Commonly called fire tornadoes, these terrifying vortices often occur in large wildfires and have more in common with dust devils or waterspouts than true tornadoes. They form when warm, buoyant air rises due to the fire’s heat. This creates low pressure over the fire source and draws in fresh, cooler air from the surroundings. If there is any small vorticity or rotational motion to that surrounding air, its spin will be amplified as it gets drawn in. This is akin to an ice skater spinning faster when she pulls her arms in – it’s a result of conservation of angular momentum. That intensification of the air’s rotation is what forms the vortex, which we see here due to the flames it draws upward. This footage was captured yesterday by crews fighting fires in Missouri. (Image credit: Southern Platte Fire Protection District/WCPO 9, source)
Fire tornadoes, despite their name, are more like dust devils than your typical tornado. In nature, they’ll often form in wildfires, but here the Slow Mo Guys simulate one for the high-speed cameras using a ring of box fans set up to provide rotational flow, or vorticity, around a kerosene fire. As the fire burns, the warm air over the flame moves upward due to buoyancy. This creates a low-pressure area around the fire that draws in the spinning air from further out. Like an ice skater who pulls her arms in when spinning, the rotating air spins faster as it moves in toward the fire, resulting in a swirling turbulent vortex of flame. Hopefully it goes without saying, but, seriously, don’t try this at home. (Video credit: Slow Mo Guys; submitted by Chris S.)
Sometimes it takes timelapse photography to truly appreciate the dynamic behavior of our atmosphere. In “The Chase” Mike Olbinski, whose work we’ve featured previously, has captured some of the most incredible and stunning weather timelapse footage I have ever seen. Despite watching it repeatedly, I continue to be awed to the point that I have no words. Seriously, just watch it. Be amazed by the drama of our sky. (Video credit: M. Olbinski)
Fire tornadoes, despite their name, are more closely related to dust devils or waterspouts than to true tornadoes. Though rarely documented, they are relatively common, especially in wildfires. The heat of the fire creates an updraft of warm, rising air that leaves behind a low-pressure region. Air from outside is drawn toward this low-pressure area, gets heated, and rises. As the outside air gets pulled in, any vorticity or rotation it had gets intensified via conservation of angular momentum–the same way a spinning ice skater speeds up when she pulls her arms in. The result is the tightly-spinning vortex at the heart of a fire tornado. (Video credit: C. Fleur; via NatGeo)
Artist Antoine Terrieux’s “En Plein Vol” exhibit shows off the power of hair dryers. Parts of the exhibit, like the floating ball at 0:16, rely on Bernoulli’s principle and the moving stream of air the dryers generate. Others, like the smoke tornado at 0:39 or the (suspended) paper airplane at 0:56, use the hair dryers to generate vorticity essential to the installation. It’s a neat concept and very well executed. (Video credit: A. Terrieux; via io9; submitted by Joseph S. and Eliza M.)
so, how is lift actually generated? i’ve been going through Anderson’s Introduction to Flight (6th Ed.) and while it offers the derivation of various equations very thoroughly, it barely touches on why lift is generated, or how camber contributes to the increase of C(L)
This is a really good question to ask. There are a lot of different explanations for lift out there (and some of the common ones are incorrect). The main thing to know is that a difference in pressure across the wing–low pressure over the top and higher pressure below–creates the net upward force we call lift. It’s when you ask why there’s a pressure difference across the wing that explanations tend to start diverging. To be clear, aerodynamicists don’t disagree about what produces lift – we just tend to argue about which physical explanation (as opposed to just doing the math) makes the most sense. So here are a couple of options:
Newton’s third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If you look at flow over an airfoil, air approaching the airfoil is angled upward, and the air leaving the aifoil is angled downward. In order to change the direction of the air’s flow, the airfoil must have exerted a downward force on the air. By Newton’s third law, this means the air also exerted an upward force–lift–on the airfoil.
The downward force a wing exerts on the air becomes especially obvious when you actually watch the air after a plane passes:
This one can be harder to understand. Circulation is a quantity related to vorticity, and it has to do with how the direction of velocity changes around a closed curve. Circulation creates lift (which I discuss in some more detail here.) How does an airfoil create circulation, though? When an airfoil starts at rest, there is no vorticity and no circulation. As you see in the video above, as soon as the airfoil moves, it generates a starting vortex. In order for the total circulation to remain zero, this means that the airfoil must carry with it a second, oppositely rotating vortex. For an airfoil moving right to left, that carried vortex will spin clockwise, imparting a larger velocity to air flowing over the top of the wing and slowing down the air that moves under the wing. From Bernoulli’s principle, we know that faster moving air has a lower pressure, so this explains why the air pressure is lower over the top of the wing.
