Aircraft typically use a vertical tail to keep the craft from rolling or yawing. Birds, on the other hand, maneuver their wings and tail feathers to counter unwanted motions. Researchers found that the list of necessary adjustments is quite small: just 4 for the tail and 2 for the wings. Implementing those 6 controllable degrees of freedom on their bird-inspired PigeonBot II allowed the biorobot to fly steadily, even in turbulent conditions, without a rudder. Adapting such flight control to the less flexible surfaces of a typical aircraft will take time and creativity, but the savings in mass and drag could be worth it. (Image credit: E. Chang/Lentink Lab; research credit: E. Chang et al.; via Physics Today)
Tag: biorobotics
Swimming Like a Ray
Manta rays are amazing and efficient swimmers — a necessity for any large animal that survives on tiny plankton. Researchers have built a new soft robot inspired by swimming mantas. Like its biological inspiration, the robot flaps its pectoral fins much as bird flaps its wings; this motion creates vortices that push water behind the robot, propelling it forward. For a downstroke, air inflates the robot’s body cavity, pushing the fins downward. When that air is released, its fins snap back up. With this simple and energy efficient stroke, researchers are able to control the robot’s swimming speed and depth, allowing it to maneuver around obstacles. Flapping faster helps the robot surface, and slower flapping allows it to sink. (Living manta rays also sink if they slow down.) Check out the robot in action below. (Image credit: J. Lanoy; video and research credit: H. Qing et al.; via Ars Technica)
Synchronizing Cilia
Just like human swimmers, microswimmers have to coordinate their motion to swim. But unlike humans, swimmers like the freshwater alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii doesn’t have a brain to help it synchronize its cilia. To investigate how these microswimmers manage their stroke, researchers built a biorobot with mechanically linked segments that mimic the alga’s swimming once a motor sets the robot vibrating.
When the robot’s base is allowed to rotate, the cilia synchronize in the freestyle-like R-mode. When allowed to move along an axis, the biorobot’s cilia synchronize in the X-mode, which resembles the breaststroke. The researchers found two strokes that mirrored the real-life alga. In one, allowing the robot’s base to rotate produced a freestyle-like stroke they called R-mode. The other came from allowing the robot’s base to move forward and backward, which created a breaststroke-like X-mode. In the wild, only the X-mode provides helpful motion, but, oddly enough, the researchers found this mode was the most energy intensive. (Image credit: top – J. Larson, others – Y. Xia et al.; research credit: Y. Xia et al.; via APS Physics)
Eel-Like Swimming
Working with living creatures can’t always reveal their mechanics. That’s one reason engineers like building biorobots. Here, researchers built 1-guilla, an eel-like swimmer, and studied how its body motions affected its swimming. Eels are anguilliform swimmers that use a traveling wave moving along their body from head to tail for propulsion. In the video (and paper), they break down the robot’s motion step by step — looking at amplitude, wavelength, and tail angle — to find the optimal values for maximizing speed and, separately, efficiency in swimming. (Video and image credit: A. Anastasiadis et al.; research credit: A. Anastasiadis et al.)
Swimming Through Mud
At the bottom of ponds, nematodes and other creatures swim in a world of mud. They squirm their way through a sediment of dirt particles suspended in water. Mud, of course, is notoriously impossible to see through, so to understand these creatures’ movements, scientists turn instead to biorobotics. Here, a team uses a magnetic head attached to an elastic tail to mimic these tiny creatures.
To drive the robot’s motion, they use an oscillating magnetic field, which forces the magnetic head to rotate. Combined with the elastic tail and the drag caused by surrounding materials, this causes the robot to swim in a fashion similar to its biological inspirations.
A biomimetic robot swims through immersed grains. The robot’s magnetic head is forced with an oscillating magnetic field. It swims through an underwater bed of hydrogel beads, with diameters smaller than that of the robot’s head. To mimic the muddy environment of a pond’s bottom, scientists used a bed of hydrogel beads immersed in water. Looking at the experimental video above, you’ll see no sign of the beads. That’s because the hydrogel beads have nearly the same index of refraction as water. Once you pour water in, they seem to disappear. That allows the researchers to focus instead on the robot’s motion. In other experiments, they added dye to the beads so that they could see how they moved around the robot.
