We humans generally use fixed wings for flight, but in nature, flapping flight dominates. As an animal flaps, it extends or draws in its wings during key points of the cycle in order to change its aerodynamics. But this control can be more than just a matter of stretching their wings. Recent work on bats shows that they can fine-tune the stiffness of their wings’ membrane using tiny, hair-thin muscles. Each muscle is too slight to change a wing’s shape on its own, but by firing synchronously–tensing on the downstroke and relaxing on the upstroke–the bat can manipulate its membrane stiffness and thereby affect its wing shape. Moreover, the timing of the muscles’ action changes with flight speed, suggesting that the bats are actively controlling their aerodynamics during flight. (Video credit: Swartz-Breuer lab/Brown University; via Futurity; submitted by Boris M)
Tag: aerodynamics
Turbine Blade Separation
[original media no longer available]
Maintaining consistent air flow along the contours of an object is key to aerodynamic efficiency. When air flow separates or forms a recirculation zone, the drag increases and efficiency drops. On wind turbine blades, flow often separates on the root end of the blade near its attachment point. This behavior is apparent in the video above at 0:34. The tufts in the foreground on the turning blade flap and flutter with no clear pattern because the air flow has separated from the surface. In the subsequent clip, a line of vortex generators has been attached near the leading edge of the blade. These structures–also commonly seen on airplanes–trail vortices behind them, mixing the flow and generating a turbulent boundary layer which is better able to resist flow separation. The effect on the flow is clear from the tufts, most of which now point in a consistent direction with little to no fluttering, indicating that the air flow has remained attached. (Video credit: Smart Blade Gmbh/Technische Universität Berlin)
(Source: /)
Hovering
Designer Eleanor Lutz used high-speed video of five different flying species to create this graphic illustrating the curves swept out in their wingbeats. The curves are constructed from 15 points per wingbeat and are intended more as art than science, but they’re a fantastic visualization of several important concepts in flapping flight. For example, note the directionality of the curves as a whole. If you imagine a vector perpendicular to the wing curves, you’ll notice that the bat, goose, and dragonfly would all have vectors pointing forward and slightly upward. In contrast, the moth and hummingbird would have vectors pointing almost entirely upward. This is because the moth and hummingbird are hovering, so their wing strokes are oriented so that the force produced balances their weight. The bat, goose, and dragonfly are all engaged in forward flight, so the aerodynamic force they generate is directed to counter their weight and to provide thrust. (Image credit: E. Lutz; via io9)
Frisbee Physics, Part 2
Yesterday we discussed some of the basic mechanics of a frisbee in flight. Although frisbees do generate lift similarly to a wing, they do have some unique features. You’ve probably noticed, for example, that the top surface of a frisbee has several raised concentric rings. These are not simply decoration! Instead the rings disrupt airflow at the surface of the frisbee. This actually creates a narrow region of separated flow, visible in region B on the left oil-flow image. Airflow reattaches to the frisbee in the image after the second black arc, and the boundary layer along region C remains turbulent and attached for the remaining length of the frisbee. Keeping the boundary layer attached over the top surface ensures low pressure so that the disk has plenty of lift and remains aerodynamically stable in flight. A smooth frisbee would be much harder to throw accurately because its flight would be very sensitive to angle of attack and likely to stall. (Image credits: J. Potts and W. Crowther; recommended papers by: V. Morrison and R. Lorentz)
Frisbee Physics
Frisbees are a popular summertime toy, but they involve some pretty neat physics, too. Two key ingredients to their long flight times are their lift generation and spin. A frisbee in flight behaves very much like a wing, generating lift by flying at an angle of attack. This angle of attack and the curvature of the disk rim cause air to accelerate over the top of the leading edge. Airflow over the top of the disk is faster than that across the bottom; thus, pressure is lower over the top of the frisbee and lift is generated. Aerodynamic lift and drag aren’t enough to keep the frisbee aloft long, though. Spin matters, too. If the frisbee is launched without spin, gravity acts on it through its center of mass, but lift and drag act through a point off-center because lift tends to be higher on the front of the disk than the back. This offset between gravitational forces and aerodynamic forces creates a torque that tends to flip the frisbee. By spinning the frisbee, the thrower gives it a high angular momentum acting about its spin axis. Now instead of flipping the disk, the torque caused by the offset forces just tips the angular momentum vector slightly. Physically, this is known as spin stabilization or gyroscopic stability. Tomorrow we’ll take a closer look at airflow over the frisbee. (Image credit: A. Leibel and C. Pugh, source video; recommended papers by: V. Morrison and R. Lorentz)
The Magnus Effect in Football
