FYFD

Search results for: “droplet”

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    How Ant Stingers Work

    Anyone who’s felt the sting of a fire ant knows it only takes an instant for this species to deliver a painful blow. Scientists are uncovering why that is using some of the first-ever high-speed footage of ant stingers in action. Stingers are actually made up of multiple separate pieces, including a central stylet and a pair of lancets that move up and down along the stylet. This lancet motion pulls the stinger deeper and helps form and deliver droplets of venom. The back-and-forth motion helps ants release up to 13 venom droplets per second, a level of speed that’s key for some of its high-speed, small-scale battles. (Image and video credit: Ant Lab; research credit: A. Smith)

  • Collecting Dew

    Collecting Dew

    In areas of the world where fresh water is scarce, one potential source is dew collection. Scientists have been working in recent years on making overnight dew collection more efficient. The challenge is that drops won’t begin to slide down an inclined surface until they are large enough for gravity to overcome the surface tension forces that pin the drop. Most efforts have focused on reducing the critical size where drops begin to slide through surface treatments and chemical coatings. 

    A recent study, however, uses a different tactic. Instead of aiming to reduce the critical drop size, these researchers built a grooved surface designed to encourage drops to grow faster. By helping the droplets coalesce quickly, their surface (right side) is able to start shedding droplets much faster than a smooth surface (left side). Under test conditions, the grooved surface was shedding droplets after only 30 minutes, whereas the smooth surface shed its first drops after 2 hours. (Image and research credit: P. Bintein et al.; see also APS Physics)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Pouring a Liquid Mirror

    In this video, the Slow Mo Guys play with liquid gallium, giving us a chance to see how molten metals behave (outside of, say, the Terminator movies). Near its melting point, gallium is about six times denser than water, with a viscosity three times higher, and a surface tension about ten times greater. So how do those properties affect its behavior?

    You may be surprised that when watching the gallium vibrate on a speaker or get poured into a pan, it doesn’t look all that different from water. Yes, it’s highly reflective, but, on the whole it doesn’t look radically different from a distance. We can use the Reynolds number to quantify what’s going on here. It’s a dimensionless number that compares the fluid’s inertial force to the viscous force. Imagine we have two versions of an experiment, one where we pour gallium at a given speed and one pouring at the same volume and speed but with water. If we compared the Reynolds numbers of the water and the gallium, they only differ by a factor of two. Overall, that’s not very much. That’s why the two pours look similar.

    The story is different, though, if we look at individual drops of gallium and water, like when the first few drops of our pour hit the surface. Check out the gallium drops below. They’re conical on either end! This looks very different from what we expect with water droplets. You might think that’s because the metal is more viscous, but if we compare a water drop with a gallium drop of the same characteristic size and impact speed, we find a different story. For this, we’ll use the Ohnesorge number, which compares the viscous forces to a combination of inertia and surface tension. In this case, we find that the gallium drop’s Ohnesorge number is almost an order of magnitude smaller than the water droplet’s. That means that viscosity isn’t a major factor for our gallium drop. Both surface tension and inertia are more important.

    But if the surface tension is so high, then why aren’t the droplets spherical? Mostly because they don’t have time to form spheres before they hit. Their shape suggests that they’ve only just broken into droplets, which makes sense if the pour is fast and the surface tension is strong. (Video and image credit: The Slow Mo Guys)

  • Superwalkers

    Superwalkers

    Walking droplets – drops that bounce their way across a pool of the same liquid without coalescing – have fascinated researchers in recent years with their unusual behaviors, some of which mimic quantum phenomena. In a new experiment, researchers vibrate the pool at two frequencies simultaneously, which helps support much larger droplets, known as superwalkers. When the two driving frequencies are close to a harmonic match – like at 80 Hz and just under half that at 39.5 Hz – the droplets will walk, then come to a stop, and then begin walking again. (Image and research credit: R. Valani et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Justin B and Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Catching Fire

    Catching Fire

    Citrus fruits like oranges house tiny pockets of oil in their peels. When squeezed, the oils jet out in tiny micro-jets that are about the width of a human hair. Despite their small size, the jets reach speeds of about 30 m/s and quickly break into a stream of droplets. When exposed to the flame of a lighter, like in the animation above, those microdroplets combust easily, creating a momentary fireball used to augment some cocktails. For more on how the citrus peel generates these jets, check out this previous post. (Image credit: Warped Perception, source; research credit: N. Smith et al.)

