FYFD

Tag: flow visualization

  • How Many Licks Does It Take to Get to the Center of a Lollipop?

    How Many Licks Does It Take to Get to the Center of a Lollipop?

    Many a child has wondered how many licks it takes to get to the center of a lollipop. Physically, this is a problem of a solid body dissolving in a flow, and it’s one scientists are interested in for its geological, industrial, and pharmacological applications.

    The animation above shows flow around a dissolving (candy!) body that was originally spherical. With both spheres and cylinders, the final shape the body takes is consistent – it has a front boundary with a curvature of nearly constant radius and a back face that is approximately flat. This creates a boundary layer of uniform thickness across the front face, and that uniform flow makes the surface dissolve steadily and evenly so that it maintains the same overall shape.

    With their model and experiments, researchers have even been able to tackle the classic question of how many licks it takes:

    “For candy of size 1 cm licked at a speed of 1 cm/s, we estimate a total of 1000 licks, a prediction that is notoriously difficult to test experimentally.”

    (Image credit: J. Huang et al., source, pdf)

  • Capturing SLS

    Capturing SLS

    NASA’s recent full-scale ground test of their Space Launch System (SLS) rocket was notable for more than just the engine. It was an opportunity to use a new high dynamic range, high speed camera prototype,

    HiDyRS-X, to capture the rocket’s exhaust in detail never seen before. Usually the extreme brightness of the rocket exhaust makes it impossible to see any structure in the flow without completely obscuring the ground equipment. With this camera, however, engineers can see how the engine, exhaust, and surroundings all interact. Be sure to check out the full video. I particularly like watching how the rocket’s exhaust entrains dust and sand from the ground nearby.  (Image credit: NASA, source; submitted by Chris P. and Matt S.)

  • Soap Film Wakes

    Soap Film Wakes

    Soap films can create remarkable flow visualizations when illuminated with monochromatic (single color) light. Each of the photos above shows a flow moving from left to right with a small object near the left creating an obstruction. In the top two images, the objects are cylinders; in the lower one it’s a flat plate tilted at 45 degrees. All of the objects shed vortices as the flow moves past. These vortices alternate in direction – the first spins clockwise, the next counter-clockwise, then clockwise again and so on. This pattern is known as a von Karman vortex street and can even show up in the atmosphere! (Image credit: D. Araya et al.)

  • Rio 2016: The Swimming Pool Controversy

    Rio 2016: The Swimming Pool Controversy

    Statistical analysis suggests possible current in the Rio Olympics swimming pool

    Several news outlets, beginning with The Wall Street Journal, are reporting that the swimming pool in Rio may have had a current that biased athletes’ performances. This is based on a statistical analysis of athlete performances across the meet, conducted by Indiana University’s Joel Stager and his coworkers. According to WSJ, Stager et al. analyzed times of athletes in the preliminary, semifinal, and final races of the 50m, 800m, and 1500m events and found consistent evidence that swimmers in the higher numbered lanes swam faster when moving toward the starting block and swimmers in the lower numbered lanes swam faster when moving toward the turn end of the pool. A separate analysis by Barry Revzin at Swim Swam came to similar conclusions about the direction and magnitude of lane effect in Rio.

    Past questions about lane bias

    This is not the first time questions have been raised about a current-induced bias in competition pools. In fact, Stager and his colleagues published an analysis in 2014 that suggested a similar bias in the pool used for the 2013 World Championships in Barcelona. That pool was a temporary pool built specifically for the competition by Myrtha Pools and was disassembled immediately after, before Stager et al.’s analysis was published.

    A more recent paper by Stager and his colleagues found that lane bias seems to be more prevalent in temporary pools than in permanent ones. The Rio Olympics pool, like the 2013 Worlds pool, is a temporary pool also built by Myrtha Pools.

    Myrtha Pools responds to the criticism 

    Myrtha responded to both WSJ and Swim Swam by sharing videos (1, 2) of their current test, which was conducted before the competition and on Day 3 of competition. The videos show a floating object in one of the outside lanes; neither video shows any noticeable movement of the object.

    Fluid dynamics and swimming pool design

    Competitive swimming pools are complicated recirculating systems that can contain special structures intended to minimize interactions between competitors. Myrtha has built many special event pools in recent years, including ones where the results did not show a bias. According to their website, Myrtha has fluid dynamicists on staff and uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to analyze pool performance during design, although they only show examples of freeform pools – not competition pools.

    In fact, I have found remarkably few CFD analyses of swimming pools in the literature. Most papers seem to focus on distribution of disinfectants in pools or in predicting evaporation rates – both practical problems but ones with limited relevance to this particular question.

    So, is there a current in the Rio pool?

    It’s tough to say with certainty that there is a current in Rio’s pool. The performance analyses by Stager et al. and by Revzin do show anomalies in the times of athletes in Rio based on their swim lane, and they show that those anomalies do not exist in many other recent competitions.

    I also do not think Myrtha’s current test constitutes evidence of a lack of current. Their floating object is only indicative of conditions at the air-water interface. Swimmers ride lower in the water and spend significant time completely underwater. Lane markers may also damp any flow effects near the surface.

    I think introducing dye underwater in the pool would do more to reveal any flow that may exist, and this would be a worthwhile test to conduct prior to the deconstruction of the Rio Olympic pool. Additionally, it would be wonderful to see a CFD analysis of the swimming pool, but this would require significant detail about the pool’s design (inlet and outlet locations, etc.) some of which is likely proprietary information.

