FYFD

Tag: airplanes

  • Stall with Pitching Foils

    Stall with Pitching Foils

    For a fixed-wing aircraft, stall – the point where airflow around the wing separates and lift is lost – is an enemy. It’s the precursor to a stomach-turning freefall for the airplane and its contents. But the story is rather different when the wing is actively pitching through these high angles of attack. In this case, you get what’s known as dynamic stall, illustrated in three consecutive snapshots above.

    In the top image, the flow has clearly separated from the upper surface of the wing, but this isn’t a cause for panic. As the middle image shows, there’s a vortex that’s formed in that separated region and it’s moving backward along the wing as the angle of attack continues to increase. That vortex causes a strong low-pressure region on the upper surface of the wing, allowing it to maintain lift.

    In the final image, the vortex is leaving the wing, taking its low-pressure zone with it. This is the point where the pitching wing loses its lift, but if the vortex’s departure is immediately followed by a pitch down to lower angles of attack, the aircraft will recover lift and carry on. (Image credit: S. Schreck and M. Robinson, source)

  • Star Wars Aerodynamics

    Star Wars Aerodynamics

    Science fiction is not always known for hewing to scientific fact, so it will probably come as little surprise that Star Wars’ ships have terrible aerodynamics. But it’s nevertheless fun to see EC Henry’s analysis of drag coefficients of various Rebel and Imperial ships and just how poorly they fare against our own designs.

    Drag coefficients really only give a tiny piece of the story, though. We don’t know what speed Henry is testing the ships at, and we get no information about properties like lift or lift-to-drag ratio, which can be even more important than just the drag when it comes to evaluating an aircraft.

    There are some intriguing hints about other aerodynamic properties in the clips of flow around an X-wing and TIE fighter, though. Notice that the wake of both ships meanders back and forth. This is an indication of vortex shedding, and it means that both spacecraft would tend to be buffeted from side-to-side when flying in an atmosphere. Either the ships would need some kind of active control to counter those forces, or pilots would need iron constitutions to operate under those conditions! (Video and image credit: EC Henry)

    [original video no longer available]

  • Seeing the Wake

    Seeing the Wake

    Hot exhaust gases churn in the wake of this climbing B-1B Lancer. The high temperature of the exhaust changes the density and, thus, the refractive index of the gases relative to the atmosphere. Light traveling through the exhaust gets distorted, making the highly turbulent flow visible to the human eye. Note how the four individual engine exhaust plumes quickly combine into one indistinguishable wake. This is typical for turbulence; it’s hard to track where any given fluctuations originally came from. The airplane’s wingtip vortices are just visible as well, if you look closely. (Image credit: T. Rogoway; submitted by Mark S.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Lift Over Wings

    One of the most vexing topics for fluid dynamicists and their audiences is the subject of how wings generate lift. As discussed in the video above, there are a number of common but flawed explanations for this. Perhaps the most common one argues that the shape of the wing requires air moving over the top to move farther in the same amount of time, therefore moving faster. The flaw here, as my advisor used to say, is that there is no Conservation of Who-You-Were-Sitting-Next-To-When-You-Started. Nothing requires that air moving over the top and bottom of a wing meet up again. In fact, the air moving over the top of the wing outpaces air moving underneath it.

    In the Sixty Symbols video, the conclusion presented is that any complete explanation requires use of three conservation principles: mass, momentum, and energy. In essence, though, this is like saying that airplanes fly because the Navier-Stokes equations say they do. It’s not a terribly satisfying answer to someone uninterested in the mathematics.

    Part of the reason that so many explanations exist – here’s one the video didn’t touch on using circulation – is that no one has presented a simple, intuitive, and complete explanation. This is not to say that we don’t understand lift on fixed wings – we do! It’s just tough to simplify without oversimplifying.

    Here’s the bottom line, though: the shape of the wing forces air moving around it to change direction and move downward. By Newton’s 3rd law (equal and opposite reactions), that means the air pushes the wing up, thereby creating lift. (Video credit: Sixty Symbols)

  • Sunset Vortices

    Sunset Vortices

    Often our atmosphere’s transparency masks the beautiful flows around us. This spectacular image shows a flight landing in Munich just after sunrise. Low-hanging clouds get sliced by the airplane’s passage and curl into its wake. The swirls are a result of the plane’s wingtip vortices, which wrap from the high-pressure underside of the wing toward the low-pressure upperside. The vortices stretch behind in the plane’s wake, creating turbulence that can be dangerous to following planes. In fact, these vortices are a major determining factor in the frequency of take-off and landing on a given runway. The larger a plane, the larger its wingtip vortices and the more time it takes for the turbulence of its passage to dissipate to a safe level for the next aircraft. (Image credit: T. Harsch; submitted by Larry S.)

