Spiking natural gas power plants with hydrogen could help them burn cleaner as we transition away from carbon power. But burners in power plants and jet engines can be extremely finicky, thanks to thermoacoustic instabilities. As a flame burns, it can sputter and fluctuate in its heat output. That creates pressure oscillations (which we sometimes hear as sound waves) that reflect off the burner’s walls and return toward the flame, causing further fluctuations. This feedback loop can be destructive enough to explode combustion chambers.
Adding hydrogen to a burner designed purely for natural gas can trigger these instabilities (above image), but researchers hope that by exploring fuel-mixtures and their effect at lab-scale, they can help designers find safe ways to adapt industrial burners for the cleaner fuel mixture. (Image and research credit: B. Ahn et al.; via APS Physics)
Microfluidic circuits are key to “labs on a chip” used in medical diagnostics, inkjet printing, and basic research. Typically, channels in these circuits are printed or etched onto solid surfaces, making it difficult to reconfigure them. A group in China developed an alternative design, inspired by reconfigurable toys like Lego blocks. Their set-up, shown above, uses a pillared surface immersed in oil. To create the channels, they pipette water — one droplet at a time — into the space between pillars. The combination of oil and pillars traps the drop. With multiple drops linked together, they get channels, like the ones above that mix two fluids. When the time comes to reconfigure the channels, they just pipette the water out and cut the channel with a sheet of coated paper. (Image and research credit: Y. Zeng et al.; via Physics Today)
Drop a ball that’s partially filled with water and it may or may not bounce. Why the difference? It all comes down to where the water is before impact. The more distributed the water is along the walls, the less likely a container will bounce. Researchers found they could control the bounce by spinning the bottles before they dropped. Centrifugal force flings the water all over the walls of the spinning bottle, and, when impact happens, the water concentrates into a central jet. For the spinning bottles, that jet is wide, messy, and swirling; it breaks up quickly, expending energy that could otherwise go into a bounce. In effect, the spinning bottle’s jet forms quickly enough to “stomp” the rebound. (Video and image credit: A. Martinez et al.; research credit: K. Andrade et al.)
Water striders spend their lives at the air-water boundary, skittering along this interfacial world. But what happens when falling rain destroys their flat existence? That’s the question that motivated today’s research study, which looks water striders subjected to artificial rain.
Although the water drops themselves are far heavier than the insects, the water doesn’t strike hard enough to injure the insects. Neither a direct impact nor the forces from a neighboring impact, the researchers found, were enough to pose a problem for the water strider’s exoskeleton. Instead, they’re more likely to get flung or submerged, as follows:
The initial impact of a raindrop creates a large crater. Depending on the position of the insect relative to the point of impact, this may fling the insect away or pull it down into the cavity.
When the drop hits, it creates a big crater in the water’s surface. Insects to the outside of the splash get flung outward, while those closer to the point of impact ride the crater wall downward. As the crater collapses, it forms a thick jet that pushes nearby water striders up with it.
As the initial cavity collapses, it creates a large jet that can push the strider into the air.
As that initial jet collapses, it forms a second crater, which — being smaller and narrower — collapses much faster than the first one. That action, researchers found, often submerges a water strider caught in the crater.
The first jet’s collapse creates a second crater, and it’s this one that tends to trap and submerge the water strider underwater.
Fortunately for the insect, their water-repellent nature means they’re covered in a thin bubble of air that lets them survive several minutes underwater. That’s time enough for the water strider to rescue itself. (Image credit: top – H. Wang, animations – D. Watson et al.; research credit: D. Watson et al.; via APS Physics)
Drip some ethanol on a hot surface, and you’d expect it to spread into a thin layer and evaporate. But that doesn’t always happen, and a recent study looks at why.
Ethanol is what’s known as a volatile liquid, meaning that it evaporates easily at room temperatures, well below its boiling point. When dropped on a uniformly heated surface above 45 degrees Celsius, the drop contracted into a hemisphere and then began to wander randomly across the surface. Researchers trained an infrared camera on the drop from below (above image), and found an unsteady, roiling motion inside the drop. These asymmetric flows, they concluded, drive the drop’s erratic self-propulsion. They suspect the mechanism may explain why some ink droplets wind up in the wrong place on a page during ink-jet printing. (Image and research credit: P. Kant et al.; via APS Physics)
In fluid dynamics, researchers are often challenged with complicated, messy flows. With so much going on at once, it’s hard to work out a way to keep track of it all. Here, researchers are looking at the break-up of two colliding liquid jets. This setup is often used to break rocket fuel into droplets prior to combustion. This video shows off a new data analysis tool that lets researchers break the flow into different parts, track them in time, and extract data about the changes that happen along the way. (Video and image credit: E. Pruitt et al.)
