FYFD

Search results for: “vortex”

  • Reader Question: Winglets

    Reader Question: Winglets

    Reader tvargo writes:

    First off… love your blog! I know very little about physics, but love reading about it. Could you potentially explain what the little upturned ends of wings do? looking on wikipedia is see this: “There are several types of wingtip devices, and although they function in different manners, the intended effect is always to reduce the aircraft’s drag by partial recovery of the tip vortex energy.” huh?

    Thanks! That’s a great question. Winglets are very common, especially on commercial airliners. To understand what they do, it’s helpful to first think about a winglet-less airplane wing. Each section of the wing produces lift. For a uniform, infinite wing, the lift produced at each spanwise location would be the same. In reality, though, wings are finite and wingtip vortices at their ends distort the flow. The vortices’ upward flow around the ends of the wing reduces the lift produced at the wing’s outermost sections, making the finite wing less efficient (though obviously more practical) than an infinite wing.

    Adding a winglet modifies the end conditions, both by redirecting the wingtip vortices away from the underside of the wing and by reducing the strength of the vortex. Both actions cause the winglet-equipped wing to produce more lift near the outboard ends than a wing without winglets.

    But why, you might ask, does the Wikipedia explanation talk about reducing drag? Since a finite wing produces less lift than an infinite one, finite wings must be flown at a higher angle of attack to produce equivalent lift. Increasing the angle of attack also increases drag on the wing. (If you’ve ever stuck a tilted hand out a car window at speed, then you’re familiar with this effect.) Because the winglet recovers some of the lift that would otherwise be lost, it allows the wing to be flown at a lower angle of attack, thereby reducing the drag. Thus, overall, adding winglets improves a wing’s efficiency. (Photo credit: C. Castro)

  • Hummingbird Hovering

    Hummingbird Hovering

    The hummingbird has long been admired for its ability to hover in flight. The key to this behavior is the bird’s capability to produce lift on both its downstroke and its upstroke. The animation above shows a simulation of hovering hummingbird. The kinematics of the bird’s flapping–the figure-8 motion and the twist of the wings through each cycle–are based on high-speed video of actual hummingbirds. These data were then used to construct a digital model of a hummingbird, about which scientists simulated airflow. About 70% of the lift each cycle is generated by the downstroke, much of it coming from the leading-edge vortex that develops on the wing. The remainder of the lift is creating during the upstroke as the bird pulls its wings back. During this part of the cycle, the flexible hummingbird twists its wings to a very high angle of attack, which is necessary to generate and maintain a leading-edge vortex on the upstroke. The full-scale animation is here. (Image credit: J. Song et al.; via Wired; submitted by averagegrdy)

  • Typhoon Neoguri

    Typhoon Neoguri

    Astronaut Reid Wiseman has been posting photos of Typhoon Neoguri in his Twitter feed this week. From our perspective on the ground, it’s easy to forget how three-dimensional the typhoons and hurricanes in our atmosphere are. But Wiseman’s photos capture the depth in the storm, especially the depression of the eye. From the top, the typhoon looks much like a vortex in a bathtub, or what’s more formally known as a free surface vortex. To understand why a vortex dips in the middle, imagine a container of water on a rotating plate. As the water is spun, its interface with the air takes on a paraboloid shape. Two external forces are acting on the fluid: gravity in the downward direction and a centrifugal force in the radial direction. The free surface of the fluid adopts a shape that is always perpendicular to the combination of these two forces. This ensures that the pressure along the free surface is a constant. (Photo credits: R. Wiseman 1,2,3)

  • Waterspouts

    Waterspouts

    Waterspouts are commonly thought of as tornadoes over water, but this is only partially true. Some waterspouts do begin as tornadoes, but waterspouts are more commonly non-tornadic or fair-weather in origin. These non-tornadic waterspouts form when cold, dry air moves over warm water. As the warm, moist air rises, entrainment and conservation of angular momentum cause the air nearby to begin rotating. The spout does not actually suck water up from the surface. Instead, the humid rising air cools and the water vapor condenses, forming the cloud wall of the spout. Waterspouts are typically very short-lived and last 5 to 10 minutes before the inflowing air cools and the vortex weakens and dissipates.  (Photo credit: U.S. Navy/K. Wasson)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Blood Flow Simulations

    Though we may not often consider it, our bodies are full of fluid dynamics. Blood flow is a prime example, and, in this video, researchers describe their simulations of flow through the left side of the heart. Beginning with 3D medical imaging of a patient’s heart, they construct a computational domain – a meshed virtual heart that imitates the shape and movements of the real heart. Then, after solving the governing equations with an additional model for turbulence, the researchers can observe flow inside a beating heart. Each cycle consists of two phases. In the first, oxygenated blood fills the ventricle from the atrium. This injection of fresh blood generates a vortex ring. Near the end of this phase, the blood mixes strongly and appears to be mildly turbulent. In the second phase, the ventricle contracts, ejecting the blood out into the body and drawing freshly oxygenated blood into the atrium. (Video credit: C. Chnafa et al.)

