Tag: Tokyo 2020

Tokyo 2020: Baseball Aerodynamics
For a long time, people thought baseball aerodynamics were simply a competition between gravity and the Magnus effect caused when a ball is spinning. But the seams of a baseball are so prominent that they, too, have a role to play. Here’s a baseline image of flow around a non-spinning baseball:
An non-spinning baseball with a straight, unaltered wake.
As in our previous post on golf, the colors indicate the direction of vorticity but don’t matter much to us here. What’s important is that the wake behind the ball is straight, indicating that there is no additional force beyond gravity and drag acting on the ball. Contrast this to the spinning baseball below:
Flow around a baseball spinning clockwise.
This ball is spinning in a clockwise motion, which causes flow to separate from the ball earlier on the advancing (bottom) side and later on the retreating (top) side. As a result, the wake is tilted downward. This indicates an upward force on the ball, caused by the Magnus effect.
But what if the seams fall in a place where they affect the flow? Here’s another baseball that’s not spinning:
Flow around a non-spinning baseball with a seam-shifted wake caused by early separation on the top surface of the baseball.
Notice that seam sitting just past the widest point on the top of the baseball. Flow around that wide point (called the shoulder) is very sensitive to disturbances essentially because the boundary layer is just barely hanging on to the ball. The blue arrow marks where the boundary layer separates from the ball on the top, which takes place earlier than the flow separation on the bottom, marked by the red arrow. As a result, the wake of the ball is tilted upward, indicating a downward force on the ball. The researchers who first proved this effect call it a seam-shifted wake, and it turns out to be a very common effect in baseball. They’ve got a great blog dedicated to baseball aerodynamics where you can learn tons more if you’re interested. (Image credit: top – Pixabay, others – B. Smith; research credit: B. Smith; see also Baseball Aerodynamics)
Today wraps up our Olympic coverage, but if you missed our earlier posts, you can find them all here.
August 6, 2021
Tokyo 2020: High-Dive Physics
In Olympic high-diving, athletes leap from a maximum of 10 meters above the water. Although the force of their water impact is substantial, it’s small enough that they can enter the water head first. For cliff divers — who may jump from 27 meters! — the impact force is too great to risk a head-first entry, so they enter the water feet first. But this does not eliminate their risk of injury.
As the diver’s body enters the water, each leg creates its own cavity, and the proximity of the two cavities generates a repulsive force. If the diver isn’t prepared to resist that force, it will force their legs apart, potentially injuring them. (Image and research credit: T. Guillet et al.)
August 4, 2021
Tokyo 2020: Sailing Faster Than The Wind
It’s a bit mindboggling, but by exploiting physics and geometry, a sailboat can reach speeds faster than the wind propelling it. Steve Mould demonstrates how in this video using some cool tabletop set-ups. Like a wing, a sail generates force by changing the direction of the incoming air. But the optimal speed for a sail is the one where the the flow doesn’t get deflected from its initial path at all (middle). If the sail were moving slower than this, the air would get pushed aside, creating a force that accelerates the boat. If the sail were moving faster, the air’s deflection would generate low pressure that would slow the boat down. Given this ideal match, it’s straightforward to show that, with the right sail angle, a boat can cover more distance than the air pushing it does in the same amount of time (right). Part of the mark of a great sailor is knowing how to manipulate this relationship to maximize your boat’s speed! (Image and video credit: S. Mould)
Missed some of our earlier Olympics coverage? Check out how to optimize oar lengths for rowing, volleyball aerodynamics, and the ideas behind future swim technologies.
August 3, 2021
Tokyo 2020: Visualizing the Magnus Effect in Golf
Golf returned to the Olympics in 2016 in Rio and is back for the Tokyo edition. Golf balls — with their turbulence-promoting dimples — are a perennial favorite for aerodynamics explanations because, counterintuitively, a dimpled golf ball flies farther than a smooth one. But today we’re going to focus on a different aspect of golf aerodynamics, namely, what happens when a golf ball is spinning. Here’s an animation showing the difference between flow around a non-spinning golf ball and flow around a golf ball spinning at 3180 rpm. Both balls are moving to the left at 30 m/s.
Animation toggling between a non-spinning and spinning golf ball moving at 30 m/s.
