Tag: drag

London 2012: Discus Physics
Like the javelin, the discus throw is an athletic event dating back to the ancient Olympics. Competitors are limited to a 2.5 m circle from which they throw, leading to the sometimes elaborate forms used by athletes to generate a large velocity and angular momentum upon release. The flight of the discus is significantly dependent on aerodynamics, as the discus flies at an angle of attack. Spin helps stabilize its flight both dynamically and by creating a turbulent boundary layer along the surface which helps prevent separation and stall. Unlike many other events, a headwind is actually advantageous in the discus throw because it increases the relative velocity between the airflow and the discus, thereby increasing lift. The headwind also increases the drag force on the discus, but research shows the benefits of the increased lift outweigh the effects of increased drag, so much so that a discus flies further in air than it would in a vacuum. (Photo credits: P Kopczynski, Wiki Commons, EPA/K Okten)
FYFD is celebrating the Olympics by featuring the fluid dynamics of sports. Check out our previous posts, including why corner kicks swerve, what makes a pool fast, how an arrow flies, and how divers avoid splash.
August 10, 2012
London 2012: Rowing Physics
In rowing, as in any water sport, drag comes in three varieties: skin friction, form (or pressure) drag, and wave drag. Skin friction comes from the friction between the hull and water causing the boat to drag water with it as it moves. This can be mitigated with the right materials and surface finish but will never be completely negligible. In fact, the racing shells used in rowing are unusual for boats because skin friction is their major source of resistance. This is because form drag, caused by the shape of the boat cutting through the water, and wave drag, the energy lost due to the waves that form along the hull, are small in racing shells due to their long, narrow, and streamlined shape. Because skin friction dominates among the three types of drag, the force a rower overcomes to move the boat is proportional to the hull’s velocity squared, and the power required to do so is proportional to the hull’s velocity cubed. This means that it is more efficient for rowers to keep a constant hull speed throughout a race than it is to start slow and speed up or start fast and slow down because the work (power x time) needed to keep a constant speed is smaller. For more on the physics of rowing, check out Anu Dudhia’s excellent website or this video from Physics of Life. (Photo credits: Ecouterre, AP)
FYFD is celebrating the Olympics by featuring the fluid dynamics of sport. Check out some of our previous posts, including what makes a pool fast, how divers reduce splash, and the aerodynamics of badminton.
August 7, 2012
London 2012: Running Aerodynamics
Running is not an event typically associated with aerodynamics, though any runner will tell you that a headwind can slow them down. For comparison, a swimmer on world record pace sees 40 to 50 times the drag force of a runner over the same distance. But despite the relatively small influence of drag on a runner, there are measurable effects due to wind and altitude when races are judged by hundredths of a second. Given this, it comes as no surprise that researchers (and presumably manufacturers) are starting to considering how to optimize aerodynamics in running. The video above describes results of a study on running shoes that suggests modest savings may be derived from shoes with dimpled surfaces, much like a golf ball. Socks, on the other hand, don’t show any aerodynamic savings from special surfaces. Of course, the bulk of a runner’s drag comes from their hair and clothing; this is, in part, why runners wear form fitting clothes. While there may be some aerodynamic savings to be had, I don’t think we’ll see world records falling like crazy in Rio because of the latest new shoes.
FYFD is celebrating the Olympics by featuring the fluid dynamics of sport. Check out our previous posts on how the Olympic torch works, what makes a pool fast, the aerodynamics of archery, the science of badminton, how cyclists get “aero”, and how divers reduce splash.
August 6, 2012
London 2012: Cycling Physics
In no discipline of cycling is more emphasis placed on fluid dynamics than in the individual time trial. This event, a solo race against the clock, leaves riders no place to hide from the aerodynamic drag that makes up 70% or more of the resistance riders overcome when pedaling. Time trial bikes are designed for low drag and light weight over maneuverability, using airfoil-like shapes in the fork and frame to direct airflow around the bike and rider without separation, which creates an area of low pressure in the wake that increases drag. Riders maintain a position stretched out over the front wheel of the bike, with their arms close together. This position reduces the frontal area exposed to the flow, which is proportional to the drag a rider experiences.
Special helmets, some with strangely streamlined curves, are used to direct airflow over the rider’s head and straight along his or her back. Both helmets and skinsuits are starting to feature areas of dimpling or raised texturing. These function in much the same way as a golf ball; the texture causes the boundary layer, the thin layer of air near a surface, to become turbulent. A turbulent boundary layer is less susceptible to separating from the surface, ultimately leading to lower drag than would be observed if the boundary layer remained laminar. Wheels, skinsuits, gloves, shoe covers, and even the location of the brakes on the bike are all tweaked to reduce drag. In an event that can be decided by hundredths of a second between riders, every gram of drag counts. (Photo credits: Stefano Rellandini, POC Sports, Reuters, Paul Starkey, Louis Garneau)
FYFD is celebrating the Olympics by featuring the fluid dynamics of sports. Check out our previous posts on how the Olympic torch works, what makes a pool fast, the aerodynamics of archery, and the science of badminton.
August 2, 2012
London 2012: Badminton Physics
Unlike most racket sports, badminton uses a projectile that is nothing like a sphere. The unusual shape of the shuttlecock not only creates substantial drag in comparison to a ball but increases the complexity of its flight path. The heavy head of the shuttlecock creates a moment that stabilizes its flight, ensuring that the head always points in the direction of travel. The skirt, traditionally made of feathers though many today are plastic, is responsible for the aerodynamic forces that make the shuttlecock’s behavior so interesting.
