FYFD

Search results for: “drag”

  • Soaring Pelicans

    Soaring Pelicans

    Earlier this summer, I looked up on a bright, sunny day and saw a quartet of black and white figures soaring overhead. Initially, I thought it might be a formation of kites or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) because I saw no flapping as the group wheeled about. With the help of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s awesome Merlin app, I was able to identify the soarers as American white pelicans – not a species I’d expected to find flying along the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains! (Turns out, they breed on lakes around here.)

    The reason I saw so little flapping is that the birds were riding thermals. As the sun heats the ground, air near the surface warms up and begins to rise due to its buoyancy. Pelicans interested in flying between breeding and foraging grounds will start testing the thermals early in the day, as soon as they begin to form. As the heating continues, the intensity of thermals strengthens and they extend higher into the atmosphere. This is where the birds can really excel at using atmospheric energy for their flight. Pelicans will circle within a thermal until they reach roughly the middle of its height. Then they will glide, gradually losing altitude until they reach another thermal where they can climb without expending their own energy. With a 2.7 meter wingspan and a relatively low drag coefficient, the pelicans can glide and soar remarkably well. Researchers have even suggested using them as a sort of biological UAV for studying atmospheric dynamics! (Image credits: D. Henise, M. Stratmoen; research credit: H. Shannon et al., pdfs – 1, 2)

  • Optimal Swimming

    Optimal Swimming

    What do trout, sharks, and whales have in common? All are fast swimmers and share remarkable similarities in their swimming dynamics despite different sizes, shapes, and environments. A new study analyzing aquatic locomotion examines the characteristics of these swimmers. The researchers found that a typical parameter for studying swimming fish – the Strouhal number, which relates swimming speed, body length, and tail-beat frequency – only tells part of the story. When cruising at minimum power input, a fish cannot choose its Strouhal number – that characteristic is completely determined by the fish’s shape, which determines its drag.

    Instead, researchers found that a second additional number – the ratio of the tail-beat amplitude to the body length – was also needed to describe optimal swimming. Taken together, their model predicts that optimal swimming performance lies within a narrow range of the two numbers. And when the researchers examined cruising behaviors of a diverse variety of fish and whales, they found that they did indeed swim in the ranges predicted by the model. Now that we better understand characteristics of efficient swimming, engineers can use the model to guide designs of new biologically-inspired robot swimmers.   (Image credit: N. Sharp, source; research credit: M. Saadat et al.)

  • Hair in the Flow

    Hair in the Flow

    Humans are hairy on the inside. Not in the way that we are on the outside, but in the sense that many interior surfaces of our bodies are covered in small, flexible, hair-like protrusions like the papillae on our tongues or the cilia in our intestines. Many of these fibers are immersed in fluids, raising the question of how the flow and the hairs interact. An elastic fiber immersed in a flow will bend in the direction of the flow (bottom); this helps reduce the drag and widens the channel flow goes through compared to a stiff, upright fiber. 

    But what happens when the fibers are all mounted at an angle? In this case, researchers found an asymmetric response. If flow moves in the direction of the fibers’ bend, the hairs don’t impend the flow at all. If flow moves against that direction, however, the hairs start to stand upright, blocking the flow channel and increasing the drag. The researchers suggest this sort of mechanism could be use in micro-hydraulic devices in the same way as a diode in a circuit – allowing flow in only one direction. For another biological example of flow control, check out how a shark’s denticles can prevent flow separation. (Image credits: hairy surface – J. Alvarado et al., flow around a hair – J. Wexler et al.; research credit: J. Alvarado et al.)

  • Tightrope Walkair

    Tightrope Walkair

    A bubble rising through water can get caught on an aerophilic (air-attracting) fiber. The bubble will then adhere to the fiber and be guided to the surface by it. In the poster above, the image is a composite photo of such a bubble every 40 milliseconds. Once captured by the fiber, the bubble first accelerates and then reaches a terminal velocity, indicated by the equal spacing of the bubble photos toward the right end of the picture. The terminal velocity strikes a balance between buoyancy, which pulls the bubble upward, and skin friction between the bubble and the water, which acts like drag on the bubble. At the terminal velocity, these forces are equal; neither is able to speed up or slow down the bubble. (Image credit: H. de Maleprade et al.)

