Tag: skin friction

Butterfly Scales
Catch a butterfly, and you’ll notice a dust-like residue left behind on your fingers. These are tiny scales from the butterfly’s wing. Under a microscope, those scales overlap like shingles all over the wing. Their downstream edges tilt upward, leaving narrow gaps between one scale and the next. Experiments show that, although butterflies can fly without their scales, these tiny features make a big difference in their efficiency.
At the microscale, a butterfly’s scales overlap like roof shingles but are tilted upward, leaving cavities in the downstream direction.
When air flows over the scales, tiny vortices form in the gaps between. These laminar vortices act like roller bearings, helping the flow overhead move along with less friction and, thus, less drag. Compared to a smooth surface, the scales reduce skin friction on the wing by 26-45%. (Image credit: butterfly – E. Minuskin, scales – N. Slegers et al., experiment – S. Gautam; research credit: N. Slegers et al. and S. Gautam; via Physics Today)
This lab-scale experiment shows how air moves over butterfly scales. As flow moves from left to right, small persistent vortices form in the gaps between scales. These act like roller bearings that reduce the skin friction from air moving past.
September 21, 2023
Reducing Drag with Bubbles
Large ships experience a great deal of drag due to friction between their hull and the water. One method shipbuilders are considering to combat this drag is the use of bubbles, which have been found to reduce drag by up to 40%. The physical mechanism behind this drag reduction is not yet understood, but a recent study suggests that bubble size and bubble coalescence play an important role.
Researchers introduced surfactants into bubbly boundary layers and found that the reductions in drag evaporated as soon as the surfactants spread. Adding only 6 parts per million of the surfactant decreased average bubble size from 1 mm to 0.1 mm and helped prevent the bubbles from growing via coalescence. The implications are that bubble-induced drag reduction could be extremely sensitive to water conditions. (Image credit: G. Kiss; research credit: R. Verschoof et al.)
April 18, 2017
Rio 2016: Swimming
Strange as it seems, elite swimmers are faster when swimming underwater than they are at the surface. So much so, in fact, that they’re restricted to being underwater only 15 m after a dive or turn. To see just how stark a difference this makes, check out this crazy video. (I know, right?!)
To understand how this is possible, it helps to look at the three types of drag a swimmer experiences: pressure drag, skin friction, and wave drag. Pressure drag is probably the most familiar; it’s the drag that comes from the swimmer’s shape and how the fluid moves around it. Skin friction is the drag that comes from viscous friction between the swimmer and the water. The final type, wave drag, comes from the energy expended to create waves at the surface of the water. As you might expect, energy that goes into splashing is energy that isn’t going into propulsion.
When swimming at the surface, swimmers experience a lot of wave drag. At least one experiment showed that wave drag accounted for most of a surface swimmer’s drag. In contrast, at a depth of more than 0.5 m, a swimmer’s wave drag is virtually negligible. The submersion does come at the cost of higher skin friction (since more of the swimmer is in contact with the water), but there is also more opportunity for useful propulsion since both sides of a kick can move water (and not air.) Bonus read for those interested in more: Is the fish kick the fastest stroke yet? (Image credits: AP; B. Esposito)
Previously: what makes a pool fast?
Join us throughout the Rio Olympics for more fluid dynamics in sports. If you love FYFD, please help support the site!
