One of the best known COVID-19 symptoms of this pandemic is difficulty breathing, and while you’ve likely heard a lot about ventilators used to help patients get oxygen, you may not know much about the processes that cause the breathing problems. This video from Deep Look provides a solid overview of the infection route and how lung damage occurs during infection. Perhaps unsurprisingly — this is FYFD, after all — fluid dynamics plays a major role in this process, both under normal conditions and when air sacs in the lungs get damaged by the body’s immune system responding to the virus. (Image and video credit: Deep Look)
Search results for: “art”

A Year From Geostationary Orbit
Our planet is a complex fluid dynamical system, and one of the best ways to watch nature at work is through timelapse. This short film takes us through an entire year, from December 2015 to December 2016, as viewed from a geostationary weather satellite centered over Oceania.
The imagery is rather hypnotic, with clouds swirling day and night across the full field of view. Watch closely, though, and you’ll see a lot of neat phenomena from typhoons forming in the Pacific to wave clouds streaming from the islands of Japan. You can also see clouds blossoming (especially during the day) over the humid rainforests of Oceania.
There are neat non-fluids phenomena, too, like a total solar eclipse and the permanent sunlight of Arctic and Antarctic summers. What do you notice? (Image and video credit: F. Dierich)

Unifying Sediment Transport Theory
On windy days, streaks of snowflakes snake in the air above a mountaintop snowfield. And when snorkeling in the surf, you can watch the inbound waves sculpt underwater ripples in the sand. Both are examples of sediment transport, and scientists have struggled to understand why the physics of these grains seems to differ between air and water. We observe certain behaviors, like saltation, in air and very different behaviors for grains underwater.
One of the key differences is how much erosion occurs for a given amount of shear. In air, the relationship is linear; double the shear stress and you double the sediment transport rate. But in water, the relationship is nonlinear, meaning a small change in the shear stress can have a much larger effect on the rate of transport.
A new study suggests that these differences are really only skin deep. Through detailed simulations, the researchers showed that what really matters is the energy dissipation caused by collisions between grains. Whether the medium is air or water, there are two important regions in the flow: the bed region where particles experience little movement, and the overlying region where grains are energized and lifted by the flow. In this framework, the researchers found no difference in how energy is dissipated, regardless of the medium.
So why do measured sediment transport rates vary between air and water? The authors concluded that the relationship between shear and transport rate is, indeed, nonlinear. It’s just that the wind here on Earth is too weak to reach that nonlinearity. (Image credit: snow – wisconsinpictures, sand – J. Chavez; research credit: T. Pähtz and O. Durán; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

Holding Pipes in Place
Newton’s 3rd law states that any action has an equal and opposite reaction. Often engineers use this to our advantage; the thrust from expelling propellants is what lifts our rockets to space. But sometimes those reactions are undesirable, as illustrated in this Practical Engineering video with underground pipes.
Anytime flow through the pipe is forced to change direction, the flow causes an equal and opposite force on the joint. Just as with rockets, engineers refer to this reaction force as thrust. And if the thrust goes unaccounted for, it will force pipe joints apart. Civil engineers use several methods to fix pipelines against these forces, including concrete blocks that distribute the force to the surrounding soil and flange fittings that resist pipe movement. (Video and image credit: Practical Engineering)

Sliding Foams
What happens when a foam interacts with a sliding surface? That’s the question at the heart of this study, which finds three major regimes of foam-surface interaction. On smooth surfaces (Image 1), foams will simply slide against the wall without sticking or deforming. When surface roughness is about as large as the foam’s wall thickness (Image 2), the foam will stick to individual asperities, then slip to the next rough spot as the wall moves. But when the surface roughness is large compared to the foam wall (Image 3), the foam will remain anchored to the surface and all the shear from the wall’s movement goes into deforming the bulk of the foam.
Researchers thus found they could change foam’s behavior by changing the surface roughness. They also looked at the reverse situation: a surface with fixed roughness — like, say, a human tongue — and how tuning the size of foam bubbles might alter perception and ease of swallowing. That’s what we’re looking at in the last image, where a spoon slides a foam along a surface with roughness similar to the human tongue. (Image and research credit: M. Marchand et al.)

