FYFD

Tag: ground effect

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    RC Ground Effect Plane

    The ekranoplan was a massive, Soviet-era aircraft that relied on ground effect to stay aloft. In this video, RC pilots test out their own homemade version of the craft, including some neat flow visualization of the wingtip vortices. When an aircraft (or, for that matter, a bird) flies near the ground, it experiences less drag than at higher altitudes. This happens primarily because of the ground’s effect on wingtip vortices.

    In normal flight, the vortices from an aircraft’s wingtips create a downwash that reduces the wing’s overall lift. But in ground effect, the vortices cannot drift downward as they normally do. Instead, they spread apart from one another, thereby reducing the drag caused by downwash from the aircraft. The end result is better performance, though it comes with added risk since there’s very little time to correct an error when flying at an altitude less than half the aircraft’s wingspan. (Video and image credit: rctestflight; submitted by Simplicator)

  • Jellyfish Make Their Own Walls

    Jellyfish Make Their Own Walls

    When we walk, the ground’s resistance helps propel us. Similarly, flying or swimming near a surface is easier due to ground effect. Most of the time swimmers don’t get that extra help, but a new study shows that jellyfish create their own walls to get that boost.

    Of course, these walls aren’t literal, but fluid dynamically speaking, they are equivalent. Over the course of its stroke, the jellyfish creates two vortices, each with opposite rotation. One of these, the stopping vortex, lingers beneath the jellyfish until the next stroke’s starting vortex collides with it. When two vortices of equal strength and opposite rotation meet, the flow between them stagnates — it comes to halt — just as if a wall were there.

    In fact, mathematically, this is how scientists represent a wall: as the stagnation line between a real vortex and a virtual one of equal strength and opposite rotation. It just turns out that jellyfish use the same trick to make virtual walls they can push off! (Image and research credit: B. Gemmell et al.; via NYTimes; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Sensing Obstacles Through Flow

    Sensing Obstacles Through Flow

    Mosquitoes, bats, and even eels use non-visual means to sense their environments. For mosquitoes, part of their obstacle avoidance comes from the exquisite sensitivity of their antennae, which are able to sense subtle changes in the air flow around them as they approach a wall or the ground. Researchers used this same technique to help a quadcopter avoid crashing by adding air pressure sensors that respond to the changes in the copter’s wake as it approaches the ground. (Image and research credit: T. Nakata et al.; via Science)

  • Bats in Ground Effect

    Bats in Ground Effect

    As pilots can tell you, flying near the ground (or an open expanse of water) gives one an aerodynamic boost. Essentially, the surface acts like a mirror, reflecting and dissipating the wingtip vortices that create downwash. That reduces the power necessary to fly, as long as you’re flying within about a wingspan of the surface.

    Theoretically, flapping fliers like bats and birds should also benefit from this ground effect, but measurements have been hard to come by. A new study using bats trained to fly in a wind tunnel provides some of the first detailed measurements of ground effect for flapping animals. The researchers found a 29% reduction in the power necessary for flight when in ground effect compared to being out of it! That’s twice the savings predicted by modeling, meaning we still have a ways to go to accurately capture the physics of flapping flight under these circumstances.

    Such a substantial savings also strengthens arguments for flight developing from the ground up. Using ground effect, surface-dwelling animals could have evolved flight gradually, taking advantage of the energy savings offered by sticking close to the surface. (Image and research credit: L. Johansson et al.; submitted by Marc A.)

  • Vortices and Ground Effect

    Vortices and Ground Effect

    Though typically unseen, the vortices that swirl from the tips of aircraft wings are powerful. Here you see a Hawker Sea Fury equipped with a smoke system used to visualize the vortices that form at the wingtip as high-pressure air from the bottom of the wing and low-pressure air from the top swirl together. As you can see, the vortices persist in the wake long after the plane passes. The size and strength of the vortices depend on the size and speed of the aircraft; this is why air traffic control requires smaller planes to wait longer to take off or land if there was just a larger aircraft on the runway.

    The other cool thing to note here is how the wingtip vortices move apart from one another in the animation above. In flight, wingtip vortices usually stay roughly parallel to one another, but they drift downward in the aircraft’s wake. Near the ground, though, the vortices cannot move down, so instead ground effect forces them apart from one another, as seen here. (Image and video credit: E. Seguin; via Kelsey C.)

  • Flying Fish Aerodynamics

    Flying Fish Aerodynamics

    Flying fish, strange as it sounds, have aerodynamic prowess comparable to hawks. The fish aren’t true fliers, but they do glide for hundreds of meters using their large pectoral and pelvic fins as wings. Wind tunnel research shows the fish have their maximum lift at an angle of attack around 30-35 degrees, matching their typical take-off angle (top). Their best gliding performance occurs when they’re roughly parallel to the water (middle). The researchers even found that the fish use ground effect to enhance their lift. Although their aerodynamics allow flying fish to get out of reach of their aquatic predators, the fish must be wary of flying too high, as this makes them a target for frigatebirds (bottom). These acrobatic seabirds can’t get wet, but they have some impressive aerodynamics of their own to help make up for it.  (Image credit: BBC Earth, source; research credit: H. Park and H. Choi; see also SciAm)

  • Testing a Supersonic Car

    Testing a Supersonic Car

    How do you test a supersonic car like the Bloodhound SSC in a wind tunnel? With free-flying objects like airplanes, wind tunnel testing is relatively straightforward. Mounting a stationary model in a supersonic flow gives an equivalent flow-field to that object flying through still air at supersonic speeds. The same does not hold true for the supersonic car, though, because you need to account for the effect of the ground on airflow. One option is to build a moving wall in the wind tunnel. For low-speed applications, this is feasible but incredibly complicated and very expensive. For supersonic speeds, it’s impossible. You could achieve the same moving-wall effect at supersonic speeds with a rocket sled, but that is also expensive and difficult to fit in most experimental facilities. The simplest solution is the one you see above – build two models and mount them belly-to-belly. Reflecting the models makes the plane of symmetry a stagnation plane, which, fluid dynamically speaking, acts like an imaginary ground plane relative to the model. For more on the project and the technique, check out this article.  (Photo credit: B. Evans; via ThinkFLIP; submitted by G. Doig)

  • Wingtip Vortices in Ground Effect

    [original media no longer available]

    If you’ve ever watched airplane contrails fade, you’ve probably observed the Crow instability, which causes the trailing wingtip vortices of the plane to interact and distort. The same effect is explored in the video above with the addition of ground effect. The first clip shows a pair of counter-rotating vortices from the side, showing a periodic pattern of thickening and thinning along the vortices. The second clip shows cross-sectional slices of the vortices at a thin and a thick point.

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Ground Effect Vehicles

    Ground effect vehicles (a.k.a. wing-in-ground-effect vehicles) rely on their proximity to a flat surface to inhibit the wingtip vortices that create lift-induced drag. This effectively increases the lifting capabilities of the vehicle in comparison to regular flight, but only so long as the vehicle remains close enough to the ground. This video features many model gliders that rely on ground effect.

  • The Ekranoplan

    The Ekranoplan

    The ekranoplan, the monster of the Caspian Sea, was a Soviet-era aircraft nearly 74 meters in length and weighing 380,000 kgs fully loaded. (In contrast, the C-17 is 53 m long and weighs 265,350 kg fully loaded.) This enormous craft relied on ground effect to stay aloft, where it was capable of 297 knots. Flying close to the ground or water increases the possible lift on wings through a “cushioning effect” that increases pressure on the lower wing surface and by disrupting the formation of wingtip vortices which typically reduce lift through downwash.