The colors in this image indicate the direction of vorticity (which is unimportant for us at the moment). What matters are the blue and red arrows, which mark where flow is leaving the surface of the golf ball, in other words, where the wake begins. For the non-spinning golf ball, flow leaves the ball at the same streamwise position on both sides of the ball. This gives a symmetric wake that is neither tilted upward nor downward.
On the spinning ball, though, the blue arrow on top of the ball moves backward, indicating that separation occurs later. On the lower surface, the red arrow moves forward, so separation happens earlier. These shifts cause the golf ball’s wake to tilt downward, which — by Newton’s Third Law — tells us that the ball is experiencing an upward force. This is known as the Magnus effect, and it plays a big role in soccer, volleyball, tennis, and any other sports with spinning balls.
It’s also possible, under the right circumstances, to get a reverse Magnus effect. For more on that, check out this video and Smith’s analysis. (Image credit: top – M. Spiske, others – N. Sakib and B. Smith; research credit: N. Sakib and B. Smith, pdf)
We’re celebrating the Olympics with sports-themed fluid dynamics. Learn how surface roughness affects a volleyball serve, see the wingtip vortices of sail boats, and find out how to optimize rowing oars. And don’t forget to come back next week for more!
August 2, 2021
Tokyo 2020: Surf Physics
Surfing is making its Olympic debut this year with a shortboard competition held at Shidashita Beach, with the event’s timing determined by weather and wave quality. The fluid dynamics involved in surfing could easily fill their own series of posts, so we’ll just scratch the surface here. Check out the video embedded below for a nice overview.

We sometimes think of waves as enormous walls of water moving on the ocean, but the truth is that individual water particles move very little when a wave passes. Instead waves are a method of transferring energy through the water, and surfers harness this energy while negotiating a delicate balance of forces between gravity, buoyancy, and hydrodynamics.
So how do surfers catch a wave? After all, anyone who’s been to the beach or in a wave pool knows that waves can easily pass without carrying you along with them. To ride a wave, surfers orient themselves in the direction the wave is traveling, then they paddle to bring their velocity close that of the incoming wave. Their surfboard helps by providing a large surface for the water to push, accelerating the surfer as the wave approaches. The longer and larger a surfboard is, the less speed the surfer themself has to provide. This is one reason it’s easier to catch a wave on a longboard than on a shortboard. But shortboards — like those used by competitors in the Tokyo Olympics — are far more maneuverable, allowing surfers more freedom in the moves they choose to make as they ride. (Image credit: B. Selway; video credit: TED-Ed; see also M. Grissom and Science Connected)
July 29, 2021
Tokyo 2020: Future Swim Tech
Recent controversies over swimsuit technologies haven’t damped the creativity of Speedo’s marketing staff. They recently unveiled Fastskin 4.0, a futuristic concept designed for the swimmers of 2040*. They’ve envisioned a custom-made, biodegradable, self-powered swimsuit that looks like a superhero’s costume. Some of the technologies strike me as extremely pie-in-the-sky, but a few of them have at least some basis in reality. Of particular interest to us, of course, are the Dynamic Flow Zones and the Shark Skin Boosters, two features intended to minimize drag and boost speed.
The Dynamic Flow Zones seem to be part of a built-in exoskeleton around the swimmer’s midriff, and they are apparently inspired by the underbelly of whales. At least one study shows that similar ridges on whale sharks help reduce flow separation on their bodies, but — given the vastly different swim styles of a human and a whale shark — it’s unclear to me that these structures would help a human swimmer. It also seems as though their helpfulness would be strongly dependent on what stroke the swimmer was using.
As for the Shark Skin Boosters, a shark’s skin does, in fact, helps its speed and agility. Individual denticles on the shark can (passively) bristle when flow near the skin tries to reverse direction. The adaptation helps them shut down flow separation before it happens, thereby maintaining flow control and low drag. Additionally, studies of 3D-printed shark skin have shown that the right texture can provide a speed boost. It would take some work to figure out just the right texture to adapt the shark’s ability to a human swimmer, but this is one feature of Fastskin 4.0 that isn’t just science fiction. (Image and video credit: Speedo; via Gizmodo)
*To be 100% clear, this product does not exist and likely never will.
Join us all this week for more Olympic-themed fluid dynamics!
July 28, 2021