FYFD

Search results for: “flow visualization”

  • Replacing Kalliroscope

    Replacing Kalliroscope

    Although you may not recognize the name, you’ve probably seen Kalliroscope (top image), a pearlescent fluid that creates beautiful flow patterns when swirled. This rheoscopic fluid was invented in the mid-1960s by artist Paul Matisse and, over the following decades, became a staple of flow visualization techniques. Kalliroscope contained a suspension of crystalline guanine. Since the crystals were asymmetric, they would orient themselves depending on the flow and, from there, scatter light, creating the beautiful pearlescent effect seen above.

    Unfortunately for researchers, the production of guanine crystals was expensive and difficult. The cosmetics industry was their main consumer and over time, they moved toward mica and other cheaper mineral alternatives. The company that produced Kalliroscope gave up production in 2014, leaving researchers scrambling for a suitable alternative.

    One contender for a new standard rheoscopic fluid is based on shaving cream. By diluting shaving cream 20:1 with water, researchers are able to extract stearic acid crystals, which form an admirable alternative to Kalliroscope (middle collage). Like Kalliroscope, the resulting fluid is pearlescent and reveals flow features well (bottom two images). Stearic acid crystals are also closer in density to water than guanine, so the fluid remains in suspension far better than Kalliroscope. Plus, the best shaving cream is cheap and widely available, meaning that this is a DIY project just about anyone can do! (Image credits: Kalliroscope – P. Matisse; other images – D. Borrero-Echeverry et al.; research credit: D. Borrero-Echeverry et al.)

  • Dissolving Candy

    Dissolving Candy

    In nature, solid surfaces often evolve over time in conjunction with the flows around them. This is how stalactites, canyons, and hoodoos all form and change over time. Here researchers examine a surface formed from hard candy that is dissolving from below. Over time, the initially flat surface develops a pitted appearance (top image, scale bar is 1 cm) with roughness that is approximately 1 mm in scale. Flow visualization (bottom row) suggests that these pits result from local flow where narrow, millimeter-sized dense plumes fall away from the surface. 

    As material dissolves from the candy, it forms a dense layer of sugar-water mixture near the solid surface. Once that layer grows to a critical thickness, it will be too unstable for viscosity to counter. At that point, the Rayleigh-Taylor instability takes over, causing the dense sugar-water layer to break up into narrow, sinking plumes. Although each area is evolving independently, the rate at which material dissolves is uniform everywhere, so the dissolving body retains the same shape over time. (Image and research credit: M. Davies Wykes et al., source)

  • Space Shuttle Sonic Booms

    Space Shuttle Sonic Booms

    The Space Shuttle had a famous double sonic boom when passing overhead during re-entry. This schlieren flow visualization of a model shuttle at Mach 3 reveals the source of the sound: the fore and aft shock waves on the vehicle. The nose of the shuttle generates the strongest shock wave since it is the first part of the vehicle the flow interacts with. This initial shock wave turns the flow outward and around the shuttle. The second boom comes from the back of the shuttle and serves to turn the flow back in to fill the wake behind the shuttle. (The actual shock wave would look a little different than this one because there’s no sting holding the shuttle like there is with the model.) The other major shock wave comes from the shuttle’s wings, but, at least for this Mach number, the wing shock wave merges with the bow shock, making the two indistinguishable. (Image credit: G. Settles, source)

  • Cycling Skinsuits and Vortex Generators

    Cycling Skinsuits and Vortex Generators

    It didn’t take long for an aerodynamic controversy to crop up in this year’s Tour de France. At the 14km individual time trial, riders from Team Sky wore custom Castelli skinsuits with integrated dot-like patterns on their upper arms (shown above). By the next day, a sports scientist with a competing team cried foul play, claiming that these fabrics could have given Team Sky as much as 25 seconds’ advantage over other riders. The Sky team finished with 4 out of the top 10 places on the time trial, and their leader, three-time Tour winner Chris Froome, finished some 35 seconds ahead of his expected competitors for the yellow jersey.

    Vortex generators explained

    So how could a few dots make a measurable difference? These protrusions are vortex generators meant to modify flow around a cyclist. Humans are not aerodynamic and what typically happens when air flows over a cyclist’s arms is shown in the flow visualization above: the air follows the curve of the arm part way, then it separates from the body, leaving a region of recirculation that increases drag. Vortex generators can help prevent or delay that drag-inducing flow separation by adding extra energy and turbulence to the air near the arm’s surface. Because turbulent boundary layers can follow a curve longer before separating, this helps reduce the drag by reducing the recirculation zone.

    About that time savings

    Aerodynamically speaking, those vortex generators can make a difference, but the question is, how much? In his complaint, Grappe cites a 2016 paper by L. Brownlie et al. that wind-tunnel tested different vortex generator patterns for use in running apparel. The speeds tested included those relevant to cycling. The specific numbers Grappe quotes aren’t directly relevant, however:

    As noted above, race garments that contain VG provide reductions in Fd of between 3.7 and 6.8% compared to equivalent
    advanced race apparel developed for the 2012 London Olympics which in turn provided substantially lower drag than
    conventional race apparel.

    the effectiveness of 5, 10 and 15 cm wide strips of VG applied to each flank of a sleeveless singlet revealed that the 5 cm wide
    strips provided between 3.1 and 7.1% less Fd than the 10 cm wide strips and between 1.9 and 4.3% less Fd than the 15 cm wide
    strips.  