  • Condensing Halos

    Condensing Halos

    Drops that impact a very hot surface will surf on their own vapor, and ones that hit a very cold surface will freeze almost immediately. But what happens when the temperature differences aren’t so extreme? Scientists explored this (above) by dropping room-temperature water droplets onto a cool surface – one warmer than the freezing point but cooler than the dew point at which water condenses. 

    They found that impacting drops formed a triple halo of condensate (right).  The first and brightest ring forms at the radius of the drop’s maximum extent during impact. The second band forms from water vapor that leaves the droplet at impact. As that vapor cools, it condenses into a second band. The final, dimmest band forms as the droplet stabilizes and cools. It’s the result of water vapor near the droplet continuing to cool and condense. (Image and research credit: Y. Zhao et al.; via Nature News; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Oil-on-Water Impact

    Oil-on-Water Impact

    Although many people have studied droplet impacts over the years, there’s been remarkably little work done with oil-on-water impacts. One of the things that makes this situation different is that the oil and water are completely immiscible, which means we can see aspects of the impact process that are invisible with, say, water-on-water impacts.

    The animation above shows an underwater view of the oil droplet’s impact. The energy of the initial impact creates an expanding crater and an unstable crown splash. That crown splash contains both water and oil. After it ejects some droplets, the rim stabilizes, but we can still see small perturbations along its edge as it starts to retract. In the water, high surface tension damps out these perturbations. Not so for the oil! As the crater retracts, the small disturbances along the rim get stretched into mushroom-shaped fingers that point inward toward the impact site. Because the index of refraction is different between oil and water, we can see the fingers clearly near the end of the animation. (Image and research credit: U. Jain et al.; submitted by Utkarsh J.)

  • Bubble Break-Up

    Bubble Break-Up

    When bubbles burst, they spray a myriad of tiny droplets into the air. In general, the older a bubble gets, the thinner it is, thanks to gravity draining its liquid away. When older bubbles burst, they create tinier and more numerous droplets (upper right) compared to a younger bubble (upper left). But there are more forces than just gravity at play.

    Bubbles also undergo evaporation – most effectively at the apex. Evaporation cools the cap of the bubble, increasing its surface tension and triggering a Marangoni flow that helps restore fluid to the bubble film. This stabilizes an aging bubble. 

    Contamination plays a role as well. The bright spots in the bottom image reveal bacteria in the bubble’s cap. Compared to a clean bubble, these contaminated ones can survive far longer and, when burst, produce 10 times as many droplets as a clean bubble of the same age. That has major implications for disease transmission, especially for bacteria that spend a significant portion of their life cycle in liquids. (Image and research credit: S. Poulain and L. Bourouiba; see also Physics Today)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Reader Question: Inside a Vortex

    Reader embersofkymillo asks:

    Hey FYFD, could you do some analysis/explanations behind the physics of this vortex stuff? I love when you do spots on Slow Mo Guys vids and figured I’d share a recent one w you 

    I enjoy doing that, too! So let’s talk a little about vortices. What Dan’s tea stirrer is doing is creating a low-pressure core for a vortex. We can see just how strong that low pressure region is by the way it sucks the air-water interface down toward the spinning arms. Eventually the interface and stirrer meet, and what was once a single, smooth(ish) surface gets torn into a myriad of bubbles. (As an aside, those bubbles get loud.) 

    I also like the sequence of sugar cube drops because they make for some very cool splashes. Notice how the orientation of the cube’s edges as it hits determines the shape of the inital splash curtain. The asymmetry borne out of that impact actually follows through all the way through the seal of the cavity behind the cube. It reminds me of this oldie-but-goodie video on drops hitting different shapes. (Video and image credit: The Slow Mo Guys; submitted by embersofkymillo)

  • The Leidenfrost Crack

    The Leidenfrost Crack

    In 1756, Leidenfrost reported on the peculiar behaviors of droplets on surface much hotter than the liquid’s boiling point. Such droplets were highly mobile, surfing on a thin layer of their own vapor and were prone to loud cracking noises.

    More recently, scientists have observed that drops with an initially small radius eventually rocket off the hot surface whereas larger drops end their lives in an explosion (above) – the source of Leidenfrost’s crack. Now researchers have explained why drops of different sizes have such different fates. The key is their level of contamination.

    To reach the take-off radius, the drop has to evaporate a significant portion of its volume. For an initially-large drop, that’s tough because any solid contaminants in the drop will build up along the surface of the drop as it shrinks. Eventually, they restrict the liquid from evaporating, which thins the vapor layer the drop sits on. It sinks until a part of it touches the surface. The sudden influx of heat from the surface explosively destroys whatever remains of the drop. (Image and research credit: S. Lyu et al.; via Brown University; submitted by gdurey)

More posts