Hummingbirds are incredible flyers, especially when it comes to hovering. To hover stationary and stable enough to feed, the hummingbird’s flapping pattern not only has to generate enough lift, or vertical force, to counteract their weight, but the bird must balance any forward or backward forces generated during flapping.
As you can see in the animations above, when hovering the hummingbird’s wings move forward and back rather than up and down. When slowed down even further, the figure-8 motion of the wings becomes apparent. This careful motion is key to the hover; it allows the bird to generate about 70% of its lift on the downstroke when the wings move forward and creates the remainder of the lift needed on the upstroke. For much more high-speed footage of hummingbirds, check out the full BBC Earth Unplugged video, but be warned: you may experience a cuteness overdose! (Image credit: BBC Earth Unplugged, source)
In this video, Kjell Lindgren demonstrates his technique for making coffee aboard the Space Station. Astronauts usually drink coffee reconstituted from powder, or, on special occasions, enjoy a beverage from their special espresso machine. But Lindgren uses a pour-over method by attaching a pod of coffee grounds to the underside of a Capillary Beverage Experiment cup – a specially-designed 3D printed cup that uses capillary action and surface tension to guide fluids. Then, by forcing hot water from a syringe through the grounds and into the cup, he gets a result that’s not too different from the way many people enjoy their coffee here on Earth. I must say, though, that my favorite part of this video is how he just starts spinning to separate the air and water in the syringe! (Video credit: NASA; via IRPI LLC)
When I first studied fluid dynamics, one of the concepts I struggled with was that of Eulerian and Lagrangian reference frames. Essentially, these are just two different perspectives you can view the fluid from. Physics is the same in both, but mathematically, you approach them differently. In the Eulerian perspective one sits at a location and watches the flow pass, like an observer watching a river go by. It’s demonstrated in the top animation, where turbulent flow sweeps past in a pipe. This is the usual perspective experimentally – you put an instrument at a certain point in the flow and you gather information as the fluid streams past in time.
In the Lagrangian perspective, on the other hand, one follows a particular bit of fluid around and observes its changes over time. This means that one has to follow along at the mean speed of the flow in order to keep up with the fluid parcel one is observing. It would be like running alongside a river so that you can always be watching the same water as it flows downstream. The Lagrangian view of the same turbulent pipe flow is shown in the bottom animation. Notice how moving alongside the pipe makes it easier to see how the turbulence morphs as it goes along. Experimentally, this can be harder to achieve (at least in a flow with non-zero mean speed), but it’s a useful method of studying unsteadiness. (Image credit: J. Kühnen et al., source)
Large filter-feeders like the manta ray face the interesting challenge of obtaining enough small particulates like plankton to sustain an animal the size of a car. They do this through what is known as ram filter-feeding, essentially swimming open-mouthed through food-laden waters, filtering out the food, and releasing the water through their gills. Their internal filtration doesn’t simply catch particles like a colander does, though – it would be too easy for the ray’s filters to clog. Instead, the animals use several alternative methods to catch and redirect particles toward their esophagus. One, known as crossflow filtration, causes water to turn sharply through the filters. Heavier particles cannot accelerate that quickly, so they are carried onward. Another method, vortex filtration, works like a tiny centrifuge, spinning the water and ejecting the heavier particles back toward the esophagus. (Video credit: Science Friday; research credit: E. Paig-Tran, thesis)
Every year Chicago dyes part of its river green to celebrate St. Patrick’s Day. This timelapse video gives a great view of the 2016 dyeing. If you watch closely, you’ll see that what’s being put in the river isn’t originally green. It’s actually an orange powder being distributed through flour sifters by the men on the boat. The exact formula is secret, but the dye is considered environmentally safe. To mix up the dye, a chase boat follows the dye boat, using its motor and wake structure to help add some turbulence to the river. It takes several passes to get the water uniformly green, but it requires a remarkably small amount of dye to do so, only about a paint can’s worth. So enjoy a little fluid dynamics today with your festivities! (Or, if you prefer to celebrate a different sort of fluid dynamics today, allow me to offer you the physics of Guinness.) (Video credit: Chris B Photo)
The seemingly-alive dancing droplets are back in a new video from Veritasium. These droplets of food coloring attract, merge, and chase one another due to evaporation and surface tension interactions between their two components: water and
