FYFD

Tag: flow visualization

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Vortex Ring Collisions

    One of the most enduringly popular submissions I receive is T. Lim’s experimental footage of two vortex rings colliding head-on. It’s an devilishly tough experimental set-up to master because perfectly aligning the rings is incredibly difficult. The pay-off, however, is huge because the breakdown of the colliding rings and their transformation into secondary rings is breathtaking. Destin at Smarter Every Day and his team have worked hard to recreate the experiment (top video), but they’re not the only ones – nor are they the first in decades – to do so.

    Ryan McKeown and a team at Harvard have a set-up of their own for vortex ring collisions, and you can see a little of it in action in the middle video. Ryan’s set-up is, frankly, incredible. It scans a light sheet through the vortex rings at high-speed, allowing him to capture the collision and break-up in minute detail in both space and time. What you see in the latter half of his video is a digital reconstruction of that data – not a simulation but real data! His work is capturing vortex collisions in unprecedented detail, allowing researchers to probe the smallest scales of the phenomenon.

    When two vortex rings approach one another, they can undergo what’s known as a vortex reconnection event. Bubbles rings are a great place to see this. The vortex cores get distorted when they’re close to one another due to the influence of the other vortex ring’s velocity field. This often stretches and flattens the vortex core. It’s impossible for the rings to simply break apart, though, (per Helmholtz’s second theorem). So when the original vortex rings thin to the point of breaking, they immediately reconnect to a piece of the other ring, creating a series of small vortex rings around the remains of the originals. The exact details of how this works are what investigators like Ryan and his colleagues are trying to understand. You can hear a little more about their work in my interview with Ryan in the bottom video, starting at ~2.54. (Video credits: Smarter Every Day, R. McKeown et al., and N. Sharp and T. Crawford; submission credit: a huge number of readers)

  • Visualizing Turbulence

    Visualizing Turbulence

    Turbulence, the seemingly random and chaotic state that fluids often tend toward, can be difficult to wrap one’s head around. Turn your faucet on high or pour milk into your coffee, and the flow just looks like a completely unpredictable mess. But there are important patterns to be found.These flows have many different lengthscales and timescales to them. Think of a cloud. There are very large-scale motions that are close to the size of the entire cloud, but there are also very small ones that may be only a centimeter or so in size. 

    Our best understanding of turbulence so far says that energy starts out in these large scales and slowly works its way down to the smaller ones, where viscosity (essentially friction, in this case) can transform that motion into heat. Above you see a creative way to display this fact. Using data from a numerical simulation, the authors transformed velocity information into these mandala-like patterns. The center of the image represents the large lengthscales, where energy is added. Moving around the circle, like a clock’s hand does, shows different positions in space. Moving radially from the center outward takes you through different lengthscales from large to small. 

    Notice how the large lengthscales break into smaller and smaller ones as you move outward. The pattern looks like a set of fractal pitchforks, with each lengthscale fracturing into smaller and smaller ones as the turbulence breaks down further. There’s lots more to see in the original poster, below, but you should really click here for the glorious full-size original. The poem, by the way, is the work of physicist Lewis Richardson, who wrote it to summarize how turbulence works. (Image credit: M. Bassenne et al.)

    image
  • Star Wars Aerodynamics

    Star Wars Aerodynamics

    Science fiction is not always known for hewing to scientific fact, so it will probably come as little surprise that Star Wars’ ships have terrible aerodynamics. But it’s nevertheless fun to see EC Henry’s analysis of drag coefficients of various Rebel and Imperial ships and just how poorly they fare against our own designs.

    Drag coefficients really only give a tiny piece of the story, though. We don’t know what speed Henry is testing the ships at, and we get no information about properties like lift or lift-to-drag ratio, which can be even more important than just the drag when it comes to evaluating an aircraft.

    There are some intriguing hints about other aerodynamic properties in the clips of flow around an X-wing and TIE fighter, though. Notice that the wake of both ships meanders back and forth. This is an indication of vortex shedding, and it means that both spacecraft would tend to be buffeted from side-to-side when flying in an atmosphere. Either the ships would need some kind of active control to counter those forces, or pilots would need iron constitutions to operate under those conditions! (Video and image credit: EC Henry)

    [original video no longer available]

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    360 Fireball

    Flames are inherently fascinating to watch. Most of the ones we see regularly, like candle flames and campfires, tend to flicker unsteadily due to their turbulence. But larger fires have a spell-binding nature all their own, one that’s highlighted in slow motion. Here the Slow Mo Guys take flame-gazing to a new level by circling a fireball with a high-speed camera. In the resulting footage, you can admire the incredible expansion of the flame front, and the beautiful, detailed turbulence that creates all the myriad tiny eddies you see in the slow motion. It’s well worth watching more than once! (Video and image credit: The Slow Mo Guys)

  • Collecting Fog

    Collecting Fog

    In some parts of the world, fog is a major source of freshwater, but collecting it is a challenge. Most systems use a wire mesh to capture and collect droplets, but the process is highly inefficient, pulling only 1-3% of droplets from the fog. Researchers found that this is due largely to aerodynamic effects. The presence of the wire deflects droplets around it (bottom left). To solve this, engineers introduced an electric charge into the fog. The subsequent electric field actually pulls droplets to the wires (bottom right). When applied to a mesh (top), the efficiency of fog capture improves dramatically. 

