FYFD

Tag: fluid dynamics

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Why Fish Don’t Freeze

    Have you ever wondered why it is that fish in a pond or lake don’t freeze during the winter? The secret is due to a peculiarity of water that’s vital for life here on Earth. In general, cold things are denser than warmer ones. This is why, for the most part, cold fluids tend to sink and warmer ones rise here on Earth. So as fall moves into winter and water near the surface of a pond cools, it sinks. But only to a point.

    Water is at its densest at 4 degrees Celsius. Any colder and the water will actually expand and become less dense. This is why you can’t fill ice cube trays to the very top before putting them in the freezer. In the pond it means that buoyant convection shuts down at 4 degrees Celsius. When the water at the top keeps cooling down to the freezing point, it doesn’t sink. Instead, the fish and other pond life get to spend the winter at a chill – but not freezing – 4 degrees. (Video credit: A. Fillo)

  • Bringing the Stars Home

    Bringing the Stars Home

    One of my favorite aspects of fluid dynamics is the way that the same patterns and phenomena appear over and over again – sometimes in the most unexpected places. That’s the theme of my new article in American Scientist, which focuses on the connections between our daily lives and the stars:

    “Solar energy arises from nuclear fusion reactions in the core, but that energy is buried hundreds of thousands of kilometers beneath the surface, and most of the Sun’s overlying gas is nearly opaque; it hinders light from passing through, like a blanket thrown over a flashlight. Clearly the Sun does shine—but how? For the answer, you can simply go to your kitchen, fill a kettle, and flip on a burner.” #

    Click-through to read the full article. (Image credit: N. Sharp, Big Bear Solar Observatory, J. Blom, NASA/ESA, J. Straccia, NASA/JPL/B. Jonsson)

  • The Jumping Flea

    The Jumping Flea

    Nearly every lab has a magnetic stirrer for mixing fluids, but this ubiquitous tool still holds some surprises, like its ability to unexpectedly levitate. Magnetic stirrers consist of two main parts, a driving magnet that creates a rotating magnetic field, and a bar magnet – commonly referred to as the flea – that is submerged in the fluid to be stirred. When the driver’s rotating field is active, the flea will spin at the bottom of its container, keeping its magnetic field in sync with the driver.

    But if you place the flea in a viscous enough fluid, the drag forces on the flea can pull it out of sync with the driver’s field. Above a certain speed, the flea will jump so that its field repulses the driver’s. That makes the flea levitate as it spins. Depending on the interplay of viscous and magnetic forces, that spin can be unstable (left) or stable (right). The researchers suggest that this peculiar behavior could help artificial swimmers propel themselves or lead to new methods for measuring fluid viscosity. (Image and research credit: K. Baldwin et al.; via APS; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Zones and Stars

    Zones and Stars

    Large-scale rotating flows, like planetary atmospheres, tend to organize themselves into zones. Within a zone, flow remains essentially in an east-west direction and serves as a barrier that keeps heat or other elements from mixing from one zone to another. This is, for example, how the tropical trade winds work here on Earth.

    Stars, on the other hand, don’t show this kind of zonal behavior. The reason, it turns out, is their magnetic fields. When there’s no magnetic influence, even weak shear in a rotating flow is enough to start organizing turbulent fluctuations and grow a zonal flow. This tendency toward growth is known as the zonostrophic instability. But when you add a magnetic field, instead of organizing the hydrodynamic disturbances, that weak shear strengthens the magnetic ones, which in turn suppress the flow fluctuations. As a result, the hydrodynamic disturbances cannot grow and no zonal flow forms.

    Researchers think this mechanism can explain both why stars have no zonal flows and just how deep zones can penetrate inside the atmospheres of gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn before their planet’s magnetic field suppresses them. (Image credit: NASA; research credit: N. Constantinou and J. Parker, arXiv; via LLNL News; submitted by Stephanie N.)

  • Swirling the Wrong Way

    Swirling the Wrong Way

    When you swirl wine, you create a rotating wave that travels in the direction that you’re moving the glass. You would expect that anything floating atop that fluid would travel in the same direction of rotation. But it turns out, for a large, thin raft floating atop the rotating fluid, that’s not the case.

    Above you can see a swirling container, rotating counter-clockwise, with a raft of foam. This is from a timelapse where only one photo is taken per rotation, so that it’s easier to see how the foam is rotating relative to the container. And, once enough foam covers the surface, it starts rotating in a clockwise direction – opposite the container! It works for more than foam, too. The researchers show that the same holds for powders or beads. The key to the counter-rotation is that the raft needs to be coherent; it has to be able to transmit friction and internal stress among its constituents. Otherwise, the raft will just drift along with the swirling wave. (Image and research credit: F. Moisy et al., source, arXiv; via Improbable Research; submitted by David H. and Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    “Volumes”

    “Volumes” is an experimental art film by Maxim Zhestkov using physics-based particle animation. Waves and unseen forces send billions of color-changing particles aloft in the film. The motions – especially the way the particles seem to tear themselves – are reminiscent of a complex fluid, like yogurt. These substances have both liquid-like (viscous) and solid-like (elastic) properties depending on the forces they experience. Zhestkov’s particles are similar; they move like a fluid but tear more like a solid.

