FYFD

Category: Research

  • Swarm of Surfers

    Swarm of Surfers

    Self-propelled objects can form fascinating patterns. Here, researchers investigate how small plastic “surfers” move on a vibrating fluid. Each surfer is heavier in its stern than its bow. When the fluid vibrates, the surfer creates waves that are asymmetric — deeper in the stern than at the bow. For single surfers, this imbalance propels the surfer in the direction of its bow. But with more than one surfer, other patterns form.

    The video demonstrates five of the seven patterns pairs of surfers exhibit.
    The video demonstrates five of the seven patterns pairs of surfers exhibit.

    The team looked at groups of surfers all the way up to eight members. Among pairs, the researchers found seven distinctive patterns, including orbiting groups, tailgaters, and promenading pairs. Larger groups, they found, had similar collective behaviors. They hope their surfers will be an easily accessible platform for exploring active matter. (Image and research credit: I. Ho et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Controlling Finger Formation

    Controlling Finger Formation

    When gas is injected into thin, liquid-filled gaps, the liquid-gas interface can destabilize, forming distinctive finger-like shapes. In laboratories, this mechanism is typically investigated in the gap between two transparent plates, a setup known as a Hele-Shaw cell. In the past, researchers looking to control the instability have explored how surface tension, viscosity, and the elasticity of the gap itself affect the flows. But a new set of studies look at the compressibility of the gas being injected.

    The team found that viscous fingers formed later the higher the gas’s compressibility. That provides a potential control knob for people trying to exploit the mechanism, especially geologists. For geologists trying to extract oil, viscous fingering is detrimental, but, on the flip side, viscous fingers are desirable when injecting carbon dioxide for sequestration. With these results, users can tweak their injection characteristics to match their goals. (Image credit: C. Cuttle et al.; research credit: C. Cuttle et al. and L. Morrow et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Ice Damages With Liquid Veins

    Ice Damages With Liquid Veins

    Water expands when it freezes, a fact that’s often blamed for ice-cracked roads. But expansion isn’t what gives ice its destructive power. In fact, liquids that contract when freezing also break up materials like pavement and concrete. A recent study pinpoints veins between ice crystals as the source of this infrastructure-cracking power.

    Ice doesn’t like to stick on most surfaces, so when it forms, there’s often a narrow gap between the ice and a solid surface. That gap fills with water, and that water, it turns out, doesn’t just sit there. Instead, grooves between ice crystals act like tiny straws that are frigid on the icy end and warmer on the end connected to water. As ice forms on the cold end, it creates a negative pressure gradient that draws liquid up the groove. This ‘cryosuction’ keeps pumping water into the ice, where it freezes and further expands the icy zone, as seen in the image below.

    Under a microscope, fluorescent particles show water (right side) getting pulled into an ice groove (left).
    Under a microscope, fluorescent particles show water (right side) getting pulled into an ice groove (left).

    If the ice is made up of a single crystal, this growth rate is very slow. But most ice is polycrystalline — made up of many crystals, all separated by these liquid-filled grooves. That, researchers found, is a recipe for fast growth and quickly-expanding ice capable of breaking concrete and other structures. (Image credits: pothole – I. Taylor, experiment – D. Gerber et al.; research credit: D. Gerber et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Granular Gaps

    Granular Gaps

    Push air into a gap filled with a viscous fluid, and you’ll get the branching, dendritic pattern of a Saffman-Taylor instability. Here, researchers use a similar set-up: injection into a narrow gap between transparent planes to explore something quite different. In this experiment, the gap was initially filled with a mixture of air and tiny hydrophobic glass beads. When the team injected a viscous mixture of water and glycerol, new patterns emerged. At low injection rates, a single finger structure formed. But at high injection rates, a whole spoke-like pattern formed. (Image and research credit: D. Zhang et al.; via Physics Today)

  • The Jumping Jump

    The Jumping Jump

    Turn on your kitchen sink, and the falling jet may form a circle of shallow flow where it strikes the sink. This fast-moving region of flow, surrounded by a wall of water, is a hydraulic jump. A recent study delves into a previously-missed phenomenon of this flow: intermittent disruption and reappearance.

    An oscillating hydraulic jump, viewed from below.
    An oscillating hydraulic jump, viewed from below.

    The team found that, within a narrow range of jet and surface sizes, a hydraulic jump will periodically appear and disappear. The effect comes from the hydraulic jump itself; waves from the jump propagate outward, hit the edge of the circular plate, and reflect inward. When the incoming and outgoing waves interfere, it floods the jump zone, making it disappear briefly. (Image credit: sink – Nik, jump – A. Goerlinger et al.; research credit: A. Goerlinger et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Turbulent Thermal Convection

    Turbulent Thermal Convection

    In the winter, warm air rises from our floor vents or radiators, creating a complex, invisible flow in the background of our lives. Buoyancy lifts warmer air upward while cooler, denser air sinks back down. This thermal convection is everywhere: in our buildings, the ocean, the sky overhead — even in the visible layer of our sun.

    In nature, these systems are so large and complex that fully measuring or simulating them remains impossible. Instead, researchers focus on a simplified system — a Rayleigh-Bénard cell — that’s essentially an idealized version of a pot on a stovetop. The lower surface of the cell is heated — like the bottom of a pan on the burner — while the upper surface of the fluid cools. Even this idealized system is a challenge, though, and neither lab-scale versions nor simulations can reach the same conditions that we find in nature.

    To bridge the gap, scientists rely on mathematical models — theories built on our best understanding of the physics — and physical analogies to similar systems — like flow over a flat plate — that are “easier” to measure. For a thorough overview of recent work in the area, check out this review in Physics Today. (Image credit: A. Blass; research credit: D. Lohse and O. Shishkina in Physics Today)

  • Enhancing the Cheerios Effect

    Enhancing the Cheerios Effect

    The Cheerios in your morning cereal clump together with one another and the bowl’s wall due to an attractive force caused by the curvature of their menisci. A recent study looks at how this effect changes when you’re pulling objects out of the liquid.

