FYFD

Category: Reader Questions

  • Reader Question: Kinetic Sand

    Reader Question: Kinetic Sand

    An inquiring reader wants to know:

    How does kinetic sand work to make it flow like a liquid?  Thanks!

    – 3 Year Olds Everywhere

    I confess I don’t have any firsthand experience with Kinetic Sand, but it certainly looks fun. It’s a colorful, moldable sand toy that holds together far better than your typical pile of sand. From what I’ve been able to find, the secret ingredients are a little bit of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) — a type of silicon-based polymer — and olive oil, which coats the sand and keeps it from drying out.

    PDMS is viscoelastic, which is what gives the Kinetic Sand its unique properties. When a force is applied quickly, the material reacts like a solid, which is why you can mold or cut the sand and have it maintain its shape. But when left alone for awhile under gravity’s influence, the sand will flow like a liquid. This combination of behaviors usually comes down to the polymers in the material. When forces try to stretch these long molecules quickly, they resist; that’s what creates the elasticity of the material. On the other hand, when a force is gradual, the complex molecules have the time to untangle and relax, allowing the material to flow. (Image credit: Kinetic Sand, source)

  • Reader Question: Cross Sea

    Reader Question: Cross Sea

    Reader Matt G asks:

    [What’s] going on here?

    Why’s the pattern square? Just a special case of waves traveling in different directions, and this photo happened to catch some at right angles to one another?

    You’re not far off, Matt! This is an example of cross sea, where wave trains moving in different directions meet. Like most ocean waves, these waves originated from wind moving over the water. As the wind blows, it transfers energy to the water, disturbing what would otherwise be a smooth surface and setting up a series of waves. Oftentimes, these waves can outlast the wind that generates them and travel over long distances of open water as a swell.

    Cross seas occur when two of these wave systems collide at oblique angles. They’re most obvious in shallow waters like those seen here, where the depth makes their criss-cross pattern clearer. Another name for them is square waves, and although the pattern isn’t a perfect square, it’s usually fairly close. If the waves aren’t separated by a large angle, they’re more likely to merge than to create this sort of pattern.

    Neat as cross seas look, they’re quite dangerous, both to ships and swimmers. Ships are built to tackle waves head-on and don’t fare well when they’re forced to take waves from the side. For swimmers, the danger is a little different. Cross seas create intense vorticity under the surface and can generate stronger than usual riptides that sweep the unwary out to sea. (Image credit: M. Griffon)

  • Reader Question: Exoplanetary Life

    Reader orbiculator asks:

    I’ve been having this thought regarding biological adaptations to viscous mediums. In a hypothetical exoplanet where the ocean is this thick, aqueous gel – could we assume that the native macroscopic species would have morphologies similar to Earth’s plankton despite their large sizes? That is, instead of being propelled by fins like our fish and whales, they’d go around using large ciliar or flagella?

    Propulsion-wise, that’s a reasonable theory. If the ambient environment were viscous enough that macroscopic creatures would still be limited to laminar flow, then, yes, you could expect them to use something like cilia or flagella to move. They’d be restricted by the same reversibility that microscopic species are here on Earth.

    But there are other factors that could come into play. Many microscopic species rely on diffusion for survival, whether that’s chemical diffusion across their exterior or diffusion within their body. As a species gets larger, the distance diffusion has to occur across grows, and diffusion becomes harder and harder to sustain. 

    So while hydrodynamic constraints might result in an exoplanet’s fauna having features similar to Earth’s microscopic life, it probably wouldn’t be as simple as merely enlarging the species we see here on Earth. Some of the key biophysics that goes on inside cellular life as we know it just doesn’t hold at larger scales.

  • Reader Question: White Caps

    Reader Question: White Caps

    Reader eclecticca asks:

    I really like the last two posts about waves, and they left me with another question…  My dad had a little boat he used to take us ocean fishing on quite a bit.  I always noticed that some days we just had big waves (swells) when out from the coastline and in fairly deep water (a hundred feet to hundreds of feet according to the depth sounder) and other days those swells would “break” and curl and foam and crash in on themselves, being what we called “breakers” or “white caps”.  There is no shore to create the breakers in this case, so what is happening?  Is it due to wind? current  a combination of factors?    Always been kind of curious about this really…

    You’re exactly right: those open ocean white caps are due to wind. Strictly speaking, the wind is what’s causing all* of the waves out in open, deep waters. But once the wind is strong enough, it starts breaking up the crests of waves, creating those foamy white tops. 

    According to one study, the break-up happens when the wind transfers more energy to the wave than surface tension can withstand. When the wave crest breaks up into a mixture of air, spray, and foam, it effectively gives the wind more surface area to push against and continue transferring energy. (Image credit: M. Moers)

    * With a few notable exceptions, like in the case of a tsunami.

