Year: 2016

Why Does This Kite Look So Real?
A recent viral video features mesmerizing footage of a giant octopus kite flown at a kite festival in Singapore earlier this month. The kite’s arms twist and wave lazily in the breeze. Watching the video, I was struck by how realistic the kite’s motion looks. It really looks like an octopus is just cruising there in mid-air. And that resemblance might not be accidental.
In fluid dynamics, scientists often use a concept called dynamic similitude to test the physics of a scale model instead of the full-size original. The simplest version of this uses the Reynolds number to compare the model and the original. The Reynolds number is a dimensionless number that depends on the object’s size, the flow’s speed, and the density and viscosity of the fluid. If you match the scale model’s Reynolds number to the original’s Reynolds number, then the physics will be the same – even if you changed the fluid or the size of the object.
Returning to our kite, one thing the footage doesn’t entirely convey is just how enormous this kite really is. The Straits Times reports the kite is about the length of five buses and requires six people to get aloft. But the kite’s size helps compensate for the fact that it’s flying in air instead of swimming through viscous water like a real octopus. Although I’m left estimating the kite’s size and the wind’s speed, my quick calculations put the Reynolds numbers for the kite and the octopus on the order of 10,000. So, strange as it seems, this giant kite really is acting like a swimming octopus!
(Image credits: E. Chew, source)
May 26, 2016
The Reverse Magnus Effect
A good soccer player can kick the ball from the corner of the field into the goal thanks to the Magnus effect. But if you’ve ever tried to play soccer with a smooth ball, you may have noticed that sometimes the ball bends the wrong way! This is the reverse Magnus effect and it’s caused when the boundary layers on either side of the ball switch from turbulent to laminar flow at different times. Dianna Cowern explains (with a little help from yours truly) in the video above. Want to learn more about how roughness affects boundary layers? Check out our companion video on FYFD’s YouTube channel. (Video credit: D. Cowern/Physics Girl)
May 25, 2016
How Fluid Dynamics Saved the Space Shuttle
New FYFD video! In which Dianna Cowern (Physics Girl) joins me to explore boundary layer transition and how a couple of small bits of roughness could be a huge problem for the Space Shuttle during re-entry. A lot of people have asked me what I did for my PhD research, and the truth is, I’ve never really discussed my own work here on FYFD. This video is probably the closest I’ve come. The story I tell about STS-114 is one that appears in the first chapter of my dissertation, and it did, in many respects, motivate my work exploring roughness effects on transition in Mach 6 boundary layers. I hope you enjoy my video, and don’t forget to check out Dianna’s video, too! (Video credit: N. Sharp/FYFD)
May 24, 2016
Climbing Up the Walls
You may have noticed when baking that fluids don’t always behave as expected when you agitate them. If you put a spinning rod into a fluid, we’d expect the rod to fling fluid away, creating a little vortex that stirs everything around. And for a typical (Newtonian) fluid, this is what we see. The fluid’s viscosity tries to resist deforming the fluid, but the momentum imparted by the rod wins out. With a viscoelastic fluid, on the other hand, the story is much different. As before, the spinning of the rod deforms the fluid. But the viscoelastic fluid contains long chains of polymers. As those polymers get stretched by the deformation, they generate their own forces, including forces parallel to the rod. Instead of being flung outward, the viscoelastic fluid starts climbing up the rod, with the stretchy elasticity of the polymers helping pull more fluid up and up. (Image credit: Ewoldt Research Group, source)
May 23, 2016
Bursting Into Droplets
Our atmosphere is full of aerosols – extremely tiny particles and droplets of salt, dust, pollutants, and other substances. Wind’s effects alone cannot account for the sizes and quantities of aerosols we measure. Another potential source is the bursting of bubbles; more specifically, the bubbles that form at the oceans’ surface. Frothy, crashing waves often capture pockets of air. When these bubbles burst, the thin film of their surface ruptures into long filaments that break into tiny droplets. Such droplets can be small enough to get carried on the breeze, eventually evaporating and leaving the particulates that were once in the water to ride the winds. (Image credit: H. Lhuissier & E. Villermaux; see also: Y. Couder)
May 20, 2016
Whiskey Stains
Photographer Ernie Button discovered that whiskey left behind intriguing patterns after it evaporated. Unlike coffee rings, the whiskey leaves behind a more uniform residue. Curious, he contacted researchers at Princeton, who were eventually able to explain why whiskey and coffee dry so differently. They observed three major effects in drying whiskey mixtures. Firstly, the alcohol in whiskey evaporates faster than other components, creating differences in concentration and, therefore, surface tension along the droplet. These variations in surface tension create Marangoni flow, which tends to mix the droplet. Coffee, being non-alcoholic, does not do this.