They found that the robot’s motion fluidizes the grains around it. Effectively, the robot’s motion creates an area with fewer grains and more water for it to move through. Once it’s passed, however, more grains settle in, and the bed returns to a denser packing. (Image credit: nematode – P. Garcelon, experiment – A. Biswas et al.; research credit: A. Biswas et al.)
Little Surfer
Here’s another look at SurferBot, a low-cost, vibration-based robot capable of traversing both water and land. SurferBot’s vibration creates asymmetric ripples on the water surface. Because the waves are bigger at the rear of the robot, it gets propelled forward. But there doesn’t have to be water for SurferBot to get around! It’s actually amphibious, moving on both land and water. It can even transition from land to water on its own. (Image and video credit: E. Rhee et al.; research credit: E. Rhee et al.)
Surf’s Up!
Inspired by honeybees and their ability to surf on capillary waves of their own making, researchers have developed SurferBot, a low-cost, untethered, vibration-driven surf robot. Built on a simple 3D-printed platform, the bot has a vibration motor powered by a simple coin cell battery. As the motor vibrates, it propels the bot forward (Image 2). With the motor placed off-center, the bot’s vibrations create larger capillary waves at the rear of the bot than at the front (Image 3). It’s this asymmetry that drives the robot forward. The flow pattern created by the bot’s propulsion is impressively strong (Image 4) and consists of a pair of counter-rotating vortices trapped ahead of the bot and a strong central jet in its wake.
Best of all: SurferBot is a great platform for educational experimentation, costing <$1 apiece! (Image and submission credit: D. Harris; research credit: E. Rhee et al.)
Benefits of Schooling
Though fluid dynamicists have long theorized about the hydrodynamic benefits of fish swimming in schools, nailing down the actual physics has been quite difficult. Fish rarely swim exactly as an experimenter would like, and measuring quantities like swimming efficiency in a living fish is tough to do. In the numerical realm, it’s tough to simulate multiple fish swimming at realistic conditions. So some teams have turned to biomimetic robotic platforms to study schooling, as in this new research.
Once you’ve built a robotic fish that swims in a realistic way, that fish will have no problem swimming the same experimental patterns over and over. In this work, the researchers compared their robots swimming solo and swimming with a partner. In the partnered studies, they looked at fish swimming in phase — with their undulations matching one another — and out of phase — where the fish move opposite one another. They found that having a nearby partner improved the speed and efficiency for both fish, regardless of phase. But they also found a peculiar exception.
If one fish modifies their tailbeat frequency relative to their partner, they can slightly increase their power efficiency. But if they do so, it costs their partner more energy. That implies that fish could employ competitive dynamics, but, of course, it doesn’t tell us that they do! (Image and research credit: L. Li et al.; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)
Insect-Inspired Flight
Insects are incredibly agile and resilient fliers, capable of colliding and recovering without damage. Engineers are only beginning to capture these characteristics in their robots. Here, engineers use a soft actuator — a rubber cylinder coated in carbon nanotubes — to drive their robot’s flight. When voltage is applied across the carbon nanotubes, the rubber squeezes and stretches, causing the robot’s wings to flap. These soft actuators are far less fragile than hard ones, allowing the robots to take hits and keep flapping, much like the real insects. (Image and video credit: MIT News; research credit: K. Chen et al.)
Mimicking Insect Flight
There’s an oft-repeated tale that science cannot explain how a bumblebee flies. And while that may have been true 80 years ago, when engineers assumed they could apply their knowledge of fixed-wing aircraft to insects, it’s very far from the truth now.
Being small, insects use aerodynamic tricks that are very different from the physics used by aircraft or even birds. Insects like fruit flies use a forward-and-backward sweeping motion at a very high angle of attack as they flap. This motion creates a vortex at the leading edge of the wing that provides the lift keeping the insect aloft. It still requires fast reflexes — most insects flap their wings hundreds of times a second — but the mechanism is robust enough to keep insects aloft and maneuverable. (Image credits: Robobee – K. Ma and P. Chirarattananon, simulation – F. T. Muijres et al., illustration – G. Lauder; via APS Physics)
