FYFD

Search results for: “art”

  • COVID-19 and Outdoor Exercise

    COVID-19 and Outdoor Exercise

    By now you’ve probably come across some blog posts and news articles about a new pre-print study looking at the aerodynamics of running and the potential exposure to exhaled droplets. And you may also have seen articles questioning the accuracy and validity of such simulations. I’ve had several readers submit questions about this, so I dug into both the research and the criticisms, and here are my thoughts:

    Is this study scientifically valid?

    I’ve seen a number of complaints that since this paper hasn’t been peer-reviewed, we shouldn’t trust anything about it. That seems like an unreasonable overreaction to me considering how many studies receive press attention prior to their actual peer-reviewed publication. This is not a random CFD simulation produced by someone who just downloaded a copy of ANSYS Fluent. This work comes from a well-established group of engineers specializing in sports aerodynamics, and long-time readers will no doubt recognize some of their previous publications. Over the past decade, Blocken and his colleagues have become well-known for detailed experimental and simulation work that indicates larger aerodynamic effects in slipstreams than what we generally recognize.

    In this paper, they lay out previous (biological) studies related to SARS and droplet exhalation; they use those papers and several wind tunnel studies to validate computational models of droplet evaporation and runner aerodynamics; and then they use those inputs to simulate how a cloud of exhaled droplets from one runner affects someone running alongside, behind, or in a staggered position relative to the first runner.

    In other words, their work includes all the components one would expect of a scientific study, and it makes scientifically justifiable assumptions with regard to its methods. (That’s not, mind you, to say that no one can disagree with some of those choices, but that’s true of plenty of peer-reviewed work as well.) All in all, yes, this is a scientifically valid study, even if it has not yet undergone formal peer-review*.

    Can simulations actually tell us anything about virus transmission?

    One complaint I’ve seen from both biologists and engineers is that simulations like these don’t actually capture the full physics and biology involved in virus transmission. While I agree with that general sentiment, I would point out two important facts:

    1) Blocken et al. acknowledge that this is not a virology study and confine their scientific results to looking at what happens physically to droplets when two people are moving relative to one another. Whether those droplets can transmit disease or not is a question left to biological researchers.

    2) Most medical and biological research also does not account for the physics of droplet transmission and transport. For the past century, this research has focused almost exclusively on droplet sizes, with the assumption that large droplets fall quickly and small droplets persist a little longer. To my knowledge, some of the only work done on the actual physics of the turbulent cloud produced by coughing or sneezing comes from Lydia Bourouiba’s lab at MIT. And, to me, one of the fundamental conclusions from her work is that droplets (especially small ones) can persist a lot longer and farther than previously assumed. Can those droplets facilitate transmission of COVID-19? The general consensus I’ve seen expressed by medical experts is no, but, to my knowledge, that is based on opinion and assumption, not on an actual scientific study.

    The bottom line

    In my opinion, there’s a big disconnect right now between the medical/biological community and the engineering community. To truly capture the physics and biology of COVID-19 transmission requires the expertise and cooperation of both. Right now both sides are making potentially dangerous assertions.

    Honestly, based on what I know about aerodynamics, I am personally skeptical as to whether 6 ft of physical separation is truly enough; whether it is or not seems to depend on how transmissible the novel coronavirus is through small droplets, which, again, to my knowledge, is unestablished.

    Should we leave more distance than 6ft between us when exercising outdoors? Absolutely. Aerodynamically, it makes perfect sense that following in someone’s slipstream would put you inside their droplet cloud, which needs time and space to disperse. Personally, I’ve sidestepped the question entirely by doing all my cycling indoors while quarantined.

    tl;dr: There are a lot of open questions right now about COVID-19 transmission and what qualifies as safe distancing, but it’s smarter to err on the side of more distancing. Don’t hang close to others when running or cycling outdoors.

    (Image and research credit: B. Blocken et al.; submitted by Corky W. and Wendy H.)

    *I will add that, with my training, I have and do occasionally peer-review studies such as this one, and I read the full paper with the same sort of critical eye I would turn to a paper I was asked to review.