    Neither dye visualization nor CFD simulation will change the results of this competition, but it may help reveal underlying issues in temporary pool designs so that any bias can be avoided in future competitions.

    (Image credit: Rio City Government)

    Special thanks to @MicahJGreen for bringing this story to my attention and to Dave B. for his assistance.

  • Rio 2016: Sailing and Rule 42

    Rio 2016: Sailing and Rule 42

    If you watch some of the sailing in Rio, you may hear commentators mention sailors being penalized for breaking Rule 42. Broadly speaking, Rule 42 says that sailors can’t use their body to propel the boat. While it seems like a little rocking couldn’t make much difference, it turns out events have these rules for good reason.

    One way to break Rule 42 is to perform sail flicking, demonstrated in the animation above. The sailor uses his or her body weight to roll the boat slightly, which causes the sail to flick. Aerodynamically speaking, we’d call this motion heaving. On the flexible sail, this unsteady motion decreases drag, allowing the boat to go faster. Done with the right frequency and amplitude, sail flicking actually makes the sail’s drag become negative, thereby creating thrust!

    The bottom image shows a visualization of the wake of a normal sail (left) and a sail being flicked (right). Both sails shed vortices in the downstream direction, but the flicked sail has much stronger vortices, indicated by the darker colors. In addition to giving a sailor an illegal boost, sail flicking creates more difficult, turbulent conditions for any competitors downstream, so it’s restricted in many (but not all) sailing events. (Image credits: AP Photos; Reuters; National Solo, source; research and flow diagram credit: R. Schutt and C. Williamson, pdf)

    Join us throughout the Rio Olympics for more fluid dynamics in sports. If you love FYFD, please help support the site!

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Starting a Lighter

    Lots of fluids are transparent, which makes it hard for us to appreciate their motion. One technique for making these invisible motions visible is schlieren photography, which makes differences in density visible. Here it’s combined with high-speed video to show what happens when you use a lighter (minus the spark!). When the fuel starts flowing, it’s unstable and turbulent, but after that initial start-up, you can see the jet settle into a smooth and laminar flow. Wisps of fuel diffuse away from the jet as the fluid disperses. As the valve shuts off, the flow becomes unstable again, and the remains of the lighter fluid diffuse away. (Video credit: The Missing Detail)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Sublimation

    Sublimation is a transition directly from a solid phase to a gaseous one. Given typical Earth atmospheric conditions, one of the most commonly observed examples of sublimation is that of solid carbon dioxide, a.k.a. dry ice. Submerging dry ice in water both speeds up the sublimation–since water is a better conductor of heat than air–and creates ethereal fog that’s a combination of the expanding carbon dioxide and condensate from the water. This gorgeous video from Wryfield Lab lets you admire the process close-up. As the dry ice sublimates, watch for the ice crystals that grow on its surface. This is deposition–the opposite of sublimation–and comes from water vapor freezing onto the dry ice. (Video credit: Wryfield Lab; via Gizmodo)

    A warning for those who want to try this at home: only do this in well-ventilated spaces. The shift from solid to gas requires a huge increase in volume. Carbon dioxide is denser than air, so it does stay low to the ground, but you can still suffocate yourself (or children or pets) if you do this in an enclosed space.

  • Visualizing Smell

    Visualizing Smell

    Every day we’re surrounded by an invisible world of smells. Like the fluorescein dye in the animation above, these odors drift and swirl in the background flow. What you may not have stopped to consider when you smell the roses, though, is how the very act of sniffing changes the scent. When you inhale, filaments of the odor are drawn into your nose, and, likewise, when you exhale, your breathe mixes with the scent and sends it swirling outward in turbulent eddies. To see more about the science of scent, check out PBS News Hour’s full video below. (Video credit: PBS News Hour; GIF via skunkbear)

  • Wingtip Vortices Visualized

    Wingtip Vortices Visualized

    In flight, airplane wings produce dramatic wingtip vortices. These vortices reduce the amount of lift a 3D wing produces relative to a 2D one. How much they influence the lift depends on both the strength and proximity of the vortex. The stronger and closer it is, the more detrimental its effect. One way airplane designers reduce the effects of wingtip vortices is by adding an extra section, called a winglet, to the end of the wing. Among other effects, the winglet moves the wingtip vortex further away from the main wing, which reduces its influence and allows the airplane to regain some of the lift that would otherwise be lost. (Image credits: A. Wielandt et al., source)

  • Bioluminescent Plankton

    Bioluminescent Plankton

    The blue-outlined dolphins you see above get their glow from microorganisms called dinoflagellates. They are a type of bioluminescent plankton, shown in the lower image, that can be found in oceans around the world. Their glow comes from combining two chemicals: luciferase and luciferin. The dinoflagellates suspended in the ocean do this when they are disturbed–specifically, when the water around them transmits a shear stress above a certain threshold. Typically, this is caused by something larger–a potential predator–moving past, although it can also be stimulated by breaking waves. The higher the shear stress, the more intense the glow, but the dinoflagellates only use their bioluminescence sparingly. If you apply shear stress and keep applying it, their glow fades away without reactivating. After all, they can only produce so much chemical fuel. (Image credit: BBC from Attenborough’s Life That Glows; h/t to Gizmodo; research credit: E. Maldonado and M. Latz)