Whiskey also contains surfactants, low surface tension chemicals, which help pull particulates away from the edge of the droplet so they aren’t trapped there like in coffee. And finally, they found that the polymers in whiskey helped glue particles to the glass so that they were less likely to be carried by the flow. Taken together, these three ingredients – alcohol, surfactants, and polymers – all help make the whiskey stain more uniform. For more, watch the video below, see Button’s website, or check out the research paper. (Image credit: E. Button; research credit: H. Kim et al.; video credit: C&EN; submitted by @tommyjwilson)

May 19, 2016
Vortex Ring Roll-Up
Vortex rings are endlessly fascinating, and they appear throughout nature from dolphins to volcanoes and from splashes to falling drops. One way to form them is to inject a jet into a stationary fluid. Viscosity between the fast-moving jet and the quiescent surrounding fluid slows down fluid at the jet’s edge. That slower fluid slips to the rear, only to get sucked into the faster -moving flow and pushed forward again. The result is a spinning toroid, or ring. A similar method generates vortex rings by pushing a fluid out a round orifice. In this case, interaction between the fluid and the wall provides some of the force necessary to form the vortex ring. (Image credit: Irvine Lab, source)
May 18, 2016
“Bubble Circus”
The “Bubble Circus” is a delightful outreach device equipped for all manner of physics demos, as seen in the video above. Many of its exercises explore surface tension, a force observed at the interface of a fluid. Surface tension is what provides bubbles with their surface-minimizing spherical shape. That same property determines the minimal distance between the four vertices of a pyramid (0:54). Changing the surface tension causes fluid at the interface to move. At 1:16 adding a lower surface tension fluid makes the water and black pepper pull away; the same physics drives the boat away at 2:09. For more on the Bubble Circus, see here. (Video credit: A. Echasseriau et al.; via J. Ouellette)
May 17, 2016
Flying with Large Ears
Evolution often requires compromise between competing effects. Large-eared bats, for example, rely on the size of their ears to aid their echolocation, but such large ears can hurt them aerodynamically, thus limiting their flight. Results from a recent experiment, however, suggest that large ears are not a total loss aerodynamically speaking. Researchers used particle image velocimetry to study the wakes behind free-flying, large-eared bats and found significant downward flow behind the bats’ bodies. This indicates that the bats generate some lift with their ears, body, and/or tail. The position and tilt of the ears in flight is similar to forward swept wings, which the authors suggest could help contract the wake behind the ears and reduce its negative influence on flow over the wings. Although the evidence is not yet conclusive, the study does suggest that large ears may be more aerodynamically beneficial than they appear. (Image credit: L. Johansson et al./Lund University, source; via Jalopnik)
The next FYFD webcast will be this Saturday, May 21st at 1pm EDT. My guests will be Professor Jean Hertzberg of the University of Colorado at Boulder and Professor Kate Goodman of the University of Colorado at Denver. Dr. Hertzberg is the creator of the course Flow Visualization, an interdisciplinary course combining engineering, art, and fluid dynamics. It’s a class (and website) that’s been an inspiration for me and FYFD since the early days! Dr. Goodman, an expert in engineering education, earned her PhD studying the Flow Viz course and its impact. This will be wide-ranging discussion – with everything from experimental fluid dynamics and engineering education to art, photography, and hopefully even cardiac fluid dynamics!
(Original images: P. Davis et al.; B. Moore; L. Swift et al.)
May 16, 2016
Foggy Flows
The transparency of air makes it easy to overlook its fluid nature. In this National Geographic Travel Photographer of the Year entry, photographer Thierry Bornier captures the early morning view from China’s Yellow Mountain. Foggy clouds flow around and over nearby mountain peaks, like water flowing over rocks in a stream. To see other, similar effects, check out these timelapse videos of fog in the Grand Canyon and clouds around San Francisco. (Image credit: T. Bornier; via Colossal)
May 13, 2016