Though often spotted in water waves or clouds, the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is easily demonstrated in the lab as well. Here a tank with two layers of liquid – fresh water on top and denser blue-dyed saltwater on the bottom – is used to generate the instability. When level, the two layers are stationary and stable due to their stratification. Upon tilting, the denser blue liquid sinks to the lower end of the tank while the freshwater shifts upward. When the relative velocity of these two fluids reaches a critical point, their interface becomes unstable, forming the distinctive wave crests that tumble over to mix the two layers. (Video credit: M. Stuart)
Search results for: “art”
Bubble Lenses
In this video, artist Jesse Zanzinger experiments with the lens-like refractive properties of bubbles. Though focused on the bending of light, there’s plenty here in terms of coalescence, surface tension, and miscibility. He has a similar video that includes a shot of his set-up here. (Video credit: J. Zanzinger)
Fluids Round-up – 25 May 2013
Sometimes I come across cool links and stories about fluid dynamics that don’t quite fit into a typical FYFD post, but I’d like to start sharing those semi-regularly with round-up posts. Here’s some fun stuff I’ve seen lately:
- We’ve talked before about penguins and fluid dynamics, but this IOP talk from Helen Czerski is a great take on how they use fluids to escape predators.
- Over at FlowViz, Richard has a great video demonstrating deep versus shallow water waves side-by-side.
- io9 shows off the vibrational modes of mercury as well as explaining why birds can be good at flying or swimming but not both.
- Giant paint explosions (specifically here) may be fun to watch but the dangers are not for squeamish viewers.
- Dylan G sent us this 512K real-time fluid particle simulation that’s a fun distraction.
- xckd’s Randall Munroe answers all kinds of physics questions at his What If? blog, but occasionally there are some fluids ones. Two of my favorites consider a hypersonic steak and what happens if the glass is literally half full.
- Finally, for the cyclists and triathletes among you, the recent news that bicycle manufacturer Specialized has built its own wind tunnel has generated lots of discussion of aerodynamics in sport. Mark Cote (@MITAeroBike) and Chris Yu (@chrisyuinc) of Specialized’s aero R&D have been answering questions on Slowtwitch, Twitter, and in live chats.
And, yes, that last Specialized video chat includes an FYFD shout-out about 49 minutes in. 🙂
(Photo credit: Specialized)
Turbulence and Magnetic Field Lines
During a solar flare, magnetic field lines on the sun are often visible due to the flow of plasma–charged particles–along the lines. According to theory, these magnetic lines should remain intact, but they are sometimes observed breaking and reconnecting with other lines. An interdisciplinary team of researchers suggests that turbulence may be the missing link. In their magnetohydrodynamic simulation, they found that the presence of chaotic turbulent motions made the magnetic line motion entirely unpredictable, whereas laminar flows behaved according to conventional flux-freezing theory. (Photo credit: NASA SDO; Research credit: G. Eyink et al.; via SpaceRef; submitted by jshoer)
Effects of Hills on Flow
Hills and other topology can have interesting and complex effects on a flowfield. With the FAITH experiment, NASA has been investigating an axisymmetric model hill using a combination of experimental methods. The video above shows flow visualization over the hill in a water channel using dye injection both upstream and downstream of the model. They’ve also done wind tunnel tests with oil-flow visualization, particle-image velocimetry, pressure sensitive paint and other measurement techniques. There are nice photos of some of these by Rob Bulmahn. By combining qualitative and quantitative flow measurement techniques, the researchers are able to capture many different aspects of the flow, which can then be shared and compared with other groups’ works. (Video credit: NASA Ames Research Center)
Mercedes-Benz Tornado
The world’s most powerful artificial tornado is part of the Mercedes-Benz Museum in Stuttgart, Germany. Though popular enough with visitors that the staff will bring out smoke generators to make it visible, the tornado was not built as an attraction – It’s actually part of the building’s fire protection system. The modern open design of the museum meant that conventional smoke removal systems were inadequate. Instead vorticity is generated in the central lobby with 144 wall-mounted jets. The angular velocity created by the jets is strongest at the middle, in the vortex core, due to conservation of angular momentum – exactly the way a spinning ice skater speeds up by pulling his arms in. The core of the vortex is a low pressure area, which draws outside air toward it – this is how the tornado pulls in smoke when there is a fire. The fan on the ceiling provides the pressure draw necessary for the smoke to be pulled up and out of the building at a supposed rate of 4 tons per minute. See the tornado in action here. (Photo credit: Mercedes-Benz Passion; submitted by Ivan)
Dendritic Designs
Imagine a thin layer of viscous liquid sandwiched between two horizontal glass plates. Then pull those plates apart at a constant velocity. What you see in the image above is the shape the viscous fluid takes for different speeds, with velocity increasing from left to right and from top to bottom. For lower velocities, the fluid forms tree-like fingers as air comes in from the edges. At higher velocities, though, there’s a transition from the finger-like pattern to a cell-like one. The cells are actually caused by cavitation within the fluid. When the plates are pulled apart fast enough, the local low pressure in the fluid causes cavitation bubbles to form just before the force required to remove the plate reaches its peak. (Photo credit: S. Poivet et al.)
