of science blogs. It should only take 10-15 minutes to complete. You can find the survey here. Please take a few minutes to participate and share!

Suppressing Instability
The Rayleigh Taylor instability is a common fluid phenomenon in which the interface between fluids of differing densities becomes unstable. It’s what’s responsible for all those awesome pictures of milk in ice coffee. For many years, fluid dynamicists theorized that the instability might be inhibited by rotation, which tends to suppress velocity changes along the axis of rotation. But actually creating an experiment demonstrating the effect was extremely difficult because any attempts to set a denser fluid over a lighter one before rotating it would kick off the instability. Recently, however, researchers succeeded in creating an experimental demonstration, seen in the video above. They did so by using magnetism. The initial set-up consists of two fluids of similar densities – a heavier, diamagnetic fluid on the bottom and a lighter, paramagnetic fluid floating on top. The tank was then spun up until both fluids were rotating like a rigid body. Then, the entire set-up was lowered into a vertically-oriented magnetic field. The paramagnetic fluid on top was attracted by the field while the diamagnetic fluid on the bottom was repelled. The end result is that the magnetic field created the effect of the upper fluid being heavier, thereby initiating the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. As you can see in the video, rotation does slow down–but not prevent–the instability. But it took some very clever and careful experimental design to show! (Video credit: K. Baldwin et al.)
——————
Don’t forget about our FYFD survey! I’ve teamed up with researcher Paige Brown Jarreau to create a survey of FYFD readers. By participating, you’ll be helping me improve FYFD and contributing to novel academic research on the readers of science blogs. It should only take 10-15 minutes to complete. You can find the survey here. Please take a few minutes to participate and share!

The Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability
The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is a pattern frequently found in nature. It has a distinctive shape, like a series of breaking ocean waves that curl over on themselves to create a string of vortices. The instability shows up when there is a velocity difference between two fluid layers. The unequal shear between the two layers magnifies any disturbance to their interface, which manifests in the fractal, overturning whorls seen in the numerical simulation above. You can find the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in the lab, in the sky, in the ocean, on Jupiter and Mars–even on the sun! For more information on the methods used to create the simulation above, check out the full paper. (Video and research credit: K. Schaal et al.)

Recreating Hurricanes
Hurricane-related winds and storm surge cause massive damage every year. Understanding and being able to predict the impact of these storms on coastal structures can help save lives and properties. Until recently the most ferocious of hurricanes–category 5 storms that feature winds above 250 kph (150 mph)–could not be recreated in a laboratory scale. Now the University of Miami’s SUSTAIN (SUrge-STructure-Atmosphere INteraction) facility can produce category-5 equivalent winds, waves, and surge in a controlled environment. The massive test section measures 18 m x 6 m x 2 m and can be filled with over 140,000 liters of saltwater. The acrylic walls of the facility let researchers use optical flow diagnostics like particle image velocimetry (PIV) to measure flow anywhere in the test section. Some of their planned studies include experiments on how oil spills behave in storms and how strong aquaculture nets must be to maintain their catch through a storm. It will also be used to study interactions between buildings and storm surge. For more, check out their website or this video from the Weather Channel. (Image credits: Gort Photography, AFP/K. Sheridan, AP Photo/W. Lee; SUSTAIN Laboratory)

Cars Helping Cyclists

This year’s Tour de France opened with an individual time trial stage in which riders competed solo against the clock. But, according to numerical simulations, some riders may get an unfair aerodynamic advantage in the race if they have a following car. The top image shows the pressure fields around a rider with a car following 5 meters behind versus 10 meters behind. The size of the car means that it displaces air well in advance of its arrival. By following a rider closely, that car’s high pressure region can help fill in a cyclist’s wake, thereby reducing the drag the rider experiences. For a short time trial like the 13.8 km race that kicked off this year’s tour, a rider whose car follows at 5 meter could save 6 seconds over one whose car followed at the regulation 10 meter distance. (As it happens, the stage was decided by a 5 second margin.) Since not all riders get a team follow car, it’s especially important to ensure that those who do aren’t receiving an additional advantage. For more about cycling aerodynamics, check out our previous cycling posts and Tour de France series. (Image credit: TU Eindhoven, EPA/J. Jumelet; via phys.org; submitted by @NathanMechEng)

The Upside-Down Jellyfish
The upside-down jellyfish Cassiopea lives along the sea bottom in coastal regions. As its name suggests, the jellyfish rests upside-down with its bell against the sea floor and its frilly oral arms pointed upward. This jellyfish is a filter feeder, and it draws water up and through its arms by pulsing its bell. The video above visualizes this flow using dye. Each pulse propels fluid up through the arms and draws in fresh water from the surroundings. The frilly arms break up any large vortices from the pulsed flow and diffuse the filtered water as it moves upward. (Video credit: Applied Fluid Mechanics Laboratory at Oklahoma State University)

Jumps in Stratified Flows
One of the factors that complicates geophysical flows is that both the atmosphere and the ocean are stratified fluids with many stacked layers of differing densities. These variations in density can generate instabilities, trap rising or sinking fluids, and transmit waves. The animations above show flow over two ridges with dye visualization (top), velocity (middle), and contours of density (bottom). The upstream influence of the left ridge creates a smooth, focused flow that quickly becomes turbulent after the crest. The jet rebounds as a turbulent hydraulic jump before slowing again upstream of the second ridge. Like the first ridge, the second ridge also generates a hydraulic jump on the lee side. Clearly both stratification and the local topography play a big role in how air moves over and between the ridges. If prevailing winds favor these kinds of flows, it can help generate local microclimates. (Image credit and submission: K. Winters, source videos)

Rain-spread Pathogens
Like humans, plants can spread pathogens to one another. Although scientists had observed correlations between rainfall and the spread of diseases among plants, this study is one of the first to look at the fluid dynamics of leaf and rainfall interaction. When a raindrop hits a leaf, it doesn’t simply splash as it would against an immobile surface. The impact of the drop deforms the leaf, and the plant’s rebound significantly affects the trajectory and size of the resulting droplets. Depending on factors like the leaf’s stiffness, a large drop, carrying many pathogens, may rebound and splatter onto a neighboring leaf. Other leaves tend to catapult out many smaller droplets, which may fly farther afield but carry fewer pathogens. For more, check out the press release or the original research paper. (Video credit: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; research credit: Bourouiba Research Group)














