Tag: hydrodynamics

Under the Sea
Deep below the ocean surface, light is in short supply. But dive photographer Steven Kovacs specializes in capturing the ethereal creatures that live in this darkness. Many of his subjects are larval fish, whose forms defy our hydrodynamic expectations. Why would young (presumably less energetic) fish have so many long, drag-inducing appendages? Clearly there’s more to life under the sea than streamlining alone!
Perhaps our instincts are wrong and these shapes are not as detrimental as they look at first glance. Flexibility can make a drastic difference in hydrodynamics, after all. And some of these species are preparing themselves for a life not spent entirely underwater, anyway. (Image credit: S. Kovacs; via Colossal)
September 9, 2022
Swimming Together
Scientists have long pondered the possibilities of hydrodynamic benefits to the ways fish school. But most analyses of schooling have assumed a fixed spacing that’s far more orderly than what we observe in nature. In this experiment, researchers instead used a pair of robotic swimmers (essentially hydrofoils) to explore a range of swimming formations. What they found was a map of places where a second swimmer could easily “lock in” to a position relative to the leader and have their positioning stabilized by interactions with the leader’s wake (lower image). Interestingly, the beneficial regions extend much further downstream for fish positioned diagonally to the leader than they do for one directly following. With such a wide range of easily-stabilized following positions, it’s no wonder that schools of fish are amorphous instead of strictly crystalline! (Image credit: top – S. Pena Lambarri, map – J. Newbolt et al.; research credit: J. Newbolt et al.)
The shaded areas of this map represent areas where a second swimmer can passively “lock-in” relative to the leader’s position, shown in gray. This data is based on tests with robotic swimmers.
July 28, 2022
The Best of FYFD 2021
A year ago I observed what a strange year 2020 had been, and in many ways, I could say the same of 2021. Before the pandemic, I spent quite a lot of time traveling. In 2021, the only nights I slept outside my own bed came on a long weekend up to the mountains with my family. But 2021 also saw a bit of a return to normalcy – I was giving keynote addresses and workshops again, albeit virtually. What will 2022 hold? Who knows?!
As per tradition, here are the top FYFD posts of 2021:
It’s an eclectic mix of topics this year: bizarre phenomena, stunning art, archaeological exploration, and a touch of biophysics!
If you enjoy FYFD, please remember that it’s primarily reader-supported. You can help support the site by becoming a patron, making a one-time donation, buying some merch, or simply by sharing on social media. And if you find yourself struggling to remember to check the website, remember you can get FYFD in your inbox every two weeks with our newsletter. Happy New Year!
(Image credits: mirage – D. Morris, sheep – L. Patel, pavement – Practical Engineering, Le Temps – T. Blanchard, insects – Ant Lab, Satellike – R. De Giuli, sea sponge – G. Falcucci et al., speaker – DAKD Jung, Stonehenge – T. Cox et al., butter – Art Insider)
January 3, 2022
Stingray Eyes
With their flexible, flattened shape, rays are some of the most efficient swimmers in the ocean. But, at first glance, it seems as if their protruding eyes and mouth would interfere with that streamlining. A new study uses computational fluid dynamics to tackle the effects of these protrusions on stingray hydrodynamics.
With their digital stingrays, the team found that the animal’s eyes and mouth created vortices that accelerated flow over the front of the ray and increased the pressure difference across its top and bottom surfaces. The result was better thrust and the ability to cruise at higher speeds. Overall, the ray’s eyes and mouth increased its hydrodynamic efficiency by more than 20.5% and 10.6%, respectively. The lesson here: looks can be deceiving when it comes to hydrodynamics! (Image credit: D. Clode; research credit: Q. Mao et al.)
October 7, 2021
Sea Sponge Hydrodynamics
The Venus’s flower basket is a sea sponge that lives at depths of 100-1000 meters. Its intricate latticework skeleton has long fascinated engineers for its structural mechanics, but a new study shows that the sponge’s shape benefits it hydrodynamically as well.
The sea sponge’s skeleton is predominantly cylindrical, with tiny gaps that allow water to flow through it and helical ridges alongside its outer surface to strengthen it against the deep-sea currents surrounding it. Through detailed numerical simulations, researchers found that both of these features — the holes and the ridges — serve fluid mechanical purposes for the sponge. The porous holes of the sea sponge drastically reduce flow in the sponge’s wake (third image), which provides major drag reduction for the sea sponge. That drag reduction makes it easier for the sponge to stay rooted to the ocean floor.
The helical ridges, on the other hand, create low-speed vortices within the sea-sponge’s body cavity (second image). Such vortices increase the time water spends inside the sponge, likely helping it to filter-feed more efficiently. The additional vorticity comes at the cost of slightly increased drag but not enough to outweigh the savings from its porosity. (Image and research credit: G. Falcucci et al.; via Nature; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
September 6, 2021
Benefits of Schooling
Though fluid dynamicists have long theorized about the hydrodynamic benefits of fish swimming in schools, nailing down the actual physics has been quite difficult. Fish rarely swim exactly as an experimenter would like, and measuring quantities like swimming efficiency in a living fish is tough to do. In the numerical realm, it’s tough to simulate multiple fish swimming at realistic conditions. So some teams have turned to biomimetic robotic platforms to study schooling, as in this new research.