  • Shocks on a Wing

    Shocks on a Wing

    Commercial airliners fly in what is known as the transonic regime at Mach numbers between 0.8 and 1.0. While the airplane itself never exceeds the speed of sound, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t localized regions where air flows over the airplane at speeds above Mach 1. In fact, it’s actually possible sometimes to see shock waves on the top of airliner’s wings with nothing more than your eyes. The animations above show shock waves sitting about 50-60% of the way down the wing’s chord on a Boeing 737 (top) and Airbus A-320 (bottom). The shock wave looks like an unsteady visual aberration sitting a little ways forward of the wing’s control surfaces.

    The wings themselves are shaped so that these little shock waves are relatively stationary and remain upstream of the flaps pilots use for control. Otherwise, the sharp pressure change across a shock wave sitting over a control surface could make moving that surface difficult. This was one of the challenges pilots first trying to break the sound barrier faced. (Image credits: R. Corman, source; agermannamedhans, source)

  • Crow Instability

    Crow Instability

    Watching airplane contrails overhead, you may have noticed them transform into a daisy chain of distorted rings. This is an effect known as the Crow instability. The contrails themselves are the airplane’s wingtip vortices, made visible by water vapor condensed out of the engine exhaust. These two initially parallel vortex lines spin in opposite directions. A slight crosswind can disturb the initially straight lines, causing them to become wavy. This waviness increases over time until the vortex lines almost touch. Then the vortices pinch off and reconnect into a line of vortex rings that slowly dissipate. Be sure to check out the full-resolution version of this animation for maximum effect. (Image credit: J. Hertzberg, source)

  • Wingtip Vortices Visualized

    Wingtip Vortices Visualized

    In flight, airplane wings produce dramatic wingtip vortices. These vortices reduce the amount of lift a 3D wing produces relative to a 2D one. How much they influence the lift depends on both the strength and proximity of the vortex. The stronger and closer it is, the more detrimental its effect. One way airplane designers reduce the effects of wingtip vortices is by adding an extra section, called a winglet, to the end of the wing. Among other effects, the winglet moves the wingtip vortex further away from the main wing, which reduces its influence and allows the airplane to regain some of the lift that would otherwise be lost. (Image credits: A. Wielandt et al., source)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Fluids Round-Up

    Time for another fluids round-up! Here are some of the best fluids-related links I’ve seen around:

    – Above The Brain Scoop tells us about beetles that spend their whole lives underwater. They carry a little bubble of air with them in order to breathe!

    – Microfluidics are helping reveal how cancer cells metastasize and spread through the bloodstream.

    – It’s official! NASA’s going to build X-planes again.

    – See how snake venom kills by changing the fluid properties of a victim’s blood. (via Gizmodo)

    – Metallic foams can stop bullets and radiation, spawning many potential future uses here on Earth or in space.

    – Why nature prefers hexagons, especially in honeycomb, bubbles, and foam.

    – Earth has beautiful auroras, but if you could look at Jupiter with x-ray vision, you’d see something even more spectacular – a non-stop aurora that brightens on a regular schedule.

    – SciShow asks where the water goes in Minnesota’s Devil’s Kettle Falls. Conservation of mass says it has to go somewhere!

    And, in case you missed it, you can check out the latest FYFD video and learn more about the Brazil Nut effect over at Gizmodo.

    (Video credit: The Brain Scoop)

  • Fluids Round-up

    Fluids Round-up

    Last week was supposed to have a fluids round-up, but we were having too much fun walking on water instead. So here it is now!

    – NASA has asked Congress for funding for new X-plane programs to explore solutions for greener airliners and quieter sonic booms to enable next-generation air travel. Popular Science, Gizmodo, and Ars Technica take a closer look at the proposed projects. I won’t lie – as an aerospace engineer I am hugely in favor of this. The first ‘A’ in NASA has been neglected for quite a while and projects like these are needed if we want to advance the state-of-the-art in aeronautics.

    – The New York Times’ ScienceTake video series took a look back at their most popular videos, and 3 of the top 5 videos are fluid dynamics-related. Because we are just that awesome. (via Rebecca M)

    – I made a guest appearance on last week’s Improbable Research podcast, where we talked about bizarre experiments trying to unravel swimming.

    – Physics Girl shows us 5 weird ways to blow out a candle. There’s some neat and potentially non-intuitive fluid dynamics involved!

    – SciShow offers an explanation of why we sneeze. Spoiler alert: it’s more than just to get rid of irritants.

    – Fluid dynamics made the short list for NPR’s Golden Mole awards with the discovery of dancing droplets. Here’s Skunkbear’s take on it.

    – Ernst Mach, of Mach number fame, was also a bit of an artist and philosopher. (via @JenLucPiquant)

    – It’s not quite fluid dynamics, but this Slow Mo Guys video of spinning burning steel wool might be their most beautiful video yet. Check it out!

    (Image credit: NASA)