  • Chains of Salps

    Chains of Salps

    Salps are small, jellyfish-like marine invertebrates that swim by ejecting a pulsatile jet. They are unusual creatures whose lives have two major stages: one in which salps swim individually and one in which they link together and swim in large chains. In the chain, salps don’t synchronize their jetting; each salp jets with its own phase and frequency. A new study suggests that, in spite of this lack of synchronicity, the salp chain’s swimming reduces the animals’ drag. There are several  factors that contribute to this result. One is that drag is generally lower on a body moving at constant speed compared to one moving in bursts. When linked together and firing randomly, all the individual jets tend to average out into one continuous swimming speed. There’s even a benefit to being out of sync: previous work showed that synchronized jets lose some of their thrust when they are too close together. Salps avoid that loss by keeping to their own beat. (Image and research credit: K. Sutherland and D. Weihs, source; via Gizmodo)

  • Reader Question: Drafting in Time Trials

    Reader Question: Drafting in Time Trials

    In a comment on this recent post regarding drafting advantages to a leader, reader fey-ruz asks:

    in cycling, team follow cars are required to maintain a minimum distance from their riders during time trials for this very reason (although i imagine the effects in that context are much smaller and dependent on the conditions, esp the wind speed, direction, and strength). FYFD, is there a simple way to understand where this upstream influence comes from? or a specific term in the navier-stokes equations that it results from?

    Cars following riders during a time trial can actually make a huge difference! One study from a couple of years ago estimated that a car following a rider in a short (13.8 km) time trial could take 6 seconds off the rider’s time. The images up top show a simulation from that study with a car following at 5 meters versus 10 meters. The colors indicate the pressure field around the car and rider. Red is high pressure, blue is low pressure. Both the car and the rider have high pressure in front of them; you can think of this as a result of them pushing the air in front of them.

    A large part of the rider’s drag comes from the difference in pressure ahead and behind them. (For a look at flow around a cyclist that focuses on velocity instead, check out my video on cycling aerodynamics.) When a car drives close behind a cyclist, it’s essentially pushing air ahead of it and into the cyclist’s wake. This actually reduces the difference in pressure between the cyclist’s front and back sides, thereby reducing his drag. Because cars are large, they have an oversized effect in this regard, but having a motorbike or another rider nearby also helps the lead cyclist aerodynamically.

    As for the Navier-Stokes equation – this effect isn’t one that you can really pin down to a single term since it’s a consequence of the flow overall. (Image credits: TU Eindhoven; K. Ramon)

  • Cycling Skinsuits and Vortex Generators

    Cycling Skinsuits and Vortex Generators

    It didn’t take long for an aerodynamic controversy to crop up in this year’s Tour de France. At the 14km individual time trial, riders from Team Sky wore custom Castelli skinsuits with integrated dot-like patterns on their upper arms (shown above). By the next day, a sports scientist with a competing team cried foul play, claiming that these fabrics could have given Team Sky as much as 25 seconds’ advantage over other riders. The Sky team finished with 4 out of the top 10 places on the time trial, and their leader, three-time Tour winner Chris Froome, finished some 35 seconds ahead of his expected competitors for the yellow jersey.

    Vortex generators explained

    So how could a few dots make a measurable difference? These protrusions are vortex generators meant to modify flow around a cyclist. Humans are not aerodynamic and what typically happens when air flows over a cyclist’s arms is shown in the flow visualization above: the air follows the curve of the arm part way, then it separates from the body, leaving a region of recirculation that increases drag. Vortex generators can help prevent or delay that drag-inducing flow separation by adding extra energy and turbulence to the air near the arm’s surface. Because turbulent boundary layers can follow a curve longer before separating, this helps reduce the drag by reducing the recirculation zone.

