Year: 2016

  • The Knuckleball

    The Knuckleball

    For more than a century, athletes have used the zigzagging path of a knuckleball to confound their opponents. Knuckleballing is best known in baseball but appears also in volleyball, soccer, and cricket. It occurs when the ball has little to no spin. The source of the knuckleball’s confusing trajectory, according to a new study, is the unsteadiness of the lift forces around the ball. As the ball flies, tiny variations occur in the flow on either side, causing small variations to the lift as well. Using experiments and numerical models, the researchers established that this white noise in the lift forces is sufficient to cause knuckleball-like path changes.

    They were also able to explain why some sports see the knuckleball effect and others don’t. The wavelength of the deviations – the distance between a zig and a zag – is relatively long, so knuckleballing can only be noticed if the distance the ball flies is long enough for the deviation to be apparent. Additionally, the side-to-side motion is largest when flow on the ball is transitioning from laminar to turbulent flow, so knuckleballing also requires a very particular (and usually low) initial speed. (Image credit: L. Kang; research credit: B. Texier et al.; submitted by @1307phaezr)

  • Granular Plugs

    Granular Plugs

    Imagine filling a narrow tube with a mixture of water and tiny glass beads. Then take a syringe and very slowly start drawing out the water. As the water gets sucked out of the tube, air will be pulled into the opposite end. The meniscus where the air and water meet sweeps up the glass beads like a liquid bulldozer. As the experiment continues, pressure builds up and air starts filtering through the beads, changing the viscous and frictional forces the system experiences. Eventually, the grains break off, leaving a chunk of glass beads – known as a plug – behind. Keep draining the tube and more plugs form. Check out the video below to see it in action! (Image/video credit: G. Dumazer et al., source; research paper; open synopsis; submitted by B. Sandnes)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    “Vorticity”

    Photographer Mike Olbinski is back with another storm-chasing timelapse entitled “Vorticity”. Like his previous work, this film is a breath-taking example of physics in action. It is well worth taking a few minutes to watch in fullscreen, at high resolution, and with headphones. Olbinski’s timelapses beautifully capture the incredible dynamic motion of our atmosphere. Fittingly, “Vorticity” is all about the swirling, roiling motion of supercell thunderstorms and the tornadoes they can spawn, but the film also captures many other great phenomena from the convection that builds clouds to unusual formations like undulatus asperatus and mammatus clouds. (Video credit: M. Olbinski; submitted by Paul vdB)

  • The Seabird That Can’t Get Wet

    The Seabird That Can’t Get Wet

    Unlike most seabirds, the frigatebird does not have waterproof feathers. Landing in the water during a transoceanic flight would quickly drown the bird, so instead they stay aloft. But until recently, scientists did not realize just how adept the birds are. Studying tagged frigatebirds in flight, researchers found that the birds could reach altitudes of 4000 meters and that they could soar without flapping for up to 64 kilometers! They achieve these heights by seeking out clouds, which mark strong atmospheric updrafts. The birds ride these thermals up to the cloud tops – well into freezing conditions – and then glide slowly back down.

    Their bodies are impressively built for slow glides. Frigatebirds boast a low body weight for their large wing area. This ratio is known as wing loading, and it’s a fundamental characteristic of any flier, avian or otherwise. Low wing loading is key to gliding longer because it reduces the speed at which a glider loses altitude. (Image credit: D. Brossard; research credit: H. Weimarskirch et al.; via @skunkbear)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Reader Question: Blood Jets

    Reader  shoebill-san asks:

    are blood jets realistic? when someone gets shot in the movies?

    This one’s a bit tough to boil down to a yes or a no, honestly. While piercing an artery can cause jetting (more on that below), movies tend to exaggerate the effect. And even among Hollywood movies, there’s a broad variation in how wounds are represented. I’m pretty sure no one thinks that blood actually behaves like it does in Monty Python or a Tarantino film!

    That said, depending on the wound, there can be a jetting effect thanks to the pulsing of our hearts. Scientists have even worked to numerically simulate human blood flow after a wound. I’ve included a video example above. Be warned – some viewers may find it gross. That said, there’s nothing all that graphic on display.

