Smoke issuing from a round jet undergoes transition from laminar to turbulent flow. As the smoke moves past the unmoving ambient air, the friction between these two layers creates shear and triggers a Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, recognizable by the formation and roll up of vortices along the edges of the jet. Those vortices then roll together in pairs, detach, and devolve into a generally turbulent flow. Because turbulence is far more efficient at mixing than a laminar flow is, the smoke seems to disappear.
Search results for: “smoke”

Smoke Visualization on an F-16
Flow around an F-16XL Scamp model is visualized using smoke illuminated by laser sheets. Lasers are common equipment in fluids laboratories; theyβre useful for flow visualization and for many velocimetry techniques.

Smokestack Plumes
On a cold and windy day, the plume from a smokestack sometimes sinks downstream of the stack instead of immediately rising (Figure 1). This isnβt an effect of temperatureβafter all, the exhaust should be warm compared to the ambient, which would make it rise. Itβs actually caused by vorticity.

Figure 2: Simple geometry (side view) In Figure 2, we see a simplified geometry. The wind is blowing from right to left, and its velocity varies with height due to the atmospheric boundary layer. Mathematically, vorticity is the curl of the velocity vector, and because we have a velocity gradient, there is positive (counterclockwise) vorticity generated.

Figure 3: Vortex lines (top view) According to Helmholtz, we can imagine this vorticity as a bunch of infinite vortex lines convecting toward the smokestack, shown in Figure 3. Those vortex lines pile up against the windward side of the smokestackβHelmholtz says that vortex lines canβt end in a fluidβand get stretched out in the wake of the stack. If we could stand upstream of the smokestack and look at the caught vortex line, we would see a downward velocity immediately behind the smokestack and an upward velocity to either side of the stack. Itβs this downward velocity that pulls the smokestackβs plume downward.

Figure 4: Vortex wrapped around stack Now Helmholtzβs theories actually apply to inviscid flows and the real world has viscosity in itβslight though its effects might beβand thatβs why this effect will fade. The vortex lines canβt sit against the smokestack forever; viscosity dissipates them.

Smoke Angel
Smoke from flares released by a C-17 Globemaster III gets caught up by the aircraftβs wingtip vortices, creating a distinctive βsmoke angelβ shape. #

Flettner Rotors Spin Anew
In the 1920s, the world saw a new sort of marine propulsion, ships with one or more tall, smokeless cylinders. These Flettner rotors, named for their inventor, would spin in the wind, generating lift to propel the boat, much as a sail would. (The difference is that the rotor uses the Magnus effect.)
The market crash that kicked off the Great Depression spelled an end to the rotorship, but the idea is getting revived as industries search for greener forms of ship propulsion. Although the Flettner rotor still uses fuel (to spin the rotor), it can complete a voyage on only a small fraction of the fuel needed for conventional propulsion. (Image credit: Getty Images; via PopSci)

Cooling Tower Demolition
As part of the demolition of a decommissioned coal-fired power plant in Nottinghamshire, workers simultaneously demolished eight cooling towers. The video is here. As the towers collapse, smoke and dust gets blown both out of the base and up each tower. The flow details are fascinating. The plumes have rings in them, perhaps related to how the blast’s waves reflect in the tower or how the structure itself fails. Vortex rings curl up as the rising plumes mix with the surrounding air. If you’re anything like me, you’ll have to replay it several times! (Image credit: BBC; submitted by jshoer)

Seeding Clouds With Wildfire
Raging wildfires send plumes of smoke up into the atmosphere; that smoke is made up of tiny particles that can serve as seeds — nucleation sites — where water vapor can freeze and form clouds. To understand wildfire’s effect on cloud growth, researchers sampled air from the troposphere (the atmosphere’s lowest layer) both in and around wildfire smoke.
The team found that smoke increased the number of nucleating particles up to 100 times higher than the background air, but the exact make-up of the smoke varied significantly by fire. Smoke particles were mostly organic, though inorganic ones appeared as well. The temperature of a fire, as well as what materials it was burning, made a big difference; the fire where they measured the highest particle concentrations included lots of unburned plant material, thought to be carried aloft by turbulence around the fire. (Image credit: K. Barry; research credit: K. Barry et al.; via Eos)

Quietening Drones
A drone’s noisiness is one of its major downfalls. Standard drones are obnoxiously loud and disruptive for both humans and animals, one reason that they’re not allowed in many places. This flow visualization, courtesy of the Slow Mo Guys, helps show why. The image above shows a standard off-the-shelf drone rotor. As each blade passes through the smoke, it sheds a wingtip vortex. (Note that these vortices are constantly coming off the blade, but we only see them where they intersect with the smoke.) As the blades go by, a constant stream of regularly-spaced vortices marches downstream of the rotor. This regular spacing creates the dominant acoustic frequency that we hear from the drone.

Animation of wingtip vortices coming off a drone rotor with blades of different lengths. This causes interactions between the vortices, which helps disrupt the drone’s noise. To counter that, the company Wing uses a rotor with blades of different lengths (bottom image). This staggers the location of the shed vortices and causes some later vortices to spin up with their downstream neighbor. These interactions break up that regular spacing that generates the drone’s dominant acoustic frequency. Overall, that makes the drone sound quieter, likely without a large impact to the amount of lift it creates. (Image credit: The Slow Mo Guys)

How Cooling Towers Work
Power plants (and other industrial settings) often need to cool water to control plant temperatures. This usually requires cooling towers like the iconic curved towers seen at nuclear power plants. Towers like these use little to no moving parts — instead relying cleverly on heat transfer, buoyancy, and thermodynamics — to move and cool massive amounts of water. Grady breaks them down in terms of operation, structural engineering, and fluid/thermal dynamics in this Practical Engineering video. Grady’s videos are always great, but I especially love how this one tackles a highly visible piece of infrastructure from multiple engineering perspectives. (Video and image credit: Practical Engineering)

“Magic of the North”
Fires glow above and below in this award-winning image from photographer Josh Beames. In the foreground, lava from an Icelandic eruption spurts into the air and seeps across the landscape as it slowly cools. Above, the northern aurora ripples through the night sky, marking the dance of high-energy particles streaming into our atmosphere, guided by the lines of our magnetic field. Throw in some billowing turbulent smoke, and it’s hard to get more fluid dynamical (or beautiful!) than this. (Image credit: J. Beames/NLPOTY; via Colossal)