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Tektites and Spinning Fluids

    Tektites, like obsidian, are a naturally-occurring glass formed from molten rock. But tektites are often dumbbell or figure-8-shaped because they form in midair from spinning bits of fluid sent skyward after the crash of a meteor. In this video, Steve Mould takes us through the process and discusses some recent work by scientists who’ve created artificial tektites in the lab by levitating and spinning candle wax and other fluids. (Video and image credit: S. Mould; research credit: K. Baldwin et al.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Why Animals Shake Themselves Dry

    For many animals, letting themselves air-dry is not an option. They would become hypothermic before their wet fur dried completely. This is why dogs and many other furry mammals shake themselves dry. It’s a remarkably efficient process, too, removing the majority of water from fur in a matter of seconds.

    The key is to shake at a frequency such that the centrifugal force of the shake overcomes surface tension’s ability to keep the water attached to fur. The looseness of a dog’s skin (compared to humans!) is a bonus for them; the extra translation as they shake increases the centrifugal force, allowing them to shed more water more quickly. (Image and video credit: BBC Earth; research credit: A. Dickerson et al.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Why Compressed Air Cans Get Cold

    Anyone who’s used a can of compressed air to clean their computer or keyboard knows that the can quickly gets quite cold to the touch. This Minute Physics video explores some of the thermodynamics behind that process. Henry first identifies a few explanations that don’t quite line up with observations, before focusing in on the contents of the can: 1,1-difluoroethane. Inside the sealed can, this chemical sits in an equilibrium of part-liquid, part-vapor. But when pressure is released by opening the nozzle, the liquid boils, generating extra vapor and cooling whatever remains in the reservoir.

    Although it’s not a good explanation for the compressed air can’s cooling, the cooling of an expanding gas is very important in applications like supersonic wind tunnels. That first equation you see at 0:36 in the video (for isentropic adiabatic expansion) is key to what happens in a nozzle with supersonic flow. As the flow accelerates to supersonic speeds, its temperature drops dramatically. When I was in graduate school, we actually had to preheat our hypersonic wind tunnel (in pretty much the same way you would preheat your oven at home) before we ran at Mach 6 because otherwise the temperature inside the test section would drop so low that the oxygen would liquefy out of the air! (Image and video credit: Minute Physics)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    The Birth of a Liquor

    A water droplet immersed in a mixture of anise oil and ethanol displays some pretty complicated dynamics. Its behavior is driven, in part, by the variable miscibility of the three liquids. Water and ethanol are fully miscible, anise oil and ethanol are only partially miscible, and anise oil and water are completely immiscible. These varying levels of miscibility set up a lot of variations in surface tension along and around the droplet, which drives its stretching and eventual jump.

    Once detached, the droplet takes on a flattened, lens-like shape that continues to spread. That spreading is driven by the mixing of ethanol and water, which generates heat and, thus, convection around the drop. This not only spreads the droplet, it causes turbulent behavior along the drop’s interface. (Image and video credit: S. Yamanidouzisorkhabi et al.)

  • Eroding Ice

    Eroding Ice

    When glaciers form, they do so in layers, with clear blue ice sandwiched between sediment and air-bubble-filled white ice. Because each of these layers absorbs sunlight differently, they don’t melt evenly. The spikes and ridges seen in this ice formed because of this differential melting between layers. The blue ice is particularly good at absorbing visible wavelengths of light, and so erodes more easily than the other layers.

    Although the results look somewhat similar to the penitente ice seen at high altitudes, the formation mechanisms are a little different. Penitentes rely heavily on sublimation — where their ice and snow change directly into a gas — rather than the melting seen here. That said, both eroded forms depend strongly on how different layers within them absorb and scatter sunlight. (Image credit: J. Van Gundy; via EPOD; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Dunes Avoid Collisions

    Dunes Avoid Collisions

    The speed at which a dune migrates depends on its size; smaller dunes move faster than larger ones. That speed differential implies that small dunes should frequently collide into and merge with larger dunes, eventually forming one giant dune rather than a field of smaller separate ones. But that’s not what we observe in nature.

    To figure out why dunes aren’t colliding that often, researchers built a dune field of their own in the form of a rotating water tank. Inside the tank, their two artificial dunes can chase one another indefinitely while the researchers observe their interactions. What they found is that the dunes “communicate” with one another through the flow.