    Here Brownlie et al. are specifically describing the savings for running apparel, which uses vortex generators in very different places than you would on a cyclist. Note the second quote even refers to a sleeveless singlet, so the vortex generators measured are definitely not in the same place as these skinsuits!

    The bottom line

    I fully expect that vortex generators give a marginal aerodynamic edge, which is why Sky and other teams have already been using them in competition. But I hesitate to declare that the savings is as high as 5-7%, and I have no way to verify Grappe’s subsequent claims that this translates to 18-25 seconds in the time trial. Those are numbers he gives without citing what model is being used to translate drag gains into time.

    In the end, what is needed is clarification of the rules. As they stand, one rule seems to allow the skinsuits because the vortex generators are integrated into the fabric, whereas another states clothing is forbidden “to influence the performances of a rider such as reducing air resistance”. Those two stances seems contradictory, and, for now, the race officials’ verdict to allow the suits stands.

    If you want to learn more about aerodynamics and cycling, be sure to check out my latest FYFD video. (Image credits: B. Tessier/Reuters; Getty Images; L. Brownlie et al. 2009; h/t to W. Küper)

  • How Cycling Position Affects Aerodynamics

    How Cycling Position Affects Aerodynamics

    New FYFD video! How much does a rider’s position on the bike affect the drag they experience? To find out I teamed up with folks from the University of Colorado at Boulder and at SimScale to explore this topic using high-speed video, flow visualization, and computational fluid dynamics. 

    Check out the full video below, and if you need some more cycling science before the Tour de France gets rolling, you can find some of my previous cycling-related posts here. (Image and video credit: N. Sharp; CFD simulation – A. Arafat)

    ETA: Please note that the video contained in this post was sponsored by SimScale.

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Quad Copter Schlieren

    Schlieren photography is a classic method of flow visualization that utilizes small variations in density (or temperature) to make otherwise unseen air motion visible. Because changing air’s density or temperature changes its index of refraction, variations in either quantity show up as dark and light regions. Here researchers use it to reveal some of the airflow around a small quadcopter, including the vortices that spiral off each propeller and help generate the lift necessary for take-off. The full video includes a couple of neat demos, including what happens when the blades are wet (shown below). In that case, the wingtip vortices are somewhat disrupted by strings of water droplets being flung off the blades by centrifugal force. Beautiful!  (Video and image credit: K. Nolan et al., source; submitted by J. Stafford)

  • Starfish Vortices

    Starfish Vortices

    Starfish larvae, like other microorganisms, use tiny hair-like cilia to move the fluid around them. By beating these cilia in opposite directions on different parts of their bodies, the larvae create vortices, as seen in the flow visualization above. The starfish larvae don’t use these vortices for swimming – to swim, you’d want to push all the fluid in the same direction. Instead the vortices help the larvae feed. The more vortices they create, the more it stirs the fluid around them and draws in algae from far away. The larvae actually switch gears regularly, using few vortices when they want to swim and more when they want to eat. Check out the full video below to see the full explanation and more beautiful footage.  (Image/video credit: W. Gilpin et al.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Fluorescein Ghosts

    Fluorescein is a popular chemical for flow visualization, and, as this video from Shanks FX demonstrates, it’s not hard to extract from highlighters if you’d like to experiment with it yourself. Fluorescein can also be purchased in powder form, but it’s typically rendered into a dye before use. When dripped into water, it can leave behind ghostly glowing wakes. Happy Halloween! (Video credit: Shanks FX)

    In other news, I am back from my vacation! Thanks again to Claire from Brilliant Botany for looking out for everything while I was gone. – Nicole

  • Soap Film Wakes

    Soap Film Wakes

    Soap films can create remarkable flow visualizations when illuminated with monochromatic (single color) light. Each of the photos above shows a flow moving from left to right with a small object near the left creating an obstruction. In the top two images, the objects are cylinders; in the lower one it’s a flat plate tilted at 45 degrees. All of the objects shed vortices as the flow moves past. These vortices alternate in direction – the first spins clockwise, the next counter-clockwise, then clockwise again and so on. This pattern is known as a von Karman vortex street and can even show up in the atmosphere! (Image credit: D. Araya et al.)

  • Rio 2016: Rugby

    Rio 2016: Rugby

    The sport of rugby returns to the Olympics in Rio this year. Rugby’s ball is somewhat similar in size and shape to an American football, but it is a little wider and more rounded. Aerodynamically, this means that the rugby ball has  more drag, but it is also more stable in flight, allowing players to pass and kick accurately, with or without a spiral.

    As seen in the flow visualizations above, air travels up and around the ball before separating on the far side. The more the ball is tilted, the larger this separated region is and the greater the drag. At the same time, though, that tilt provides lift on the ball. The ideal orientation is the one with the largest ratio of lift force and drag force. For a rugby ball, this occurs at about 40 degrees.(Image credits: Planet Rugby; A. Vance et al.)

    Previously: The aerodynamics of the American football

    Join us throughout the Rio Olympics for more fluid dynamics in sports. If you love FYFD, please help support the site!

More posts