Category: Research

  • A Better Ear Plug

    A Better Ear Plug

    Ear plugs can be wonderful at blocking outside noise, but they come with a downside: they typically amplify internal bodily sounds, like our heartbeat, breathing, and chewing. This effect, called occlusion, is distracting enough for some users to forego ear protection or hearing aids. But a new prototype offers a hope for an occlusion-free future without requiring active noise-cancelling.

    Most devices fit a short way inside our ear canals, which blocks outside sound well, but creates a little resonance chamber between the plug and our ear drums. It’s this gap that amplifies the low-frequency sounds within our bodies, making them seem much louder. To counter that, the team’s new plug contains foam sections arranged with hollow spaces between. By tuning the properties of the 3D-printed foam, they created a resonant structure inside the earbud that damps out those low-frequency body noises while still blocking outside sound.

    Illustration of the earbud's interior. The blue and green areas are foam-filled cavities.
    Illustration of the earbud’s interior. The blue and green areas are foam-filled cavities.

    So far the prototype has only been tested with an artificial ear designed for auditory tests; that’s enough to show that the concept works, but next they’ll redesign the bud to fit a human ear canal more comfortably. (Image and research credit: K. Carillo et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Understanding Cyanobacteria

    Understanding Cyanobacteria

    Over 2 billion years ago, cyanobacteria emerged as Earth’s first photosynthesizing organisms. Today they are widespread and critical contributors to both carbon and nitrogen cycles. Colonies can form large mats, like those pictured above, but, even at the microscale, cyanobacteria are actively forming patterns among individual bacteria. A recent study considers cyanobacteria as active matter.

    At the microscopic scale, cyanobacteria form different patterns.
    At the microscopic scale, cyanobacteria form different patterns, depending on their density.

    By simulating the cyanobacteria as filaments that interact through a series of simple rules, the researchers were able to reproduce the complex patterns bacterial colonies form. Their physical model also offered an explanation — based on the relative importance of advective and diffusive transport — for the characteristic length scales found in the bacterial patterns. (Image credit: Yellowstone – B. Cappellacci, patterns – M. Faluweki et al.; research credit: M. Faluweki et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Swimming Through Mud

    Swimming Through Mud

    At the bottom of ponds, nematodes and other creatures swim in a world of mud. They squirm their way through a sediment of dirt particles suspended in water. Mud, of course, is notoriously impossible to see through, so to understand these creatures’ movements, scientists turn instead to biorobotics. Here, a team uses a magnetic head attached to an elastic tail to mimic these tiny creatures.

    To drive the robot’s motion, they use an oscillating magnetic field, which forces the magnetic head to rotate. Combined with the elastic tail and the drag caused by surrounding materials, this causes the robot to swim in a fashion similar to its biological inspirations.

    A biomimetic robot swims through immersed grains. The robot's magnetic head is forced with an oscillating magnetic field. It swims through an underwater bed of hydrogel beads, whose diameter is smaller than that of the robot's head.
    A biomimetic robot swims through immersed grains. The robot’s magnetic head is forced with an oscillating magnetic field. It swims through an underwater bed of hydrogel beads, with diameters smaller than that of the robot’s head.

    To mimic the muddy environment of a pond’s bottom, scientists used a bed of hydrogel beads immersed in water. Looking at the experimental video above, you’ll see no sign of the beads. That’s because the hydrogel beads have nearly the same index of refraction as water. Once you pour water in, they seem to disappear. That allows the researchers to focus instead on the robot’s motion. In other experiments, they added dye to the beads so that they could see how they moved around the robot.

    They found that the robot’s motion fluidizes the grains around it. Effectively, the robot’s motion creates an area with fewer grains and more water for it to move through. Once it’s passed, however, more grains settle in, and the bed returns to a denser packing. (Image credit: nematode – P. Garcelon, experiment – A. Biswas et al.; research credit: A. Biswas et al.)

  • Imitating a Cough

    Imitating a Cough

    Coughing and sneezing create violent air flows in and around our bodies. As that fast air rushes over mucus layers in our lungs, throat, and sinuses, the resulting flow breaks up the mucus into droplets. To explore the details of that process, researchers built a “cough machine” that sends a rush of air over a thin film of water mixed with glycerol. The setup allows them to observe the physics in a way that’s nearly impossible in a human cough or sneeze.

    Imitating a cough: high-speed video shows how a thin film made of water and glycerol breaks down in a strong airflow. Parts of the film inflate into hollow bags that form thinner weak spots. When the film breaks in those places, it forms rims and ligaments that break up into droplets.
    Imitating a cough: high-speed video shows how a thin film made of water and glycerol breaks down in a strong airflow. Parts of the film inflate into hollow bags that form thinner weak spots. When the film breaks in those places, it forms rims and ligaments that create a spray of droplets.

    As seen above, air flowing past shears the viscous fluid, stretching it out. The leading edge of the film destabilizes and breaks into large drops, but it’s what comes next that really gets things going. Areas of the film inflate to form hollow bags. When sections of the bag thin to about 1 micron, the film ruptures and the bags burst. This triggers a cascade of instabilities in the film’s rim that ultimately rip the film into a spray of tiny aerosol droplets. The researchers found that, despite their tiny size, these droplets collectively carry a large volume of liquid, making them all the more important for understanding transmission of respiratory illnesses. (Image credit: top – A. Piacquadio, experiment – P. Kant et al.; research credit: P. Kant et al.)