  • Reader Question: Waves Breaking

    Reader Question: Waves Breaking

    As a follow-up to the recent waves post, reader robotslenderman asks:

    What does it look like when the wave breaks? And why do waves sometimes push us back? Why are we able to ride them?

    I wasn’t able to find an equivalent breaking wave version of that dyed wave – side note: readers with flumes, please feel free to make one and share it! – but here’s an undyed breaking wave for our reference.

    Waves break, or get that white, frothy look, when they reach shallower water. In the previous post, the waves we saw were effectively deep-water waves, so they didn’t change in height as they rolled across the tank. Here there’s an incline to simulate a beach, which causes the water to slow down and steepen. That forms the characteristic curl of a plunging breaker, seen here.

    At the beach, a wave runs out of water to pass through and all the energy that wave was carrying has to go somewhere. Some is lost as heat, some turns into the sound of that classic crashing wave, and a lot of it gets dissipated as turbulence that pushes us, sand, shells, and anything else its way.

    As for why we can ride waves, there’s some special physics at play when it comes to surfing. To catch a wave, a surfer has to paddle hard to get up to the wave’s speed just as it reaches them. Too slow and the wave will just pass them by, leaving them bobbing more or less in place. (Image credit: T. Shand, source)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Reader Question: Inside a Vortex

    Reader embersofkymillo asks:

    Hey FYFD, could you do some analysis/explanations behind the physics of this vortex stuff? I love when you do spots on Slow Mo Guys vids and figured I’d share a recent one w you 

    I enjoy doing that, too! So let’s talk a little about vortices. What Dan’s tea stirrer is doing is creating a low-pressure core for a vortex. We can see just how strong that low pressure region is by the way it sucks the air-water interface down toward the spinning arms. Eventually the interface and stirrer meet, and what was once a single, smooth(ish) surface gets torn into a myriad of bubbles. (As an aside, those bubbles get loud.) 

    I also like the sequence of sugar cube drops because they make for some very cool splashes. Notice how the orientation of the cube’s edges as it hits determines the shape of the inital splash curtain. The asymmetry borne out of that impact actually follows through all the way through the seal of the cavity behind the cube. It reminds me of this oldie-but-goodie video on drops hitting different shapes. (Video and image credit: The Slow Mo Guys; submitted by embersofkymillo)

  • Reader Question: Drafting in Time Trials

    Reader Question: Drafting in Time Trials

    In a comment on this recent post regarding drafting advantages to a leader, reader fey-ruz asks:

    in cycling, team follow cars are required to maintain a minimum distance from their riders during time trials for this very reason (although i imagine the effects in that context are much smaller and dependent on the conditions, esp the wind speed, direction, and strength). FYFD, is there a simple way to understand where this upstream influence comes from? or a specific term in the navier-stokes equations that it results from?

    Cars following riders during a time trial can actually make a huge difference! One study from a couple of years ago estimated that a car following a rider in a short (13.8 km) time trial could take 6 seconds off the rider’s time. The images up top show a simulation from that study with a car following at 5 meters versus 10 meters. The colors indicate the pressure field around the car and rider. Red is high pressure, blue is low pressure. Both the car and the rider have high pressure in front of them; you can think of this as a result of them pushing the air in front of them.

    A large part of the rider’s drag comes from the difference in pressure ahead and behind them. (For a look at flow around a cyclist that focuses on velocity instead, check out my video on cycling aerodynamics.) When a car drives close behind a cyclist, it’s essentially pushing air ahead of it and into the cyclist’s wake. This actually reduces the difference in pressure between the cyclist’s front and back sides, thereby reducing his drag. Because cars are large, they have an oversized effect in this regard, but having a motorbike or another rider nearby also helps the lead cyclist aerodynamically.

    As for the Navier-Stokes equation – this effect isn’t one that you can really pin down to a single term since it’s a consequence of the flow overall. (Image credits: TU Eindhoven; K. Ramon)

  • Reader Question: Resonating Bottles

    Reader Question: Resonating Bottles

    Reader shoebill-san asks:

    why does it make that weird sound when i blow over a bottle? i did a science experiment in college where we looked at the resonance in a beaker at different water levels, is it like that? related?

    Blowing across the top of a bottle creates what’s called Helmholtz resonance, where air inside the neck of the bottle actually vibrates up and down, like you see in the animation above. The stream of air from your mouth creates low pressure just outside the bottle, pulling some of the air out. That air will tend to overshoot, ultimately causing pressure in the bottle neck to drop lower. That vacuum will pull air back into the bottle, at which point the low pressure your blowing supplies pulls it back out, and so on. The actual sound you hear comes from those puffs of moving air. In reality, they move too fast to see; the animation comes from a high-speed video, and I highly recommend watching the full vid.