While vacuums can do pretty wild things to liquids, the title of this Slow Mo Guys video is a bit misleading. They’re not so much exploding gold in a vacuum as they are shredding it during repressurization. Regardless, the visuals are pretty awesome. They place thin foils in a vacuum chamber, pump it down, and then film what happens when they reopen the valve and pressurize the chamber. Flow-wise, that introduces a strong air jet that flows downward in the center of the chamber and causes a recirculating flow up the sides. For the foils, this sudden flow is devastating, shredding the material so thoroughly that it looks like a splash. (Video and image credit: The Slow Mo Guys)
In graduate school, my advisor introduced us to a particularly vexing fluid dynamical thought experiment known as the Feynman sprinkler. After observing an S-shaped sprinkler that rotated when water shot out its arms, physicist Richard Feynman wondered what would happen if the device were placed in a tank of water with the flow reversed. If the sprinkler was sucking in water, would it rotate and, if so, in what direction?
This seemingly simple question has confounded physicists ever since, in part because you can make believable arguments for multiple different results. Attempts to build the apparatus experimentally produced differing results, too — often due to variables that don’t appear in the thought experiment, like friction in the sprinkler’s bearing. But, at long last, a group posits they have the final answer to the problem.
They cleverly built their sprinkler so that it floats in its tank, with the addition or removal of water from the sprinkler controlled by a second siphon-connected tank. With no solid-solid contacts, the sprinkler can rotate with very little friction.
Flow visualization of the sprinkler in reverse (suction) mode. For image clarity, the device is held in place to prevent spinning. Notice how the jets coming into the hub glance off one another and form counter-rotating vortex pairs at an angle. This asymmetry is the source of the sprinkler’s rotation when allowed to move.
The team found that sucking water into the sprinkler does, indeed, reverse the sprinkler’s rotation, but it’s not a simple reversal of the forward sprinkler’s flow. To see why, check out the video above, which visualizes flow inside the sprinkler during suction. For clarity, the device is held fixed in place during flow visualization. Notice that the two arms of the sprinkler sit directly opposite one another in the hub. Thus, you’d expect their two jets to collide and form counter-rotating vortices along a vertical axis. But the vortex pairs are offset from the centerline.
This asymmetry takes place because the velocity profiles of flow across the hub inlets are skewed. Instead of the largest velocity occurring on the centerline of the inlet, each occurs slightly to one side. So when the jets collide, they do so off-center and impart a torque to the sprinkler. The reason for the skewed profiles at the inlets lies further upstream in the curved arms of the sprinkler. Centrifugal force from turning the corner leaves a mark on the flow, leading, ultimately, to the skewed velocity profiles, offset jets, and spinning sprinkler. (Image and research credit: K. Wang et al.; via APS Physics)
In the 1930s, Harold Edgerton used strobed lighting to capture moments too fast for the human eye, including his famous “Milk-Drop Coronet”. Recreating his set-up is far easier today, thanks to technologies like Arduino boards that make timing the drop-strobe-camera sequence simple. This poster is a collage of Edgerton-like images captured by students at Brown University. Even nearly a century after Edgerton, there are countless variations on this beautiful slice of physics: all from the splash of a simple drop striking a pool. (Image credit: R. Zenit et al.)
Every day I stand in front of my refrigerator and listen to the water dispenser pouring water into my glass. The skinny, fast-moving jet of water plunges into the pool, creating a flurry of bubbles. Those bubbles come from air the water jet pulls in with it, and the sound the water makes (minus the fridge’s noises) comes from those bubbles. A short, laminar jet will make fewer bubbles and, therefore, be quieter than a a jet that falls farther before hitting the water.
The reason? That tall jet falls for long enough that its walls start to wobble or even break up completely into separate droplets. Compared to a smooth jet, these wobbly or broken-up jets pull in more air and create more bubbles. That makes them louder. Researchers even suggest that listening to these bubbles can give a noninvasive method for finding how much fresh oxygen is in the water. (Image credit: R. Piedra; research credit: M. Boudina et al.; via APS Physics)
