In “Dispersion,” particles spread under the influence of an unseen fluid. Like Roman de Giuli’s work, filmmaker Susi Sie creates macro images that look like ice floes, deserts, and river deltas viewed from above. This similarity of patterns at both large and small scales is a specialty of fluid physics. Just as artists use it to mimic larger flows, scientists use it to study planet-scale problems in the lab. (Video and image credit: S. Sie et al.)
Knowing what speed a landslide will reach helps us predict how much damage they can cause. That speed depends on many factors: the steepness of the terrain, the sliding distance, the thickness of the flowing layer, and the type of grains making up the flow. Researchers found that predictions from previous studies often underestimated the speeds reached by thicker flows. Through laboratory experiments with grains of different shapes, a team found that those models mistakenly assumed a fully-developed flow — in other words, one where the grains have reached a constant final speed. While spherical grains reach that state over a short sliding distance, that’s not the case for other grains.
Instead, the team used their results to build a new predictive model for landslide speeds. This one still depends on incline angle and flow thickness, but it also uses a dynamical friction coefficient to describe the granular material and capture how the flow’s speed varies with distance down the incline. (Image credit: W. Hasselmann; research credit: Y. Wu et al.; via APS News)
Liquid crystals, bottles of pills, and hoppers of grains can all involve disk-shaped particles. To better understand how disks pack together, researchers studied how disks in a box orient themselves after shaking. They used MRI to observe the disks’ interior packing.
The team found that shaking increases the disks’ density, but that increase does not come from disks orienting in the same direction. Instead, the disks form short stacks of similarly-oriented disks. The stacks themselves took on many different orientations, which reduced the system’s overall alignment in orientation. (Image credit: coins – M. Blan, packing – Y. Ding et al.; research credit: Y. Ding et al.; via APS Physics)
In snowy mountainous regions, avalanches are a dangerous and destructive problem. Researchers studying the mechanisms of these flows have a suggestion: plant more trees. A group of researchers found that a “forest” of regularly spaced pillars slowed avalanches by as much as two-thirds. On an empty slope, the avalanche picked up speed as its thickness grew. But with regularly-spaced pillars the slower flow rate became almost completely independent of avalanche thickness.
For now, the researchers suggest placing trees every 3 meters on steep, avalanche-prone slopes — a technique that, admittedly, only works for slopes below the treeline. In their next round of experiments, the researchers plan to see how a randomly arranged forest affects an avalanche. (Image credit: top – N. Cool, apparatus – Université Paris-Saclay/FAST; research credit: B. Texier et al.; via Physics World)
The clear plastic disks use to study clogging appear rather plain — at least until you look at them through polarizers. Then the disks light up with a web of lines that reveal the unseen forces between the particles. In this video, researchers use this trick to explore how spontaneous clogs occur. If particles jam together into an arch, that bridge can be strong enough to hold the weight of all the particles above it, bringing the flow to a halt. Some arches aren’t strong enough to hold for long; they can break in moments. Other more stable arches persist. By watching the flow through polarizers and carefully tracking the ebb and flow of the forces between particles, researchers can predict which clogs will have staying power. (Video credit: B. McMillan et al.)
Getting around on sandy slopes is no easy feat. On steep inclines, even small disturbances will cause an avalanche. The predatory antlion takes advantage of this fact by building a conical pit that makes ants that walk in slide down into its waiting jaws. But a new study shows that it’s more than just pressure that determines when an object slides down the slope.
To simulate hapless ants sliding into an antlion’s pit, researchers used plexiglass disks with four smaller disks that act as legs on the granular slope. By varying the distance between these points of contact, researchers found that stance also affects when a slide starts. The closer together the contacts are, the more likely the disk would slide. In contrast, spreading the points of contact increased stability, meaning that adopting a wider stance could keep an animal, human, or robot from sliding as easily. (Image credit: NEOM; research credit: M. Piñeirua et al.; via APS Physics)
After the 2018 Anak Krakatoa eruption, a tsunami that ricocheted through the surrounding waters, killing hundreds on nearby islands. The source of that tsunami was a small landslide. Once the air cleared and researchers could assess how much material slid into the ocean, they were shocked that such a small volume created so much destruction.
Now new efforts are revealing the linkage between landslides and the waves they make. Researchers released glass beads into a tank of water, observing the waves that form as the beads run out. Depending on the relative initial height of the beads compared to the water depth, they observed three different kinds of waves. Not only that, they were able to connect the granular mechanics of the landslide to the hydrodynamic formation of waves, allowing predictions of the waves that will form for a given landslide.
Currently, the predictive model isn’t sophisticated enough to handle a geometry as complex as that of the Anak Krakatoa landslide, but it’s an important step toward understanding — and potentially mitigating the damage of — future oceanside landslides. (Image and research credit: W. Sarlin et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
Here’s a neat bit of fluid dynamics derived from a day at the beach! Our experiment begins with well-mixed (and likely compacted) sand grains and sea water in a bottle. When flipped, the sand layer sits at the top of the bottle with the water layer beneath.
Very quickly new layers establish themselves in the bottle. The lower half of the bottle turns into a turbulent churn of water and sand, topped by a thin air bubble, then the thick sand layer, and finally, a layer of filtered water. That air bubble beneath the sand means that the sand layer is compacted enough that surface tension keeps the air from being able to squeeze through the grains. On the other hand, water is able to filter through, eventually making it into that upper region. The compact layer of sand is supported in the bottle by force chains running through the largest grains, which is why only fine sediment settles down through the turbulent layer at this point.
Eventually, the top sand layer erodes enough that it can no longer support its weight, and the sand collapses. As the grains settle out, we end up with fine sediment on the bottom (as previously discussed), followed by a layer of coarse sand from the erosion and collapse of the sand layer, topped with a layer of very fine grains that — due to their light weight — are the very last to settle out of the water. I love that such a simple seaside experiment contains such scientific depth! (Video and submission credit: M. Schich; special thanks to Nathalie V. for helpful input)
Sand and other granular materials can flow, jam, and transmit forces in counterintuitive ways. This Lutetium Project video gives a nice overview of some of these bizarre properties.
Many of sand’s odd characteristics come from the way forces move through grains that touch. Around 5:20 there’s a demo of one of these effects: the Janssen effect. Using a scale, the video shows the mass of a bunch of grains. Then, the host pours those grains into a narrow cylinder. If you watch the scale, you’ll see that it shows a smaller mass than before. That’s not because of a difference in mass between the bowl and the cylinder; the scale is calibrated to only measure the mass of the grains. In the narrow cylinder the grains appear to weigh less because part of their weight is being supported by force chains that run to the container’s walls. (Image and video credit: The Lutetium Project)
Finger-like shapes often form on fluids injected between glass plates, but what happens when that injected fluid contains particles? That’s the situation in this recent study, where researchers sandwiched a fluid between two glass plates and then injected a second, similar fluid laced with particles.
Despite the differences from the traditional Saffman-Taylor set-up, the granular-filled fluid still forms fingers as long as there’s even a slight density difference between the original and injected fluids. It doesn’t even matter which of the two fluids has the greater density! (Image and research credit: A. Kudrolli et al.)