Search results for: “art”

Fluids Round-up
Time for another look at some of the best fluids content out there. It’s the fluids round-up – with a special focus this week on oceans!
– Ryan Pernofski spent two years filming the ocean in slow motion with his iPhone to make the short film “Slowmocean” seen above. It’s a gorgeous ode to the beauty of breaking waves.
– Oceans with higher salinity than Earth’s could drive global circulation that would make exoplanets more hospitable to life.
– Speaking of alien oceans that could harbor signs of life, there’s discussion afoot of how future missions to icy moons like Europa or Enceladus could collect samples from plumes ejected from beneath the ice.
– Wind and waves make harsh, erosive environments. This photo essay from SFGate shows how greatly the sands of Pacifica shift over time. (submitted by Richard)
Bonuses:
– New research explores how Martian mountains may have been carved out by the wind.
– Ever listened to an orchestra made from ice? You should! Learn about Tim Linhart, who builds and maintains ice instruments. (submitted by ashketchumm)
– MIT has demonstrated a new 3D-printing technique that allows for printing liquid and solid parts simultaneously, allowing would-be creators to rapid-prototype hydraulically-driven robotics.
Even more bonus bonus!
– ICYMI, the new FYFD video made Gizmodo!
If you’re a fan of FYFD, please consider becoming a patron. As a bonus, you’ll get access to this weekend’s planetary science webcast!
(Video credit: R. Pernofski; via Flow Visualization; Pluto image credit: NASA/APL)
April 14, 2016
The Brazil Nut Effect
The Brazil nut effect is a common name for the phenomenon where large particles tend to rise to the top of a mixture when it’s shaken. It’s also the subject of the latest FYFD video, which you can see above.
I’ve seen other mentions of the topic previously, but when I started researching the literature, I discovered that the Brazil nut effect was much more complicated than I’d thought! Hopefully, you’ll find the results as interesting as I did. And if you want to dig further, there are links to the papers I used over on YouTube.
Filming was also interesting this time around. I tried out stop-motion animation for the first time. It takes so much patience! But I think the results are so cute. (Image and video credit: N. Sharp/FYFD)
April 13, 2016
Upcoming Webcast
This weekend I’ll be holding my second live webcast for FYFD patrons. This month we’ll be focusing on the subject of planetary science, one of the coolest applications out there for fluid dynamics. My guests will be Keri Bean, a NASA JPL mission operations engineer and atmospheric scientist, and Professor Geoffrey Collins, a geologist at Wheaton College in Massachusetts. Keri has worked on all the recent Martian missions, including Mars Curiosity and the Phoenix Lander. She currently works on operations for the Dawn mission to Ceres. Geoff studies the geophysics of icy planets and moons like Pluto and Titan. He was part of the Galileo and Cassini missions to Jupiter and Saturn and is currently part of the team working on a future mission to Europa.
April 12, 2016
A Rocket Launch From Above
Rocket launches often produce spectacular imagery, but it’s rare to get a launch view quite like this one. The photograph above shows the recent launch of an Atlas V rocket as viewed from the International Space Station. The rocket itself is too small to be seen directly. Instead, that bright spot you see is the rocket’s exhaust. The smoky swooping curves mark the rocket’s exhaust plume. Because the gases leaving the rocket are at much higher pressure than the scant air pressure in the upper parts of the atmosphere, the exhaust expands rapidly, ballooning outward. Here the water vapor in the exhaust has frozen into crystals that catch the sunlight and make them stand out against the surrounding sky. (Image credit: NASA; via NASA Earth Observatory)
April 12, 2016
Underwater Explosions
Underwater explosions are incredibly dangerous and destructive, and this animation shows you why. What you see here are three balloons, each half-filled with water and half with air. A small explosive has been set off next to them in a pool. In air, the immense energy of an explosion actually doesn’t propagate all that far because much of it gets expended in compressing the air. Water, on the other hand, is incompressible, so that explosive energy just keeps propagating. For squishy, partially air-filled things like us humans or these balloons, that explosion’s force transmits into us with nearly its full effect, causing expansion and contraction of anything compressible inside us as our interior and exterior pressures try to equalize. The results can be devastating. To see the equivalent experiment in air, check out Mark Rober’s full video on how to survive a grenade blast. (Image credit: M. Rober, source)
April 7, 2016
Bumblebees in Turbulence
Bumblebees are small all-weather foragers, capable of flying despite tough conditions. Given the trouble that micro air vehicles have when flying in gusty winds, bumblebees can help engineers to understand how nature successfully deals with turbulence. Under smooth laminar conditions like those shown in the animation above, bumblebees stay aloft by beating their wings forward and backward in a figure-8-like motion. On both the forward downstroke and the backward upstroke, you’ll notice a blue bulge near the front of the bee’s wing. This is a leading-edge vortex, which provides much of the bee’s lift.