Measuring the drag coefficient of the shuttlecock, modeling its trajectory and behavior in the four common badminton shots, and even attempting computational fluid dynamics of the shuttlecock are all on-going research problems in sports engineering. (Photo credit: Rob Bulmahn)
FYFD is celebrating the Olympics with the fluid dynamics of sports. Check out our previous posts on how the Olympic torch works, what makes a pool fast, and the aerodynamics of archery.
August 1, 2012
London 2012: Swimming Pool Physics
The era of the LZR suit may be over in swimming, but technology is still making an impact when it comes to making swimmers faster. One thing you’ll often hear from commentators is how the London Aquatic Center boasts one of the world’s fastest pools. When swimmers compete, they have to contend with all the turbulence created in the pool by eight people trying to direct as much water behind them as possible as quickly as possible. Like ripples spreading on a pond, these waves travel, reflect, and interfere, ultimately disrupting the swimmers and causing extra drag. In a fast pool, engineers have made adjustments to reduce the impact of these waves on swimmers. Firstly, the pool is 3 meters deep, meaning that vertical disruptions are mostly damped out before they reach the bottom, so any wave reflected off the bottom of the pool will be extremely weak. Along the sides and ends of the pool, a special trough captures surface waves, preventing them from reflecting back out into the pool. The lane lines are also designed to soak up wave energy so that it does not propagate as much between lanes. When waves hit the lines, their links spin, dissipating some of the wave’s energy.
Despite these advances, the outermost lanes–those against the walls–are not used in competition. This helps to equalize the turbulence between lanes. Whether there is any fluid mechanical advantage to being in a particular lane is debatable. The outer lanes have the advantage of only one competitor’s wake to contend with, but they isolate the swimmer so he or she cannot see their competition as well. In the inner lanes, you’ll sometimes see swimmers try to swim close to the lane line if their competition is ahead of them, the idea being that they may be able to draft on their competitor’s bow wave to reduce drag. Generally speaking, the lane positions are determined by seeding going into the event, where the faster swimmers are given the innermost lanes. This is why it’s rare to see gold medals coming from the outermost lanes. For more, check out NBC’s video on designing fast pools (US only, unfortunately). (Photo credits: Associated Press, Reuters, Geoff Caddick)
July 30, 2012
Reader Question: Drafting in Cycling
jonesmartinez asks:
As a cyclist, I’m curious about drafting. How fast do I need to be going for there to be a measurable benefit? Additionally, often in a time trial a single rider is often followed by the team car and I’ve heard the rider can be pushed by the air around the team car. Any truth to this rumor? Thanks, I love the blog.
Drafting plays a major role in cycling and its tactics (check out our previous series on cycling). In general, drag increases with the square of velocity and data show this holds for cyclists. The rule of thumb I’ve heard given is that aerodynamic drag doesn’t play a large role below 15 mph, but I have not seen the numbers that inform that claim. Moreover, you have to consider the resultant airspeed around the cyclist. For example, a cyclist moving 13 mph into a 15 mph headwind (28 mph effective) will be experiencing more drag than a cyclist moving 20 mph with a 10 mph tailwind (10 mph effective). With drag being reduced 25-40% by drafting a leading rider, it is almost always beneficial to get behind someone.
That said, I have seen no measurable benefit for a leading rider with a paceline behind him, even though this should, in theory, reduce the drag on the lead rider by closing out his wake. With a large object like a car behind a solo rider, there might theoretically be some benefit. However, the car would have to be driving extremely close to the rider–far closer than they do in reality.
That said, with the prevalence of power meters in the amateur market these days, I think it would be a neat project to go out and try a few of these things firsthand and see whether such tactics actually result in a measurable difference in a cyclist’s performance–though I don’t recommend riding a foot off the front or back of a car!
May 17, 2012
Micro Air Vehicle Flow Viz
A smoke wire shows the deformation of streamlines around a swept-winged micro air vehicle (MAV). These crafts typically feature wingspans smaller than one foot and, thus, never develop the type of flow fields associated with larger fixed-wing airplanes. This complicates theoretical predictions of lift and drag for MAVs as well as making them difficult to control. MAVs have numerous commercial and military applications, including search and rescue operations. (Photo credit: Tom Omer)
March 28, 2012
Wind Tunneling Testing for BASE Jumpers
While we usually think of wind tunnel testing airplane models, the truth is that wind tunnels today test a much wider array of subjects. From oil rigs and skyscrapers to athletes and police sirens, if you can imagine it, it’s probably been stuck in a wind tunnel. This video shows some wind tunnel testing of a tracking suit used for BASE jumping. The primary focus seems to be on lift and drag at angle of attack–which can be used to determine glide ratios for the pilot–but there is also some study of localized turbulence generation, as evidenced by the use of smoke generators and the streamers attached to the suit’s arms and legs. (submitted by Jason C)
February 13, 2012
Jump Rope Aerodynamics
Researchers have used high-speed video and numerical simulation to capture the effects of aerodynamics on jump roping. After videoing an athlete jumping rope and constructing a jump roping robot (shown above imaged multiple times with a strobe light), they found that the U-shaped tip of the jump rope bends away from the direction of motion. When they built a computer model capable of deforming the jump rope based on its drag, they found the same behavior. They concluded that the “best” jump ropes are lightweight, short, and have small diameters to maximize speed and minimize the drag. #
November 2, 2011