    As you can see, wounds to arteries have an apparent jetting motion thanks to our pulses. Bleeding from veins tends to look more uniform because the pressure pulse caused by each heartbeat has been smoothed out by the viscous effects of all the blood vessels in between. (Video credit: K. Chong et al.)

  • Reversing Time

    Reversing Time

    Waves contain lots of information. They are also time invariant, which means that they will behave the same regardless of whether time moves forward or backward. This isn’t a property we observe often in life since time just moves forward for us. But a new experiment has demonstrated a method of wave control that can, in a sense, roll back the clock.

    To do this, the scientists created a instantaneous time mirror, or ITM. When they create a disturbance on the surface of a pool of water, it sends out capillary waves in the form of ripples. A short time later, they accelerate the pool sharply downward. This universal disturbance is their instantaneous time mirror, which generates backward-propagating ripples. Those new backward-propagating waves travel back toward the source and refocus into the shape of the initial disturbance. This works for both a simple point disturbance (top image) and for a more complicated geometry like a smiley face (bottom image). (Image credit: V. Bacot et al., source; submitted by @g_durey)

    ETA: To be clear, this experiment does not refute causality. It’s more like saying that the information for the initial conditions is still carried on in the later state and that you can do something to extract that information.

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Crash Course Hydrostatics

    Crash Course Physics has just put out an episode on fluids at rest (a.k.a. hydrostatics). For those who are unfamiliar, Crash Course is an educational YouTube channel that offers fun, instructional videos on a large and ever-growing array of topics. In this video, they tackle a lot of important basics for fluids, including the principles behind hydraulics, how to measure pressure, and how buoyancy works. It’s pretty densely packed, and, if you’re learning the concepts for the first time, you’ll probably pause and rewatch some segments, but even if you’re familiar with the topics, it’s a nice refresher. (Video credit: Crash Course Physics)

  • Amphibious Adaptation

    Amphibious Adaptation

    Every year newts move to the water in the springtime to mate before returning to land for the rest of the year. This annual aquatic relocation is accompanied by changes in the newt’s body. Flaps of skin grow from their upper jaw to their lower jaw, partially closing their mouths at the corners. This can be seen in the left column of the animation compared to the center and right.

    Numerical simulation shows that this mouth change has a significant impact on the newt’s ability to hunt underwater. Newts are suction feeders, who open their jaws and expand their mouth cavity to suck in water and their prey. By closing off the corners of their mouths during their aquatic phase, the newts generate more suction, reaching peak flow velocities 10% to 50% higher than in their terrestrial form and enabling them to pull prey from 15% further away. When they leave the water, the newts lose the extra flaps so that their mouths can open wider for catching prey on land. (Image credit: S. Van Wassenbergh and E. Heiss, source)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    “Memories of Paintings”

    In “Memories of Paintings,” Thomas Blanchard gives us an up-close view of fluids and mixing. It’s a calming and curious video made from combinations of paint, oil, oat milk, and soap. The fluids feather and intertwine, driven by differences in surface tension. Paint gets encapsulated by immiscible oil to create little islands of color that float and dance against the background. It’s a fun journey through effects that we witness daily but rarely take the time to watch. (Video credit: T. Blanchard; via Gizmodo)

  • Turbulence in the Solar Wind

    Turbulence in the Solar Wind

    One of the key features of turbulent flows is that they contain many different length scales. Look at the plume from an erupting volcano, and you’ll see eddies that are hundreds of meters across as well as tiny ones on the order of millimeters. This enormous difference in scale is one of the major challenges in simulating turbulent flows. Since energy enters at the large scale and is passed to smaller and smaller scales before being dissipated at the tiniest scales of the flow, properly simulating a turbulent flow requires resolving all of these length scales. This is especially challenging for applications like the solar wind – the  stream of charged particles that flows from the sun and gets diverted around the Earth by our magnetic field. The image above shows some of the turbulence in our solar wind. The structures seen in the flow range from the size of the Earth all the way to the scale of electrons! (Image credit: B. Loring, Berkeley Lab)