Rus Khasanov’s latest short film, “Unity,” is all about coming together with droplets coalescing, globules bursting, and colors mixing. Take a glittery, paint-filled break and enjoy some macro-filmed fluid dynamics in action. (Video and image credit: R. Khasanov)
The dripping of a faucet and the break-up of a jet into droplets is universal. That means that the forces – the inertia of the fluid, the capillary forces governed by surface tension, and the viscous dissipation – balance in such a way that the initial conditions of the jet – its size, speed, etc. – don’t matter to the process of break-up.
We’d expect that the inverse situation – the breakup of a gas into bubbles in a liquid – would be similarly universal, but it’s not. When unconfined bubbles pinch off, the way they do so is heavily influenced by initial conditions. But that changes, according to a new study, if you confine the gas to a liquid-filled tube before pinch-off. Confinement forces a different balance between viscous and capillary effects, one which effectively erases the initial conditions of the flow and restores universality to the pinch-off process. (Image and research credit: A. Pahlavan et al.; via phys.org)
The question of whether a droplet will splash is a complicated one, even for smooth surfaces, but researchers are also interested in what happens to hairy surfaces when droplets strike. By varying the droplet viscosity and speed, along with the spacing of the hairs, researchers sketched out the variety of impacts one can get.
What happens during impact depends largely on how the kinetic energy of the droplet compares to the dissipation caused by interaction with the hairs. When the two balance, the droplet gets captured, like in the upper right image. If the hairy dissipation wins, you get a drop that stays mostly on the surface of the hairs. And if the kinetic energy outweighs the dissipation, you end up with a star-shaped splash that spreads between the hairs. (Image and research credit: A. Nasto et al.)
Anyone who’s felt the sting of a fire ant knows it only takes an instant for this species to deliver a painful blow. Scientists are uncovering why that is using some of the first-ever high-speed footage of ant stingers in action. Stingers are actually made up of multiple separate pieces, including a central stylet and a pair of lancets that move up and down along the stylet. This lancet motion pulls the stinger deeper and helps form and deliver droplets of venom. The back-and-forth motion helps ants release up to 13 venom droplets per second, a level of speed that’s key for some of its high-speed, small-scale battles. (Image and video credit: Ant Lab; research credit: A. Smith)
In areas of the world where fresh water is scarce, one potential source is dew collection. Scientists have been working in recent years on making overnight dew collection more efficient. The challenge is that drops won’t begin to slide down an inclined surface until they are large enough for gravity to overcome the surface tension forces that pin the drop. Most efforts have focused on reducing the critical size where drops begin to slide through surface treatments and chemical coatings.
A recent study, however, uses a different tactic. Instead of aiming to reduce the critical drop size, these researchers built a grooved surface designed to encourage drops to grow faster. By helping the droplets coalesce quickly, their surface (right side) is able to start shedding droplets much faster than a smooth surface (left side). Under test conditions, the grooved surface was shedding droplets after only 30 minutes, whereas the smooth surface shed its first drops after 2 hours. (Image and research credit: P. Bintein et al.; see also APS Physics)
In this video, the Slow Mo Guys play with liquid gallium, giving us a chance to see how molten metals behave (outside of, say, the Terminator movies). Near its melting point, gallium is about six times denser than water, with a viscosity three times higher, and a surface tension about ten times greater. So how do those properties affect its behavior?
You may be surprised that when watching the gallium vibrate on a speaker or get poured into a pan, it doesn’t look all that different from water. Yes, it’s highly reflective, but, on the whole it doesn’t look radically different from a distance. We can use the Reynolds number to quantify what’s going on here. It’s a dimensionless number that compares the fluid’s inertial force to the viscous force. Imagine we have two versions of an experiment, one where we pour gallium at a given speed and one pouring at the same volume and speed but with water. If we compared the Reynolds numbers of the water and the gallium, they only differ by a factor of two. Overall, that’s not very much. That’s why the two pours look similar.
The story is different, though, if we look at individual drops of gallium and water, like when the first few drops of our pour hit the surface. Check out the gallium drops below. They’re conical on either end! This looks very different from what we expect with water droplets. You might think that’s because the metal is more viscous, but if we compare a water drop with a gallium drop of the same characteristic size and impact speed, we find a different story. For this, we’ll use the Ohnesorge number, which compares the viscous forces to a combination of inertia and surface tension. In this case, we find that the gallium drop’s Ohnesorge number is almost an order of magnitude smaller than the water droplet’s. That means that viscosity isn’t a major factor for our gallium drop. Both surface tension and inertia are more important.
But if the surface tension is so high, then why aren’t the droplets spherical? Mostly because they don’t have time to form spheres before they hit. Their shape suggests that they’ve only just broken into droplets, which makes sense if the pour is fast and the surface tension is strong. (Video and image credit: The Slow Mo Guys)
Walking droplets – drops that bounce their way across a pool of the same liquid without coalescing – have fascinated researchers in recent years with their unusual behaviors, some of which mimic quantum phenomena. In a new experiment, researchers vibrate the pool at two frequencies simultaneously, which helps support much larger droplets, known as superwalkers. When the two driving frequencies are close to a harmonic match – like at 80 Hz and just under half that at 39.5 Hz – the droplets will walk, then come to a stop, and then begin walking again. (Image and research credit: R. Valani et al.; via APS Physics; submitted by Justin B and Kam-Yung Soh)
Citrus fruits like oranges house tiny pockets of oil in their peels. When squeezed, the oils jet out in tiny micro-jets that are about the width of a human hair. Despite their small size, the jets reach speeds of about 30 m/s and quickly break into a stream of droplets. When exposed to the flame of a lighter, like in the animation above, those microdroplets combust easily, creating a momentary fireball used to augment some cocktails. For more on how the citrus peel generates these jets, check out this previous post. (Image credit: Warped Perception, source; research credit: N. Smith et al.)
Drops that impact a very hot surface will surf on their own vapor, and ones that hit a very cold surface will freeze almost immediately. But what happens when the temperature differences aren’t so extreme? Scientists explored this (above) by dropping room-temperature water droplets onto a cool surface – one warmer than the freezing point but cooler than the dew point at which water condenses.
They found that impacting drops formed a triple halo of condensate (right). The first and brightest ring forms at the radius of the drop’s maximum extent during impact. The second band forms from water vapor that leaves the droplet at impact. As that vapor cools, it condenses into a second band. The final, dimmest band forms as the droplet stabilizes and cools. It’s the result of water vapor near the droplet continuing to cool and condense. (Image and research credit: Y. Zhao et al.; via Nature News; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
Although many people have studied droplet impacts over the years, there’s been remarkably little work done with oil-on-water impacts. One of the things that makes this situation different is that the oil and water are completely immiscible, which means we can see aspects of the impact process that are invisible with, say, water-on-water impacts.
The animation above shows an underwater view of the oil droplet’s impact. The energy of the initial impact creates an expanding crater and an unstable crown splash. That crown splash contains both water and oil. After it ejects some droplets, the rim stabilizes, but we can still see small perturbations along its edge as it starts to retract. In the water, high surface tension damps out these perturbations. Not so for the oil! As the crater retracts, the small disturbances along the rim get stretched into mushroom-shaped fingers that point inward toward the impact site. Because the index of refraction is different between oil and water, we can see the fingers clearly near the end of the animation. (Image and research credit: U. Jain et al.; submitted by Utkarsh J.)