  • Leidenfrost Collapse

    Leidenfrost Collapse

    When a droplet encounters a surface much hotter than its boiling point, it forms a thin layer of vapor that insulates the liquid from the surface. But this Leidenfrost effect can’t last forever. Eventually, the vapor layer destabilizes and the drop touches the surface, causing explosive boiling that destroys the drop.

    To determine how the layer destabilizes, researchers simulated the breakdown. To their surprise, they found that inertial forces in the micron-thin vapor layer were critical for destabilization. The gas inertia caused reductions in pressure that pulled the liquid toward the surface. Usually at these small scales, we’d ignore inertial effects and focus instead on viscosity, but, for Leidenfrost drops, that simplification doesn’t work. (Image credit: L. Gledhill; research credit: D. Harvey and J. Burton)

  • Food-Based Fluid Dynamics

    Food-Based Fluid Dynamics

  • Viscoelasticity and Bubbles

    Viscoelasticity and Bubbles

    Bursting bubbles enhance our drinks, seed our clouds, and affect our health. Because these bubbles are so small, they’re easily affected by changes at the interface, like surfactants, Marangoni effects, or, as a recent study shows, viscoelasticity.

    A bubble released in pure water pops at the surface, creating a rebounding jet and a daughter droplet.
    A bubble released in pure water pops at the surface, creating a rebounding jet and a daughter droplet.

    In clean water, a bubble’s burst generates a rebounding jet that shoots off one or more daughter droplets, as seen in the animation above. But when researchers added proteins that modify only the water’s surface, they found something very different. As seen below, the bursting bubble no longer generated a jet, and, instead of forming droplets, it made a single, tiny daughter bubble. The difference, they found, comes from the added viscoelasticity of the surface. The long protein molecules resist getting stretched, which damps out the tiny waves that surface tension usually produces on the collapsing bubble cavity. (Image and research credit: B. Ji et al.; submission by Jie F.)

    When the surface of water is viscoelastic, a bursting bubble creates no jet and a daughter bubble instead of a drop.
    When the surface of water is viscoelastic, a bursting bubble creates no jet and a daughter bubble instead of a drop.
  • Bravo!

    Bravo!

    Applauding is a familiar activity, but, as you stand for an encore in the concert hall, do you think about how you hold your hands and how that affects your clap? That question prompted two scientists to embark on an acoustical exploration of clapping. By testing 11 different ways to hold their hands during clapping, the duo found some interesting results.

    The loudest clap — achieving an average of 85 decibels — held the hands at 45 degrees to one another, with palms partially overlapping (A2 in the figure). But the clap that most pleased the ear was a little different (A1+). It kept the 45 degree orientation, but the palms overlapped fully with a domed shape between them. In that configuration, the palms form a little resonance chamber that makes the clap sound deeper and richer. (Image credits: top – G. Latorre, others – N. Papadakis and G. Stavroulakis; research credit: N. Papadakis and G. Stavroulakis; via Physics World)

    Scientists studied the sounds made from clapping in 11 different hand configurations.
    Scientists studied the sounds made from clapping in 11 different hand configurations.
  • Dancing Peanuts

    Dancing Peanuts

    Bartenders in Argentina sometimes entertain patrons by tossing a few peanuts into their beer. Initially, the peanuts sink, but after a few seconds they rise, wreathed in bubbles. Once on the surface, they roll, causing the bubbles to pop, and the peanut sinks once again. The cycle repeats, sometimes for as long as a couple hours.

    There are a couple physical processes governing this dance. The first is bubble nucleation. Most beers are carbonated; they contain dissolved carbon dioxide gas that remains in solution while the beer is under pressure. Once poured, that storage pressure is gone and bubbles start to form in the liquid. The shape of the peanut means that bubbles form more easily on it than on the glass walls or in the liquid. And once the peanut is covered in bubbles, buoyancy comes into play. The bubbles attached to the peanut reduce its density relative to the surrounding fluid, enabling the peanut to rise up and float.

    This same process is seen with other objects in carbonated fluids, too, such as blueberries in beer and lemon seeds in carbonated water. But it’s also reflected elsewhere in nature. For example, magnetite crystals are thought to float in magma due to a similar nucleation of dissolved gases on their surface. (Image and research credit: L. Pereira et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Why Sea Foams

    Why Sea Foams

    Seawater froths and foams in ways that freshwater rarely does. A new study pinpoints the ocean’s electrolytes as the reason bubbles resist merging there. By studying the final moments before bubbles coalesce in both pure and salt water, researchers found that dissolved salts slow down the drainage of the thin film of liquid between two bubbles. Once the film reaches a 30-50 nanometer thickness, its electrolyte concentration causes a difference in surface tension that slows the outward flow of liquid in the film. That keeps the film in place longer and makes bubbles form foams instead of merging or popping. (Image credit: P. Kuzovkova; research credit: B. Liu et al.; via APS Physics)