    About that time savings

    Aerodynamically speaking, those vortex generators can make a difference, but the question is, how much? In his complaint, Grappe cites a 2016 paper by L. Brownlie et al. that wind-tunnel tested different vortex generator patterns for use in running apparel. The speeds tested included those relevant to cycling. The specific numbers Grappe quotes aren’t directly relevant, however:

    As noted above, race garments that contain VG provide reductions in Fd of between 3.7 and 6.8% compared to equivalent
    advanced race apparel developed for the 2012 London Olympics which in turn provided substantially lower drag than
    conventional race apparel.

    the effectiveness of 5, 10 and 15 cm wide strips of VG applied to each flank of a sleeveless singlet revealed that the 5 cm wide
    strips provided between 3.1 and 7.1% less Fd than the 10 cm wide strips and between 1.9 and 4.3% less Fd than the 15 cm wide
    strips.  

    Here Brownlie et al. are specifically describing the savings for running apparel, which uses vortex generators in very different places than you would on a cyclist. Note the second quote even refers to a sleeveless singlet, so the vortex generators measured are definitely not in the same place as these skinsuits!

    The bottom line

    I fully expect that vortex generators give a marginal aerodynamic edge, which is why Sky and other teams have already been using them in competition. But I hesitate to declare that the savings is as high as 5-7%, and I have no way to verify Grappe’s subsequent claims that this translates to 18-25 seconds in the time trial. Those are numbers he gives without citing what model is being used to translate drag gains into time.

    In the end, what is needed is clarification of the rules. As they stand, one rule seems to allow the skinsuits because the vortex generators are integrated into the fabric, whereas another states clothing is forbidden “to influence the performances of a rider such as reducing air resistance”. Those two stances seems contradictory, and, for now, the race officials’ verdict to allow the suits stands.

    If you want to learn more about aerodynamics and cycling, be sure to check out my latest FYFD video. (Image credits: B. Tessier/Reuters; Getty Images; L. Brownlie et al. 2009; h/t to W. Küper)

  • Schooling in Soap Films

    Schooling in Soap Films

    In sports, flocks of birds, and schools of fish, we’re accustomed to thinking that the followers get an aerodynamic or hydrodynamic advantage over the leaders, but this may not always be the case. Here are two flags placed one after another in a soap film flowing from top to bottom. The flags are passive, meaning that their motion is entirely dependent on the flow around them; they cannot exert any resistive force of their own. In this case, scientists observe an effect known as inverted drafting. The lead flag actually experiences less drag – by as much as 50% – than the following flag. This seems to be a result of flow around the second flag having an upstream influence on the motion of the first. (Image and research credit: L. Ristroph and J. Zhang, pdf)

  • How Cycling Position Affects Aerodynamics

    How Cycling Position Affects Aerodynamics

    New FYFD video! How much does a rider’s position on the bike affect the drag they experience? To find out I teamed up with folks from the University of Colorado at Boulder and at SimScale to explore this topic using high-speed video, flow visualization, and computational fluid dynamics. 

    Check out the full video below, and if you need some more cycling science before the Tour de France gets rolling, you can find some of my previous cycling-related posts here. (Image and video credit: N. Sharp; CFD simulation – A. Arafat)

    ETA: Please note that the video contained in this post was sponsored by SimScale.

  • Flow in a Turbine

    Flow in a Turbine

    Fluid flows are complex, complicated, and ever-changing. Researchers use many techniques to visualize parts of a flow, which can help make what’s happening clearer. One technique, shown above, uses oil and dye to visualize flow at the surface. The vertical, black, airfoil-shaped pieces are stators, stationary parts within a turbine that help direct flow. After painting the stator mount surface with a uniform layer of oil, the model can be placed in a wind tunnel (or turbine) and exposed to flow. Air moving around the stators drags some of the oil with it, creating the darker and lighter streaks seen here. Notice how the lines of oil turn sharply around the front of the stator and bunch up near its widest point. Those crowded flow lines tell researchers that the air moves quickly around this corner. (Image credit: D. Klaubert et al., source)

More posts