Once you’ve built a robotic fish that swims in a realistic way, that fish will have no problem swimming the same experimental patterns over and over. In this work, the researchers compared their robots swimming solo and swimming with a partner. In the partnered studies, they looked at fish swimming in phase — with their undulations matching one another — and out of phase — where the fish move opposite one another. They found that having a nearby partner improved the speed and efficiency for both fish, regardless of phase. But they also found a peculiar exception.
If one fish modifies their tailbeat frequency relative to their partner, they can slightly increase their power efficiency. But if they do so, it costs their partner more energy. That implies that fish could employ competitive dynamics, but, of course, it doesn’t tell us that they do! (Image and research credit: L. Li et al.; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
August 16, 2021
Hammerhead Hydrodynamics
Hammerhead sharks have some of the most distinctive craniums in the ocean, which begs the question: how do they swim with that head? New computational fluid dynamics studies suggest that their long foil-shaped heads help the sharks maneuver swiftly, but they come at the cost of substantially higher drag. The researchers found that drag on the hammerhead’s cranium required energy expenditures more than 10 times higher than other sharks, but since the study looked at heads only, it’s possible that the rest of the shark’s positioning helps mitigate that cost. (Image credit: shark – J. Allert, CFD – M. Gaylord et al.; research credit: M. Gaylord et al.; via NYTimes; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
December 22, 2020
Steering as a Boxfish
Coral reefs are full of odd-looking denizens, but one of the funniest-looking ones must be the boxfish. This family of fish lives up to its name; their bodies feature an angular, bony carapace that helps protect them. But you don’t have to be a fluid dynamicist to wonder how in the world they swim with that kind of shape.
There’s actually disagreement in scientific circles as to whether the basic shape of a boxfish is stabilizing or destabilizing, in other words, whether the fish’s body shape will try to automatically turn or roll when flow moves past. A new study focuses instead on the role the fish’s tail fin serves. Through experiments (on a fish model) and simulations, the researchers showed that boxfish rely on their tail fins both as rudders and course-stabilizers.
Living around coral reefs means that boxfish need to be highly maneuverable, and this research indicates that the fish’s body shape, combined with the stabilizing power of its tail, are key to its ability to quickly and easily turn in any direction. (Image credits: boxfish – D. Seddon, simulation – P. Boute et al.; research credit: P. Boute et al.; via NYTimes; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
April 24, 2020
Robotic Research Facilities
One of the major challenges in fluid dynamics is the size of the parameter spaces we have to explore. Because many problems in fluid dynamics are non-linear, making small changes in the initial set-up can result in large differences in the results. Consider, for example, a simple cylinder towed through a water tank. As the cylinder moves, vortices will form around it and shed off the back, causing the cylinder to vibrate. The details of what will happen will depend on variables like the cylinder’s size and flexibility, the speed it’s being towed at, and which directions it’s allowed to vibrate in. Mapping out the parameter space, even sparsely, could take a graduate student hundreds of experiments.
To speed up this process, engineers are now building robotic facilities like the Intelligent Towing Tank (ITT) shown above. Like graduate students, the ITT can work into the wee hours of the night, but, unlike graduate students, it never needs to eat, sleep, or stop experimenting. Now, one could use a facility like this to brute-force the answers by testing every possible combination of parameters, but even working 24 hours a day, that would take a long time. Instead, researchers use machine learning to guide the robotic facility into choosing test parameters in a way that optimizes the factors the researchers define as important.
Essentially, the system starts with experiments chosen at random within the parameter space, and then uses those results to select areas of interest until it’s gathered enough data to satisfy the limits specified by human researchers. In theory, a well-designed algorithm can dramatically reduce the number of experiments needed to explore a parameter space. (Image and research credit: D. Fan et al.; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
December 16, 2019
Surfing Honeybees
Honeybees have superpowers when it comes to their aerodynamics and impressive pollen-carrying, but their talents don’t end in the air. A new study confirms that honeybees can surf. Wet bees cannot fly–their wings are too heavy for them to get aloft when wet–but falling into a pond isn’t the end for a foraging honeybee.
Instead, the bee flaps its wings, using them like hydrofoils to lift and push the water. This action generates enough thrust to propel the bee three body lengths per second. It’s a workout the bee can only maintain for a few minutes at a time, but researchers estimate honeybees could cover 5-10 meters in that time. Once ashore, the bee spends a few minutes drying itself, and then flies away no worse for the wear. (Image and research credit: C. Roh and M. Gharib; via NYTimes; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
December 3, 2019