    I particularly like the sequence beginning at 1:30. The upwelling of particles leaves behind a lower layer that looks like a snapshot of convection in a planetary mantle while the upper layer resembles the clash of ocean waves. The whole film is quite mesmerizing. Check it out! (Video and image credit: M. Zhestkov; GIFs via Colossal)

  • Using Paper to Avoid Splashback

    Using Paper to Avoid Splashback

    Daily life and countless pool parties have taught us all that objects falling into water create a splash. Sometimes that splash is undesirable, and while there are many ways to tune a splash – by adding surfactants or changing the fluid’s viscosity – there’s a relatively common one that’s escaped scientific study until now. Researchers looked at how splashes change when you add a thin, penetrable fabric – commonly known as toilet paper – to the water surface. 

    Now, the common assumption is that adding a sheet of toilet paper can prevent splashback, but the story is not quite that simple. On the left, you see a splash generated without toilet paper. Because the ball is hydrophilic (water-loving), it does not pull any air into a cavity as it passes. There’s a nice axisymmetric Worthington jet formed, and it doesn’t splash very high, although some of the satellite droplets go quite a bit higher.

    On the right, we see a splash with a single sheet of toilet paper. In this case, the impact of the sphere penetrates the paper, and the way the paper deforms causes air to get sucked down into a cavity behind the ball. That creates a wider, amorphous jet that rebounds higher than the jet in clean water, though it does not shed satellite drops. 

    The researchers found that single and even double sheets of toilet paper can actually increase the height of the splash jet if the object penetrates them. The hole the object makes actually helps focus the jet. Adding a couple more layers, though, can eliminate splashing completely. (Image and research credit: D. Watson et al.)

  • The Sensitivity of a Seal’s Whiskers

    The Sensitivity of a Seal’s Whiskers

    Harbor seals and their brethren have a superpower that lets them track their prey even without sight or sound. It’s their whiskers, which are sensitive enough to follow the trail left by a single fish thirty seconds earlier. The secret to the whisker’s sensitivity lies in its shape. Instead of a uniform, circular cross-section, the seal’s whisker is oval-shaped and its width varies along the length in a wavy pattern. So unlike a straight cylinder, which vibrates when towed through water, the seal’s whiskers are unperturbed by their own movement. They shed only weak vortices and do not vibrate as a result.

    But, if you expose the whiskers to any external turbulence, like the vortices trailing a fish, the whisker ‘slaloms’ back-and-forth in time with the wake. That motion gets transmitted to the nerves in the seal’s cheek, carrying potential information about both the size and speed of the wake’s originator. Researchers hope similar bio-inspired whiskers could help underwater vehicles track schools of fish or locate underwater drilling leaks. (Image credit: M. Richter; video credit: MIT; research credit: H. Beem and M. Triantafyllou; via the Economist; submitted by Russ A. and Kam-Yung Soh)

  • The Protection of the Peloton

    The Protection of the Peloton

    It’s well-known by professional cyclists that sitting in the middle of the peloton requires little effort to overcome aerodynamic drag, but now, for the first time, there’s a scientific study to back that up. Researchers built their own quarter-scale peloton of 121 riders to investigate the aerodynamic effect of cycling in such a large group versus riding solo. Through wind tunnel studies and numerical simulation, they found that riders deep in the peloton can experience as little as 5-10% of the aerodynamic drag of a solo cyclist. 

    Tactically, this means teams should aim to position their protected leader or sprinter mid-way in the pack, where they’ll receive lots of shelter without risking one of the crashes common near the back of the peloton. It also suggests that teams wanting to isolate another team’s leader should try to push them toward the outer edges of the peloton rather than letting them sit in the middle. It will be interesting to see whether pro teams shift their race strategies at all with these numbers in hand.

    Of course, this study considers only a pure headwind. But other groups are looking at the effects of side winds on cyclists. (Image credit: J. Miranda; image and research credit: B. Blocken et al.; submitted by 1307phaezr)

  • Coalescence

    Coalescence

    Simple acts like the coalescence of two droplets sitting on a surface can be beautiful and complex. As the droplets come together, they form a thin neck between them, and the curvature of that surface causes capillary forces that drive fluid into the neck. For two dissimilar droplets, like the ones above, there can be additional forces. Here, the upper drop is pure water, but the lower one has added surfactants, which reduce its surface tension. That difference in surface tension creates a Marangoni flow that tends to pull fluid away from the neck. The result is that full coalescence takes longer. Depending on other factors in this tug-of-war between capillary action and Marangoni flow, the process of coalescence can look very different. In this example, there’s a fingering instability that occurs as the neck spreads. Change the circumstances slightly and the drops may chase each other instead of merging or will merge with a perfectly smooth contact front. (Image and research credit: M. Bruning et al.)