Tag: Tacoma Narrows Bridge

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge
One of the most dramatic and famous engineering failures of the twentieth century is also one of the most complicated: the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. This early suspension bridge earned the name “Galloping Gurtie” from construction workers while it was still being built because its flexibility made it prone to moving up and down under even relatively light winds. That vertical motion was due to vortex-induced vibration. As the wind blew, it shed vortices off the downstream side of the bridge. These vortices alternated, coming off the top and then bottom of the bridge deck. The resulting forces made the bridge shift up and down.
That wasn’t the bridge’s ultimate downfall, though. Shortly before it collapsed, the bridge stopped flexing up and down and instead twisted back and forth. This was a clear sign that the bridge had moved into aeroelastic flutter. In this situation, you get a feedback loop between the bridge’s aerodynamics and its structural dynamics. When the wind twists the bridge deck to a positive angle of attack, it will try to continue forcing the bridge to twist that direction. The internal forces of the bridge will try to twist it back, but when that happens, it can overshoot and end up at a negative angle of attack. At that point, the wind tries to push it further that direction and internal forces twist it back, overshooting the other way. This back-and-forth can create a dangerous feedback loop where the twisting of the bridge keeps getting worse and worse. In fact, that’s exactly what happened – right up until the bridge collapsed rather than twisting any more. (Video and image credit: Practical Engineering)
November 7, 2018
Why Tacoma Narrows Bridge Fell
We’ve talked about aeroelastic flutter and the demise of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge before, but this explanation from Minute Physics does a nice job of outlining the process simply. As noted in the video, the common explanation of resonance is inaccurate because the wind was constant, so there was no driving frequency for the system. (In contrast, consider vibrating a fluid where the response of the fluid depends on the frequency of the vibrations. This is resonance.) Instead the constant wind supplied energy that fed the natural frequencies of the structure such that an uncontrolled excitation built up. (Video credit: Minute Physics)
June 15, 2012
Examples of Flutter
Aeroelasticity is the study of the interaction of structural and aerodynamic forces on an object, and its most famous example is flutter, which occurs when the aerodynamic forces on an object couple with its natural structural frequencies in such a way that a violent self-excited oscillation builds. What does that mean? Take a look at the video above. This compilation shows examples of flutter on wind tunnel models, road signs, airplanes, and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge–one of the most famous examples of all time. When air moves over and around an object, like a stop sign, it exerts forces that cause the structure to twist or vibrate. Those vibrations then alter the airflow around the object, which changes the aerodynamic forces on the object. If the motion of the object increases the aerodynamic forces which then increase the oscillation, then a potentially destructive flutter cycle has been created. Flutter is very difficult to simulate computationally, so tests are usually performed experimentally to ensure that any vibrations in the system will damp out rather than grow to the point of structural failure like many of the examples in the film.
March 7, 2012
Flutter and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge
Sixty years ago yesterday the original Tacoma Narrows Bridge (a.k.a. Galloping Gertie) collapsed as a result of aeroelastic flutter during 42 mph winds. Flutter is a phenomenon in which the fluid dynamics and structural dynamics of a system are closely coupled, in this case resulting in a dramatic failure. The high sustained winds provided an energy source for self-excitation of one of the bridge’s torsional modes; as the bridge contorted, the motion caused additional vortices to be shed from the bridge deck, causing further vibrational forces on the bridge. For an analysis of the bridge’s collapse and its common misrepresentations, see Billah and Scanlan. The bridge’s spectacular collapse prompted reconsideration and redesign of the decks of modern suspension bridges.
November 8, 2010