propylene glycol. Because the droplets are constantly evaporating, they are surrounded by a cloud of vapor that helps determine a drop’s surface tension. These localized differences in surface tension are what causes the drops to attract. The chasing is also surface-tension-driven. Like any liquid, the drops will flow from areas of low surface tension to those of higher surface tension due to the Marangoni effect. Thus drops of different concentration appear to chase one another. This is a relatively simple experiment to try yourself at home, and Derek outlines what you need to know for it. (Video credit: Veritasium; research credit: N. Cira et al.; submitted by @g_durey)
One challenge facing burrowing mammals is ensuring sufficient oxygen within their den. Prairie dogs achieve this with a clever use of Bernoulli’s principle. They build multiple entrances to their tunnels. One of them, labeled as Entrance A above, is built with a raised mound of dirt, while the other, Entrance B, is not. The raised mound creates an obstacle for the wind to move around, which increases the wind velocity at Entrance A compared to the normal wind speed at Entrance B. From Bernoulli’s principle, we know that a higher velocity means a lower pressure, so there is a decreasing pressure gradient through the tunnel from Entrance B to Entrance A. That favorable pressure gradient pulls fresh air through the prairie dog tunnels, allowing the colony to breathe easy. (Image credits: N. Sharp; original prairie dog photos by jinterwas and J. Kubina; final images shared under Creative Commons; research credit: S. Vogel et al.; h/t to Chris R.)
In his latest video, The Backyard Scientist explores what happens when molten salt (sodium chloride) gets poured into water. As you can see, the results are quite dramatic! He demonstrates pretty convincingly that the effect is physical – not chemical. The extreme difference in temperature between the liquid water (< 100 degrees Celsius) and the molten salt (> 800 degrees Celsius) causes the water to instantly vaporize due to the Leidenfrost effect. This vapor layer protects the liquid water from the molten salt – until it doesn’t. When some driving force causes a drop of water to touch the salt without that protective vapor layer, the extreme temperature difference superheats the water, causing it to expand violently, which drives more water into salt and feeds the explosion.
But why don’t the other molten salts he tests explode? Sodium carbonate, the third salt he tests, has a melting point of 851 degrees Celsius, 50 degrees hotter than sodium chloride. Yet for that test, the Leidenfrost effect prevents any contact between the two liquids. The key in this case, I hypothesize, is not simply the temperature difference between the water and salt, but the difference in fluid properties between sodium chloride and sodium carbonate. The breakdown of the vapor layer and subsequent contact between the water and the molten salt depends in part on instabilities in the fluids. A cavity where instabilities can grow more easily is one where the Leidenfrost effect is less likely to protect and separate the two fluids. And, in fact, it turns out that the surface tension of molten sodium chloride is significantly lower than that of molten sodium carbonate! A lower surface tension value means that the molten sodium chloride breaks into droplets more easily and its vapor cavity will respond more strongly to fluid instabilities, making it more likely to come in contact with liquid water and, thus, cause explosions. (Image/video credit: The Backyard Scientist; submitted by Simon H)
Sand, winds, and waves can interact to form remarkable and complex patterns. These sand ripples from the tidal flats of Cape Cod are a testament to such interactions. When a fluid like air or water flows over a flat bed of sand, it can shear and lift grains of sand, moving them to a new location. Very quickly, turbulence within the flow disturbs the initially smooth surface and begins to form the wavelike crests we see. Because the change in surface shape alters the nearby air or water flow, there is a trend toward self-organization and persistence. In other words, once the ripples form, they’re reinforced by their effect on the wind or water that formed them. Once rippled, the surface does not tend to smooth back out. (Image credit: N. Sharp; research credit: F. Sotiropoulos and A. Khosronejad)
To the naked eye, glaciers don’t appear to move much, but appearances can be deceiving. Like avalanches and turbidity currents, glaciers flow under the influence of gravity. They typically move at speeds around 1 meter per day, but some glaciers, like those shown above in Pakistan’s Central Karakorum National Park, can briefly surge to speeds a thousand times higher than their usual. The animation above shows 25 years worth of Landsat satellite imagery, enabling one to more easily observe the motion of these slow giants. Try picking out a feature along one of the glaciers and watch it move year-by-year. The glaciers just right of the image centerline are some of the best! (Image credit: J. Allen; via NASA Earth Observatory; submitted by Vince D)