    The technique can also be used to capture water vapor that would otherwise escape from the cooling towers of power plants. The MIT researchers who developed the technique will conduct a full-scale test at the university’s power plant this fall. They hope the technique will recapture millions of gallons of water that would otherwise drift away from the plant. (Image credits: MIT News, source; image and research credits: M. Damak and K. Varanasi, source)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    The Coexistence of Order and Chaos

    One of the great challenges in fluid dynamics is understanding how order gives way to chaos. Initially smooth and laminar flows often become disordered and turbulent. This video explores that transition in a new way using sound. Here’s what’s going on.

    The first segment of the video shows a flat surface covered in small particles that can be moved by the flow. Initially, that flow is moving in right to left, then it reverses directions. The main flow continues switching back and forth in direction. This reversal tends to provoke unstable behaviors, like the Tollmien-Schlichting waves called out at 0:53. Typically, these perturbations in the flow start out extremely small and are difficult or even impossible to see by eye. So researchers take photos of the particles you see here and analyze them digitally. In particular, they are looking for subtle patterns in the flow, like a tendency for particles to clump together with a consistent spacing, or wavelength, between them. Normally, researchers would study these patterns using graphs known as spectra, but that’s where this video does something different.

    Instead of representing these subtle patterns graphically, the researchers transformed those spectra into sound. They mapped the visual data to four octaves of C-major, which means that you can now hear the turbulence. When the audio track shifts from a pure note to an unsteady warble, you’re hearing the subtle disturbances in the flow, even when they’re too small for your eye to pick out.

    The last part of the video takes this technique and applies it to another flow. We again see a flat plate, but now it has a roughness element, like a tiny hockey puck, stuck to it. As the flow starts, we see and hear vortices form behind the roughness. Then a horseshoe-shaped vortex forms upstream of it. Aside from the area right around the roughness, this flow is still laminar. But then turbulence spreads from upstream, its fingers stretching left until it envelops the roughness element and its wake, making the music waver. (Video and image credit: P. Branson et al.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Psychedelic Faraday Waves

    Vibrate a pool of water and above a critical frequency, a pattern of standing waves will form on the surface. These are known as Faraday waves after Michael Faraday, who studied the phenomenon in the early half of the nineteenth century. The kaleidoscopic view of them you see here comes from photographer Linden Gledhill, who used a high-speed camera and an LED ring light reflecting off the water to capture the changing motions of the waves. The wave patterns oscillate at half the frequency of the driving vibration, and, as the driving frequency changes, the wave patterns shift dramatically. Higher frequencies create more complicated patterns. (Image and video credit: L. Gledhill)

  • Dissolving Candy

    Dissolving Candy

    In nature, solid surfaces often evolve over time in conjunction with the flows around them. This is how stalactites, canyons, and hoodoos all form and change over time. Here researchers examine a surface formed from hard candy that is dissolving from below. Over time, the initially flat surface develops a pitted appearance (top image, scale bar is 1 cm) with roughness that is approximately 1 mm in scale. Flow visualization (bottom row) suggests that these pits result from local flow where narrow, millimeter-sized dense plumes fall away from the surface. 

    As material dissolves from the candy, it forms a dense layer of sugar-water mixture near the solid surface. Once that layer grows to a critical thickness, it will be too unstable for viscosity to counter. At that point, the Rayleigh-Taylor instability takes over, causing the dense sugar-water layer to break up into narrow, sinking plumes. Although each area is evolving independently, the rate at which material dissolves is uniform everywhere, so the dissolving body retains the same shape over time. (Image and research credit: M. Davies Wykes et al., source)

  • Impressionist Foams

    Impressionist Foams

    Imagine taking two panes of glass and setting them in a frame with a small gap between them. Then partially fill the gap with a mixture of dye, glycerol, water, and soap. After turning the frame over several times, the half of the frame will be filled with foamy bubbles. When you flip it again, the dyed glycerol-water will sink and penetrate the bubble layer, creating complex and beautiful patterns as it mixes. Some of the bubbles may get squeezed together until they coalesce into larger bubbles that shoot upward thanks to their increased buoyancy. Other smaller bubbles will wend their way upward as neighboring fluid shifts. If you examine the tracks left by individual bubbles, you can find patterns reminiscent of Impressionist paintings, as seen at the end of this Gallery of Fluid Motion video. (Image credit: A. Al Brahim et al., source)

  • Sunset Flow

    Sunset Flow

    Day and night mix in this flow visualization of watercolor pigments and ferrofluid. The former, as suggested by their name, are water-based, whereas ferrofluids typically contain an oil base. This means the two fluids are immiscible. Like oil and vinegar in salad dressing, the only way to mix them is to break one into tiny droplets floating in the other. This is what happens near their boundary, where brightly-colored paint droplets float in a network of dark channels. To the right, the paint and ferrofluid have been swirled around to create viscous mixing patterns among the paint colors with occasional intrusions of thin ferrofluid fingers. (Image credit: G. Elbert)