Researchers were curious how adding turbulence would affect their virtual bee’s flight. The still image above shows the bee in moderate freestream turbulence (shown in cyan). Surprisingly, this outside turbulence has very little effect on the flow generated by the bee, shown in pink. In fact, the researchers found that the bees could fly through turbulence without a significant increase in power. Too much turbulence does make it hard for the bee to control its flight, though. The bee’s shape makes it prone to rolling, and the researchers estimated, based on a bee’s 20 ms reaction time, that bumblebees can probably only correct that roll and maintain controlled flight at turbulence intensities less than 63% of the mean wind speed. (Image credits: T. Engels et al., source; via Physics Focus)
April 5, 2016
Drawing With Microfluidic Tweezers
One of the challenges of dealing with objects at the microscale is finding ways to manipulate them. This is what techniques like optical tweezers or magnetic traps are used for. The downside to these methods is that they often require complex experimental set-ups or place restrictions on the kinds of particles that can be manipulated. Recently, however, researchers have developed a new hydrodynamic alternative: the Stokes trap.
Using a six-channel microfluidic device like the the ones shown in A) and B) above, scientists can alter the flow in the device in such a way that they trap and manipulate two particles at the same time. The simultaneous inflow and outflow in the device creates streamlines like those shown in C) and D) above. The large white areas where the streamlines converge and diverge are stagnation points–areas of little to no velocity. The scientists trap their particles at the stagnation points and then carefully shift the flow rates into and out of the device to move the stagnation points–with particles in tow–wherever they want them. In the animation, you can see part of a movie where they use the particles to write out a capital I (for University of Illinois). The researchers hope the technique will be used in the future for studying the physics of soft materials and biologically-relevant molecules like DNA. For more, check out the full paper or the group’s website. (Image credit and submission: C. Schroeder et al.)
April 1, 2016
Hovering Hummingbirds
Hummingbirds are incredible flyers, especially when it comes to hovering. To hover stationary and stable enough to feed, the hummingbird’s flapping pattern not only has to generate enough lift, or vertical force, to counteract their weight, but the bird must balance any forward or backward forces generated during flapping.
As you can see in the animations above, when hovering the hummingbird’s wings move forward and back rather than up and down. When slowed down even further, the figure-8 motion of the wings becomes apparent. This careful motion is key to the hover; it allows the bird to generate about 70% of its lift on the downstroke when the wings move forward and creates the remainder of the lift needed on the upstroke. For much more high-speed footage of hummingbirds, check out the full BBC Earth Unplugged video, but be warned: you may experience a cuteness overdose! (Image credit: BBC Earth Unplugged, source)
March 30, 2016
Coffee-Making in Space
In this video, Kjell Lindgren demonstrates his technique for making coffee aboard the Space Station. Astronauts usually drink coffee reconstituted from powder, or, on special occasions, enjoy a beverage from their special espresso machine. But Lindgren uses a pour-over method by attaching a pod of coffee grounds to the underside of a Capillary Beverage Experiment cup – a specially-designed 3D printed cup that uses capillary action and surface tension to guide fluids. Then, by forcing hot water from a syringe through the grounds and into the cup, he gets a result that’s not too different from the way many people enjoy their coffee here on Earth. I must say, though, that my favorite part of this video is how he just starts spinning to separate the air and water in the syringe! (Video credit: NASA; via IRPI LLC)
March 29, 2016
Eulerian vs. Lagrangian
When I first studied fluid dynamics, one of the concepts I struggled with was that of Eulerian and Lagrangian reference frames. Essentially, these are just two different perspectives you can view the fluid from. Physics is the same in both, but mathematically, you approach them differently. In the Eulerian perspective one sits at a location and watches the flow pass, like an observer watching a river go by. It’s demonstrated in the top animation, where turbulent flow sweeps past in a pipe. This is the usual perspective experimentally – you put an instrument at a certain point in the flow and you gather information as the fluid streams past in time.
In the Lagrangian perspective, on the other hand, one follows a particular bit of fluid around and observes its changes over time. This means that one has to follow along at the mean speed of the flow in order to keep up with the fluid parcel one is observing. It would be like running alongside a river so that you can always be watching the same water as it flows downstream. The Lagrangian view of the same turbulent pipe flow is shown in the bottom animation. Notice how moving alongside the pipe makes it easier to see how the turbulence morphs as it goes along. Experimentally, this can be harder to achieve (at least in a flow with non-zero mean speed), but it’s a useful method of studying unsteadiness. (Image credit: J. Kühnen et al., source)
March 28, 2016

More posts