In their natural state, rivers are variable in their course, shifting and meandering. Sometimes they deposit sediment, and sometimes they erode it. In this video, Grady from Practical Engineering digs into the principles behind these changes. With help from Emriver‘s stream tables, which demonstrate years of changes in a river over minutes, Grady shows how changing the sediment load, flow rate, and other factors in a river affect its course. (Video credit: Practical Engineering)
We see plenty of droplets splash when they fall into a pool, but what happens when the drop and pool are two-dimensional? Here researchers captured the familiar process of a splash in an unfamiliar way by looking at a falling drop contained within a soap film. As the drop reached the thicker lower boundary of the soap film (which acts like a pool), its impact sent up ejecta that stretch and curl, much like the three-dimensional splashes we’re accustomed to. (Image credit: A. Alhareth et al.)
In this high-speed video, artist Linden Gledhill ignites a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen contained within a soap bubble. As neat as the video is, I decided to take a closer look at the initial detonation with this animation:
Even here, it’s hard to appreciate just how fast ignition is; it lasts only a handful of frames, despite filming at 40,000 frames per second. But we can still pick out some very neat physics. The ignition begins with a spike-like jet but immediately forks into three ignition fronts that pierce the soap bubble. You can see the shadowy mist of the bubble bursting as the flame front expands. Watch the background carefully, and you can see a shock wave flying away from that moment of detonation.
Once the soap bubble is gone, the expanding flames begin to wrinkle and deform. Turbulence takes shape, eddying through the flames at a much slower speed than the initial detonation. This is where most of combustion takes place, with turbulence mixing the hydrogen and oxygen together to better enable burning. (Image and video credit: L. Gledhill)
Soap films naturally thin over time as fluid evaporates and differences in film thickness cause surface-tension-driven flows. In this video, researchers experiment with adding magnetic nanoparticles to the soap film. In the second image, the white structures near the center of the film contain nanoparticles, and they’re drawn toward the magnet that sits (out-of-frame) to the left of the film. With more nanoparticles and a stronger magnetic field (Image 3), the entire soap film takes on a distinctive profile that thins from left to right. The effect is so strong that the film quickly thins to the point of rupture. (Image and video credit: N. Lalli et al.)
The world of fluid instabilities is a rich one. Combine fluids with differing viscosities, densities, or flow speeds and they’ll often break down in picturesque and predictable manners. Here, researchers explore the Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI), which occurs when a denser fluid sits above a less dense one (in a gravitational field). It’s an extremely common instability, showing up in both the cream in your ice coffee and the shape of a supernova’s explosion. It’s very difficult to set up and observe, though, which is where the real cleverness of this experiment stands out.
To study the RTI, these researchers first created another instability, the Saffman-Taylor instability. They filled the space between two glass plates with a viscous fluid, then injected a less viscous one. That created the distinctive viscous fingering pattern seen in the top image. In addition to being less viscous, the injected fluid was also less dense. As it pushed into the original fluid, it displaced some of it, creating a three-layer structure with dense fluid over less-dense fluid over dense fluid. That laid the groundwork for the Rayleigh-Taylor instability form.
Check out the cell-like pattern distributed across the fluid in the top image. These are plumes formed in the RTI as dense fluid sinks into the less-dense fluid below it. From the side (see second image), each plume takes on the distinctive mushroom-like shape of a Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Given time, the two fluids mix and the cellular pattern disappears. But until then, this set-up uses one instability to study a second one. How cool is that?! (Image and research credit: S. Alqatari et al., see also)
In the ocean, waves often curl over and trap air, becoming plunging breakers. How do surfactants like soap or oil affect this process? That’s the question behind this video, where researchers visualize breaking waves with differing amounts of added surfactant. In the case of pure water, the wave forms a smooth jet that curls over and traps air when the wave breaks. As more and more surfactant gets added, the shape of that jet and cavity change. In one case, they become irregular. In another, they disappear entirely, and with the most surfactant added, the wave suddenly looks just like the water-only case.
The key to these behaviors, it turns out, is not how much surfactant there is, but how much the concentration of surfactant varies along the length of the wave. When there are significant changes in the surfactant concentration along the wave, local Marangoni flows try to even out the surface tension, causing the wave to break up in an irregular fashion. (Image and video credit: M. Erinin et al.)
The new year brought California a series of atmospheric rivers that poured record amounts of water onto drought-stricken lands. While the precipitation refreshed snowpacks and reservoirs, much of it washed away as soils oversaturated. Those flows carried sediment with them, creating swirls of brown and green along the coastline.
Compare the two satellite images above to see how different January 2022 looked from January 2023, post-deluge. The snow levels in January 2023 were about 248 percent of their average level for that part of the season. But the sediment levels in the ocean are also drastically increased, indicating high levels of erosion. (Image credit: J. Stevens; via NASA Earth Observatory)
Lab experiments and numerical simulations can only take us so far; sometimes there’s no substitute for getting out into the field. That’s why a beach in San Diego turned pink this January and February, as researchers released a safe, non-toxic dye into an estuary. The goal is to understand how small freshwater sources mix with colder, saltier ocean waters when they meet in the surf zone. Differences in temperature and salinity both affect the waters’ density and, therefore, how they’ll combine, especially in the face of the turbulent surf. Using drones, distributed sensors, and a specially-outfitted jet ski, the researchers collect data about how the dye (and therefore the estuary’s water) spreads over the 24 hours following each dye release. Check out their experiment’s site to learn more. (Image credits: E. Jepsen/A. Simpson/UC San Diego; via SFGate; submitted by Emily R.)
When a drop falls into a pool of liquid, it creates a distinctive cavity, followed by a jet. From above the surface, this process is well-studied. But this poster offers us a glimpse of what goes on beneath the surface, using particle image velocimetry. This technique follows the paths of tiny particles in the fluid to reveal how the fluid moves.
As the cavity grows, fluid is pushed away. But the cavity’s reversal comes with a change in flow direction. The arrows now point toward the shrinking cavity — and they’re much larger, indicating a strong inward flow. It’s this convergence that creates the Worthington jet that rebounds from the surface. And, as the jet falls back, its momentum gets transferred into a vortex ring that drifts downward from the point of impact. (Image credit: R. Sharma et al.)
What happens when a flow meets swimming micro-organisms? Does the flow affect the swimmers? And how do the swimmers affect the flow in turn? Those are the questions behind the experiment seen here. The apparatus contains a thin layer of saline water with swimming E. coli. Electromagnetism is used to mix the fluid in an array-like pattern that triggers chaotic mixing. To visualize what’s going on, dye is introduced into the right half of the image, while the left half remains undyed.
On the right side of the image, bright blue and white mark areas of high dye concentration, where strong mixing occurs. On the undyed left side of the image, pale blue streaks mark areas where E. coli are clustered. By comparing the two, we see that the micro-swimmers are clustered in the very same regions of flow marked by strong mixing. This result suggests strong interactions and the potential for feedback between the mixing flow and the swimmers. (Image and research credit: R. Ran et al.; see also 1 and 2)