Like many sports, the gameplay in football can be strongly affected by the ball’s spin. Corner kicks and free kicks can curve in non-intuitive ways, making the job of the goalie much harder. These seemingly impossible changes in trajectory are due to airflow around the spinning ball and what’s known as the Magnus effect. In the animation above, flow is moving from right to left around a football. As the ball starts spinning, the symmetry of the flow around the ball is broken. On top, the ball is spinning toward the incoming flow, and the green dye pulls away from the surface. This is flow separation and creates a high-pressure, low-velocity area along the top of the ball. In contrast, the bottom edge of the ball pulls dye along with it, keeping flow attached to the ball for longer and creating low pressure. Just as a wing has lift due to the pressure difference on either side of the wing, the pressure imbalance on the football creates a force acting from high-to-low pressure. In this case, that is a downward force relative to the ball’s rightward motion. In a freely moving football, this force would curve its trajectory to the side. (GIF credit: SkunkBear/NPR; original video: NASA Ames; via skunkbear)
Brazuca
Since 2006, Adidas has unveiled a new football design for each FIFA World Cup. This year’s ball, the Brazuca, is the first 6-panel ball and features glued panels instead of stitched ones. It also has a grippy surface covered in tiny nubs. Wind tunnel tests indicate the Brazuca experiences less drag than other recent low-panel-number footballs as well as less drag than a conventional 32-panel ball. Its stability and trajectory in flight are also more similar to a conventional ball than other recent World Cup balls, particularly the infamous Jabulani of the 2010 World Cup. The Brazuca’s similar flight performance relative to a conventional ball is likely due to its rough surface. Like the many stitched seams of a conventional football, the nubs on the Brazuca help trip flow around the ball to turbulence, much like dimples on a golf ball. Because the roughness is uniformly distributed, this transition is likely to happen simultaneously on all sides of the ball. Contrast this with a smooth, 8-panel football like the Jabulani; with fewer seams to trip flow on the ball, transition is uneven, causing a pressure imbalance across the ball that makes it change its trajectory. For more, be sure to check out the Brazuca articles at National Geographic and Popular Mechanics, as well as the original research article. (Photo credit: D. Karmann; research credit: S. Hong and T. Asai)
When Turbulence Is Desirable
One of the common themes in aerodynamics, especially in sports applications, is that tripping the flow to turbulence can decrease drag compared to maintaining laminar flow. This seems counterintuitive, but only because part of the story is missing. When a fluid flows around a complex shape, there are actually three options: laminar, turbulent, or separated flow. An object’s shape creates pressure forces on the surrounding fluid flow, in some cases causing an increasing, or unfavorable, pressure gradient. When this occurs, fluid, especially the slower-moving fluid near a surface, can struggle to continue flowing in the streamwise flow direction. Consider the video above, in which the flow moves from left to right. Near the surface a turbulent boundary layer is visible, where fluid motion is significantly slower and more random. Occasionally the flow even reverses direction and billows up off the surface. This is separation. Unlike laminar boundary layers, turbulent boundary layers can better resist and recover from flow separation. This is ultimately what makes them preferable when dealing with the aerodynamics of complex objects. (Video credit: A. Hoque)
Sochi 2014: Speed Skiing
As FYFD wraps up coverage of #Sochi2014, let’s take a look at a winter sport not currently contested at the Olympics. This year’s Winter Games featured 12 new events. Speed skiing was not among them, though it was a demonstration sport in the 1992 Olympics. Like many of the sports in Sochi, speed skiing is gravity-driven, and friction and drag serve only to slow competitors. Speed skiing is about getting from the top of the course to the bottom, in a straight line, as fast as possible. Athletes reach velocities as high as 250 kph (155 mph), and aerodynamics are of the utmost concern. The skiers’ rubberized speed suits include airfoil-shaped fairings behind their calves that mold the airflow, and athletes wear giant aerodynamic helmets to smooth flow over their heads and shoulders. They spend their entire descent in an aerodynamic tuck, arms extended ahead of them like a cyclist in a time trial. It looks a pretty crazy ride. Would you like to see it added to the Olympics? (Video credit: R. Sill/University of Cambridge)
FYFD is celebrating #Sochi2014 with a look at fluid dynamics in winter sports. Check out the previous poss on why ice is slippery, the aerodynamics of speedskating, and how lugers slide fast.
Sochi 2014: Bobsledding
Today bobsledding is an sport rife with modern technology and design techniques. In recent years, companies better known for their expertise in automobiles and Formula 1 racing have become players with BMW designing American sleds, McLaren making the UK sleds, and Ferrari providing for the Italian team. Like many winter gravity sports, contenders can be separated by as little as hundredths of a second. This makes aerodynamics a serious concern, but the variability of the sled’s position and orientation over a run makes realistically simulating the aerodynamics, either in a wind tunnel or computationally, extremely difficult. Additionally, the sport’s governing body restricts a sled’s dimensions, weight, shape, and other details; for example, bobsleds are not allowed to use vortex generators that would help maintain attached flow and reduce drag. Instead, designers try to shave drag elsewhere, in the shaping of the sled’s nose or by tweaking the back end of the sled to reduce the drag-inducing wake. Even the shape of the driver’s helmet is aerodynamically significant. (Image credits: Exa Corp, Getty Images, BMW)
FYFD is celebrating #Sochi2014 by looking at fluid dynamics in winter sports. Check out our previous posts on how skiers glide, the US speedskating suit controversy, and why ice is slippery.