    As flow moves over the upstream dune, it generates turbulence in its wake, which the downstream dune then encounters. All that extra turbulence affects how sediment is picked up and transported for the downstream dune, ultimately changing its migration speed. For two dunes of initially equal size and close spacing, these interactions push the downstream dune further away until the separation between the dunes is large enough that they both migrate at the same speed. Even between dunes of unequal sizes, the researchers found that these repulsive interactions force the dunes away from collision and into migration at the same speed. (Image credit: dune field – G. Montani, others – K. Bacik et al.; research credit: K. Bacik et al.; via Cosmos; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Sunlight Is Older Than You Think

    Joe Hanson over at “It’s Okay to Be Smart” has a great video on the random walk photons have to make to escape the core of the sun and other stars. Because the high-energy photons born in the star’s core have to bounce their way out rather than flying in a straight line, those photons can spend thousands of years escaping the sun. After that, the eight-and-a-half minute trip to Earth is nothing.

    But there’s a key element missing in this explanation: convection! That radiative random walk photons do doesn’t last all the way from the core of the sun to its surface. From a depth of about 200,000 km onward, the dominant mode of transport in the sun is convection, actual fluid motion that carries heat and light much faster than simple molecular diffusion, or Brownian motion, does. That’s why the surface of the sun shines with convection cells similar to the ones you’ll see in your skillet when heating a layer of oil.

    Fluid motion beyond molecular diffusion is also a big part of the other flows Joe describes in the video. If you had to wait on Brownian motion in order to smell your morning coffee, it would be cold long before you knew it was there! (Video and image credit: It’s Okay to Be Smart; sun surface image credit: Big Bear Solar Observatory/NJIT)

  • Listening to a Bubble’s Pop

    Listening to a Bubble’s Pop

    Sound is an important aspect of many flows, from the scream of a rocket engine to the hum of electrical wires vibrating in the wind. Critically, those sounds carry important information about the flow. A new study extends these acoustic diagnostics to the popping of soap bubbles.

    When a hole opens in a soap bubble, it throws the surface-tension-driven capillary forces of the bubble into disarray. The rim around the hole retracts, pushing fluid away from the expanding hole. At the same time, air is pushed out of the collapsing bubble. Using microphone arrays, the researchers found they could measure and distinguish sound from both sources — the escaping air and the expanding hole.

    From the sound, they developed a model that predicts the rupture location, bubble thickness profile, and other properties of the bubble. They confirmed the model’s results by comparing with high-speed photography. The authors hope their new acoustic technique will shed light on bubble bursting events that are hard to observe visually, like the bubbling of magma. (Image and research credit: A. Bussonnière et al.; via Science News; submitted by Kam-Yung Soh)

  • Nitro Bubble Cascades

    Nitro Bubble Cascades

    Animation of nitrogen bubbles cascading in Guinness

    Fans of nitro beers — particularly Guinness’ stout — have probably noticed the fascinating cascade of bubbles that form as the beer settles. It’s a non-intuitive behavior — bubbles rise since they’re lighter than the surrounding fluid. So why do the bubbles appear to sink in these beers?

    There are several effects at play here. Firstly, overall the bubbles in the beer are rising; even mixing nitrogen gas into a beer in place of carbon dioxide doesn’t change that. But pint glasses typically flare so that they’re wider at the top than at the bottom. Since the bubbles rise essentially straight up, this causes a bubble-less film to form near the upper walls. And as that heavier fluid sinks, it pulls some of the tiny nitrogen bubbles with it. (You don’t see this effect in typical beers because the bubbles there are larger and thus too buoyant to get pulled down by the falling fluid.)

    As for the cascading waves we see in the bubbles, this, too, comes from the shape of the glass. Hydrodynamically speaking, what’s happens as the fluid film slides down the pint glass is similar to what happens when rain runs downhill. Beyond a certain angle, the flow becomes unstable and will form rolls and waves of varying thickness instead of sinking in a thin, uniform layer. As the film goes, so go the bubbles being dragged along, giving everyone at the bar a brief but entertaining fluid dynamical show. (Image credits: pints – M. d’Itri; bubble cascade – T. Watamura et al.; research credit: T. Watamura et al.)

More posts