This 1936 promotional film by Chevrolet explains the concept of streamlining objects to reduce their drag. And it actually does a pretty nice job of it, including some wind tunnel footage and table-top demonstrations. It’s also an amazing snapshot of the era, both in terms of engineering and the vision they had for the future. Just check out that City of the Future and its torpedo cars! (Video and image credit: Chevrolet; submitted by Larry S.)
Flight testing models has a long history in aerodynamics. Above you see a Curtiss JN-4 biplane in flight with a model wing suspended below the fuselage. This test was conducted circa 1921 by NASA’s predecessor, NACA. At the time, of course, computational simulations were non-existent, and, although wind tunnels existed, presumably they could not recreate the exact circumstances needed for the test. Available wind tunnels might have lacked the power to reach the speeds engineers wanted, or they could have been too small for the model or had too many disturbances compared to the pristine flight environment. Any or all of these concerns can drive decisions to use flight testing instead of ground tests.
Flight testing in aerodynamics is still used today, albeit sparingly. The second image shows a crew of Texas A&M graduate students (including yours truly) with a swept wing model we were about to test with a Cessna O-2 aircraft. By this point (roughly 10 years ago), we had wind tunnels capable of overlapping the conditions we could achieve in flight, but flight testing still gave us a larger range of conditions than working solely in the wind tunnel. (Image credits: JN-4 – NASA, O-2 – M. Woodruff; via Rainmaker1973; submitted by Marc A.)
When I was in graduate school, I worked in a facility known as the High-Speed Wind Tunnel Lab. We were located next door to the Low-Speed Wind Tunnel, and every few months we’d receive a phone call asking whether we could film someone in the high-speed wind tunnel. This was impossible for several reasons – the size of human beings and the necessity of drawing the hypersonic tunnels down to vacuum-like pressures before initiating flow being only two of them – but what it really did was highlight the difference in definitions.
What these (usually) weather forecasters wanted was to simulate hurricane force winds on a human being. And to an aerodynamicist, that hundred mile-an-hour flow is still low-speed. Because we’re comparing it to the speed of sound, not the normal range of wind speeds a human experiences. That said, watching humans struggle inside a wind tunnel is always entertaining.
As you can see from the Slow Mo Guys here, counteracting the lift and drag forces from these wind speeds is tough. On the bottom left, Dan has managed to balance his weight and the drag forces to hold himself in a virtual chair. Meanwhile, Gav’s attempt to jump forward against the wind just pushes him backward as his lab coat parachutes behind him. (Image and video credit: The Slow Mo Guys)
It’s well-known by professional cyclists that sitting in the middle of the peloton requires little effort to overcome aerodynamic drag, but now, for the first time, there’s a scientific study to back that up. Researchers built their own quarter-scale peloton of 121 riders to investigate the aerodynamic effect of cycling in such a large group versus riding solo. Through wind tunnel studies and numerical simulation, they found that riders deep in the peloton can experience as little as 5-10% of the aerodynamic drag of a solo cyclist.
Tactically, this means teams should aim to position their protected leader or sprinter mid-way in the pack, where they’ll receive lots of shelter without risking one of the crashes common near the back of the peloton. It also suggests that teams wanting to isolate another team’s leader should try to push them toward the outer edges of the peloton rather than letting them sit in the middle. It will be interesting to see whether pro teams shift their race strategies at all with these numbers in hand.
Of course, this study considers only a pure headwind. But other groups are looking at the effects of side winds on cyclists. (Image credit: J. Miranda; image and research credit: B. Blocken et al.; submitted by 1307phaezr)
Summer brings with it lots of great sports, and whether you love riding a bike, sailing a boat, or just hanging out at the pool, our latest FYFD/JFM video has something for you. Want even more sports physics? Check out the Olympic series we did for the London and Rio games. And if you’re looking for more of the latest fluids research, don’t miss the rest of our video series. (Video and image credit: N. Sharp and T. Crawford)
Skeleton, the sliding event in which athletes race down an ice track head first, is a fast-paced and punishing sport. Skeleton racers can reach speeds of 125 kph (~80 mph) during their descents. This is a little slower than the feet-first luge, in part because the skeleton sled runs on circular bars rather than sharp runners.
Body positioning is key in the sport. It’s the athlete’s primary method of steering, and it controls how much drag slows them down. But skeleton runs are brutally taxing; athletes pull 4 or 5g in the turns – more than astronauts experience during a launch! All that jostling means athletes cannot stand more than about 3 trips down the track in a day. To practice positioning without the bone-jarring descent, athletes can work in a wind tunnel. While the wind tunnel provides the aerodynamic equivalent of their usual speed, athletes focus on holding their bodies in the most streamlined position. Some wind tunnels are even able to provide screens that let the athletes see their drag values in real-time, letting them adjust to learn what works best for them. (Image credit: N. Pisarenko/AP, Bromley Sports)
Two of the most awesome things (in my admittedly biased opinion) about fluid dynamics are the amazing facilities we build for experiments and the tests they allow us to do. In this video, you get a behind-the-scenes look at one such facility, used for wind turbine research at Princeton.
One challenge of wind turbine research is accurately capturing the aerodynamic effects of full-scale wind turbines in the controlled-environment of a laboratory. At Princeton, they match conditions between their model turbines and the real ones by drastically raising the density in their wind tunnel. This means that running the tunnel requires a series of compressors and storage tanks full of compressed air, and it also means that the wind tunnel itself has to be quite hefty to handle the pressure difference inside and out. Definitely check out the full video for more on their wind tunnel and what it can help them learn about wind turbines. (Video credit: M. Miller and J. Keifer; submitted by M. Miller)
New year, new (or renewed) experiments. This is the fluids round-up, where I collect cool fluids-related links, articles, etc. that deserve a look. Without further ado:
(Video credit and submission: Julia Set Collection/S. Bocci; image credit: IRPI LLC, source)
Conventional wind tunnels are great, but some aerodynamic testing requires facilities of a different nature. The video above is from the WindEEE dome, a hexagonal chamber with sixty fans on one wall, eight directional fans on the other five walls, and six fans in the upper chamber. Each is individually computer controlled, allowing the researchers to create straight flows as well as complex vortical ones. The video shows their tornado flow, which stands 5 m tall and swirls at 30 m/s. They can also move the tornado around the chamber at 2 m/s. This capability enables a kind of scale-model analysis of tornadoes and their impact that’s not possible in most facilities. You can read more about the dome at New Scientist or the WindEEE website. (Video credit: New Scientist/WindEEE; submitted by entropy-perturbation)
How do you test a supersonic car like the Bloodhound SSC in a wind tunnel? With free-flying objects like airplanes, wind tunnel testing is relatively straightforward. Mounting a stationary model in a supersonic flow gives an equivalent flow-field to that object flying through still air at supersonic speeds. The same does not hold true for the supersonic car, though, because you need to account for the effect of the ground on airflow. One option is to build a moving wall in the wind tunnel. For low-speed applications, this is feasible but incredibly complicated and very expensive. For supersonic speeds, it’s impossible. You could achieve the same moving-wall effect at supersonic speeds with a rocket sled, but that is also expensive and difficult to fit in most experimental facilities. The simplest solution is the one you see above – build two models and mount them belly-to-belly. Reflecting the models makes the plane of symmetry a stagnation plane, which, fluid dynamically speaking, acts like an imaginary ground plane relative to the model. For more on the project and the technique, check out this article. (Photo credit: B. Evans; via ThinkFLIP; submitted by G. Doig)