Tag: beer

  • Nitro Bubble Cascades

    Nitro Bubble Cascades

    Animation of nitrogen bubbles cascading in Guinness

    Fans of nitro beers — particularly Guinness’ stout — have probably noticed the fascinating cascade of bubbles that form as the beer settles. It’s a non-intuitive behavior — bubbles rise since they’re lighter than the surrounding fluid. So why do the bubbles appear to sink in these beers?

    There are several effects at play here. Firstly, overall the bubbles in the beer are rising; even mixing nitrogen gas into a beer in place of carbon dioxide doesn’t change that. But pint glasses typically flare so that they’re wider at the top than at the bottom. Since the bubbles rise essentially straight up, this causes a bubble-less film to form near the upper walls. And as that heavier fluid sinks, it pulls some of the tiny nitrogen bubbles with it. (You don’t see this effect in typical beers because the bubbles there are larger and thus too buoyant to get pulled down by the falling fluid.)

    As for the cascading waves we see in the bubbles, this, too, comes from the shape of the glass. Hydrodynamically speaking, what’s happens as the fluid film slides down the pint glass is similar to what happens when rain runs downhill. Beyond a certain angle, the flow becomes unstable and will form rolls and waves of varying thickness instead of sinking in a thin, uniform layer. As the film goes, so go the bubbles being dragged along, giving everyone at the bar a brief but entertaining fluid dynamical show. (Image credits: pints – M. d’Itri; bubble cascade – T. Watamura et al.; research credit: T. Watamura et al.)

  • Tapping a Can Won’t Save Your Beer

    Tapping a Can Won’t Save Your Beer

    It happens to the best of us: sometimes our beer gets shaken up during transit. One common reaction to this is to tap the side of the can repeatedly before opening, but a new scientific study shows that tapping doesn’t affect the volume of beer lost. Danish scientists tested over 1,000 cans of beer in randomized combinations of shaken, unshaken, tapped, and untapped, and observed no difference between tapped and untapped cans.

    The foam-up upon opening takes place in shaken beer because carbon dioxide bubbles form in the pressurized beer, especially along defects in the wall where bubbles can nucleate. When the pressure is released, the carbon dioxide becomes supersaturated and comes out of solution, especially into the pre-formed bubbles, which rapidly grow and overflow. In theory, tapping could disturb those bubbles before opening, but in practice, it makes no difference. Your best bet? Give the beer time to settle before you open it. (Image credit: Q. Dombrowski; research credit: E. Sopina et al.; via Ars Technica)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Overflowing Foam

    Hitting a glass bottle full of a non-carbonated drink can shatter the bottle due to cavitation, but doing the same with a carbonated beverage can make the bottle overflow with foam. The video above breaks down the physics of this bar prank. It all begins with nucleation and the tiny bubbles of carbon dioxide that form in the liquid. Striking the top of the bottle generates a compression wave that travels through the liquid, shrinking bubbles as it passes. When it hits the bottom of the bottle, it gets reflected as an expansion wave that expands the bubbles. This reflection happens several times between the free surface of the liquid and the bottom of the bottle. The rapid collapse-and-expansion of the bubbles makes them implode into a cloud of tinier bubbles that expands until the local supply of carbon dioxide is used up. At this point, the buoyancy of the bubbles carries them upward in plumes, creating more bubbles with the dissolved carbon dioxide nearby. And, all of a sudden, you’ve got foam everywhere. Like all of this week’s videos, this video is an entry in the 2013 Gallery of Fluid Motion. (Video credit: J. Rodriguez-Rodriguez et al.)

  • Other Ig Nobel Fluids

    Other Ig Nobel Fluids

    To round out our series on fluid dynamics in the Ig Nobel Prizes (which are not the same thing as the actual Nobel Prizes), here are some of the other winners. Last year Mayer and Krechetnikov won for a study on coffee sloshing when people walk. We’ve mentioned the pitch-drop experiment measuring the viscosity of an extremely viscous fluid a couple times; Mainstone and Parnell won a 2005 Ig Nobel for that (on-going) work. Another 2005 prize went to Meyer-Rochow and Gal for calculating the pressures involved in penguin defecation. (Yes, seriously.) A avian-related award was also handed out to B. Vonnegut for estimating tornado wind speeds by their ability to strip a chicken of its feathers. And, finally, for those looking to interest undergraduate lab students in mathematics and fluid dynamics, I suggest following the lead of 2002 winner A. Leike who demonstrates laws of exponential decay with beer head. (Photo credit: S. Depolo)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Guinness Physics

    Take a look at the physics of a pint of Guinness, including the formation of foam, the circulation of bubbles, and the importance of nitrogen and surfactants. The Physics of Fluids paper the host refers to is available here. (And, yes, I will admit to debating the physics occurring in my pint glass while in a pub.) # (via Martin)