Bristling Sharkskin Fights Separation
The speedy shortfin mako shark has a secret weapon to fight drag: bristling denticles that line its fins and tail. Denticles are tiny, anvil-shaped enamel scales on the mako’s skin. In the photo above, each one is about 100 microns across. Under normal conditions, with flow moving over the shark from nose to tail, the denticles lie flat, providing no interference.
But when sudden changes in flow near the shark’s skin cause water to begin moving in the opposite direction, the denticles flare up. Their rise interferes with the reversed flow, trapping it in small eddies beneath each denticle. Since that flow reversal is a precursor to the flow separating from the shark’s body, the bristling effectively cuts off flow separation before it can begin. The result is much less separation and much lower drag. Once the flow stops trying to move upstream, the denticles settle back into their original place. (Image credit: mako shark – jidanchaomian, denticles – J. Oeffner and G. Lauder, illustration – A. Lang, bristling – A. Lang et al.; research credit: A. Lang and A. Lang et al.; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

Icy Swirls
Rafts of sea ice follow swirling eddies in this satellite image of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Just as with phytoplankton blooms and sediment, this thin sea ice can be moved by wind and currents to reveal hidden flow patterns. Experimentalists use many similar diagnostics that introduce bubbles, particles, smoke, and other tracers into flows to visualize motion that’s otherwise invisible. (Image credit: J. Stevens/NOAA/NASA; via NASA Earth Observatory)

Choosing Swimming Over Flight
When studying modern birds it quickly becomes apparent that they can either be good at swimming or at flying, but not at both. The characteristics that make wings good for flying are diametrically opposed to those that make for a good swimmer. So most species have chosen to invest in one strategy or the other. Penguin ancestors chose the swimming route tens of millions of years ago, in the aftermath of the extinction event that emptied our oceans of the large reptilian predators that had ruled them during the age of the dinosaurs. This video explores what we know about the fossil record of these birds, and it’s pretty incredible. Did you know there used to be 2-meter-tall penguins? (Image and video credit: PBS Eons)

Breaking Up Granular Rafts
Particles at a fluid interface will often gather into a collection known as a granular raft. The geometry of the interface where it meets individual particles, combined with the surface tension, creates the capillary forces that attract these particles to one another. Colloquially, this is called the Cheerio’s effect; it’s the same physics that draws those cereal chunks together in your bowl.
Once together, these granular rafts can be surprisingly difficult to break up. That’s the focus of a new study on erosion in granular rafts. As seen in the top image, the raft has to be moving quite quickly before individual beads get pulled away. The experimental set-up here is pretty neat, and it’s not apparent from the video, so I’ll take a moment to explain it. The particles you see are gathered at an interface between water and oil. To generate the movement we see, researchers take the metal cylinder seen at the left of the image and pull it downward. That curves the oil-water interface, effectively creating a hill for the raft to accelerate down.
To focus in on the forces necessary to separate individual particles, the researchers also looked at a pair of particles (bottom image). With this set-up, they could more easily track the geometry of the contact line where the oil, water, and bead meet. What they found is that the attractive forces generated between the beads are two orders of magnitude larger than predicted by classical theory. To correctly capture the effect, they needed a far more precise description of the contact line geometry around a sphere than is typically used. (Image and research credit: A. Lagarde and S. Protière)

Shock Waves Drive Nova Brightening
New observations of nova V906 Carinae have provided some of the first direct evidence that the observed brightening of these stellar objects is driven by shock waves. Novae form when hydrogen from a companion star settles onto a white dwarf. Once enough material accumulates, the white dwarf blows out the excess hydrogen in a donut-shaped shell moving about the speed of a typical solar wind.
Next, another outflow — likely triggered by residual nuclear reactions on the dwarf’s surface — slams into the denser shell at about twice the speed. This collision triggers shock waves that emit light in the gamma and visible wavelengths. Weeks later, a third, even faster outflow expanded into the cloud, generating more shock waves and measurable flares. (Video credit: NASA Goddard; research credit: E. Aydi et al.)
