Reader Question: Drafting in Triathlons
Reader juleztalks writes:
I’ve just entered an amateur triathlon, and there’s a whole load of rules about not “drafting” in the cycle stage (basically, not sitting in other cyclists’ slipstream). However, there are no such rules for the swim or run stage; I thought the effects would be the same from drafting other swimmers and runners. Any ideas?
As in many endurance sports, it’s all a question of energy savings from drag reduction. Drag on an object, like a triathlete, is roughly proportional to fluid density (air for cycling or running, water for swimming), frontal area, and the velocity squared. Because drag increases more drastically for an increase in velocity, it makes sense one would worry most about drag when one’s velocity is highest – on the bike.
Drafting has major benefits in cycling and can reduce drag on a rider by 25-40%. Aerodynamic drag accounts for 70% or more of a cyclist’s energy expenditure, so that reduction can really add up. The energy saved by drafting during cycling can even increase a triathlete’s speed during a subsequent running leg. So it makes sense for a sport’s governing body to be concerned with it.
That said, there’s plenty of room for drag reduction in swimming as well. Even though the velocities are much lower, water’s density is 1,000 times higher than air’s, generating plenty of drag for an athlete to overcome. For swimmers at maximum speed, drafting can reduce drag by 13-26%, depending on relative positioning. Such drafting has been found to increase stroke length and may (or may not) improve subsequent cycling performance.
Although a similar reduction in drag is possible by drafting when running, drag on a runner only accounts for about 8% of his/her energy expenditure so such savings would matters very little next to the swimming and cycling legs. There could be some psychological benefits, though, in terms of pacing oneself. (Photo credit: Optum Pro Cycling p/b Kelly Benefit Strategies)
The Silence of Owls
Owls are nearly silent hunters, able to swoop down on their prey without the rush of air over their wings giving away their approach, thanks to several key features of their feathers. The trailing edge of their feathers–or any lifting body, like an airplane wing–are a particular source of acoustic noise due to the interaction of turbulence near the surface with the edge. Since owls are especially good at eliminating self-produced noise in a frequency range that overlaps human hearing, investigators want to learn what works for owls and apply to it aircraft. A recent theoretical analysis uses a simplified model of the feather as a porous, elastic plate. The researchers found that the combination of porosity with the elasticity of the trailing edge significantly reduced noise relative to a rigid edge. (Photo credit: N. Jewell; research credit: J. Jaworski and N. Peake)
Breaking Up a Ferrofluid
Ferrofluids are known for their fascinating behaviors when subjected to magnetic fields, especially for the distinctive peaks they can form. In this video, we see a very thin ferrofluid drop on a pre-wetted surface just as a uniform perpendicular magnetic field is applied. Immediately the droplet breaks up into tiny isolated peaks that migrate out to the circumference. The interface breaks down from center, where the drop height is largest, and moves outward. Simultaneously, the diffusion of ferrofluid from the circumferential droplets into the surrounding fluid lowers the magnetization of those droplets, making it more difficult for them to repel their neighbors. As a result, they drift outward more slowly and get caught by the faster-moving droplets from within. (Video credit: C. Chen)