    Snapshots show how two flexible fibers get drawn together by an attractive force as they are pulled out of silicon oil.
    Snapshots show how two flexible fibers get drawn together by an attractive force as they are pulled out of silicon oil.

    The researchers inserted thin flexible glass fibers into silicon oil and withdrew them. As they did, they explored what lengths and retraction speeds caused the fibers to pull together. They found that a single moving rod had a taller meniscus than a stationary one, and two moving rods had a liquid bridge that superposed their individual menisci. The result was an attractive force even stronger than what the fibers experienced when still. (Image credit: Cheerios – D. Streit, experiment – H. Bense et al.; research credit: H. Bense et al.; via APS Physics)

  • Jamming Inside

    Jamming Inside

    Worm-like Spirostomum ambiguum are millimeter-sized single-cell organisms that live in brackish waters. In milliseconds, these cells can retract to half their original length, generating g-forces greater than a Formula One driver experiences when cornering. How, researchers wondered, do these cells avoid shredding their internal structure with forces that strong?

    Spirostomum ambiguum, they found, contain fluid-filled sacs called vacuoles that are entangled with the folds of a membrane-like structure called the endoplasmic reticulum. The researchers constructed a simulated cell, based on the properties of the living ones, and tested it under retraction. Without the endoplasmic reticulum, the insides of their model acted like a liquid, with vacuoles moving past one another readily. That’s not good for staying alive since swapping positions can disrupt bodily functions.

    An artificially-colored micrograph highlights the different structures inside Spirostomum ambiguum. The red strings are a membrane-like endoplasmic reticulum entangled between yellow, fluid-filled vacuoles.
    An artificially-colored micrograph highlights the different structures inside Spirostomum ambiguum. The red strings are a membrane-like endoplasmic reticulum entangled between yellow, fluid-filled vacuoles.

    With the vacuoles connected by a model endoplasmic reticulum, the cell’s insides acted more like a solid during retraction. The vacuoles deformed but fewer of them traded places, instead jamming together to prevent rearrangement. Mimicking this structure at a larger scale, the team suggests, could enable new types of shock absorbers. (Image and research credit: R. Chang and M. Prakash; via APS Physics)

  • Extreme Weather and Climate Change

    Extreme Weather and Climate Change

    Extreme weather events like floods, hurricanes, atmospheric rivers, heat waves, and droughts are increasingly discussed in terms of the effects of climate change. Because complex systems have complex causes, it’s difficult to draw exact lines of causality between human-made climate change and a given weather event. But scientists have built an array of tools that help address two key questions: 1) how much more extreme was this weather due to climate change, and 2) how much more likely was this extreme event due to climate change?

    Comparing (a) the actual flooding from Hurricane Harvey with (b) the estimated flood that would have been without climate change. The depth of actual flood waters was about 1m greater due to climate change.
    Comparing (a) the actual flooding from Hurricane Harvey with (b) the estimated flood that would have occurred without climate change. The depth of actual flood waters was about 1m greater due to climate change.

    To answer the first question, scientists often use hindcasts. In these studies, scientists first build a simulation that mirrors the actual event, like Hurricane Harvey’s stall over Houston, Texas. Once their simulated storm reflects the actual one, they tweak the initial conditions to reflect a world without climate change and see how the storm differs. By comparing the actual and simulated floods (image above), scientists can estimate just how much worse climate change made things. In Harvey’s case, they found that human activity increased the overall precipitation by 19% and that 32% of the flooded homes in Harris county would not have flooded in a world without climate change. Detailed results from that particular study can be explored in the web portal here. (Image credits: Flooded street – J. Gade, Harvey flooding – M. Wehner; research credit: M. Wehner in Physics Today)

  • Linking Size and Origin in Droplets

    Linking Size and Origin in Droplets

    Respiratory diseases like measles, flu, tuberculosis, and COVID-19 are all transmitted by droplets. Some are tiny and airborne, capable of traveling long distances. Other drops are larger and only capable of traveling short distances. A new review paper consolidates what we know about these droplets and categorizes them by size and origin.

    It turns out that a droplet’s size can tell us where it originated in the body. The largest type of droplets come from our mouths, lips, and tongues. Some form from filaments of saliva that stretch across our mouths and burst during exhalation. Others originate in our nasal passages where a sneeze can destabilize the mucus film there. These types of droplets are best suited to transmitting diseases that reside in the upper respiratory tract. Coughing, sneezing, singing, and speaking all produce these droplets, but breathing does not.

    In contrast, the smallest classes of droplets come from the bronchial passages of the lungs, where films form after exhalation closes a passage. When we inhale again, the passage reopens, the film breaks up, and tiny droplets flow further into the lungs before getting exhaled. Breathing alone is enough to create and spread these tiny droplets, which are well-suited to spreading diseases that reside deep in the lungs, like tuberculosis.

    In between these extremes are medium-sized droplets created from movement around our vocal cords. The formation mechanism for these droplets is least understood, but they are connected to breathing, coughing, speaking, singing, and so on.

    Ultimately, understanding the mechanics of disease transmission is about knowing how to best prevent transmission. Knowing the size of droplets responsible for transmission lets us prioritize responses that work. For example, if large droplets are the primary transmission mechanism, loose-fitting masks and face masks will stop the spread. But for smaller droplets, ventilation measures and well-fitted N-95 respirators are the better choice. (Image credit: Anton; research credit: M. Pöhlker et al.; via APS Physics)