Asymmetric Flow and Bernoulli’s Principle
There are two basic types of airfoils – symmetric ones (like the one in the first picture above) and asymmetric, or cambered, airfoils (like the one in the image immediately above this). Symmetric airfoils only generate lift when at an angle of attack. Otherwise, the flow around them is symmetric and there’s no pressure difference and no lift. Cambered airfoils, by virtue of their asymmetry, can generate lift at zero angle of attack. Their variations in curvature cause air flowing around them to experience different forces, which in turn causes differing pressures along the top and the bottom of the airfoil surface. A fluid particle that travels over the upper surface encounters a large radius of curvature, which strongly accelerates the fluid and creates fast, low-pressure flow. Air moving across the bottom surface experiences a lesser curvature, does not accelerate as much, and, therefore, remains slower and at a higher pressure compared to the upper surface.
There’s an infamous supposition about drains swirling one way in the Northern Hemisphere and the other way in the Southern Hemisphere. Destin from Smarter Every Day and Derek from Veritasium have put the claim to the test with experiments on either side of the globe. First, go here and watch their synchronized videos side-by-side. (To synchronize, start the left video and pause it at the sync point. Then start the second video and unpause the first video when the second video hits the sync point.) I’ll wait here.
…
That was awesome, right?! The demonstration doesn’t work with toilets because they’re driven by the placement of jets around the circumference. And your bathtub doesn’t usually work either because any residual vorticity in the tub gets magnified by conservation of angular momentum as it drains. It’s like a spinning ice skater pulling their arms in; the rotation speeds up. So, to get around that problem, Destin and Derek let their pools sit for a day to damp out any motion before draining. At that point, the Coriolis effect is strong enough to cause the pools to rotate in opposite directions when drained. You may wonder why the effect is so slight for the pools when it’s pretty stark with hurricanes and cyclones. The answer is a matter of scale. The pools are perhaps 2 meters wide, which means that the difference in latitude across the the pool is very slight and therefore, the differential speed imparted by the Earth’s rotation is also very small. Because hurricanes and cyclones are much larger, they experience stronger influence from the Coriolis effect. (Image credits: Smarter Every Day/Veritasium; via It’s Okay To Be Smart)
This photo from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter stares almost straight down a dust devil on Mars. Like their earthbound brethren, Martian dust devils form when the surface is heated by the sun, causing warm air to rise. The rising air causes a low pressure area that the surrounding air flows into. Any rotational motion of the air intensifies as it is entrained. This is a consequence of conservation of angular momentum. Just as a spinning ice skater spins faster when he pulls his arms in, the vorticity of the inward-flowing air increases, forming a vortex. In addition to dust devils, this same physical mechanism applies to waterspouts and fire tornadoes, although the heating source for those is different. (Photo credit: NASA; via APOD)
From below a plunging breaking wave–the classic surfer’s wave–looks like a giant vortex tube. Smaller rib vortices, the rings around the main vortex in the photo above, can form where there are variations along the breaking wave. As the wave rolls on, it stretches the vorticity variations along the wave’s span. When stretched, vortices spin up and intensify; this is a result of conservation of angular momentum. Check out more amazing photos of waves in Ray Collins’ portfolio. (Photo credit: R. Collins; via The Inertia)
Seven waterspouts align as lava from the Hawaiian volcano Kilauea pours into the ocean in this striking photo from photographer Bruce Omori. Like many waterspouts–and their landbound cousins dust devils–these vortices are driven by variations in temperature and moisture content. Near the ocean surface, air and water vapor heated by the lava create a warm, moist layer beneath cooler, dry air. As the warm air rises, other air is drawn in by the low pressure left behind. Any residual vorticity in the incoming air gets magnified by conservation of angular momentum, like a spinning ice skater pulling her arms in. This creates the vortices, which are made visible by entrained steam and/or moisture condensing from the rising air. (Photo credit: B. Omori, via HPOTD; submitted by jshoer)