    From your description, I’m not 100% sure what the experiment you did in college was, but I’m guessing it was some variation of the glass harp, where you rub a partially-filled glass and get an eerie sound that varies depending on how much water is in the glass. Like the bottle example above, that’s an example of resonance, but the two are different. In the bottle, it’s the air that’s resonating. For the glass harp, it’s the glass walls themselves that are resonating. The liquid inside just changes the pitch by slowing down the speed at which the glass’s walls vibrate. For a full and fantastic explanation of how that works, check out this video by Dan Quinn. (Image credit: N. Moore, source)

  • Reader Question: Image Credits

    kermitsstickylittlefingers asks:

    Dear Nicole, thanks a lot for your amazing blog which I have been following for years. My name is Julian and I am a PhD candidate working on tree frog attachment at Wageningen University in the Netherlands. Inspired by FYFD, I decided to start a science blog on bioadhesion and biomimetics. With respect to that, I would like to ask a question: How do you handle sources and referring to image credits and how do you always know to whom to refer? Thanks for the answer, Julian

    Hi Julian,

    That is an awesome topic you’re studying and sharing. I hope you keep up the great work.

    I do my best to give appropriate credit when sourcing materials, but sometimes it can be quite hard to track down an original source. I’ve had to pass up great visuals on occasion because I simply could not determine whose work they originally were.

    Fortunately, there is an invaluable tool out there for tracking down sources: Google Image Search. That service lets you upload a photo and it will show you other versions of that picture on other pages, which often helps in tracking down the proper original source. If you use the Chrome browser, you can simply right-click on a photo and select “Search Google for image” to automatically do this search.

    Kudos to you for trying to do right by creators and credit them for their work. Good luck in your blogging and your research! (I <3 tree frogs.)

  • Featured Video Play Icon

    Pascal’s Barrel Follow-Up

    fuckyeahfluiddynamics:

    Pascal’s Law tells us that pressure in a fluid depends on the height and density of the fluid. This is something that you’ve experienced firsthand if you’ve ever tried to dive in deep water. The deeper into the water you swim, the greater the pressure you feel, especially in your ears. Go deep enough and the pressure difference between your inner ear and the water becomes outright painful.

    In the video demonstration above, you’ll see how a tall, thin tube containing only 1 liter of water is able to shatter a 50-liter container of water. Not only does this show just how powerful height is in creating pressure in a fluid, but it shows how a fluid can be used to transmit pressure over a distance – one of the fundamental principles of hydraulics! (Video credit: K. Visnjic et al.; submitted by Frederik B.)

    Reader @hoosierfordman77 writes:

    “They’re pressurizing the line by using a syringe sealed to the tube.  Of course, the volume of water in the tube added to this.  But it was not the only source of pressure.  Also explaining that pressure only has one vector as in the illustration using Hoover Dam is preposterous.  Sir [sic] later stated correctly that pressure is evenly distributed through the inside of a container.  If her demonstration was correct then the pressure of the water in lake Meade is not proportional to the volume of the lake…only proportional to its depth.  Now I’ve not done testing but I do not believe a 100,000 acre lake that’s 1 foot deep would be held back by the walls of a kiddie pool that routinely handle that depth.” (emphasis added)

    Hi, hoosierfordman77, thanks for your comment! It does seem counter-intuitive that pressure in a reservoir is proportional to depth, not volume, but it is correct. If you go swimming 1 meter below the water surface, the pressure you experience is the same whether you’re in a backyard pool or the Gulf of Mexico. And, yes, a 100,000 acre lake that’s 1 foot deep has a static pressure that could be withstood by a kiddie pool.

    Now engineers don’t build it that way for a couple of reasons. 1) Pascal’s Law only describes hydrostatic forces – that is, the force experienced when the water is motionless. In reality, a dam would need to withstand not only the hydrostatic forces caused by the water’s depth but also any forces exerted when the water moves due to wind action, temperature differences, etc. And 2) after evaluating all of the expected forces a structure will endure, engineers add a factor of safety to make the structure strong enough to withstand forces above and beyond what is expected in ordinary or extraordinary operation.

    As for the syringe, it only adds additional pressure to the line if they do not allow a gap for air in the line to escape. That can be a bit of a challenge, as they acknowledge in the video when they discuss the effects of air bubbles in the line. However, there is every indication that they were aware of this potential in their demonstration and did everything they could to ensure that it was not affecting the result. The fact remains, however, that extra pressure in the line is unnecessary – the 1 liter of water’s depth alone will shatter that container.