Tag: smoke visualization

“Sfumato”
Handmade kinetic sculptures by artists Marion Pinaffo and Raphaël Pluvinage spin and paint the sky in colorful smoke in “Sfumato”. Named for an artistic technique in which shading gradually changes tone and hue, the installation was built, the artists note, “without motors, electronics, computer generated images, or artificial intelligence”. Just pure hands-on engineering and physics. Watch the short video of the installation in action for the full effect. You can find more of their work on their website, Vimeo, and Instagram. (Image and video credit: M. Pinaffo and R. Pluvinage; via Colossal)
March 29, 2024
Flow Above the Treetops
As this smoke visualization shows, trees have a significant impact on airflow around them. Flow in the image is from left to right. On the left, the upstream air is traveling in smooth, laminar lines that are quickly disrupted as the flow moves into the trees. After the first shorter trees, flow inside the wooded area has been broken up and slowed. Above the canopy, the smoke streaklines have also slowed and become more turbulent. Understanding how wind and trees interact is important in a variety of applications, including when adding renewable energy options to buildings and when predicting the spread of forest fires. (Image credit: W. Frank et al.)
May 2, 2017
Tip Vortex
Smoke released from the end of a test blade shows the helical pattern of a tip vortex from a horizontal-axis wind turbine. Like airplane wings, wind turbine blades generate a vortex in their wake, and the vortices from each blade can interact downstream as seen in this video. These intricate wakes complicate wind turbine placement for wind farms. A turbine located downstream of one of its fellows not only has a decreased power output but also has higher fatigue loads than the upstream neighbor. In other words, the downstream turbine produces less power and will wear out sooner. Researchers visualize, measure, and simulate turbine wakes and their interactions to find ways of maximizing the wind power generated. (Photo credit: National Renewable Energy Laboratory)
July 7, 2014
Wind Tunnel Testing
Wind tunnel testing is an important step in designing new aircraft. This video shows footage of visualization tests of the 21-ft wingspan Boeing X-48C model in NASA Langley’s Full-Scale Tunnel. The X-48C is a blended wing body design capable of higher lift-to-drag ratios than conventional aircraft, which should lead to a higher range and greater fuel economy. The video shows some smoke visualization that illustrates airflow around the airfoil-shaped craft. The long probe sticking forward from the starboard wing is used to measure air pressure, angle of attack, and sideslip angle of the model. Notice how smoke from the wand is pulled from below the leading edge of the wing up and over the top of the wing. This is because there is lower pressure over the top of the wing than the bottom, and, like an electrical charge seeking the path of least resistance, fluids flow preferentially toward lower pressures. (Video credit: NASA Langley)
September 12, 2013
Ski Jumping Aerodynamics
Last summer we featured fluid dynamics in the Summer Olympics and there’s more to come for Sochi. Winter athletes like ski jumper Sarah Hendrickson are hard at work preparing, which can include time in wind tunnels, as shown here. There are two main diagnostics in tests like these: drag measurements and smoke visualization. The board Hendrickson stands on is connected to the tunnel’s force balance, which allows engineers to measure the differences in drag on her as she adjusts equipment and positions. This gives a macroscopic measure of drag reduction, and reduced drag makes the skier faster on the snow and lets her fly longer in the jump. The smoke wand provides a way to visualize local flow conditions to ensure flow remains attached around the athlete, which also reduces drag. (Video credit: Red Bull/Outside Magazine; submitted by @YvesDubief)
August 28, 2013
Reader Question: Does Flow Viz Alter Flow?
gorbax asks:
I’ve been wondering for a while, actually, how do we know when the method of flow visualization doesn’t actually alter the flow of a fluid itself?
This is a great question and one that fluid dynamicists have to deal with all the time. Ideally, we’d love to measure everything we want from a flow at all points at all times without doing anything to affect it. In reality, however, that just doesn’t happen. Some measurement techniques are less intrusive than others, but just about everything risks having some effect. This raises two questions: 1) How small can we make that effect? and 2) Do we even care if we’re affecting the flow?
With regards to the first, the onus is typically on the experimentalist to show that whatever visualization technique he/she uses is not significantly affecting the flow. For something like particle image velocimetry, which requires seeding the flow with particles, this means selecting particles that follow the flow rather than changing it and considering carefully how and where to seed the flow such that any added vorticity from the injection does not alter the flow significantly. Checking for this can be done many ways, for example with comparisons to other measurement techniques (with and without seeding) or by comparing to simulation.
The second question–do we care?–is also a significant consideration. Because the purpose of flow visualization is often to get a qualitative feel for the flow field rather than quantitative information, it is often not a significant concern if there is some slight effect from the visualization technique. This can often be the case with smoke-wire and dye visualizations where we just want to see what’s going on.
Finally, there are some instances of flow visualization which are completely unobtrusive to the flow. Schlieren photography and infrared thermography are two examples. Both are optical techniques that act from a distance and take advantage of extant flow properties to make certain features visible. The real key is knowing what technique(s) will work for the flow you have and will give you the information you want. After that, it’s all about proper and thorough execution. (Photo credits: N. Vandenberge et al., T. Omer, M. Canals, P. Danehy et al., A. Wilkens et al., W. Saric et al.)
June 11, 2013