August 8, 2016
Holiday Fluids: Santa’s Aerodynamics
Today we have some holiday-themed fluid dynamics: visualization of flow around Santa’s sleigh! This is a flowing soap film visualization at a low speed (author Nick Moore has some other speeds as well). Santa’s sleigh is what aerodynamicists call a bluff body–a shape that is not streamlined or aerodynamic–and sheds a complicated wake of vortices. Like any object moving through a fluid, Santa’s sleigh generates drag forces made up of several components. There is viscous drag, which comes from friction between the sleigh’s surface and the fluid, and form drag (or pressure drag), which comes from the shape of the sleigh. That wake full of complicated vortices significantly increases the sleigh’s pressure drag, requiring Rudolph and the other reindeer to provide more thrust to counter the sleigh’s drag. Speaking thereof, the visualization does not take into account the aerodynamics of the reindeer, who, in addition to providing the sleigh’s thrust, would also affect the flowfield upstream of the sleigh. This post is part of this week’s holiday-themed post series. (Video credit: N. Moore)
December 24, 2013
London 2012: Rowing Physics
In rowing, as in any water sport, drag comes in three varieties: skin friction, form (or pressure) drag, and wave drag. Skin friction comes from the friction between the hull and water causing the boat to drag water with it as it moves. This can be mitigated with the right materials and surface finish but will never be completely negligible. In fact, the racing shells used in rowing are unusual for boats because skin friction is their major source of resistance. This is because form drag, caused by the shape of the boat cutting through the water, and wave drag, the energy lost due to the waves that form along the hull, are small in racing shells due to their long, narrow, and streamlined shape. Because skin friction dominates among the three types of drag, the force a rower overcomes to move the boat is proportional to the hull’s velocity squared, and the power required to do so is proportional to the hull’s velocity cubed. This means that it is more efficient for rowers to keep a constant hull speed throughout a race than it is to start slow and speed up or start fast and slow down because the work (power x time) needed to keep a constant speed is smaller. For more on the physics of rowing, check out Anu Dudhia’s excellent website or this video from Physics of Life. (Photo credits: Ecouterre, AP)
FYFD is celebrating the Olympics by featuring the fluid dynamics of sport. Check out some of our previous posts, including what makes a pool fast, how divers reduce splash, and the aerodynamics of badminton.
August 7, 2012
Sharkskin-Style Swimsuits
Fans of swimming will recall the controversies of the now-banned sharkskin-style swimsuits that helped break so many records in the past few years. The suits decrease drag on a swimmer both by making them more hydrodynamic in form and by drastically reducing skin friction where the water meets the swimmer’s body. In addition to decreasing the two major sources of drag on a swimmer, the compression provided by the material can help increase blood flow to muscles. These improvements came at a high material cost, though, and, since the technology was not viable for all athletes, it has since been banned.
October 5, 2011
Laminar and Turbulent Flows from a Faucet
Here laminar and turbulent flows, basic concepts in fluid mechanics, are demonstrated in the kitchen sink! While laminar flow is often desirable for decreasing drag due to friction, most practical flows are turbulent. The hissing the video author associates with the onset of turbulence is not a coincidence either. The chaotic motion of turbulent flows can produce aerodynamic noise like the roar produced by airplane propellers or the hum of electrical lines in the wind.
September 20, 2011
Tour de France Physics: Time Trials
Unlike road stages in which cyclists can draft off one another to reduce drag, in the time trial a cyclist is on a solo race against the clock with nowhere to hide. As a result, the event features lots of technologies designed to reduce both pressure drag and skin friction on the cyclist. For time trials, cyclists wear skinsuits and shoe covers to eliminate any sources of flapping fabrics and to reduce skin friction. They ride bicycles designed to be as light and aerodynamic as possible. Instead of rounded tubing in the frames, these bikes consist of elongated airfoil profiles that direct air past and prevent separation that may increase pressure drag. The rims of their tires are wider and the back wheel is replaced with a disc wheel that allows no airflow aross the wheel. Like the airfoil tubing, these changes help prevent separation. Similarly, riders wear elongated helmets designed to be as aerodynamic as possible while the rider is in the “aero” position, with arms directed out over the wheels, head level, elbows tucked, and back flat. In wind tunnel tests, the rider best able to hold this position will experience the least drag. Even the addition or subtraction of a water bottle is not left to chance, with many time trial bikes designed to be more aerodynamic with a water bottle onboard (though you probably won’t catch the cyclists breaking their aero position to get a drink)! (Photos by Veeral Patel)
FYFD is celebrating the Tour de France with a weeklong exploration of the fluid dynamics of cycling. See previous posts on drafting in the peloton, and pacelining and echelons, and the art of the lead-out train.
July 14, 2011