  • Reader Question: Rib Vortices

    Reader Question: Rib Vortices

    Reader tarastarr1 asks:

    For the (awesome) wave gif and explanation, I think the asker was wondering about that little branch-like projection you can see in the top-middle part of the gif right after the camera submerges. Your explanation of the wave is great, but now I’m also wondering: if the wave is so powerful, how can that little jet form?

    I think you’re probably right about the original question. I actually didn’t even notice that tiny vortex until after the post went up today! I think the little vortex is probably similar to the rib vortices I referenced at the end of the last post. If there happened to be some small localized rotation in the water initially, the wave’s passage would stretch it out. Stretching a vortex causes it to spin faster, exactly the way that an ice skater pulling her arms in causes her to spin faster – conservation of angular momentum! In that situation, the wave’s passage actually strengthens the vortex rather than destroying it.

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Stirring Up

    When a viscoelastic non-Newtonian fluid is stirred, it climbs up the stirring rod. This behavior is known as the Weissenberg effect and results from the polymers in the fluid getting tangled and bunched due to the stirring. You may have noticed this effect in the kitchen when beating egg whites. In this video, researchers explore the effect using rodless stirring. The first example in the video shows a viscous Newtonian fluid being stirred. The stirring action creates a concave shape in the glycerin-air interface, and dye injection shows a toroidal vortex formed over the stirrer. Fluid near the center of the vortex is pulled downward and circulates out to the sides. In contrast, the viscoelastic fluid bulges outward when stirred. Dye visualization reveals fluid being pulled up the center into the bulge. It then travels outward, forming a mushroom-cap-like shape before sinking down the outside. This is also a toroidal vortex, but it rotates opposite the direction of the Newtonian one. Exactly how the polymers create this change in flow behavior is a matter of active research. (Video credit: E. Soto et al.)

  • Growing Turbulence

    Growing Turbulence

    Flow patterns can change dramatically as fluid speed and Reynolds number increase. These visualizations show flow moving from left to right around a circular plunger. The lower Reynolds number flow is on the left, with a large, well-formed, singular vortex spinning off the plunger’s shoulder. The image on the right is from a higher Reynolds number and higher freestream speed. Now the instantaneous flow field is more complicated, with a string of small vortices extending from the plunger and a larger and messier area of recirculation behind the plunger. In general, increasing the Reynolds number of a flow makes it more turbulent, generating a larger range of length scales in the flow and increasing its complexity. (Image credit: S. O’Halloran)

  • “Demersal”

    “Demersal”

    The ethereal shapes of inks and paints falling through water make fascinating subjects. Here the ink appears to rise because the photographs are upside-down. The fluid forms mushroom-like plumes and little vortex rings. The strands that split apart into tiny lace-like fingers are an example of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability, which occurs when a denser fluid sinks into a less dense one. Similar fingering can occur on much grander scales, as well, like in the Crab Nebula. These images come from photographer Luka Klikovac’s “Demersal” series. (Photo credit: L. Klikovac)

  • Cylinder Wakes

    Cylinder Wakes

    A simple cylinder in a steady flow creates a beautiful wake pattern known as a von Karman vortex street. The image above shows several examples of this pattern. Flow is from bottom to top, and the Reynolds number is increasing from left to right. In the experiment, this increasing Reynolds number corresponds to increasing the flow velocity because the cylinder size, fluid, and temperature were all fixed. As the Reynolds number first increases, the cylinder begins to shed vortices. The vortices alternate the side of the cylinder from which they are shed as well as alternating in their sense of rotation (clockwise or counterclockwise). Further increasing the Reynolds number increases the complexity of the wake, with more and more vortices being shed. The vortex street is a beautiful example of how fluid behavior is similar across a range of scales from the laboratory to our planet’s atmosphere.  (Image credit: Z. Trávníček et. al)

More posts